1q jumping translocation as a biomarker in myeloid malignancy: frequently mutated genes associated with bad prognosis and low survival.

1q jumping translocation (JT) is rare and its molecular profiles in myeloid malignancies are not well-known. This study evaluated gene mutations in 1q-JT cohorts (0.38%) from hematological malignant specimens that underwent genetic analysis at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (n = 11,908) and the MD Anderson Cancer Center. 1q-JT had frequent mutations in eleven genes, most of which are associated with worse prognosis. BCOR mutations significantly co-occurred with others. Patients tended to have mutations in DNA-repair, spliceosome, and epigenetic modification pathways, though genes utilized within each of these pathways were not randomly distributed. Multi-, albeit overlapping, pathway interruptions tended to manifest in mutations of two gene sets. One gene set consisted of SF3B1 (spliceosome) and TET2 (epigenetic modification), while the other consisted of STAG2 (DNA repair), SRSF2, U2AF (spliceosome), ASXL1, KMT2D (epigenetic modification), BCOR, and GATA2 (transcription factors). An "intermediate" JT-like rearrangement may represent an early sign of occurring 1q-JT. Treatments (hypomethylating agents) and unique structures of the short arms of acrocentric chromosomes may contribute to 1q-JT formation in myeloid malignancies. The median overall survival after identification of a JT was 10 months (95% confidence interval, 5-15 months). Our cohort represents the largest number of myeloid malignancies from multi-centers with before and after the 1q-JT event analyzed to date. Overall, this study identified specific molecular profiles that are associated with 1q-JT in myeloid malignancies. 1q-JT could serve as a poor prognosis biomarker in myeloid malignancies, which could be important in making well-informed clinical decisions and treatment strategies.

Health-Related Quality of Life with Gilteritinib versus Placebo Post-Transplant for FLT3-ITD+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

BMT CTN 1506 was a phase III randomized trial comparing gilteritinib versus placebo after allogeneic HCT for FLT3-ITD-positive AML. The primary analysis comparing relapse-free survival (RFS) was not statistically significant, however, patients with detectable FLT3-ITD MRD peri-HCT had significantly longer RFS with gilteritinib. The aim of this analysis is to describe the effect of post-HCT gilteritinib versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-BMT, FACT-Leukemia (-Leu), and EQ-5D-5L at post-HCT randomization, day 29, month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and/or end of therapy. HRQOL and clinically meaningful differences were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using mixed model repeated measures to evaluate longitudinal change from baseline and stratified Cox model to evaluate time to improvement. Between 8/2017 and 7/2020, 356 patients were randomized. HRQOL completion rate was acceptable (>70%) across all time points and measures. There were no differences in FACT-BMT, FACT-Leu, or EQ-5D-5L scores at any time point between cohorts. There was an increase in scores over time, indicating improvement in HRQOL post-HCT. Clinically meaningful improvement and time to improvement in HRQOL was similar in both arms. Despite higher TEAEs with gilteritinib, response to the question of being "bothered by side effects of treatment" did not differ between groups. Subgroup analysis of MRD detectable and negative patients demonstrated no differences in HRQOL between arms. For FLT3-ITD+ AML patients undergoing HCT, gilteritinib maintenance was not associated with any difference in HRQOL or patient-reported impact of side effects. Trial Registration: NCT02997202.

Inhibition of NOTCH4 sensitizes FLT3/ITD acute myeloid leukemia cells to FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibition.

Internal tandem duplication mutations of FLT3 (FLT3/ITD) confer poor prognosis in AML. FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) alone have limited and transient clinical efficacy thus calling for new targets for more effective combination therapy. In a loss-of-function RNAi screen, we identified NOTCH4 as one such potential target whose inhibition proved cytotoxic to AML cells, and also sensitized them to FLT3 inhibition. Further investigation found increased NOTCH4 expression in FLT3/ITD AML cell lines and primary patient samples. Inhibition of NOTCH4 by shRNA knockdown, CRISPR-Cas9-based knockout or γ-secretase inhibitors synergized with FLT3 TKIs to kill FLT3/ITD AML cells in vitro. NOTCH4 inhibition sensitized TKI-resistant FLT3/ITD cells to FLT3 TKI inhibition. The combination reduced phospho-ERK and phospho-AKT, indicating inhibition of MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. It also led to changes in expression of genes involved in regulating cell cycling, DNA repair and transcription. A patient-derived xenograft model showed that the combination reduced both the level of leukemic involvement of primary human FLT3/ITD AML cells and their ability to engraft secondary recipients. In summary, these results demonstrate that NOTCH4 inhibition synergizes with FLT3 TKIs to eliminate FLT3/ITD AML cells, providing a new therapeutic target for AML with FLT3/ITD mutations.

A phase 1 study of the irreversible FLT3 inhibitor FF-10101 in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

ABSTRACT: FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have clinical efficacy for patients with FLT3-mutated AML (acute myeloid leukemia), but their impact is limited by resistance in the setting of monotherapy and by tolerability problems when used in combination therapies. FF-10101 is a novel compound that covalently binds to a cysteine residue near the active site of FLT3, irreversibly inhibiting receptor signaling. It is effective against most FLT3 activating mutations, and, unlike other inhibitors, is minimally vulnerable to resistance induced by FLT3 ligand. We conducted a phase 1 dose escalation study of oral FF-10101 in patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML, the majority of whom harbored FLT3-activating mutations and/or had prior exposure to FLT3 inhibitors. Fifty-four participants enrolled in cohorts receiving doses ranging from 10 to 225 mg per day and 50 to 100 mg twice daily (BID). The dose limiting toxicities were diarrhea and QT prolongation. Among 40 response-evaluable participants, the composite complete response rate was 10%, and the overall response rate (including partial responses) was 12.5%, including patients who had progressed on gilteritinib. Overall, 56% of participants had prior exposure to FLT3 inhibitors. The recommended phase 2 dose was 75 mg BID. FF-10101 potentially represents a next-generation advance in the management of FLT3-mutated AML. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03194685.

Gilteritinib as Post-Transplant Maintenance for AML With Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation of FLT3.

PURPOSE: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) improves outcomes for patients with AML harboring an internal tandem duplication mutation of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) AML. These patients are routinely treated with a FLT3 inhibitor after HCT, but there is limited evidence to support this. Accordingly, we conducted a randomized trial of post-HCT maintenance with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02997202) to determine if all such patients benefit or if detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) could identify those who might benefit. METHODS: Adults with FLT3-ITD AML in first remission underwent HCT and were randomly assigned to placebo or 120 mg once daily gilteritinib for 24 months after HCT. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and the effect of MRD pre- and post-HCT on RFS and OS. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-six participants were randomly assigned post-HCT to receive gilteritinib or placebo. Although RFS was higher in the gilteritinib arm, the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.679 [95% CI, 0.459 to 1.005]; two-sided P = .0518). However, 50.5% of participants had MRD detectable pre- or post-HCT, and, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, gilteritinib was beneficial in this population (HR, 0.515 [95% CI, 0.316 to 0.838]; P = .0065). Those without detectable MRD showed no benefit (HR, 1.213 [95% CI, 0.616 to 2.387]; P = .575). CONCLUSION: Although the overall improvement in RFS was not statistically significant, RFS was higher for participants with detectable FLT3-ITD MRD pre- or post-HCT who received gilteritinib treatment. To our knowledge, these data are among the first to support the effectiveness of MRD-based post-HCT therapy.

Impact of inotuzumab ozogamicin on outcome in relapsed or refractory acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia patients prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/venous occlusive disease.

We evaluated 58 patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL; median age, 42.5 years; range, 16-69 years), treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) between 2016-2022 and who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) consecutively. Forty-seven (81%) of the 58 patients were heavily pretreated receiving intensive chemotherapy +/- TKI, blinatumomab in 24 (41%) and allo-HCT at first-line in 11 (19%) patients. Complete remission (CR) rate prior to allo-HCT was 84%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months and median overall survival (OS) measured from start of INO was 11.2 months. Oneand 2-years OS rates were 50% (95%-CI, 38.4-56.1%) and 36.7% (95%-CI, 25.5-52.9%), respectively. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/venous occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) after allo-HCT occurred in 17 (29%) patients. Of those, 9 (53%) patients died due to SOS/VOD and multi-organ failure. Two had received >2 INO cycles (3 cycles, 5 cycles, n=1, each), all others ≤2 INO cycles prior to allo-HCT. Logistic regression analysis revealed conditioning with double alkylators (P=0.038) and allo-HCT during first-line therapy (P=0.050) as significant risk factors for SOS/VOD and in trend allo-HCT ≤ 60 days from last INO application (P=0.07), whereas number of INO cycles before allo-HCT and time between last INO application and allo-HCT were not significant. Relapse/progressive disease occurred in 20 (34%) patients. Of those, five (25%) patients are still alive, whereas 15 succumbed of their disease. Treatment with INO seems to be an effective approach with successful bridge-to-transplant. However, risk of SOS/VOD is high, necessitating continuous monitoring and recognition of SOS/VOD risk factors.

Sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML: a randomized, placebo-controlled study by the ALLG.

Sorafenib maintenance improves outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although promising outcomes have been reported for sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy, randomized data are limited. This placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (ACTRN12611001112954) randomized 102 patients (aged 18-65 years) 2:1 to sorafenib vs placebo (days 4-10) combined with intensive induction: idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 plus either cytarabine 1.5 g/m2 twice daily on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 (18-55 years) or 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 7 (56-65 years), followed by consolidation and maintenance therapy for 12 months (post-HCT excluded) in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Four patients were excluded in a modified intention-to-treat final analysis (3 not commencing therapy and 1 was FLT3-ITD negative). Rates of complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery were high in both arms (sorafenib, 78%/9%; placebo, 70%/24%). With 49.1-months median follow-up, the primary end point of event-free survival (EFS) was not improved by sorafenib (2-year EFS 47.9% vs 45.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.51; P = .61). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 67% in the sorafenib arm and 58% in the placebo arm (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42-1.39). For patients who received HCT in first remission, the 2-year OS rates were 84% and 67% in the sorafenib and placebo arms, respectively (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.18-1.12; P = .08). In exploratory analyses, FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) negative status (<0.001%) after induction was associated with improved 2-year OS (83% vs 60%; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.17-0.93; P = .028). In conclusion, routine use of pretransplant sorafenib plus chemotherapy in unselected patients with FLT3-ITD AML is not supported by this study.

Co-occurring mutations in ASXL1, SRSF2, and SETBP1 define a subset of myelodysplastic/ myeloproliferative neoplasm with neutrophilia.

Identification of genomic signatures with consistent clinicopathological features in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) is critical for improved diagnosis, elucidation of biology, inclusion in clinical trials, and development of therapies. We describe clinical and pathological features with co-existence of mutations in ASXL1 (missense or nonsense), SRSF2, and SKI homologous region of SETBP1, in 18 patients. Median age was 68 years with a male predominance (83%). Leukocytosis and neutrophilia were common at presentation. Marrow features included hypercellularity, granulocytic hyperplasia with megakaryocytic atypia, while the majority had myeloid hyperplasia and/or erythroid hypoplasia, myeloid dysplasia, and aberrant CD7 expression on blasts. Mutations in growth signaling pathways (RAS or JAK2) were noted at diagnosis or acquired during the disease course in 83% of patients. Two patients progressed upon acquisition of FLT3-TKD (acute myeloid leukemia) or KIT (aggressive systemic mastocytosis) mutations. The prognosis is poor with only two long-term survivors, thus far, who underwent blood or marrow transplantation. We propose that the presence of co-occurring ASXL1, SRSF2, and SETBP1 mutations can be diagnostic of a subtype of MDS/MPN with neutrophilia if clinical and morphological findings align. Our report underscores the association between genotype and phenotype within MDS/MPN and that genomic signatures should guide categorization of these entities.

Gilteritinib in Combination With Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy and as Maintenance Therapy: A Phase IB Study in Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML.

PURPOSE: Gilteritinib is a type 1 FLT3 inhibitor active as monotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of gilteritinib incorporated into intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy, and as maintenance therapy for adult patients with newly diagnosed, non-favorable-risk AML. METHODS: In this phase IB study (2215-CL-0103; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02236013), 103 participants were screened and 80 were allocated to treatment. The study was divided into four parts: dose escalation, dose expansion, investigation of alternate anthracycline and gilteritinib schedule, and continuous gilteritinib during consolidation. RESULTS: After dose escalation, 120 mg gilteritinib once daily was chosen for further study. There were 58 participants evaluable for response at this dose, 36 of whom harbored FLT3 mutations. For participants with FLT3-mutated AML, the composite complete response (CRc) rate was 89% (83% were conventional complete responses), all achieved after a single induction cycle. The median overall survival time was 46.1 months. Gilteritinib was well-tolerated in this context although the median time to count recovery during induction was approximately 40 days. Longer time-to-count recovery was associated with higher trough levels of gilteritinib, which, in turn, were associated with azole use. The recommended regimen is gilteritinib at a dose of 120 mg once daily from days 4 to 17 or 8 to 21 of a 7 + 3 induction with either idarubicin or daunorubicin and from day 1 continuously with high-dose cytarabine consolidation. Maintenance therapy with gilteritinib was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated the safety and tolerability of gilteritinib incorporated into an induction and consolidation chemotherapy regimen, and as single-agent maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutant AML. The data herein provide an important framework for the design of randomized trials comparing gilteritinib with other FLT3 inhibitors.

Multicenter Phase I Trial of Ivosidenib as Maintenance Treatment Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for IDH1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

PURPOSE: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations occur in 5% to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ivosidenib is an IDH1 inhibitor, approved for use in patients with IDH1-mutated AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, phase I trial of maintenance ivosidenib following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with IDH1-mutated AML. Ivosidenib was initiated between days 30 and 90 following HCT and continued for up to 12 28-day cycles. The first dose level was 500 mg daily, with level reduction to 250 mg daily, if needed, in a 3 × 3 de-escalation design. Ten additional patients would then receive the MTD or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary endpoint was establishing the MTD or RP2D of ivosidenib. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled, of whom 16 initiated post-HCT ivosidenib. One dose-limiting toxicity, grade(g) 3 QTc prolongation, was observed. The RP2D was established at 500 mg daily. Attributable g≥3 adverse events were uncommon, with the most common being QTc prolongation in 2 patients. Eight patients discontinued maintenance, with only one due to adverse event. Six-month cumulative incidence (CI) of gII-IV aGVHD was 6.3%, and 2-year CI of all cGVHD was 63%. Two-year CI of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 19% and 0%, respectively. Two-year progression-free (PFS) was 81%, and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Ivosidenib is safe and well-tolerated as maintenance therapy following HCT. Cumulative incidence of relapse and NRM, as well as estimations of PFS and OS, were promising in this phase I study.

Alternative donor BMT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide as initial therapy for acquired severe aplastic anemia.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a marrow failure disorder with high morbidity and mortality. It is treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for those with fully matched donors, or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for those who lack such a donor, which is often the case for underrepresented minorities. We conducted a prospective phase 2 trial of reduced-intensity conditioning HLA-haploidentical BMT and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host (GVHD) prophylaxis as initial therapy for patients with SAA. The median patient age was 25 years (range, 3-63 years), and the median follow-up time was 40.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.4-55.7). More than 35% of enrollment was from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 or 4 acute GVHD on day 100 was 7% (95% CI, not applicable [NA]-17), and chronic GVHD at 2 years was 4% (95% CI, NA-11). The overall survival of 27 patients was 92% (95% CI, 83-100) at 1, 2, and 3 years. The first 7 patients received lower dose total body irradiation (200 vs 400 cGy), but these patients were more likely to have graft failure (3 of 7) compared with 0 of 20 patients in the higher dose group (P = .01; Fisher exact test). HLA-haploidentical BMT with PTCy using 400 cGy total body irradiation resulted in 100% overall survival with minimal GVHD in 20 consecutive patients. Not only does this approach avoid any adverse ramifications of IST and its low failure-free survival, but the use of haploidentical donors also expands access to BMT across all populations. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02833805.

Quizartinib plus chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-internal-tandem-duplication-positive acute myeloid leukaemia (QuANTUM-First): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) positive for internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations of FLT3 have poor outcomes. Quizartinib, an oral, highly potent, selective, type 2 FLT3 inhibitor, plus chemotherapy showed antitumour activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with FLT3-ITD-positive newly diagnosed AML. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of quizartinib versus placebo on overall survival in patients with FLT3-ITD-positive newly diagnosed AML aged 18-75 years. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial comparing quizartinib and placebo in combination with chemotherapy in induction and consolidation, followed by quizartinib or placebo single-agent continuation, in patients with FLT3-ITD-positive newly diagnosed AML at 193 hospitals and clinics in 26 countries in Europe; North America; and Asia, Australia, and South America. Patients aged 18-75 years were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the quizartinib group or the placebo group by an independent biostatistician through an interactive web and voice response system, stratified by region, age, and white blood cell count at diagnosis. Patients, investigators, funders, and contract research organisations were masked to treatments assigned. Induction therapy comprised a standard 7 + 3 induction regimen of cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day (or 200 mg/m2 per day allowed if institutional or local standard) by continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 7 and anthracycline (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 per day or idarubicin 12 mg/m2 per day) by intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, then quizartinib 40 mg orally or placebo once per day, starting on day 8, for 14 days. Patients with complete remission or complete remission with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery received standard consolidation with high-dose cytarabine plus quizartinib (40 mg per day orally) or placebo, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), or both as consolidation therapy, followed by continuation of single-agent quizartinib or placebo for up to 3 years. The primary outcome was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation until death from any cause and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of quizartinib or placebo. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02668653). FINDINGS: Between Sept 27, 2016, and Aug 14, 2019, 3468 patients with AML were screened and 539 patients (294 [55%] male patients and 245 [45%] female patients) with FLT3-ITD-positive AML were included and randomly assigned to the quizartinib group (n=268) or placebo group (n=271). 148 (55%) of 268 patients in the quizartinib group and 168 (62%) of 271 patients in the placebo group discontinued the study, primarily because of death (133 [90%] of 148 in the quizartinib group vs 158 [94%] of 168 in the placebo group) or withdrawal of consent (13 [9%] of 148 in the quizartinib group vs 9 [5%] of 168 in the placebo group). Median age was 56 years (range 20-75, IQR 46·0-65·0). At a median follow-up of 39·2 months (IQR 31·9-45·8), median overall survival was 31·9 months (95% CI 21·0-not estimable) for quizartinib versus 15·1 months (13·2-26·2) for placebo (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·62-0·98, p=0·032). Similar proportions of patients in the quizartinib and placebo groups had at least one adverse event (264 [100%] of 265 in the quizartinib group and 265 [99%] of 268 in the placebo group) and one grade 3 or higher adverse event (244 [92%] of 265 in the quizartinib group and 240 [90%] of 268 in the placebo group). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia, hypokalaemia, and pneumonia in both groups and neutropenia in the quizartinib group. INTERPRETATION: The addition of quizartinib to standard chemotherapy with or without allo-HCT, followed by continuation monotherapy for up to 3 years, resulted in improved overall survival in adults aged 18-75 years with FLT3-ITD-positive newly diagnosed AML. Based on the results from the QuANTUM-First trial, quizartinib provides a new, effective, and generally well tolerated treatment option for adult patients with FLT3-ITD-positive newly diagnosed AML. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo.

The clinical impact of the molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia.

Research into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to remarkable advances in our understanding of the disease. Mutations now allow us to explore the enormous diversity among cytogenetically defined subsets of AML, particularly the large subset of cytogenetically normal AML. Despite the progress in unraveling the tumor genome, only a small number of recurrent mutations have been incorporated into risk-stratification schemes and have been proven to be clinically relevant, targetable lesions. The current World Health Organization Classification of myeloid neoplasms and leukemia includes eight AML categories defined by recurrent genetic abnormalities as well as three categories defined by gene mutations. We here discuss the utility of molecular markers in AML in prognostication and treatment decision-making. New therapies based on targetable markers include IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib), venetoclax-based therapy, FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib, and quizartinib), gemtuzumab ozogamicin, magrolimab and menin inhibitors.

Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agent for the treatment of advanced myeloproliferative neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia with extramedullary disease.

The combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (HMA/venetoclax) has emerged as a treatment option for patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unfit to receive intensive chemotherapy. In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated clinical outcomes following treatment with HMA/venetoclax in 35 patients with advanced myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes or AML with extramedullary disease. The composite complete remission (CR) rate (including confirmed/presumed complete cytogenetic response, acute leukemia response-complete, CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery) was 42.9% with median overall survival (OS) of 9.7 months. Complex karyotype was associated with inferior median OS (3.7 versus 12.2 months; p = 0.0002) and composite CR rate (22% versus 50.0%; p = 0.2444). Although SRSF2 mutations were associated with higher composite CR rate (80.0% versus 28.0%; p = 0.0082), this was not associated with longer median OS (10.9 versus 8.0 months; p = 0.2269). Future studies should include these patient subgroups.

An Update on FLT3 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Landscape.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) mutations. RECENT FINDINGS: The recent European Leukemia Net (ELN2022) recommendations re-classified AML with FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) as intermediate risk regardless of Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) co-mutation or the FLT3 allelic ratio. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is now recommended for all eligible patients with FLT3-ITD AML. This review outlines the role of FLT3 inhibitors in induction and consolidation, as well as for post-alloHCT maintenance. It outlines the unique challenges and advantages of assessing FLT3 measurable residual disease (MRD) and discusses the pre-clinical basis for the combination of FLT3 and menin inhibitors. And, for the older or unfit patient ineligible for upfront intensive chemotherapy, it discusses the recent clinical trials incorporating FLT3 inhibitors into azacytidine- and venetoclax-based regimens. Finally, it proposes a rational sequential approach for integrating FLT3 inhibitors into less intensive regimens, with a focus on improved tolerability in the older and unfit patient population. The management of AML with FLT3 mutation remains a challenge in clinical practice. This review provides an update on the pathophysiology and therapeutic landscape of FLT3 AML, as well as a clinical management framework for managing the older or unfit patient ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation with High-Dose Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Patients Age ≥55 Years.

Patients age ≥55 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) fare poorly with conventional chemotherapy, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of ∼20%. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and novel B cell-targeted therapies can improve outcomes, but rates of relapse and death in remission remain high. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) provides an alternative consolidation strategy, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) facilitates HLA-mismatched transplantations with low rates of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The transplantation database at Johns Hopkins was queried for patients age ≥55 years who underwent alloBMT for ALL using PTCy. The database included 77 such patients. Most received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (88.3%), were in first complete remission (CR1) (85.7%), and had B-lineage disease (90.9%). For the entire cohort, 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 57%) and 49% (95% CI, 37% to 60%), respectively. Grade III-IV acute GVHD occurred in only 3% of patients, and chronic GVHD occurred in 13%. In multivariable analysis, myeloablative conditioning led to worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.65; P = .001), whereas transplantation in CR1 (HR, .30; P = .004) and transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL versus T-ALL (HR, .29; P = .03) were associated with improved RFS. Of the 54 patients who underwent RIC alloBMT in CR1 for B-ALL, the 5-year RFS and OS were 62% (95% CI, 47% to 74%) and 65% (95% CI, 51% to 77%), respectively, with a 5-year relapse incidence of 16% (95% CI, 7% to 27%) and an NRM of 24% (95% CI, 13% to 36%). RIC alloBMT with PTCy in CR1 represents a promising consolidation strategy for B-ALL patients age ≥55 years.

Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy.

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as safety outcomes in patients who received post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy. ADMIRAL was a global phase 3 randomized controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML. Patients with R/R AML who harbored FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in the juxtamembrane domain or D835/I836 point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain were randomized (2:1) to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or to preselected high- or low-intensity salvage chemotherapy (1 or 2 cycles). Patients in the gilteritinib arm who proceeded to HSCT could receive post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy if they were within 30 to 90 days post-transplantation and had achieved composite complete remission (CRc) with successful engraftment and no post-transplantation complications. Adverse events (AEs) during HSCT were recorded in the gilteritinib arm only. Survival outcomes and the cumulative incidence of relapse were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT during the trial. Treatment-emergent AEs were evaluated in patients who restarted gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Patients in the gilteritinib arm underwent HSCT more frequently than those in the chemotherapy arm (26% [n = 64] versus 15% [n = 19]). For all transplantation recipients, 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Despite a trend toward longer OS after pretransplantation CRc, post-transplantation survival was comparable in the 2 arms. Patients who resumed gilteritinib after HSCT had a low relapse rate after pretransplantation CRc (20%) or CR (0%). The most common AEs observed with post-transplantation gilteritinib therapy were increased alanine aminotransferase level (45%), pyrexia (43%), and diarrhea (40%); grade ≥3 AEs were related primarily to myelosuppression. The incidences of grade ≥III acute graft-versus-host disease and related mortality were low. Post-transplantation survival was similar across the 2 study arms in the ADMIRAL trial, but higher remission rates with gilteritinib facilitated receipt of HSCT. Gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy had a stable safety and tolerability profile and was associated with low relapse rates. Taken together, these data support a preference for bridging therapy with gilteritinib over chemotherapy in transplantation-eligible patients.

CCRL2 affects the sensitivity of myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia cells to azacitidine.

Better understanding of the biology of resistance to DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors is required to identify therapies that can improve their efficacy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). CCRL2 is an atypical chemokine receptor that is upregulated in CD34+ cells from MDS patients and induces proliferation of MDS and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) cells. In this study, we evaluated any role that CCRL2 may have in the regulation of pathways associated with poor response or resistance to DNMT inhibitors. We found that CCRL2 knockdown in TF-1 cells downregulated DNA methylation and PRC2 activity pathways and increased DNMT suppression by azacitidine in MDS/sAML cell lines (MDS92, MDS-L and TF-1). Consistently, CCRL2 deletion increased the sensitivity of these cells to azacitidine in vitro and the efficacy of azacitidine in an MDS-L xenograft model. Furthermore, CCRL2 overexpression in MDS-L and TF-1 cells decreased their sensitivity to azacitidine. Finally, CCRL2 levels were higher in CD34+ cells from MDS and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm patients with poor response to DNMT inhibitors. In conclusion, we demonstrated that CCRL2 modulates epigenetic regulatory pathways, particularly DNMT levels, and affects the sensitivity of MDS/sAML cells to azacitidine. These results support CCRL2 targeting as having therapeutic potential in MDS/sAML.