ICD Implantation Rates in Cardiac Arrest Survivors in Canada.

Background: Patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are at high risk of recurrence, posing a substantial burden on healthcare systems. Despite the established benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in many such patients, and recommendations by guidelines, few studies have described the proportion of OHCA patients who receive guideline-concordant care. Methods: The Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database dataset was used to identify OHCA patients admitted to hospitals across Canada, excluding Quebec. We analyzed all patients without a probable ischemic or bradycardia etiology of cardiac arrest, who survived to discharge, to estimate the ICD implantation rates in patients who were potentially eligible to have an ICD. Results: Between 2013 and 2017, a total of 10,435 OHCA patients who were admitted to the hospital were captured in the database; 4486 (43%) survived to hospital discharge, and 2580 survivors (57.5%) were potentially eligible to receive an ICD. Among these potentially eligible patients, 757 (29.3%) received an ICD during their index admission or within 30 days after discharge from the hospital. The ICD implantation rate during index admission increased from 13.8% in 2013 to 19.6% in 2017 (P-value for time trend < 0.05). The rate of ICD implantations in potentially eligible patients was higher in urban than in rural settings (19.5% vs 11.1%) and in teaching vs community hospitals (34.7% vs 9.8%). Conclusions: Although ICD implantation rates show an increasing trend among patients with OHCA who are likely eligible for secondary prevention, significant underutilization of ICDs persists in these patients.

Contexte: Les patients ayant survécu à un arrêt cardiaque extra-hospitalier (ACEH) présentent un risque élevé de récidive, ce qui impose un lourd fardeau aux systèmes de soins de santé. Malgré l'avantage établi de la mise en place d'un défibrillateur cardioverteur implantable (DCI) chez un grand nombre de ces patients, et les recommandations des lignes directrices, peu d'études décrivent la proportion de patients victimes d'un ACEH ayant reçu des soins conformes aux lignes directrices. Méthodologie: Nous avons recensé les admissions à l'hôpital de patients ayant subi un ACEH au Canada, à l'exception du Québec à partir de l'ensemble de données de la Base de données sur les congés des patients de l'Institut canadien d'information sur la santé. Nous avons inclus dans notre analyse tous les patients pour lesquels la cause de l'arrêt cardiaque n'était probablement pas ischémique ou bradycardique et qui avaient survécu jusqu'à leur congé de l'hôpital, afin d'estimer les taux d'implantation d'un DCI chez les patients potentiellement admissibles à cette intervention. Résultats: Entre 2013 et 2017, un total de 10 435 patients ayant subi un ACEH ont été hospitalisés selon la base de données; 4 486 (43 %) avaient survécu jusqu'à leur congé de l'hôpital, et 2 580 survivants (57,5 %) étaient potentiellement admissibles à l'implantation d'un DCI. Parmi les patients potentiellement admissibles, 757 (29,3 %) avaient reçu un DCI au moment de leur admission initiale ou dans les 30 jours suivant leur congé de l'hôpital. Le taux d'implantation de DCI lors de l'admission initiale est passé de 13,8 % en 2013 à 19,6 % en 2017 (valeur p pour la tendance au fil du temps < 0,05). Le taux d'implantation d'un DCI chez les patients potentiellement admissibles était plus élevé en milieu urbain qu'en milieu rural (19,5 % contre 11,1 %) et dans les hôpitaux d'enseignement/universitaires par comparaison avec les hôpitaux communautaires (34,7 % contre 9,8 %). Conclusions: Bien que les taux d'implantation de DCI affichent une tendance à la hausse chez les patients ayant subi un ACEH qui sont probablement admissibles à des interventions de prévention secondaire, les DCI demeurent largement sous-utilisés chez ces patients.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadian emergency medical system management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: We sought to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care provided by Canadian emergency medical system (EMS) clinicians to patients suffering out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and whether any observed changes persisted beyond the initial phase of the pandemic. METHODS: We analysed cases of adult, non-traumatic, OHCA from the Canadian Resuscitation Outcome Consortium (CanROC) registry who were treated between January 27th, 2018, and December 31st, 2021. We used adjusted regression models and interrupted time series analysis to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (January 27th, 2020 - December 31st, 2021)on the care provided to patients with OHCA by EMS clinicians. RESULTS: There were 12,947 cases of OHCA recorded in the CanROC registry in the pre-COVID-19 period and 17,488 during the COVID-19 period. We observed a reduction in the cumulative number of defibrillations provided by EMS (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.89 - 0.93, p < 0.01), a reduction in the odds of attempts at intubation (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31 - 0.34, p < 0.01), higher rates of supraglottic airway use (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.16-1.30, p < 0.01), a reduction in vascular access (aOR for intravenous access 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 - 0.89, p < 0.01; aOR for intraosseous access 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 - 0.96, p < 0.01), a reduction in the odds of epinephrine administration (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 - 0.94, p < 0.01), and higher odds of resuscitation termination on scene (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.31 - 1.46, p < 0.01). Delays to initiation of chest compressions (2 min. vs. 3 min., p < 0.01), intubation (16 min. vs. 19 min., p = 0.01), and epinephrine administration (11 min. vs. 13 min., p < 0.01) were observed, whilst supraglottic airways were inserted earlier (11 min. vs. 10 min., p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial changes in EMS management of OHCA. EMS leaders should consider these findings to optimise current OHCA management and prepare for future pandemics.

Organ Donation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

AIM OF THE REVIEW: Improving rates of organ donation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who do not survive is an opportunity to save countless lives. The objectives of this scientific statement were to do the following: define the opportunity for organ donation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; identify challenges and opportunities associated with organ donation by patients with cardiac arrest; identify strategies, including a generic protocol for organ donation after cardiac arrest, to increase the rate and consistency of organ donation from this population; and provide rationale for including organ donation as a key clinical outcome for all future cardiac arrest clinical trials and registries. METHODS: The scope of this International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation scientific statement was approved by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation board and the American Heart Association, posted on ILCOR.org for public comment, and then assigned by section to primary and secondary authors. A unique literature search was completed and updated for each section. RESULTS: There are a number of defining pathways for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to become organ donors; however, modifications in the Maastricht classification system need to be made to correctly identify these donors and to report outcomes with consistency. Suggested modifications to the minimum data set for reporting cardiac arrests will increase reporting of organ donation as an important resuscitation outcome. There are a number of challenges with implementing uncontrolled donation after cardiac death protocols, and the greatest impediment is the lack of legislation in most countries to mandate organ donation as the default option. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has the potential to increase organ donation rates, but more research is needed to derive neuroprognostication rules to guide clinical decision-making about when to stop extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to evaluate cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: All health systems should develop, implement, and evaluate protocols designed to optimise organ donation opportunities for patients who have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and failed attempts at resuscitation.

Organ Donation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

AIM OF THE REVIEW: Improving rates of organ donation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who do not survive is an opportunity to save countless lives. The objectives of this scientific statement were to do the following: define the opportunity for organ donation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; identify challenges and opportunities associated with organ donation by patients with cardiac arrest; identify strategies, including a generic protocol for organ donation after cardiac arrest, to increase the rate and consistency of organ donation from this population; and provide rationale for including organ donation as a key clinical outcome for all future cardiac arrest clinical trials and registries. METHODS: The scope of this International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation scientific statement was approved by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation board and the American Heart Association, posted on ILCOR.org for public comment, and then assigned by section to primary and secondary authors. A unique literature search was completed and updated for each section. RESULTS: There are a number of defining pathways for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to become organ donors; however, modifications in the Maastricht classification system need to be made to correctly identify these donors and to report outcomes with consistency. Suggested modifications to the minimum data set for reporting cardiac arrests will increase reporting of organ donation as an important resuscitation outcome. There are a number of challenges with implementing uncontrolled donation after cardiac death protocols, and the greatest impediment is the lack of legislation in most countries to mandate organ donation as the default option. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has the potential to increase organ donation rates, but more research is needed to derive neuroprognostication rules to guide clinical decision-making about when to stop extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to evaluate cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: All health systems should develop, implement, and evaluate protocols designed to optimize organ donation opportunities for patients who have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and failed attempts at resuscitation.

The Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Survival and Neurological Outcomes in Shock Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Examining the association of time to treatment (drug or placebo) with survival to hospital discharge and neurologic outcome. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Emergency medical services enrolled patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at multiple North American sites. PATIENTS: Adults with nontraumatic OHCA and an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia refractory to at least one defibrillation attempt were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment with survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic status at discharge (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3) for the three treatment groups including an interaction term between treatment and time to treatment to determine the effect of time on treatment effects. Time to treatment data were available for 2,994 out of 3,026 patients (99%). The proportion of patients who survived to hospital discharge decreased as time to drug administration increased, in amiodarone (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93 per min), lidocaine (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), and placebo (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93). Comparing amiodarone to placebo, there was improved survival at all times of drug administration (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05-1.65). Comparing lidocaine to placebo, survival was not different with shorter times to drug administration (< 11 min), whereas survival was higher with lidocaine at longer times to drug administration with an interaction between treatment effect and time to treatment (p = 0.048). Survival with good neurologic outcome showed similar results for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and favorable neurologic outcomes decreased with longer times to drug administration. Amiodarone improved survival at all time points whereas lidocaine improved survival only at later time points, compared with placebo.

Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Network Meta-analysis and Subgroup Analyses of Shockable and Nonshockable Rhythms.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is the most commonly used drug in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation, but evidence supporting its efficacy is mixed. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the comparative efficacy and safety of standard dose epinephrine, high-dose epinephrine, epinephrine plus vasopressin, and placebo or no treatment in improving outcomes after OHCA? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, we searched six databases from inception through June 2022 for randomized controlled trials evaluating epinephrine use during OHCA resuscitation. We performed frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and present ORs and 95% CIs. We used the the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. Outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission, survival to discharge, and survival with good functional outcome. RESULTS: We included 18 trials (21,594 patients). Compared with placebo or no treatment, high-dose epinephrine (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 3.68-4.97), standard-dose epinephrine (OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 3.32-4.10), and epinephrine plus vasopressin (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.94-4.26) all increased ROSC. High-dose epinephrine (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 2.97-4.20), standard-dose epinephrine (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.66-3.38), and epinephrine plus vasopressin (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.27-3.44) all increased survival to hospital admission as compared with placebo or no treatment. However, none of these agents may increase survival to discharge or survival with good functional outcome as compared with placebo or no treatment. Compared with placebo or no treatment, standard-dose epinephrine improved survival to discharge among patients with nonshockable rhythm (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.21-3.63), but not in those with shockable rhythm (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.39-1.85). INTERPRETATION: Use of standard-dose epinephrine, high-dose epinephrine, and epinephrine plus vasopressin increases ROSC and survival to hospital admission, but may not improve survival to discharge or functional outcome. Standard-dose epinephrine improved survival to discharge among patients with nonshockable rhythm, but not those with shockable rhythm. TRIAL REGISTRY: Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/arxwq.

The ability of machine learning algorithms to predict defibrillation success during cardiac arrest: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existing knowledge on the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms inpredicting defibrillation success during in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus were searched from inception to August 30, 2022. Studies were included that utilized ML algorithms for prediction of successful defibrillation, observed as return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital or discharge, or neurological status at discharge.Studies were excluded if involving a trauma, an unknown underlying rhythm, an implanted cardiac defibrillator or if focused on the prediction or onset of cardiac arrest. Risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool. RESULTS: There were 2399 studies identified, of which 107 full text articles were reviewed and 15 observational studies (n = 5680) were included for final analysis. 29 ECG waveform features were fed into 15 different ML combinations. The best performing ML model had an accuracy of 98.6 (98.5 - 98.7)%, with 4 second ECG intervals. An algorithm incorporating end-tidal CO2 reported an accuracy of 83.3% (no CI reported). Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity in study design, ROSC definitions, and characteristics. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms, specifically Neural Networks, have been shown to have potential to predict defibrillation success for cardiac arrest with high sensitivity and specificity.Due to heterogeneity, inconsistent reporting, and high risk of bias, it is difficult to conclude which, if any, algorithm is optimal. Further clinical studies with standardized reporting of patient characteristics, outcomes, and appropriate algorithm validation are still required to elucidate this. PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020148912.

Establishing a multicenter, preclinical consortium in resuscitation: A pilot experimental trial evaluating epinephrine in cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Large animal studies are an important step in the translation pathway, but single laboratory experiments do not replicate the variability in patient populations. Our objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing a multicenter, preclinical, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled cardiac arrest trial. We evaluated the effect of epinephrine on coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) as previous single laboratory studies have reported mixed results. METHODS: Forty-five swine from 5 different laboratories (Ann Arbor, MI; Baltimore, MD; Los Angeles, CA; Pittsburgh, PA; Toronto, ON) using a standard treatment protocol. Ventricular fibrillation was induced and left untreated for 6 min before starting continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After 2 min of CPR, 9 animals from each lab were randomized to 1 of 3 interventions given over 12 minutes: (1) Continuous IV epinephrine infusion (0.00375 mg/kg/min) with placebo IV normal saline (NS) boluses every 4 min, (2) Continuous placebo IV NS infusion with IV epinephrine boluses (0.015 mg/kg) every 4 min or (3) Placebo IV NS for both infusion and boluses. The primary outcome was mean CPP during the 12 mins of drug therapy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean CPP between the three groups: 14.4 ± 6.8 mmHg (epinephrine Infusion), 16.9 ± 5.9 mmHg (epinephrine bolus), and 14.4 ± 5.5 mmHg (placebo) (p = NS). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated inter-laboratory variability in the magnitude of the treatment effect (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing a multicenter, preclinical, randomized, double-blinded cardiac arrest trials. Standard dose epinephrine by bolus or continuous infusion did not increase coronary perfusion pressure during CPR when compared to placebo.

Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Shock-Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Background The effects of amiodarone and lidocaine on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in relation to time to treatment in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is not known. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the ROC ALPS (Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo) randomized controlled trial examining the association of time to treatment (drug or placebo) with ROSC at hospital arrival. Methods and Results In the trial, adults with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia after at least 1 defibrillation were randomly assigned to receive amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo. We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment (911 call to study drug administration) with ROSC. An interaction term between treatment and time to treatment was included to determine the potential effect of time on treatment effects. Overall, 1112 (36.7%) patients had ROSC at hospital arrival (350 in the amiodarone arm, 396 in the lidocaine arm, and 366 in the placebo arm). The proportion of patients who had ROSC decreased as time to drug administration increased, in patients treated with amiodarone (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94 per minute increase), lidocaine (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), and placebo (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96). With shorter times to drug administration, the proportion with ROSC was higher in amiodarone versus placebo recipients. Conclusions The probability of ROSC decreased as time to drug administration increased. The effect of amiodarone but not lidocaine to restore ROSC declined with longer times to drug administration, potentially attributable to its adverse hemodynamic effects.

Responding to Cardiac Arrest in the Community in the Digital Age.

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a common event, affecting almost 400,000 individuals annually in North America. Initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation using an automated external defibrillator (AED) are critical for survival, yet many bystanders are reluctant to intervene. Digital technologies, including mobile devices, social media, and crowdsourcing might help play a role to improve survival from SCA. In this article we review the current digital tools and strategies available to increase rates of bystander recognition of SCA, prompt immediate activation of emergency medical services (EMS), initiate high-quality CPR, and to locate, retrieve, and operate AEDs. Smartphones can help to educate and connect bystanders with EMS dispatchers, through text messaging or video calling, to encourage the initiation of CPR and retrieval of the closest AED. Wearable devices and household smart speakers could play a future role in continuous vital signs monitoring in individuals at risk of lethal arrhythmias and send an alert to either chosen contacts or EMS. Machine learning algorithms and mathematical modelling might aid EMS dispatchers with better recognition of SCA as well as policymakers with where to best place AEDs for optimal accessibility. There are challenges with the use of digital tech, including the need for government regulation and issues with data ownership, accessibility, and interoperability. Future research will include smart cities, e-linkages, new technologies, and using social media for mass education. Together or in combination, these emerging digital technologies might represent the next leap forward in SCA survival.

Moderating effects of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest characteristics on the association between EMS response time and survival.

BACKGROUND: Although several Utstein variables are known to independently improve survival, how they moderate the effect of emergency medical service (EMS) response times on survival is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To quantify how public location, witnessed status, bystander CPR, and bystander AED shock individually and jointly moderate the effect of EMS response time delays on OHCA survival. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was a secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest database (December 2005 to June 2015). We included all adult, non-traumatic, non-EMS witnessed, and EMS-treated OHCAs from eleven sites across the US and Canada. We trained a logistic regression model with standard Utstein control variables and interaction terms between EMS response time and the four aforementioned OHCA characteristics. RESULTS: 102,216 patients were included. Three of the four characteristics - witnessed OHCAs (OR = 0.962), bystander CPR (OR = 0.968) and public location (OR = 0.980) - increased the negative effect of a one-minute delay on the odds of survival. In contrast, a bystander AED shock decreased the negative effect of a one-minute response time delay on the odds of survival (OR = 1.064). The magnitude of the effect of a one-minute delay in EMS response time on the odds of survival ranged from 1.3% to 9.8% (average: 5.3%), depending on the underlying OHCA characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in EMS response time had the largest reduction in survival odds for OHCAs that did not receive a bystander AED shock but were witnessed, occurred in public, and/or received bystander CPR. A bystander AED shock appears to be protective against a delay in EMS response time.

Mandating Training Is Not Enough: The State of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Training in Ontario Schools.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) training in schools are mandated in the Ontario high school curriculum. We surveyed schools to understand the scope of this training, including its barriers and facilitators. We recruited 120 (58.5%) elementary, 25 (12.2%) middle, and 60 (29.3%) high schools. Almost 60% (120 of 200) provided staff with CPR training, but only 56% (27 of 48) of high schools trained students. Major barriers included lack of funding, time, and trainers. Despite government-mandated curriculum, only 56% of high schools offer CPR and AED training. More research is needed to understand the barriers to implementing this lifesaving training.

La formation en réanimation cardiorespiratoire (RCR) et défibrillateurs externes automatisés (DEA) est obligatoire dans le cadre du programme d'études secondaires des écoles de l'Ontario. Nous avons entrepris une enquête dans les écoles pour comprendre la portée de cette formation, notamment ses obstacles et ses facilitateurs. Nous avons procédé au recrutement dans 120 (58,5 %) écoles élémentaires, 25 (12,2 %) écoles intermédiaires et 60 (29,3 %) écoles secondaires. Presque 60 % (120 sur 200) des écoles secondaires offraient la formation en RCR au personnel, mais seulement 56 % (27 sur 48) formaient les élèves. Les principaux obstacles étaient le manque de financement, de temps et de formateurs. Bien que le gouvernement ait rendu obligatoire la formation en RCR et DEA dans le cadre du programme d'études secondaires, seulement 56 % des écoles offrent la formation. D'autres études sont nécessaires pour comprendre les obstacles à la mise en œuvre de cette formation qui permet de sauver des vies.

2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations.

This is the summary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's 2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published evidence reviewed by the First Aid Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the topics of first aid methods of glucose administration for hypoglycemia; techniques for cooling of exertional hyperthermia and heatstroke; recognition of acute stroke; the use of supplementary oxygen in acute stroke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life- threatening bleeding through the use of tourniquets, haemostatic dressings, direct pressure, or pressure devices; the use of a compression wrap for closed extremity joint injuries; and temporary storage of an avulsed tooth. Additional summaries of scoping reviews are presented for the use of a recovery position, recognition of a concussion, and 6 other first aid topics. The First Aid Task Force has assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of evidence on the basis of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and present their consensus treatment recommendations with evidence-to-decision highlights and identified priority knowledge gaps for future research. The 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) is the fourth in a series of annual summary publications from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This 2020 CoSTR for first aid includes new topics addressed by systematic reviews performed within the past 12 months. It also includes updates of the first aid treatment recommendations published from 2010 through 2019 that are based on additional evidence evaluations and updates. As a result, this 2020 CoSTR for first aid represents the most comprehensive update since 2010.

What Is the Financial Impact of Orthopaedic Sequelae of Intravenous Drug Use on Urban Tertiary-care Centers?

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic sequelae such as skin and soft-tissue abscesses are frequent complications of intravenous drug use (IVDU) and comprise many of the most common indications for emergency room visits and hospitalizations within this population. Urban tertiary-care and safety-net hospitals frequently operate in challenging economic healthcare environments and are disproportionately tasked with providing care to this largely underinsured patient demographic. Although many public health initiatives have been instituted in recent years to understand the health impacts of IVDU and the spreading opioid epidemic, few efforts have been made to investigate its economic impact on healthcare systems. The inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU is a high-cost healthcare element that is critically important to understand within the current national context of inflationary healthcare costs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What were the total healthcare costs incurred and total hospital reimbursements received in the treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? (2) What were the total healthcare costs incurred and total hospital reimbursements received in the treatment of spinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? (3) How did patient insurance status effect the economic burden of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? METHODS: An internal departmental record of all successive patients requiring inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU was initiated at Boston Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) in 2012 and MetroHealth Medical Center (Cleveland, OH, USA) in 2015. A total of 412 patient admissions between 2012 to 2017 to these two safety-net hospitals (n = 236 and n = 176, respectively) for orthopaedic complications of IVDU were included in the study. These sequelae included cellulitis, cutaneous abscess, bursitis, myositis, tenosynovitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and epidural abscess. Patients were included if they were older than 18 years of age, presented to the emergency department for management of a musculoskeletal infection secondary to IVDU, and required inpatient orthopaedic treatment during their admission. Exclusion criteria included all patients presenting with a musculoskeletal infection not directly secondary to active IVDU. Patients presenting with an epidural abscess (Boston Medical Center, n = 36) were evaluated separately to explore potential differences in costs within this subgroup. A robust retrospective financial analysis was performed using internal financial databases at each institution which directly enumerated all true hospital costs associated with each patient admission, independent of billed hospital charges. All direct, indirect, variable, and fixed hospital costs were individually summed for each hospitalization, constituting a true "bottom-up" micro-costing approach. Labor-based costs were calculated through use of time-based costing; for instance, the cost of nursing labor care associated with a patient admission was determined through ascription of the median hospital cost of a registered nurse within that department (that is, compensation for salary plus benefits) to the total length of nursing time needed by that patient during their hospitalization. Primary reimbursements reflected the true monetary value received by the study institutions from insurers and were determined through the total adjusted payment for each inpatient admission. All professional fees were excluded. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effect of patient insurance status on hospital costs and reimbursements for each patient admission. RESULTS: The mean healthcare cost incurred for the treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU was USD 9524 ± USD 1430 per patient admission. The mean hospital reimbursement provided for the treatment of these extraspinal sequelae was USD 7678 ± USD 1248 per patient admission. This resulted in a mean financial loss of USD 1846 ± USD 1342 per patient admission. The mean healthcare cost incurred at Boston Medical Center for the treatment of epidural abscesses secondary to IVDU was USD 44,357 ± USD 7384 per patient. Hospital reimbursements within this subgroup were highly dependent upon insurance status. The median (range) reimbursement provided for patients possessing a unique hospital-based nonprofit health plan (n = 4) was USD 103,016 (USD 9022 to USD 320,123), corresponding to a median financial gain of USD 24,904 (USD 2289 to USD 83,079). However, the mean reimbursement for all other patients presenting with epidural abscesses (n = 32) was USD 30,429 ± USD 5278, corresponding to a mean financial loss of USD 5768 ± USD 4861. A secondary analysis demonstrated that treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU for patients possessing Medicaid insurance (n = 309) resulted in a financial loss of USD 2813 ± USD 1593 per patient admission. Conversely, treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae for patients possessing non-Medicaid insurance (n = 67) generated a mean financial gain of USD 2615 ± USD 1341 per patient admission. CONCLUSIONS: Even when excluding all professional fees, the inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU resulted in substantial financial losses driven primarily by high proportions of under- and uninsured people within this patient population. These financial losses may be unsustainable for medical centers operating in challenging economic healthcare landscapes. The development of novel initiatives and support of existing programs aimed at mitigating the health-related and economic impact of IVDU must remain a principal priority of healthcare providers and policymakers in coming years. Advocacy for the expansion of Medicaid accountable care organizations and national syringe service programs (SSPs), and the development of specialized outpatient wound and abscess clinics at healthcare centers may help to substantially alleviate the economic burden of the orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level, IV, economic and decision analyses.

Correction to: Epidemiology and patient predictors of infection and sepsis in the prehospital setting.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.

Epidemiology and patient predictors of infection and sepsis in the prehospital setting.

PURPOSE: Paramedics are often the first healthcare contact for patients with infection and sepsis and may identify them earlier with improved knowledge of the clinical signs and symptoms that identify patients at higher risk. METHODS: A 1-year (April 2015 and March 2016) cohort of all adult patients transported by EMS in the province of Alberta, Canada, was linked to hospital administrative databases. The main outcomes were infection, or sepsis diagnosis among patients with infection, in the Emergency Department. We estimated the probability of these outcomes, conditional on signs and symptoms that are commonly available to paramedics. RESULTS: Among 131,745 patients transported by EMS, the prevalence of infection was 9.7% and sepsis was 2.1%. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients with sepsis was 28%. The majority (62%) of patients with infections were classified by one of three dispatch categories ("breathing problems," "sick patient," or "inter-facility transfer"), and the probability of infection diagnosis was 17-20% for patients within these categories. Patients with elevated temperature measurements had the highest probability for infection diagnosis, but altered Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), low blood pressure, or abnormal respiratory rate had the highest probability for sepsis diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Dispatch categories and elevated temperature identify patients with higher probability of infection, but abnormal GCS, low blood pressure, and abnormal respiratory rate identify patients with infection who have a higher probability of sepsis. These characteristics may be considered by paramedics to identify higher-risk patients prior to arrival at the hospital.

Healthcare costs and resource utilization associated with treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: The management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients requires the coordination of prehospital, in-hospital and post-discharge teams. Data reporting a comprehensive analysis of all costs associated with treating OHCA are scarce. We aimed to describe the total costs (and their components) related to the management of OHCA patients. PATIENT AND METHODS: We performed an analysis on a merged database of the Toronto Regional RescuNet Epistry database (prehospital data) and administrative population-based databases in Ontario. All non-traumatic OHCA patients over 18 years of age treated by the EMS between January 1, 2006, and March 31, 2014, were included in this study. The primary outcome was per patient longitudinal cumulative healthcare costs, from time of collapse to a maximum follow-up until death or 30 days after the event. We included all available cost sectors, from the perspective of the health system payer. We used multivariable generalized linear models with a logarithmic link and a gamma distribution to determine predictors of healthcare costs. RESULTS: 25,826/44,637 patients were treated by EMS services for an OHCA (mostly male 64.4%, mean age 70.1). 11,727 (45%) were pronounced dead on scene, 8359 (32%) died in the emergency department, 3640 (14%) were admitted to hospital but died before day-30, and 2100 (8.1%) were still alive at day-30. Total cost was $690 [interquartile range (IQR) $308, $1742] per patient; ranging from $290 [IQR $188, $390] for patients who were pronounced on scene to $39,216 [IQR 21,802, 62,093] for patients who were still alive at day-30. In-hospital costs accounted for 93% of total costs. After adjustment for age and gender, rate of patient survival was the main driver of total costs: the rate ratio was 3.88 (95% confidence interval 3.80, 3.95), 49.46 and 148.89 for patients who died in the ED, patients who died after the ED but within 30 days, and patients who were still alive at day-30 compared to patients who were pronounced dead on scene, respectively. Factors independently associated with costs were the number of prehospital teams (rate ratio (RR) 5.50 [5.32, 5.67] for being treated by 4 teams vs. 1), the need for hospital transfer (RR 2.38 [2.01, 2.82]), coronary angiography (RR 1.43 [1.27, 1.62]) and targeted temperature management (RR 1.25 [1.09, 1.44]). CONCLUSION: Survival is the main driver of total costs of treating OHCA patients in a large Canadian health system. Inpatient costs accounted for the majority of the total costs; potentially modifiable factors include the number of prehospital teams that arrive to the scene of the arrest and the need for between-hospital transfers after successful resuscitation.