ABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100125.].
ABSTRACT
Background: Viral sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 has been used for outbreak investigation, but there is limited evidence supporting routine use for infection prevention and control (IPC) within hospital settings. Methods: We conducted a prospective non-randomised trial of sequencing at 14 acute UK hospital trusts. Sites each had a 4-week baseline data collection period, followed by intervention periods comprising 8 weeks of 'rapid' (<48 hr) and 4 weeks of 'longer-turnaround' (5-10 days) sequencing using a sequence reporting tool (SRT). Data were collected on all hospital-onset COVID-19 infections (HOCIs; detected ≥48 hr from admission). The impact of the sequencing intervention on IPC knowledge and actions, and on the incidence of probable/definite hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), was evaluated. Results: A total of 2170 HOCI cases were recorded from October 2020 to April 2021, corresponding to a period of extreme strain on the health service, with sequence reports returned for 650/1320 (49.2%) during intervention phases. We did not detect a statistically significant change in weekly incidence of HAIs in longer-turnaround (incidence rate ratio 1.60, 95% CI 0.85-3.01; p=0.14) or rapid (0.85, 0.48-1.50; p=0.54) intervention phases compared to baseline phase. However, IPC practice was changed in 7.8 and 7.4% of all HOCI cases in rapid and longer-turnaround phases, respectively, and 17.2 and 11.6% of cases where the report was returned. In a 'per-protocol' sensitivity analysis, there was an impact on IPC actions in 20.7% of HOCI cases when the SRT report was returned within 5 days. Capacity to respond effectively to insights from sequencing was breached in most sites by the volume of cases and limited resources. Conclusions: While we did not demonstrate a direct impact of sequencing on the incidence of nosocomial transmission, our results suggest that sequencing can inform IPC response to HOCIs, particularly when returned within 5 days. Funding: COG-UK is supported by funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) (grant code: MC_PC_19027), and Genome Research Limited, operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute. Clinical trial number: NCT04405934.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Infection Control/methods , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , HospitalsABSTRACT
Nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections have severely affected bed capacity and patient flow. We utilized whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to identify outbreaks and focus infection control resources and intervention during the United Kingdom's second pandemic wave in late 2020. Phylogenetic analysis of WGS and epidemiological data pinpointed an initial transmission event to an admission ward, with immediate prior community infection linkage documented. High incidence of asymptomatic staff infection with genetically identical viral sequences was also observed, which may have contributed to the propagation of the outbreak. WGS allowed timely nosocomial transmission intervention measures, including admissions ward point-of-care testing and introduction of portable HEPA14 filters. Conversely, WGS excluded nosocomial transmission in 2 instances with temporospatial linkage, conserving time and resources. In summary, WGS significantly enhanced understanding of SARS-CoV-2 clusters in a hospital setting, both identifying high-risk areas and conversely validating existing control measures in other units, maintaining clinical service overall.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Whole Genome Sequencing , Asymptomatic Infections , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Health Personnel , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment , Phylogeny , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are a global health concern. Nosocomial outbreaks have been reported globally with patient-to-patient transmission felt to be the most frequent route of cross-transmission. AIM: To describe the investigation and control of an outbreak of healthcare-associated New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) CPE on a haematology ward, over 2 months. METHODS: Four patients acquired CPE; all had gastrointestinal tract colonisation with two subsequently developing bacteraemias. The outbreak team performed a retrospective review, prospective case finding and environmental sampling using swabs, settle plates, air and water sampling. Immediate control measures were implemented including appropriate isolation of cases and additional ward cleaning with chlorine disinfectant, ultra-violet light decontamination and hydrogen peroxide. FINDINGS: Following two cases of nosocomial acquired CPE prospective case finding identified two further cases. 4.6% of the initial environmental samples were positive for CPE including from waste water sites, the ward sluice and the ward kitchen. Three of the four CPE isolates were identical on pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing. Detection of the CPE from the ward kitchen environmental samples suggests a possible role for cross transmission. CONCLUSION: This is the first CPE outbreak report to highlight the role of a ward kitchen as a possible source of cross-transmission. In view of this we suggest ward kitchens are reviewed and investigated in nosocomial CPE outbreaks.
ABSTRACT
Infection expertise in the NHS has historically been provided predominantly by hospital-based medical microbiologists responsible for provision of diagnostic services and advice to front-line clinicians. While most hospitals had consultant-led microbiology departments, infectious iiseases departments were based in a small number of specialist centres. The demand for infection expertise is growing in the NHS, driven by advances in medical care, increasing awareness of the impact of antibiotic resistant and healthcare associated infections and threats from emerging infectious diseases. At the same time diagnostic services are being reorganised into pathology networks. The Combined Infection Training (CIT) is delivering a consultant workforce with expertise both in laboratory diagnostic practice and delivery of direct patient care. These changes create challenges for delivery of high quality infection expertise equitably across the NHS. They also offer an opportunity to shape infection services to meet clinical and laboratory demands. To date there has not been an attempt to bring together a single set of best practice guidelines for the requirements of an infection service. This document sets out seven standards. These are written to be practical and flexible according to the diverse ways in which infection expertise may be required across the NHS. It has been prepared by the Clinical Services Committee of the British Infection Association drawing on published evidence and guidance where they exist and on the group's extensive experience of delivering infection services in hospitals across the NHS. It was then refined with input from the RCP Joint Specialist committee (JSC) and the RCPath Specialist Advisory Committee (SAC) and through consultation with the RCPath membership. It has been endorsed by the Royal College of Pathologists and the Royal College of Physicians. It will be reviewed annually by the CSC and updated as additional evidence becomes available.
ABSTRACT
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are nosocomial pathogens associated with significant morbidity in immunosuppressed patients. Stool culture is considered the gold standard for VRE screening. However, in a clinical environment, there are difficulties associated with the practicalities of obtaining stool samples. Groin swabs, routinely collected as part of the mandatory admissions policy for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening were used to detect VRE. In direct comparison, stool culture had better sensitivity to groin swabs. However, groin swabs with broth enrichment allowed earlier detection of VRE carriage in 14 patients from whom stool samples could not be obtained in a timely manner.