Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Breast Care (Basel) ; 19(1): 49-61, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38384487

ABSTRACT

Background: We investigated the efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients receiving either ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) or chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). Patients and Methods: In this randomized, phase III study (RIBBIT), 38 patients diagnosed with metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative BC with presence of visceral metastases recruited between May 2018 and December 2020 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either arm A (ribociclib + ET) or arm B (chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab) at 12 sites in Germany. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), patient-reported HRQoL, and frequency and type of adverse events. During study conduction, the recruitment rate was persistently and considerably lower than originally expected. Therefore, the recruitment was ended prematurely. The study was initially designed to enroll and randomize 158 patients. Results: Median [95% CI] PFS was 27.3 months [19.1 - NA, parameter not estimable] in arm A and 15.8 months [8.2 - NA] in arm B. Complete responses were achieved only in arm A (n = 2, 10.5%). The ORR [95% CI] between arm A (57.9% [33.5-79.7]) and arm B (52.6% [28.9-75.6]) was comparable. Median OS [95% CI] was not reached in arm A, while in arm B median OS was 28.4 months [25.0 - NA]. Patients in arm A reported less burden by side-effects. No new safety signals emerged. Conclusion: Treatment of patients with visceral metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative BC with ribociclib in combination with ET showed a tendency toward a more favorable clinical outcome. Despite small numbers of patients and sites, this head-to-head comparison with chemotherapy supports the use of ribociclib with ET in patients with visceral metastasis at risk of fast disease progression.

2.
J Immunother Cancer ; 11(10)2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37903590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tumor samples from the phase III IMpower010 study were used to compare two programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assays (VENTANA SP263 and Dako 22C3) for identification of PD-L1 patient subgroups (negative, positive, low, and high expression) and their predictive value for adjuvant atezolizumab compared with best supportive care (BSC) in resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: PD-L1 expression was assessed by the SP263 assay, which measured the percentage of tumor cells with any membranous PD-L1 staining, and the 22C3 assay, which scored the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membranous PD-L1 staining. RESULTS: When examining the concordance at the PD-L1-positive threshold (SP263: tumor cell (TC)≥1%; 22C3: tumor proportion score (TPS)≥1%), the results were concordant between assays for 83% of the samples. Similarly, at the PD-L1-high cut-off (SP263: TC≥50%; 22C3: TPS≥50%), the results were concordant between assays for 92% of samples. The disease-free survival benefit of atezolizumab over BSC was comparable between assays for PD-L1-positive (TC≥1% by SP263: HR, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.40 to 0.85) vs TPS≥1% by 22C3: HR, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45 to 0.95)) and PD-L1-high (TC≥50% by SP263: HR, 0.27 (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.53) vs TPS≥50% by 22C3: HR, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.60)) subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The SP263 and 22C3 assays showed high concordance and a comparable clinical predictive value of atezolizumab at validated PD-L1 thresholds, suggesting that both assays can identify patients with early-stage NSCLC most likely to experience benefit from adjuvant atezolizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02486718.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Immunohistochemistry , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Adjuvants, Immunologic
3.
Int J Cancer ; 153(6): 1227-1240, 2023 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260368

ABSTRACT

The prospective, multicenter, noninterventional TACTIC study assessed effectiveness and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting in Germany, thus evaluating the external validity of the findings from the pivotal RECOURSE trial. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Subgroups comprised patients with good (<3 metastatic sites at inclusion, ≥18 months from diagnosis of first metastasis to inclusion) or poor (remaining patients) prognostic characteristics (GPC/PPC). GPC without liver metastases was considered best prognostic characteristics (BPC). In total, 307 eligible patients (pretreated or not suitable for other available therapies) were treated with FTD/TPI. Overall, median [95%-CI] OS was 7.4 months [6.4-8.6], median PFS was 2.9 months [2.8-3.3]. In BPC (n = 65) and GPC (n = 176) compared to PPC (n = 124) subgroup, median OS (13.3 [9.1-17.6] vs 8.9 [7.6-9.8] vs 5.1 [4.4-7.0] months) and median PFS (4.0 [3.3-5.3] vs 3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 2.6 [2.4-2.8] months) were longer. Patient-reported QoL, assessed by validated questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, PRO-CTCAE), was stable throughout FTD/TPI treatment. Predominant FTD/TPI-related adverse events of grades 3 or 4 were neutropenia (13.0%), leukopenia (7.5%), and anemia (5.2%). Altogether, palliative FTD/TPI therapy in patients with pretreated mCRC was associated with prolonged survival, delayed progression, maintained health-related QoL, and manageable toxicity. Low metastatic burden and indolent disease were favorable prognostic factors for survival. TACTIC confirms the effectiveness and safety of FTD/TPI, highlighting its value in routine clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Frontotemporal Dementia , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Quality of Life , Uracil/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Trifluridine/adverse effects , Frontotemporal Dementia/chemically induced , Frontotemporal Dementia/drug therapy , Pyrrolidines/adverse effects , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Combinations , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
5.
J Immunother ; 45(2): 89-99, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34908007

ABSTRACT

Nivolumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for use in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This noninterventional, prospective cohort study investigates real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in pretreated NSCLC patients in Germany (Enlarge-Lung/CA209-580). Patients with squamous (SQ) or nonsquamous (NSQ) NSCLC previously treated for locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) disease received nivolumab according to the current Summary of Product Characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Of 907 patients enrolled, 660 patients who were followed for at least 12 months across 79 study centers in Germany, were analyzed. Median OS was 11.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.1-12.9]; outcomes for the 418 patients with NSQ histology [13.1 mo (95% CI, 10.6-15.6)] were more favorable than outcomes for the 242 patients with SQ histology [8.9 mo (95% CI, 6.4-11.3)]. Patients' age, presence of distant or brain metastases, or line of therapy did not affect outcomes; however, patients with poor performance status (ECOG-PS ≥2, n=80) had shorter median OS [4.7 mo (95% CI, 3.1-5.4)]. This study represents one of the largest real-world cohorts providing outcomes of nivolumab in pretreated NSCLC. The results match well with the published evidence from pivotal clinical trials and demonstrate clinical effectiveness of nivolumab in advanced NSCLC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Humans , Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Prospective Studies
6.
Br J Haematol ; 191(5): 764-774, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583458

ABSTRACT

Primary objective of this non-interventional, post-authorisation safety study was to provide real-world safety data [incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs)/serious adverse events (SAEs)] on adult patients with myelofibrosis exposed/or not exposed to ruxolitinib. Key secondary objectives included the incidence/outcome of events of special interest (bleeding events, serious/opportunistic infections, second primary malignancies, and deaths). Overall, 462 patients were included [prevalent users = 260, new users = 32, non-exposed = 170 (inclusive of ruxolitinib-switch, n = 57)]. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates (per 100 patient-years) of ADRs (19·3 vs. 19·6) and SAEs (25·2 vs. 25·0) were comparable amongst new-users versus prevalent-users cohorts, respectively; most frequent ADRs across all cohorts included thrombocytopenia, anaemia, epistaxis, urinary tract infection, and herpes zoster. Anaemia, pneumonia, general physical health deterioration, sepsis, and death were the most frequent SAEs across all cohorts. Incidence rates of bleeding events (21·6) and serious/opportunistic infections (34·5) were higher in ruxolitinib-switch cohort versus other cohorts. The incidence rate of second primary malignancies was higher in the prevalent-users cohort (10·1) versus other cohorts. The observed safety profile of ruxolitinib in the present study along with the safety findings from the COMFORT/JUMP/EXPAND studies support the use of ruxolitinib for long-term treatment of patients with myelofibrosis.


Subject(s)
Primary Myelofibrosis/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nitriles , Prospective Studies , Pyrimidines
7.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 195(6): 544-557, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30859254

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Long-term impact of stage-adapted field reduction in a large cohort of gastric marginal zone lymphoma (gMZL) patients treated conservatively with curative radiation therapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of paper records of 290 patients with stage IE-IIE gMZL, treated in 78 radiotherapeutic institutions in Germany from 1992-2013. Stage-adapted radiation fields decreased from extended field (EF) to involved field (IF) over the course of three consecutive prospective trials of the German Study Group on Gastrointestinal Lymphoma (DSGL). Treatment results were compared between the three cohorts. RESULTS: Overall collective with median age of 60 years, slight male predominance (m:f = 1.1:1) and ratio of disease stage I:stage II = 2.1:1. Median follow-up 6.4 years in total: 13.0 years in the first gastrointestinal study (GIT 1992), 8.2 years in the second (GIT 1996) and 4.7 years in the third study (DSGL 01/2003). Stage-adapted radiation field decrease together with further technological development led to reduced relative frequencies of acute/chronic adverse effects and until now was accompanied by lower disease recurrence. The third study design with smallest field size (IF in stage I, locoregional EF in stage II) achieved the best survival outcome at the 5­year follow-up (overall survival 92.7%, event-free survival 89.5% and lymphoma-specific survival 100.0%). Disease relapse observed in 10 patients. Cumulative incidence of disease-specific death was 1.7% of the followed patients. Primary disease stage associated with lymphoma-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Stage-adapted reduction towards IF in gMZL resulted in favorable adverse effects, local control and survival rates. These results support further decreases in modern RT of gMZL.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/radiotherapy , Stomach Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/mortality , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Neoplasm Staging , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
9.
Recent Results Cancer Res ; 180: 137-63, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20033382

ABSTRACT

Targeted therapies against cancer have become more and more important. In particular, the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and vascular targeting have been the focus of new treatment strategies. Numerous new substances were developed as angiogenesis inhibitors and evaluated in clinical trials for safety, tolerance, and efficacy. With positive study results, some of these molecules have already been approved for clinical use. For example, this is true for the vascular endothelial growth factor neutralizing antibody bevacizumab (BEV) in metastatic colorectal cancer, nonsmall cell lung cancer, renal cancer, and breast cancer. The tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib have been approved for metastatic renal cancer as well as for hepatocellular carcinoma, and sunitinib has also been approved for gastrointestinal stroma tumors. In this chapter we try to give an overview of the substances currently investigated in Phase III studies and beyond with regard to antiangiogenesis in cancer therapy.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Axitinib , Benzenesulfonates/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Endostatins/therapeutic use , Humans , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Indazoles/therapeutic use , Indoles/therapeutic use , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Sorafenib , Sunitinib , Thalidomide/therapeutic use , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
10.
Psychophysiology ; 45(2): 327-32, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17995909

ABSTRACT

We analyzed heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), oxygen consumption, and carbon dioxide production in 17 male adolescents during a racing simulation video game (VG) and compared to resting state (RS) and exercise testing (ET) measures. We were able to demonstrate a significant (p<.005) increase from RS to VG concerning HR (+13.1 bpm), SBP (+20.8 mmHg), and DBP (+12.1 mmHg) with SBP and DBP elevations exceeding 2 SD in all children and 14/17 children, respectively. The energy consumption during VG (max 1.71 kcal/min) was unaltered compared to RS and significantly lower compared to ET even at the starting strain of 25 W (1.94 kcal/min). Hemodynamic parameters tested demonstrated lower HR, unchanged SBP, and higher DBP during the VG compared with ET. Comparing all measured parameters it can be said that the relation of blood pressure and energy consumption during VG might not be favorable.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Video Games/adverse effects , Video Games/psychology , Adolescent , Energy Metabolism , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors
11.
J Mol Cell Cardiol ; 42(2): 352-6, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189636

ABSTRACT

Marfan syndrome is caused by mutations in fibrillin-1, a large gene spanning approximately 200 kb of genomic DNA on chromosome 15q21. So far, more than 600 different mutations have been identified, accounting for 60-90% of all Marfan syndrome cases, the vast majority being single nucleotide exchanges as well as small deletions and insertions. Only four major rearrangements have been described in the literature so far. We have screened 11 individuals fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of Marfan syndrome but negative for point mutations in the fibrillin-1 gene by SSCP and/or direct sequencing, for large rearrangements. We report here the largest known de novo and out of frame deletion in the fibrillin-1 gene in a patient fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of Marfan syndrome. We identified the deletion breakpoints at the genomic and transcript levels and studied the expression of the mutated allele at the transcript and protein level. We conclude that large rearrangements may account for a non-negligible proportion of all Marfan cases.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15/genetics , Exons/genetics , Marfan Syndrome/genetics , Microfilament Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational , Sequence Deletion , Alleles , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Fibrillin-1 , Fibrillins , Humans , Male
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 23(28): 7050-9, 2005 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16129843

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In the prospective study 02/96 on primary GI lymphoma, we have collected data on histology, clinical features, and treatment results. In particular, in stages I and II localized primary gastric lymphoma (PGL), our objectives were to reduce treatment intensity and to confirm our hypothesis from study 01/92, which maintained that an organ-preserving approach is not inferior to primary surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were stratified for histologic grade, stage, and whether surgery had been carried out or not (as decided by each participating center). Patients with aggressive PGL received six cycles of CHOP-14 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by involved-field radiotherapy (40 Gy). Patients with indolent PGL (including patients experiencing treatment failure with antibiotic therapy for Helicobacter pylori) were treated with extended-field radiotherapy. The volume depended on stage. The irradiation dose was 30 Gy, followed by a boost of 10 Gy (the latter omitted after complete resection) to the tumor region. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients were accrued. Of these patients, 393 with localized PGL were treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy only or additional surgery between December 1996 and December 2003. The survival rate at 42 months for patients treated with surgery was 86% compared with 91.0% for patients without surgery. CONCLUSION: In this nonrandomized study (02/96), we reproduced the previous results of study 01/92 showing no disadvantage for an organ-preserving treatment. Therefore, primary stomach resection should be questioned.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Lymphoma/radiotherapy , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Lymphoma/pathology , Lymphoma/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Vincristine/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...