[Early experience with mechanical hemodynamic support for catheter ablation of malignant ventricular tachycardia].

Objective: To explore the role of mechanical hemodynamic support (MHS) in mapping and catheter ablation of patients with hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT), report single-center experience in a cohort of consecutive patients receiving VT ablation during MHS therapy, and provide evidence-based medical evidence for clinical practice. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with hemodynamically unstable VT who underwent catheter ablation with MHS at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University between August 2021 and December 2023 were included. Patients were divided into rescue group and preventive group according to the purpose of treatment. Their demographic data, periprocedural details, and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 15 patients with hemodynamically unstable VT were included (8 patients in the rescue group and 7 patients in the preventive group). The acute procedure was successful in all patients. One patient in the rescue group had surgical left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, remaining 14 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for circulation support. ECMO decannulation was performed in 12 patients due to clinical and hemodynamic stability, of which 6 patients were decannulation immediately after surgery and the remaining patients were decannulation at 2.0 (2.5) d after surgery. Two patients in the rescue group died during the index admission due to refractory heart failure and cerebral hemorrhage. During a median follow-up of 30 d (1 d to 12 months), one patient with LVAD had one episode of ventricular fibrillation at 6 months after discharge, and no further episodes of ventricular fibrillation and/or VT occurred after treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs. No malignant ventricular arrhythmia occurred in the remaining 12 patients who were followed up. Conclusions: MHS contributes to the successful completion of mapping and catheter ablation in patients with hemodynamically unstable VT, providing desirable hemodynamic status for emergency and elective conditions.

Distinguishing immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis from radiation pneumonitis by CT radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop a CT-based model to classify pneumonitis etiology in patients with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) after radiotherapy(RT) and Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 130 NSCLC patients who developed pneumonitis after receipt of ICIs only (n = 50), thoracic RT only (n = 50) (ICIs only + thoracic RT only, the training cohort, n = 100), and RT + ICIs (the test cohort, n = 30). Clinical and CT radiomics features were described and compared between different groups. We constructed a random forest (RF) classifier and a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier by CT radiomics to discern pneumonitis etiology. RESULTS: The patients in RT + ICIs group have more high grade (grade 3-4) pneumonitis compared to patients in ICIs only or RT only group (p < 0.05). Pneumonitis after the combined therapy was not a simple superposition mode of RT-related pneumonitis(RP) and ICI-related pneumonitis(CIP), resulting in the distinct characteristics of both RT and ICIs-related pneumonitis. The RF classifier showed favorable discrimination between RP and CIP with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.859 (95 %CI: 0.788-0.929) in the training cohort and 0.851 (95 % CI: 0.700-1) in the test cohort. The LDA classifier achieved an AUC of 0.881 (95 %CI: 0.815-0.947) in the training cohort and 0.842 (95 %CI: 0.686-0.997) in the test cohort. Our analysis revealed four principal CT-based features shared across both models:original_glrlm_LongRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis, wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Median, wavelet-LLL_ngtdm_Busyness， and wavelet-LLL_glcm_JointAverage. CONCLUSION: CT radiomics-based classifiers could provide a noninvasive method to identify the predominant etiology in NSCLC patients who developed pneumonitis after RT alone, ICIs alone or RT + ICIs.