Evaluation of cell surface vimentin positive circulating tumor cells as a prognostic biomarker for stage III/IV colorectal cancer.

Currently, little is known about the phenotypes of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), particularly epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes, and their impact on the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study aims to investigate the CTC phenotypes and their prognostic implications in stage III/IV CRC. Patients who were diagnosed with CRC and underwent CTC detection at two hospitals were included. CTCs were detected using a mesenchymal CTC kit, and the clinical and pathological characteristics of CTCs were compared with those of cell surface vimentin-positive CTCs (CSV-CTCs). Disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed and used as an indicator of CTC phenotype-related prognosis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were made to identify risk factors, and nomogram models were employed for prognostic prediction. A total of 82 patients were enrolled, with a CTC detection rate of 86.6%. Among the detected CTCs, 60% were CSV-CTCs. The CSV-CTC count showed a positive correlation with the T-stage, the M-stage, and the location of the primary tumor (P = 0.01, P = 0.014, and P = 0.01, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that CSV-CTCs were associated with worse DFS in patients receiving first-line oxaliplatin chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.78, 95% CI 1.55-9.26, p = 0.04). When the cut-off value of the CSV-CTC count was 3, the optimal prognostic prediction was achieved. Compound models considering CSV-CTCs, TNM staging, the site of the primary tumor and the Ras gene status yielded the best results in both the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the decision curve analysis (DCA). This study indicates that CSV-CTCs predominate in CTCs of CRC patients, and a count of CSV-CTCs ≥ 3 is an independent risk factor for worse prognosis.

Bile is a reliable and valuable source to study cfDNA in biliary tract cancers.

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy of bile-derived liquid biopsy compared with plasma and tumor tissue biopsy in patients with biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Methods: A total of 13 patients with BTC were enrolled in this cohort. Tumor tissue, bile, and plasma samples were obtained and analyzed using next-generation sequencing for genomic profiling. Results: Bile and plasma samples were collected from all 13 patients, and 11 patients also had matched tumor tissues available. The cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration was significantly higher in the bile supernatant than in plasma (median: 1918 vs. 63.1 ng/ml, p = 0.0017). The bile supernatant and pellet had a significantly higher mean mutation allele frequency (MF) than plasma (median: 3.84% vs. 4.22% vs. 0.16%; p < 0.001). Genomic alterations were predominantly missense. Both bile supernatant and pellet had significantly more genomic alterations than plasma (average: 9.3 vs. 7.2 vs. 2.3 alterations per sample; p < 0.01). Among the top 10 most frequent genomic alterations, the consistency between bile supernatant and tumor tissue was 90.00% (18/20), that between bile pellet and tumor tissue was 85.00% (17/20), and that between the plasma and tissue was only 35.00% (7/20). MAF of both bile supernatant and pellet was positively correlated with that in tissue samples (ρ < 0.0001, spearman r = 0.777, and ρ < 0.0001, spearman r = 0.787, respectively), but no significant correlation with tissue was found in the plasma (ρ = 0.966, spearman r = 0.008). Furthermore, additional genomic alterations could be detected in bile supernatant and pellet than in tissue. Potential targets for targeted therapy were identified in bile supernatant and pellet. Regarding copy number variation (CNV) and chromosomal instability (CIN) detection, four additional CNVs from two patients were detected in the bile supernatant that was not detected in tissues (i.e., amplification of TERC, IL7R, RICTOR, and TERT). CIN was significantly higher in tumor tissue than in plasma. The CIN of the bile was also significantly higher than that of plasma. There was no significant difference in CIN between the tissue and the bile supernatant. Conclusion: The consistency of all genomic alterations and tumor tissue-determined genomic alteration in the bile supernatant/pellet was significantly higher than in plasma. Bile supernatants/pellets are better for genetic sequencing and may also have potential clinical value to guide targeted therapy and evaluate prognosis. Bile cfDNA may be a feasible substitute for tumor tissue in the genetic testing of patients with BTC.

Therapeutic effectiveness and safety of sintilimab-dominated triple therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has shown promising results in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sintilimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade, combined with sorafenib and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization in this patient population, compared with sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy. This was a 22 months single center retrospective cohort study in China. 80 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included, with diagnosis confirmed by either histologic, cytologic or diagnostic imaging analysis. The patients were divided into three groups based on therapeutic regimen: sintilimab monotherapy (sintilimab group, n = 22), sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy (duplex group, n = 23), sintilimab-sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined therapy (triple group, n = 35). The principal evaluation criteria were overall survival and progression free survival in the population, assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Secondary evaluation criteria were safety, objective response rate and disease control rate. From March 1st, 2019 to December 31, 2020, 80 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included and divided into three treatment groups (22 received sintilimab monotherapy, 23 received sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy, and 35 received sintilimab-sorafenib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization). The median overall survival of all patients was 11.0 months (95% CI 7.7-14.3). Median overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI NE-NE), 9.0 months(95% CI 6.3-11.7)and 3.0 months (95% CI 1.9-4.1, p < 0.0001) in the triple therapy, duplex and sintilimab groups respectively, while the corresponding median progression-free survival were 5.0 months (95% CI 2.9-7.1, p < 0.001), 4.0 months (95% CI 2.8-5.2) and 2.0 months (95% CI 1.7-2.3). Disease control and clinical benefits rates were higher in the triple therapy group (80%, 95% CI 63.1-91.6, p < 0.001; 54.3%, 95% CI 36.6-71.2, p < 0.01) compared to the sintilimab group. Median duration of disease control was 4.0 months (95% CI NE-NE, p < 0.01) in the triple therapy group, longer than that of the duplex group (2.0 months, 95% CI 0.9-3.1) and sintilimab group (2.0 months, 95% CI 0.8-3.2). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 26.3% of 80 patients with hypertension was the most common event observed (38, 47.5%), however, other severe toxic effects were infrequent. Sintilimab combined with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization might have more beneficial effects on overall and progression-free survival and on the duration of disease control outcomes than both sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This triple therapy model might represent an innovative and effective option for inoperable liver cancer.