Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
JACC Adv ; 3(7): 100977, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39129997

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain at increased risk of thromboembolism despite apparent maintenance of sinus rhythm with the cause often attributed to periods of asymptomatic AF. Atrial mechanical discordance, with the body of the left atrium (LA) in sinus rhythm and the left atrial appendage (LAA) in AF may also be a contributor. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm and LAA and/right atrial appendage (RAA) Doppler ejection phenotype (transesophageal echocardiography [TEE]) discordance in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: A total of 124 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), CABG and valve surgery, or isolated valve repair or replacement (valve ± CABG) were prospectively studied. Intraoperative surface ECG rhythm strip and TEE were performed before cardiopulmonary bypass. The ECG and TEE LAA/RAA Doppler spectrum were independently classified as sinus or AF. Results: Of 107 patients (age 65 ± 12 years; 31% female; 65% CABG, 31% valve ± CABG) without a history of AF, 39 (36%) had ECG and LAA and/or RAA discordance (ECG/LAA Doppler discordance, n = 12 [11%]; ECG/RAA Doppler discordance, n = 35 [33%]). There was no significant difference between concordant and discordant groups with regard to age, gender, history of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, or stroke (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: A large minority of patients without a history of AF undergoing cardiac surgery have ECG/atrial appendage Doppler discordance, a setting that may promote thromboembolism in non-anticoagulated patients. Clinical parameters do not identify patients at increased risk for discordance.

2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098723

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have indicated that increased obesity in patients with established peripheral artery disease (PAD) is inversely associated with disease prognosis, a phenomenon coined as the "obesity paradox". A major cause of criticism in studies investigating the obesity paradox is the use of body mass index (BMI) as a surrogate marker in defining and quantifying the degree or severity of obesity. We conducted a retrospective review to verify whether the obesity paradox persists in patients with PAD when using body surface area (BSA) as an alternative anthropometric measure. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery (open or endovascular) for PAD between January 2009 and March 2020 were identified from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) national database. The association between BSA/BMI and risk of post-operative complications was evaluated using logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analysis, both of which adjusted for demographic and comorbid risk predictors. When analyzing BSA and BMI as categorical variables, patients were grouped according to BSA quintiles and the World Health Organization (WHO) BMI categories. RESULTS: A total of 130,428 patients were included based on our eligibility criteria, of which 85,394 (65.5%) were men. Patients were typically hypertensive (87.8%), diabetic (50.4%), and overweight (63.0% over 25 kg/m2). Patients with a high BMI or BSA typically presented at a younger age and with greater pre-operative administration of drugs (statin, ACE-inhibitor, anticoagulant, and beta blocker). Our results indicate that BSA and BMI are inversely associated with post-operative risk of all-cause morbidity, mortality, and cardiac complications. This finding was displayed when analyzing BMI/BSA as a continuous variable, or when indexing patients into BMI/BSA groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that the obesity paradox persists in patients with PAD when using either BMI or BSA as anthropometric measures. Future studies with a prospective design and utilizing newer anthropometric indices should be conducted to fully verify the presence of this phenomenon.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39048413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study assess the feasibility of integrating virtual reality (VR) simulation into the central venous catheter (CVC) placement training curriculum. DESIGN: The study consists of 3 parts: (1) Evaluating current manikin-based training for CVC placement through surveys for senior first-year anesthesia residents and cardiac anesthesia faculty who supervise resident performing the procedure; (2) Interventional study training novice trainees with VR simulator and assessing their reaction satisfaction; and (3) pilot study integrating VR training sessions into CVC training curriculum for first-year anesthesia residents. SETTING: Conducted at a single academic-affiliated medical center from December 2022 to August 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Junior first-year anesthesia residents. INTERVENTIONS: VR training sessions for CVC placements using the Vantari VR system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome: novice trainees' satisfaction with VR training for CVC procedure. Satisfaction of resident and faculty with standard manikin-based training was also collected. Faculty expressed concerns about residents' confidence and perceived knowledge in performing CVC placement independently. Novice trainees showed high satisfaction and perceived usefulness with VR training, particularly in understanding procedural steps and developing spatial awareness. Pilot integration of VR training into the curriculum demonstrated comparable training times and emphasized structured stepwise training modules to ensure completion of vital procedural steps. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the potential of VR simulation as a complementary training tool for CVC placement rather than a substitution of standard manikin training. VR is offering immersive experiences and addressing limitations of traditional manikin-based training methods. The integration of VR into training curricula warrants further exploration to optimize procedural proficiency and patient safety in clinical practice.

5.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(9): 2070-2079, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918095

ABSTRACT

The incorporation of 3D imaging into diagnostic and interventional echocardiography has rapidly expanded in recent years. Applications such as multiplanar reconstruction that were once considered research tools and required off-cart analysis can now readily be performed at the point of image acquisition and in real-time during live image acquisition for procedural guidance. While the application and quality of 3D images have significantly improved in recent years, there remains a noticeable lag in the evolution of artificial intelligence that would further simplify the interpretative processes, both during live sessions and offline analyses. Users are still required to mentally reconstruct sliced images during multiplanar reconstruction based on color-coded planes. While this may be an effortless task for the seasoned echocardiographer, it can be a challenging task for echocardiographers who are less familiar with 3D imaging and multiplanar reconstruction. This article describes the utility of using 3D markers to aid in image interpretation.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional , Humans , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/methods , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/standards , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods
6.
JACC Case Rep ; 29(8): 102278, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774795

ABSTRACT

Implantation of prosthetic heart valves may result in both early and late complications. Early complications are usually structural and can have significant hemodynamic consequences. In this clinical vignette, we highlight how malposition of a newly implanted aortic valve resulted in alterations of coronary perfusion pressure physiology and subsequent significant hemodynamic effects.

7.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(7): 1460-1466, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580474

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of identifying the true aortic valve (AV) annulus using 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, with the goal of highlighting potential misidentification issues in clinical practice. DESIGN: An observational study employing 3-dimensional (3D) datasets to generate 2D images of the AV annulus for analysis. SETTING: The study was conducted in an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography datasets were obtained from 11 patients with normal AV and aortic root anatomies undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Attending anesthesiologists certified by the National Board of Echocardiography (NBE) were approached subsequently to participate in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Two images per patient were generated from 3D datasets, reflecting the mid-esophageal long-axis view of the AV, a true AV annulus image, and an off-axis image. A survey was distributed to NBE-certified perioperative echocardiographers across 12 academic institutions to identify the true AV annulus from these images. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The survey, completed by 45 qualified respondents, revealed a significant misidentification rate of the true AV annulus, with only 36.8% of responses correctly identifying it. The rate of correct identification varied across image sets, with 44.4% of participants unable to correctly identify any true AV annulus image. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the limitations of 2D echocardiography in accurately identifying the true AV annulus in complex 3D structures like the aortic root. The findings suggest a need for greater reliance on advanced imaging modalities, such as 3D echocardiography, to improve accuracy in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Humans , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/methods , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/standards , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/standards , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards
9.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(5): 1251-1259, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423884

ABSTRACT

New artificial intelligence tools have been developed that have implications for medical usage. Large language models (LLMs), such as the widely used ChatGPT developed by OpenAI, have not been explored in the context of anesthesiology education. Understanding the reliability of various publicly available LLMs for medical specialties could offer insight into their understanding of the physiology, pharmacology, and practical applications of anesthesiology. An exploratory prospective review was conducted using 3 commercially available LLMs--OpenAI's ChatGPT GPT-3.5 version (GPT-3.5), OpenAI's ChatGPT GPT-4 (GPT-4), and Google's Bard--on questions from a widely used anesthesia board examination review book. Of the 884 eligible questions, the overall correct answer rates were 47.9% for GPT-3.5, 69.4% for GPT-4, and 45.2% for Bard. GPT-4 exhibited significantly higher performance than both GPT-3.5 and Bard (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). None of the LLMs met the criteria required to secure American Board of Anesthesiology certification, according to the 70% passing score approximation. GPT-4 significantly outperformed GPT-3.5 and Bard in terms of overall performance, but lacked consistency in providing explanations that aligned with scientific and medical consensus. Although GPT-4 shows promise, current LLMs are not sufficiently advanced to answer anesthesiology board examination questions with passing success. Further iterations and domain-specific training may enhance their utility in medical education.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Humans , Artificial Intelligence , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Language
11.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(3): 755-770, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) management reduces rates of adverse complications. DESIGN: A retrospective before-after study. SETTING: A tertiary-care academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent open or endovascular rAAA repair; data were stratified into before-protocol implementation (group 1: 2015-2018) and after-protocol implementation (group 2: 2019-2022) groups. INTERVENTION: The protocol details the workflow for vascular surgery, anesthesia, emergency department, and operating room staff for a rAAA case; training was accomplished through yearly workshops. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause morbidity and other major complications. Differences in postoperative complication rates between groups were assessed using Pearson's χ2 test. Of the 77 patients included undergoing rAAA repair, 41 (53.2%) patients were in group 1, and 36 (46.8%) patients were in group 2. Patients in group 2 had a significantly shorter median time to incision (1.0 v 0.7 hours, p = 0.022) and total procedure time (180.0 v 160.5 minutes, p = 0.039) for both endovascular and open repair. After protocol implementation, patients undergoing endovascular repair exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (46.2% v 20.0%, p = 0.048), all-cause morbidity (65.4% v 44.0%, p = 0.050), and renal complications (15.4% v 0.0%, p = 0.036); patients undergoing open repair for a rAAA exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (53.3% v 27.3%, p = 0.018) and bowel ischemia (26.7% v 0.0%, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for the management of a rAAA may reduce rates of adverse complications and improve the quality of care.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Aortic Rupture , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Controlled Before-After Studies , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors
12.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 17(5): 471-485, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38099912

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The CLASP IID randomized trial (Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System Pivotal Clinical Trial) demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL system for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) in patients at prohibitive surgical risk with significant symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). OBJECTIVES: This study describes the echocardiographic methods and outcomes from the CLASP IID trial and analyzes baseline variables associated with residual mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤1+. METHODS: An independent echocardiographic core laboratory assessed echocardiographic parameters based on American Society of Echocardiography guidelines focusing on MR mechanism, severity, and feasibility of M-TEER. Factors associated with residual MR ≤1+ were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: In 180 randomized patients, baseline echocardiographic parameters were well matched between the PASCAL (n = 117) and MitraClip (n = 63) groups, with flail leaflets present in 79.2% of patients. Baseline MR was 4+ in 76.4% and 3+ in 23.6% of patients. All patients achieved MR ≤2+ at discharge. The proportion of patients with MR ≤1+ was similar in both groups at discharge but diverged at 6 months, favoring PASCAL (83.7% vs 71.2%). Overall, patients with a smaller flail gap were significantly more likely to achieve MR ≤1+ at discharge (adjusted OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.99). Patients treated with PASCAL and those with a smaller flail gap were significantly more likely to sustain MR ≤1+ to 6 months (adjusted OR: 2.72 and 0.76; 95% CI: 1.08-6.89 and 0.60-0.98, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The study used DMR-specific echocardiographic methodology for M-TEER reflecting current guidelines and advances in 3-dimensional echocardiography. Treatment with PASCAL and a smaller flail gap were significant factors in sustaining MR ≤1+ to 6 months. Results demonstrate that MR ≤1+ is an achievable benchmark for successful M-TEER. (Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System Pivotal Clinical Trial [CLASP IID]; NCT03706833).


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Mitral Valve , Predictive Value of Tests , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Male , Female , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Aged , Risk Factors , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Time Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Feasibility Studies , Risk Assessment , Prosthesis Design , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL