Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Ophthalmol ; 2022: 9724160, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36457950

ABSTRACT

Background: The aim of this study was to apply bioinformatic analysis to develop a robust miRNA signature and construct a nomogram model in uveal melanoma (UM) to improve prognosis prediction. Methods: miRNA and mRNA sequencing data for 80 UM patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The patients were further randomly assigned to a training set (n = 40, used to identify key miRNAs) and a testing set (n = 40, used to internally verify the signature). Then, miRNAs data of GSE84976 and GSE68828 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database for outside verification. Combining univariate analysis and LASSO methods for identifying a robust miRNA biomarker in training set and the signature was validated in testing set and outside dataset. A prognostic nomogram was constructed and combined with decision curve as well as reduction curve analyses to assess the application of clinical usefulness. Finally, we constructed a miRNA-mRNA regulator network in UM and conducted pathway enrichment analysis according to the mRNAs in the network. Results: In total, a 3-miRNA was identified and validated that can robustly predict UM patients' survival. According to univariate and multivariate cox analyses, age at diagnosis, tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification, stage, and the 3-miRNA signature significantly correlated with the survival outcomes. These characteristics were used to establish nomogram. The nomogram worked well for predicting 1 and 3 years of overall survival time. The decision curve of nomogram revealed a good clinical usefulness of our nomogram. What's more, a miRNA-mRNA network was constructed. Pathway enrichment showed that this network was largely involved in mRNA processing, the mRNA surveillance pathway, the spliceosome, and so on. Conclusions: We developed a 3-miRNA biomarker and constructed a prognostic nomogram, which may afford a quantitative tool for predicting the survival of UM. Our finding also provided some new potential targets for the treatment of UM.

2.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 674, 2020 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682400

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify gene signatures and prognostic values of m6A methylation regulators in uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS: The RNA sequencing dataset and corresponding clinical information were downloaded from TCGA and GEO database. Based on the expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators, the patients were further clustered into different groups by applying the "ClassDiscovery" algorithm. Best survival analysis was performed to select prognostic m6A regulators and multivariate cox regression analysis was applied to constructed m6A regulators signature. The association between mutations and m6A regulators was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis tests and clinical characteristics were examined by using chi-square test. RESULTS: Totally, we identified two molecular subtypes of UM (C1/2) by applying consensus clustering to m6A RNA methylation regulators. In contrast to the C1 subtype, the C2 subtype associates with a better prognosis, has higher percentage of subtype 1 and lower percentage of Monosomy 3 which have been regarded as the well established prognostic markers for UM. The malignant hallmarks of mTORC1 signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, interferon-a response and apoptosis signaling are also significantly enriched in the C1 subtype. Moreover, a 3-m6A regulators signature was constructed by multivariate cox regression analysis method, which closely correlated with chromosome 3 status, subtype 1 of UM and can robustly predict patients' overall survival time. CONCLUSIONS: m6A RNA methylation regulators take a crucial role in the potential malignant progression and prognostic value of UM and might be regarded as a new promising biomarker for UM prognosis and treatment strategy development.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Melanoma/mortality , RNA/genetics , Transcriptome/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/mortality , Datasets as Topic , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Methylation , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Sequence Analysis, RNA , Survival Analysis , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics
3.
Cancer Biomark ; 27(3): 343-356, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31903983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults, which has a high mortality rate and worse prognosis. Therefore, early potential molecular detection and prognostic evaluation seem more important for early diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Gene expression data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas-Uveal melanomas database. Survival genes were identified by univariate analysis and were regarded to be associated with the overall survival of UM patients. Then, pathway enrichment analysis of these survival genes was performed. Robust likelihood-based survival model and multivariate survival analysis were conducted to identify more reliable genes and the prognostic signature for UM survival prediction. Two internal datasets and another two UM datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were used for the validation of prognostic signature. RESULTS: Firstly, 2,010 survival genes were screened by univariate survival analysis. GO and KEGG analysis revealed that these genes were mainly involved in pathways such as mRNA processing, RNA splicing, spliceosome and ubiquitin mediated proteolysis. Secondly, a six-gene signature was identified by Robust likelihood-based survival model approach. The gene expression of the six genes can successfully divide UM samples into high- and low-risk groups and have strong survival prediction ability. What's more, the expression of six genes was compared in 80 healthy adipose tissue samples obtained from GTEx (Genotype-Tissue Expression) database and further validated in internal datasets and GEO datasets, which also can predict UM patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: The six genes (SH2D3A, TMEM201, LZTS1, CREG1, NIPA1 and HIST1H4E) model might play a vital role in prognosis of UM, which should be helpful for further insight into the treatment of uveal melanoma.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/mortality , Uveal Neoplasms/genetics , Uveal Neoplasms/mortality , Base Sequence , Databases, Genetic , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Uveal Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL