ABSTRACT
AIM: To explore the value of B-flow (B-mode blood flow) imaging and its enhanced mode in perforator mapping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before surgery, B-flow imaging, enhanced B-flow imaging, colour Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) were used to detect the skin-perforating vessels and small vessels in the fat layer of the donor site. Taking the intra-operative results as the reference standard, the diagnostic consistency and efficiency of the four modes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using the Friedman M-test, Cochran's Q-test, and the Z-test. RESULTS: Thirty flaps were excised, with 34 skin-perforating vessels and 25 non-skin-perforating vessels, as confirmed during surgery. In order of the number of skin-perforating vessels detected, the results showed that enhanced B-flow imaging detected more vessels than B-flow imaging and CDFI (all p<0.05), CEUS detected more vessels than B-flow imaging and CDFI (all p<0.05), B-flow imaging detected more vessels than CDFI (p<0.05). All four modes had remarkable and satisfactory diagnostic consistency and effectiveness, but B-flow imaging was the best (sensitivity 100%, specificity 92%, Youden index 0.92). In order of the number of small vessels in the fat layer detected, the results showed that enhanced B-flow imaging detected more vessels than CEUS, B-flow imaging, and CDFI (all p<0.05). CEUS detected more vessels than B-flow imaging and CDFI (all p<0.05). CONCLUSION: B-flow imaging is an alternative method for perforator mapping. Enhanced B-flow imaging can reveal the microcirculation of flaps.
