ABSTRACT
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of acetazolamide as an add-on diuretic therapy in patients with heart failure. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. A systematic literature search was independently performed by two authors using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify relevant studies assessing the use of acetazolamide in patients with heart failure. The search keywords included "acetazolamide" and "heart failure". The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included natriuresis (mmol/L), diuresis (Liters) and decongestion (absence of signs of volume overload) by 72 hours. Other outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included hospitalization due to heart failure and all-cause mortality. A total of three studies included a total of 569 heart failure patients. The number of patients achieved decongestion was significantly higher in patients receiving acetazolamide compared to the patients randomized in the control group (RR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06-1.67). Compared to patients in the control group, mean natriuresis was significantly higher in acetazolamide patients (MD: 74.91, 95% CI: 39.85-109.97). Diuresis was significantly higher in patients receiving acetazolamide compared to the control group (MD: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.16-0.72). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that acetazolamide may have beneficial impacts on heart failure patients by increasing the number of successful decongestions. Additionally, patients who were treated with acetazolamide had significantly higher natriuresis and diuresis compared to patients in the control group.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes between those who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone and CABG with mitral valve repair (MVR) in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. The present study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two authors performed a comprehensive search of international databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant studies published from inception to March 1, 2023. The search was performed again before the submission of the manuscript on March 20, 2023. Primary outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included early mortality and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) score from baseline, change in ejection fraction (EF) from baseline (%), and major cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 13 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Out of 13 included studies, four were randomized control trials (RCTs) and nine were retrospective cohort studies. The pooled analysis showed that early mortality was significantly lower in patients in the CABG group compared to the CABG+MVR group (risk ratio [RR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.70). Long-term mortality was also lower in patients who underwent CABG compared to patients in the CABG+MVR group. However, the difference was statistically insignificant (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.02). No significant differences were reported in the EF score between patients who underwent CABG and patients who underwent CABG plus MVR (mean difference [MD]: 0.40, 95% CI: -1.90, 2.69). NYHA score was significantly lower in patients in the CABG+repair group compared to the CABG alone group (MD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.72). In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that concomitant MVR during CABG may not improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Further clinical trials are needed to investigate this intervention in more detail.