Is Posterior Femoral Neck Cortex an Obstacle in Achieving Sagittal Plane Balance of Uncemented Straight Femoral Stem?

Summary of Background Data: There is a paucity of the literature that aims to improve sagittal plane balance of femoral stem in hip arthroplasty. We have comparatively evaluated the effect of trimming the posterior cortex left in situ after femoral neck osteotomy and counter-clockwise rotation of starting awl with respect to their ability to achieve neutral alignment of femoral stem in sagittal plane. Questions/Purposes: (1) Which of the two techniques under reference is more reliable in achieving a sagittal plane balance of the femoral stem in the femoral canal? (2) Does either of the two techniques have the potential to adversely affect other parameters for the optimum placement of femoral stem? Patients and Methods: This prospective study involved a total of 60 patients (age group of 18 to 60 years) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a standard posterolateral approach. They were randomized into groups (1) PNCT (n = 30): femoral canal preparation was done by posterior neck cortex trimming method; (2) CCRA (n = 30): femoral canal preparation was done by counter-clockwise rotation of starting awl. Postoperatively, radiographs and computed tomography were obtained and angle of femoral stem with the femoral canal in coronal and sagittal plane, femoral stem tip deviation in coronal and sagittal plane, anteversion of the femoral stem, duration of canal preparation and blood loss were analyzed between the two groups. Results: Based on our results, there is a significantly better sagittal alignment of the femoral stem within the femoral canal, both in terms of angle of the femoral stem with the femoral canal (p < 0.001) and the deviation of the femoral stem tip from the center of the medullary canal (p < 0.001) when the posterior neck cortex was trimmed. Canal preparation by trimming the posterior neck cortex took a mean of 11.93 min (range 8-15 min) against the mean duration of 6.87 min (range; 5 min to 9 min) in the other group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Trimming the posterior femoral neck cortex after neck osteotomy results in better sagittal plane balance of uncemented straight femoral stem. Level of Evidence: III.

A Comparative Evaluation of Combined Nerve Block Versus Periarticular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain Relief in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Introduction: To minimize the side effects of the central neuraxial blockade to obtain postoperative pain relief, there has been an increasing preference for targeting the peripheral structures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients and Methods: This prospective study was performed between September 2019 and September 2021 and involved 30 patients that were randomized to two groups. One group (n = 15) received combined nerve block (CNB) [obturator nerve, nerve to quadratus femoris, superior gluteal nerve, and femoral nerve], while another group (n = 15) received periarticular infiltrative analgesia (PIA). All the patients were given the same volume and composition of the drug cocktail (20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine, 1 ml (100 mcg) dexmedetomidine, and 29 ml normal saline). Results: The patients in group CNB had a significantly lower visual analog score (VAS) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48 h after surgery (p < 0.05). Patients in group CNB required fewer (p < 0.001) doses of the rescue analgesic (1.67 ± 0.90 doses) as compared to group PIA (3.53 ± 0.64 doses). Time to the first rescue analgesia was significantly longer (p = 0.01) in group CNB (6.71 ± 2.36 h) as compared to group PIA (4.80 ± 1.26 h). However, patients in group PIA had significantly faster sensory (p < 0.001) and motor recovery (p < 0.001) as compared to group CNB. It took significantly longer (p < 0.001) to administer the nerve block (16.87 ± 1.80 min) as compared to periarticular infiltration (6.53 ± 1.18 min). There were no complications in either group. Conclusion: CNB registered significant superiority over PIA with respect to postoperative pain relief and time to rescue analgesia. However, the time taken to administer CNB was significantly higher and the patients in the PIA group had early recovery in sensory and motor modalities. Level of Evidence: III (therapeutic).