Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pharmacol Res ; 80: 9-13, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24368192

ABSTRACT

Multiple studies indicate that endothelin antagonism may have a protective effect for chronic kidney disease. Despite that, clinical studies using avosentan have been halted due to adverse effects including fluid overload. Therefore, we aimed at investigating whether avosentan may have protective effects against hypertensive nephropathy at doses below those inducing fluid-retention. We used double transgenic rats (dTGR), overexpressing both the human renin and angiotensinogen gene, which develop malignant hypertension. Effects of avosentan alone or in combination with low-dose of valsartan (angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist) on end-organ damage were studied. Avosentan induced a decrease of diuresis (18.3%) with a consequent decrease in hematocrit (8.3%) only at the highest dose investigated (100mg/kg). Treatment with the combination of avosentan and valsartan (10 and 0.1mg/kg, once daily by gavage, respectively) decreased albuminuria to a greater extent than each compound given alone (avosentan: 19.6mg/24h; valsartan: 12.9mg/24h; avosentan+valsartan: 1.7mg/24h, data are median values). Histological severity score also showed a drastic reduction of kidney damage. Furthermore, avosentan alone or in combination therapy dramatically decreased mortality compared to the 100% in untreated animals. These data support a therapeutic effect of avosentan at doses below those inducing fluid overload.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Renal/drug therapy , Nephritis/drug therapy , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Albuminuria/drug therapy , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensinogen/biosynthesis , Angiotensinogen/genetics , Animals , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Diuresis/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hematocrit , Humans , Hypertension, Renal/mortality , Hypertension, Renal/pathology , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney/pathology , Male , Nephritis/mortality , Nephritis/pathology , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Rats , Rats, Transgenic , Renin/biosynthesis , Renin/genetics , Tetrazoles/administration & dosage , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Valine/administration & dosage , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Valine/therapeutic use , Valsartan
2.
Front Physiol ; 3: 103, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22529820

ABSTRACT

Several clinical studies have investigated the potential benefits of endothelin receptor antagonism in chronic pathologies such as diabetic kidney disease. However, fluid retention and edema have been identified as major side effects of endothelin receptor antagonists. In the present study we hypothesized that avosentan which was described as a predominant ET(A) receptor antagonist would produce fluid retention at high concentrations where non-specific blockade of ET(B) receptors may occur. Incremental doses of the predominant ET(A) receptor antagonist SPP301 (0.003; 0.03; 3 mg/kg) were administered intravenously to anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats undergoing saline diuresis. Diuresis, glomerular filtration rate, and blood pressure (BP) were monitored. SPP301 decreased urine output (5.6; 34.8; 58.8% decrease from vehicle) and fractional excretion of water (5.7; 31.7; 56.4% decrease from vehicle) in a concentration-dependent manner. Glomerular filtration rate was unchanged while BP was reduced by 10 mmHg only by the highest dose of SPP301. Administration of the ET(B) selective receptor antagonist BQ-788 (3 mg/kg) following SPP301 3 mg/kg did not further decrease urine output or water excretion and was without effect on glomerular filtration rate. These data indicate that increasing concentrations of SPP301 may also block ET(B) receptors and cause antidiuresis. This effect could explain why fluid retention and edema occur during treatment with predominant ET(A) receptor blockers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL