Increased FGL1 Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis and Promotes EMT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) is a proliferation- and metabolism-related factor secreted by the liver that is aberrantly expressed and functionally abnormal in human malignancies. However, the role of FGL1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unknown. We analysed FGL1 expression in HNSCC and its impact on patient survival using the TCGA database. The role of FGL1 in HNSCC cells was investigated by Cell Counting Kit-8, colony formation, and Transwell assays. In addition, we conducted in vivo experiments to assess the effect of FGL1 knockdown on tumour growth. We found that FGL1 was highly expressed in HNSCC and correlated with a poor prognosis. Downregulation of FGL1 expression inhibited the proliferation and invasion of HNSCC cells. Furthermore, mechanistic analysis revealed that FGL1 induced an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype and, thus, the malignant progression of HNSCC cells. Finally, xenograft models showed that FGL1 knockdown significantly inhibited EMT in HNSCC in vivo. Our study revealed that FGL1, an oncogene, promotes the malignant progression of HNSCC, providing new perspective on and potential therapeutic target for the treatment of HNSCC.

AVPR2 is a potential prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To explore the potential of AVPR2 in the immunotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), thus providing insights into a novel antitumour strategy. METHODS: In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the AVPR2 gene in HNSCC using public datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus. We explored the potential molecular mechanism of HNSCC in clinical prognosis and tumour immunity from the aspects of gene expression, prognosis, immune subtypes, and immune infiltration. RESULTS: AVPR2 expression was significantly downregulated in primary HNSCC tissue compared with normal tissue. HNSCC patients with high AVPR2 expression had a better prognosis. Moreover, the results of GSEA showed that immune subtype surface AVPR2 is involved in immune modulation. Furthermore, significant strong correlations between AVPR2 expression and infiltrating immune cells existed in HNSCC, and marker genes of infiltrating immune cells were also significantly related to AVPR2 expression in HNSCC. These results suggest that AVPR2 expression can influence the infiltration of tumour immune cells. Finally, we found that only high levels of B-cell infiltration, rather than those of other immune cells, can predict a longer overall survival in patients with HNSCC. Future studies are needed to explore the role of AVPR2 and tumour-infiltrating B cells in HNSCC. CONCLUSIONS: The AVPR2 gene may be a prognostic biomarker of HNSCC. Moreover, AVPR2 may play a role in HNSCC immune modulation, and the regulation of tumour-infiltrating B cells by AVPR2 may be a key link.

Retrospective study comparing anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone for stage II-IVb nasopharyngeal carcinoma and prognostic value of EGFR and VEGF expression.

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of adding anti-EGFR therapy to conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remain uncertain, possibly because only a subgroup of patients show better outcome. To address this issue, we compared the efficacy of CRT plus cetuximab (CTX) or nimotuzumab (NTZ) to CRT alone for stage II-IVb NPC and examined possible prognostic indicators, including tumour EGFR and VEGR expression levels. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective study enrolled 1812 patients at initial NPC diagnosis at Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University between January 2005 and December 2015. The cetuximab or nimotuzumab plus CRT group (CRT+NTZ/CTX) and the conventional chemoradiotherapy group (CRT) were matched by propensity scoring at 1:5, yielding 282 patients at clinical stage II-IVb with 47 in the CRT+NTZ/CTX group and 235 in the CRT group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The endpoints of the present study were locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to investigate EGFR and VEGF expression levels in 31 patients of the CRT+NTZ/CTX group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in LRFS, DMFS and OS, haematologic toxicity reactions, and gastrointestinal reactions between CRT+NTZ/CTX and CRT groups. There was a positive correlation between EGFR and VEGF expression levels. Among CRT+NTZ/CTX patients, those with high EGFR and VEGF expression levels exhibited better DMFS. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of anti-EGFR to cisplatin-based CRT appears to benefit only a subset of stage II-IVb NPC patients, those with elevated EGFR and VEGF expression levels.