Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122149

ABSTRACT

The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of altering the dietary supply of acetate, palmitic acid (PA), and cottonseed on the yields of milk components and milk fatty acids (FA) in lactating dairy cows. Thirty-two multiparous Holstein cows (133 ± 57 d in milk, 50.5 ± 7.2 kg/d milk) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square split plot design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of subplot treatments. Cows were blocked by energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield and allocated to a main plot receiving a basal diet (n = 16) with no supplemental PA (Low PA) or a basal diet (n = 16) with 1.5% inclusion of a FA supplement containing ~85% PA (High PA). In each main plot, the following subplots of treatment diets were fed in a Latin square arrangement consisting of 14-d periods: 1) a control diet (CON), 2) the control diet supplemented with 3% sodium acetate (AC), 3) the control diet supplemented with 12% whole cottonseed (CS), and 4) the control diet supplemented with 3% sodium acetate and 12% whole cottonseed (CS+AC). The PA supplement and sodium acetate replaced soyhulls, and whole cottonseed replaced cottonseed hulls and meal. All diets were balanced for 30% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), 23% forage NDF, 28% starch, and 17% crude protein (CP). Sources of FA were classified as de novo (<16 carbons), mixed (16-carbon), and preformed (>16 carbons). The statistical model included the random effect of cow nested within basal diet and fixed effect of period, basal diet, acetate, cottonseed, and their interactions. Three-way interactions among basal diet, acetate, and cottonseed were observed for the yields of milk fat, 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM), and the molar yields of de novo FA, mixed FA, and preformed FA. In the Low PA diets, AC and CS+AC increased the yields of milk fat and FCM compared with CON and CS, whereas, in the High PA diets, CS+AC increased the yields of milk fat and FCM compared with the other treatments and AC increased milk fat yield compared with CON and CS. Compared with Low PA, High PA increased milk fat content, mixed FA yield, and tended to increase C4:0 yield. Diets containing acetate increased DMI and the yields of milk fat, ECM, FCM, de novo FA, mixed FA, and preformed FA compared with diets without acetate. Diets containing cottonseed increased the yields of milk and preformed FA, tended to increase the yields of FCM and protein, and decreased DMI and the yields of de novo FA and mixed FA compared with diets without cottonseed. In summary, in high PA diets, the inclusion of acetate plus cottonseed increased milk fat yield compared with the other treatments. The CON diet in High PA increased milk fat yield to the same extent as AC and CS+AC in Low PA suggesting PA is important for initiating milk TG synthesis. Balancing the supply of de novo FA substrates and preformed FA is important for increasing the synthesis of milk fat triglycerides and milk fat production.

2.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908699

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to compare abomasal infusions of linoleic (18:2n-6) and α-linolenic (18:3n-3) acids on the enrichment of n-6 and n-3 fatty acids (FA) into the plasma lipid fractions of lactating dairy cows and evaluate their potential carryover effects in plasma lipid fractions post-infusion. Six rumen-cannulated multiparous Holstein cows (252 ± 33 d in milk) were fed the same diet and assigned to 1 of 2 treatments in a completely randomized design with repeated measures. Treatments were abomasal infusions (67 g/d total FA) of 1) n-6 FA blend (N6) to provide approximately 43 g/d 18:2n-6 and 8 g/d of 18:3n-3; or 2) n-3 FA blend (N3) providing 43 g/d 18:3n-3 and 8 g/d 18:2n-6. Treatments were dissolved in ethanol, and the daily dose for each treatment was divided into 4 equal infusions, occurring every 6 h. The treatment period lasted from d 1 to 20, and the carryover period lasted from d 21 to 40. Results are presented as FA contents within each of the 4 main plasma lipid fractions: cholesterol esters (CE), phospholipids (PL); triglycerides (TG), and plasma nonesterified fatty acids. Concentrations of individual lipid fractions in plasma were not quantified. Plasma CE and PL had the highest content of polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) during both the treatment and carryover periods. In plasma PL, N3 increased the contents of total n-3 FA (134%), 18:3n-3 (267%), and eicosapentaenoic acid (96.3%, 20:5n-3), and decreased total n-6 FA (8.14%) and 18:2n-6 (8.16%) from d 4 to 20 compared with N6. In plasma CE, N3 increased the contents of total n-3 FA (191%) from d 4 to 20, 18:3n-3 from d 2 to 20 (178%), and 20:5n-3 from d 6 to 20 (59.9%), while N3 decreased total n-6 FA from d 4 to 20 (11.2%) and 18:2n-6 from d 2 to 20 (10.5%) compared with N6. In addition, compared with N6, N3 decreased arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) at d 2 (45%) and from d 10 to 20 (14.7%) in PL and tended to decrease 20:4n-6 without interacting with time for CE. Phospholipids were the only lipid fraction with detectable levels of docosahexaenoic acid (22:3n-6) in all samples, but we did not observe differences between treatments. In plasma TG, N3 increased the contents of total n-3 FA (135%) and 18:3n-3 (146%) from d 4 to 20, increased 20:5n-3 from d 12 to 20 (89%), decreased or tended to decrease total n-6 FA content from d 6 and 8 (26.9%), and tended to decrease 18:2n-6 at d 8 compared with N6. A similar pattern was observed for plasma nonesterified fatty acids. We observed positive carryover effects for both N3 and N6 at different degrees in all lipid fractions, with N3 promoting more consistent outcomes and increasing total n-3 FA throughout the carryover period (from d 22 to 40) in both PL (52.8%) and CE (68.6%) compared with N6. It is important to emphasize that the higher magnitude responses observed for n-3 FA are also influenced by the content of n-3 FA being much lower than those of n-6 FA in all lipid fractions. While these data provide important and robust information, future research quantifying changes in concentrations of individual lipid fractions in plasma and the entry and exit rates of specific FA will further enhance our understanding. In conclusion, abomasally infusing N3 and N6 increased the contents of n-3 and n-6 FA, respectively, in all plasma lipid fractions. These responses were more evident in PL and CE. We also observed positive carryover effects in all lipid fractions, where N3 had more consistent outcomes than N6. Our results indicate that dairy cows have a robust mechanism to conserve essential FA, with a pronounced preference for n-3 FA.

3.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825117

ABSTRACT

Recent research has highlighted the importance of dietary fatty acid profile of fatty acid supplements on production responses of high-producing dairy cows. Conventional soybeans contain ∼15% oleic acid and ∼50% linoleic acid whereas high oleic acid soybeans (HOSB) contain ∼70% oleic acid and ∼7% linoleic acid. We determined the effect of increasing dietary inclusion of roasted and ground HOSB on production responses of high-producing dairy cows. Twenty-four multiparous Holstein cows (50.7 ± 4.45 kg/d of milk; 122 ± 57 DIM) were randomly assigned to treatment sequences in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 21-d periods. Treatments were increasing doses of HOSB at 0, 8, 16, and 24% DM. The HOSB replaced conventional soybean meal and hulls to maintain similar diet nutrient composition (% DM) of 27.4 - 29.4% (NDF), 20.6% forage NDF, 27.5% starch, and 15.9 - 16.5% CP. Total fatty acid content of treatments was 1.65, 3.11, 4.52, and 5.97% DM, respectively. Pre-planned polynomial orthogonal contrasts included the linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of increasing HOSB. Increasing dietary inclusion of HOSB linearly decreased DMI and milk urea nitrogen and increased yields of milk, 3.5% fat corrected milk, energy corrected milk, and milk fat, and quadratically increased milk protein. The increased response to milk fat was due to an increase in preformed milk fatty acids. Due to the increase in milk component yields and decrease in DMI, there was an increase in feed efficiency. Increasing HOSB inclusion linearly decreased plasma BUN concentration and tended to decrease plasma insulin. Increasing HOSB had no effect on BW change or BCS change. In summary, increasing dietary inclusion of HOSB up to 24% DM increased production responses of high-producing dairy cows and did not affect body reserves.

4.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825140

ABSTRACT

We determined the effects increasing dietary inclusion of whole cottonseed (WCS) on nutrient digestibility and milk production responses of high-producing dairy cows. Twenty-four multiparous Holstein cows (mean ± SD; 52.7 ± 2.63 kg/d of milk; 104 ± 23 DIM) were randomly assigned to treatment sequences in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 21-d periods. Treatments were increasing doses of WCS at 0, 8, 16, and 24% DM, with WCS replacing soybean meal and hulls to maintain similar diet nutrient composition (%DM) of NDF (32%), forage NDF (21%), starch (27%), and CP (17%). Total fatty acid (FA) content of each treatment was 1.70, 2.96, 4.20, and 5.40%DM, respectively. Three preplanned contrasts were used to test the linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of increasing dietary WCS. Increasing dietary WCS from 0 to 24% DM quadratically influenced intakes of DM and NDF, with the highest value being for the 8% WCS, and intakes of 16- and 18-carbon, and total FA, with maximum values obtained up to 24% WCS. Increasing dietary WCS affected digestibility of DM (cubic) and NDF (quadratic), with the lowest values being for the 8% WCS. Increasing WCS increased 16-carbon digestibility (quadratic) but decreased digestibility of 18-carbon and total FA (both quadratic), with highest and lowest values for the 24% WCS, respectively. Increasing dietary WCS quadratically increased absorbed 16- and 18-carbon, and total FA, with maximum values obtained for 24% WCS. Increasing dietary WCS quadratically increased yields of milk, milk fat, milk protein, milk lactose, 3.5% fat corrected milk, and energy corrected milk, and linearly increased body weight gain. The source of milk FA was affected by dietary WCS, with a quadratic decrease in the yield of de novo and mixed milk FA and a quadratic increase in preformed milk FA. Increasing dietary WCS linearly increased trans-10 C18:1 milk FA content. As dietary WCS increased, plasma insulin linearly decreased, and plasma gossypol levels linearly increased. Despite the decrease in total FA digestibility, increasing dietary WCS from 0 to 24% DM increased FA absorption. Increasing dietary inclusion of WCS up to 16% DM increased milk production responses and DM intake. Under the current dietary conditions, high-producing dairy cows benefited best from a diet containing 8-16% DM inclusion of WCS.

5.
JDS Commun ; 5(2): 96-101, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38482116

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the effects of fatty acid (FA) supplements with different ratios of palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (cis-9 C18:1) in low- and high-FA basal diets on production responses of lactating dairy cows. Thirty-six multiparous Holstein cows (50.2 ± 5.8 kg/d of milk; 160 ± 36 d in milk) were used in a split-plot Latin square design balanced for carryover effects. Cows were blocked by milk yield and allocated to a main plot receiving either a low-FA (LF; 1.93% FA content) basal diet (n = 18) containing cottonseed meal and cottonseed hulls or a high-FA (HF; 3.15% FA content) basal diet (n = 18) containing whole cottonseed. Within each plot, a 3 × 3 Latin square arrangement of treatments was used in 3 consecutive 21-d periods. Treatments were (1) control (CON; no FA supplementation), (2) FA supplement containing 80% C16:0 + 10% C18:1 (PA), and (3) FA supplement containing 60% C16:0 + 30% cis-9 C18:1 (PA+OA). The FA supplements were fed at 1.5% of dry matter and replaced soyhulls in CON. Preplanned contrasts were (1) overall effect of FA supplementation {CON vs. the average of the FA treatments [1/2 (PA + PA+OA)]}, and (2) the effect of the PA treatment versus the PA+OA treatment (PA vs. PA+OA). Treatment by basal diet interactions were observed for yields of milk and lactose, where FA treatments increased yields of milk and milk lactose in LF but not in HF. Basal diet had no effect on dry matter intake (DMI) or milk yield. Compared with LF, HF increased milk fat yield and 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM) and tended to increase milk fat content and energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield. The FA treatments decreased DMI but increased the yields of milk fat, 3.5% FCM, and ECM, compared with CON, due to increases in mixed and preformed milk FA yields. The PA+OA treatment decreased DMI and milk protein yield compared with PA. In conclusion, a high-fat basal diet increased milk fat production, and the addition of FA supplements to a low-fat basal diet increased milk lactose yield and tended to increase milk yield. Additionally, regardless of basal diet fat level, FA supplements increased production responses compared with the non-FA-supplemented control diet.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL