Does point-of-care ultrasonography improve diagnostic accuracy in emergency department patients with undifferentiated hypotension? An international randomized controlled trial from the SHOC-ED investigators.

PURPOSE: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is an established tool in the management of hypotensive patients in the emergency department (ED). We compared the diagnostic accuracy of a POCUS protocol versus standard assessment without POCUS in patients with undifferentiated hypotension. METHODS: This was an international, multicenter randomized controlled trial included three EDs in North America and three in South Africa from September 2012 to December 2016. Hypotensive patients were randomized to early POCUS protocol plus standard care (POCUS group) or standard care without POCUS (control group). Initial and secondary diagnoses were recorded at 0 and 60 min. The main outcome was measures of diagnostic accuracy of a POCUS protocol in differentiating between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic shock. Secondary outcomes were diagnostic performance for shock sub-types, as well as changes in perceived category of shock and overall diagnosis. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed for 270 of 273 patients. For cardiogenic shock, the POCUS-based diagnostic approach (POCUS) performed similarly to the non-POCUS approach (control) for specificity [95.5% (89.9-98.5) vs.93.8% (87.7-97.5)]; positive likelihood ratio (17.92 vs 14.80); negative likelihood ratio (0.21 vs 0.09) and diagnostic odds ratio (85.6 vs 166.57), with a similar overall diagnostic accuracy between the two approaches [93.7% (88-97.2) vs 93.6% (87.8-97.2)]. Diagnostic performance measures were similar across sub-categories of shock. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial to compare diagnostic performance of a POCUS protocol to standard care without POCUS in undifferentiated hypotensive ED patients. POCUS performed well diagnostically in undifferentiated hypotensive patients, especially as a rule-in test; however, performance did not differ meaningfully from standard assessment.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'échographie au point d'intervention (POCUS) est un outil bien établi dans la gestion des patients hypotendus dans le service des urgences. Nous avons comparé la précision diagnostique d'un protocole POCUS par rapport à une évaluation standard sans POCUS chez des patients présentant une hypotension indifférenciée. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'un essai contrôlé randomisé international multicentrique incluant 3 services d'urgence en Amérique du Nord et 3 en Afrique du Sud de septembre 2012 à décembre 2016. Les patients hypotenseurs ont été répartis par randomisation selon le protocole POCUS précoce plus les soins standard (groupe POCUS) ou les soins standard sans POCUS (groupe témoin). Les diagnostics initiaux et secondaires ont été enregistrés à 0 et 60 minutes. Le principal résultat était la mesure de la précision diagnostique d'un protocole POCUS pour différencier le choc cardiogénique du choc non cardiogénique. Les résultats secondaires étaient la performance diagnostique pour les sous-types de chocs, ainsi que les changements dans la perception de la catégorie de choc et du diagnostic global. RéSULTATS: Le suivi a été complété pour 270 des 273 patients. Pour le choc cardiogénique, l'approche diagnostique basée sur le POCUS (POCUS) a donné des résultats similaires à l'approche non-POCUS (Contrôle) pour la spécificité (95,5 % (89,9­98,5) vs 93,8 % (87,7­97,5)) ; Rapport de vraisemblance positif (17,92 vs 14,80) ; Le rapport de vraisemblance négatif (0,21 vs 0,09) et le rapport de cotes diagnostiques (85,6 vs 166,57), avec une précision diagnostique globale similaire entre les deux approches (93,7 % (88­97,2) vs 93,6 % (87,8­97,2). Les mesures de performance diagnostique étaient similaires dans toutes les sous-catégories de choc. CONCLUSION: Il s'agit du premier essai contrôlé randomisé visant à comparer la performance diagnostique d'un protocole POCUS aux soins standard sans POCUS chez des patients hypotendus indifférenciés aux urgences. La POCUS a donné de bons résultats diagnostiques chez les patients hypotendus indifférenciés, surtout en tant que test de référence ; cependant, les performances ne diffèrent pas de manière significative de l'évaluation standard.

A retrospective review and multi-specialty, evidence-based guideline for the management of necrotising otitis externa.

BACKGROUND: Necrotising otitis externa is a progressive infection of the external auditory canal which extends to affect the temporal bone and adjacent structures. Progression of the disease process can result in serious sequelae, including cranial nerve palsies and death. There is currently no formal published treatment guideline. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to integrate current evidence and data from our own retrospective case series in order to develop a guideline to optimise necrotising otitis externa patient management. METHODS: A retrospective review of necrotising otitis externa cases within NHS Lothian, Scotland, between 2013 and 2018, was performed, along with a PubMed review. RESULTS: Prevalent presenting signs, symptoms and patient demographic data were established. Furthermore, features of cases associated with adverse outcomes were defined. A key feature of the guideline is defining at-risk patients with initial intensive treatment. Investigations and outcomes are assessed and treatment adjusted appropriately. CONCLUSION: This multi-departmental approach has facilitated the development of a succinct, systematic guideline for the management of necrotising otitis externa. Initial patient outcomes appear promising.

Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis associated with injecting new psychoactive substances.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis (IE) associated with injection of new psychoactive substances (NPS) in Edinburgh from 2014 to 2016 was observed. We compared these infections with a series of S. aureus IE cases in a non-injecting population within Edinburgh. METHODS: NPS-associated S. aureus IE diagnosed between 1 January 2014 and 31 May 2016 in persons who inject drugs (PWID) were compared with a series of S. aureus IE cases from non-PWID. RESULTS: There was a fourfold increase in the annual incidence of S. aureus IE, mainly due to NPS use in PWID. A larger vegetation diameter was seen on echocardiogram in PWID vs non-PWID (median 1.7 cm vs 0.65 cm; p = 0.009) with more embolic complications in PWID (15 PWID vs 1 non-PWID; p = 2.1 x 10-7) but no difference in 90-day mortality (2 PWID vs 4 non-PWID; p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: NPS-associated S. aureus IE correlated with complications, such as deep organ embolic abscesses, that were different from non-PWID S. aureus IE. The alarming increase in incidence resolved with targeted public health and legislative measures.

Survey of four day care facilities at the Royal Edinburgh Hospital.

A survey is described which compared patients' rehabilitation status, activities, needs and reasons for attending at four different psychiatric day care units attached to one hospital. The views of staff and patients were also examined.

Haemophilus influenzae subtyping by SDS-PAGE of whole-cell polypeptides.

Strains of Haemophilus influenzae isolated from patients in N.E. Scotland between 1983 and 1986 have been subtyped by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of whole-cell polypeptides. Gels were stained with Coomassie blue and polypeptide profiles were analysed using the Dice coefficient of similarity. Type b strains were all closely related, the 19 strains analysed being grouped at a 90% similarity level into one large (13 strains) and one small (3 strains) cluster with 3 strains being ungrouped. Thirty-six non-typable, epidemiologically unrelated strains were subtyped; one pair of strains had indistinguishable polypeptide profiles. The polypeptide profiles of the remaining strains showed much heterogeneity, although groups of strains isolated from the same patient over short periods showed indistinguishable profiles.