ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based treatments gained popularity for migraine treatment. In this manuscript we report the results of a single-arm open pilot study that evaluated the impact of a multimodal web-based intervention combining home-based medication withdrawal, patients' education, and online mindfulness-based interventions. We aimed to address whether our program had the ability to show a change in the observed parameters and the study should therefore be intended as an early phase trial. METHODS: Consecutive patients with chronic migraine associated with medication overuse headache were enrolled, followed-up for 12 months, in a program that included home-based medication withdrawal, education on the correct use of drugs and lifestyle issues, prescription of tailored pharmacological prophylaxis, and attendance to six online mindfulness-based sessions. We tested the effect of the program on improving headache frequency, medication intake, quality of life (QoL), headache impact, depression, self-efficacy, and pain catastrophizing. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients completed the study (10 dropped out). We observed a large improvement in headache frequency, medication intake, headache impact, and QoL, a moderate improvement in pain catastrophizing and a mild improvement in depression symptoms; 70% to 76% of patients achieved 50% or more reduction in headache frequency from baseline to each follow-up (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our multimodal program showed significant improvements in headache frequency, medication intake, and patient-reported outcomes. Future studies are needed to better identify patients who might benefit most from Digital Health Interventions and to demonstrate at least an equivalence in outcome with in-person programs carried out in hospital settings.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of thirteen neurological manifestations in people affected by COVID-19 during the acute phase and at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up time points. METHODS: The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022325505). MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were used as information sources. Eligible studies included original articles of cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and case series with ≥5 subjects that reported the prevalence and type of neurological manifestations, with a minimum follow-up of 3 months after the acute phase of COVID-19 disease. Two independent reviewers screened studies from January 1, 2020, to June 16, 2022. The following manifestations were assessed: neuromuscular disorders, encephalopathy/altered mental status/delirium, movement disorders, dysautonomia, cerebrovascular disorders, cognitive impairment/dementia, sleep disorders, seizures, syncope/transient loss of consciousness, fatigue, gait disturbances, anosmia/hyposmia, and headache. The pooled prevalence and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated at the six pre-specified times. RESULTS: 126 of 6,565 screened studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, accounting for 1,542,300 subjects with COVID-19 disease. Of these, four studies only reported data on neurological conditions other than the 13 selected. The neurological disorders with the highest pooled prevalence estimates (per 100 subjects) during the acute phase of COVID-19 were anosmia/hyposmia, fatigue, headache, encephalopathy, cognitive impairment, and cerebrovascular disease. At 3-month follow-up, the pooled prevalence of fatigue, cognitive impairment, and sleep disorders was still 20% and higher. At six- and 9-month follow-up, there was a tendency for fatigue, cognitive impairment, sleep disorders, anosmia/hyposmia, and headache to further increase in prevalence. At 12-month follow-up, prevalence estimates decreased but remained high for some disorders, such as fatigue and anosmia/hyposmia. Other neurological disorders had a more fluctuating occurrence. DISCUSSION: Neurological manifestations were prevalent during the acute phase of COVID-19 and over the 1-year follow-up period, with the highest overall prevalence estimates for fatigue, cognitive impairment, sleep disorders, anosmia/hyposmia, and headache. There was a downward trend over time, suggesting that neurological manifestations in the early post-COVID-19 phase may be long-lasting but not permanent. However, especially for the 12-month follow-up time point, more robust data are needed to confirm this trend.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cerebrovascular Disorders , Nervous System Diseases , Sleep Wake Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Anosmia , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Headache , Fatigue/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Well-being is a relevant outcome after stroke, potentially impacted by mental health difficulties. We addressed the psychological and cognitive predictors of psychological well-being in a sample of 122 stroke survivors (75 males, 97 with ischemic stroke; mean age 64.1, mean NIHSS 2.9, mean distance from the acute event 5.1 years) admitted to the 'Carlo Besta' Neurological Institute. Trait anxiety (ß = -0.257), state anxiety (ß = -0.208) and symptoms of depression (ß = -0.484) significantly predicted well-being variation (Adj. R2â =â 0.687). These potentially modifiable factors are promising targets for interventions to reduce the burden of illness and enhance the recovery process.
Subject(s)
Psychological Well-Being , Stroke , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cognition , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Stroke/psychology , Survivors , FemaleABSTRACT
Pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia are commonly altered in patients with chronic migraine associated with medication overuse headache (CM-MOH) and tend to improve in parallel with clinical improvement. The relation between pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia is poorly understood in patients with CM-MOH receiving OnabotulinumtoxinA therapy. In this single-arm open-label longitudinal observational study, patients with CM-MOH were assigned to structured withdrawal and then administered OnabotulinumtoxinA (5 sessions on a three-month basis, 195 UI per 31 sites). Headache frequency, medication intake, disability, impact, cutaneous allodynia and pain catastrophizing were evaluated with specific questionnaires. In total, 96 patients were enrolled and 79 completed the 12-month follow-up. With the exclusion of cutaneous allodynia and the magnification subscale of the pain catastrophizing questionnaire, all variables showed significant improvement by the sixth month, which was maintained at 12 months. Reduction of pain catastrophizing, and particularly of its helplessness subscale, was a significant predictor of reduction in headache frequency and medication intake. Pain catastrophizing is often implicated in the clinical improvement in patients with CM-MOH receiving behavioral treatments, but, in this study, also showed a role in patients receiving OnabotulinumtoxinA; combining OnabotulinumtoxinA and behavioral treatments specifically addressing pain catastrophizing might further enhance patients' clinical outcome.
Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Headache Disorders, Secondary , Migraine Disorders , Humans , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Headache/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Headache Disorders, Secondary/chemically induced , Headache Disorders, Secondary/complications , Headache Disorders, Secondary/drug therapy , Catastrophization , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
(1) Objectives: to investigate the main lessons learned from the public health (PH) response to COVID-19, using the global perspective endorsed by the WHO pillars, and understand what countries have learned from their practical actions. (2) Methods: we searched for articles in PubMed and CINAHL from 1 January 2020 to 31 January 2022. 455 articles were included. Inclusion criteria were PH themes and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. One hundred and forty-four articles were finally included in a detailed scoping review. (3) Findings: 78 lessons learned were available, cited 928 times in the 144 articles. Our review highlighted 5 main lessons learned among the WHO regions: need for continuous coordination between PH institutions and organisations (1); importance of assessment and evaluation of risk factors for the diffusion of COVID-19, identifying vulnerable populations (2); establishment of evaluation systems to assess the impact of planned PH measures (3); extensive application of digital technologies, telecommunications and electronic health records (4); need for periodic scientific reviews to provide regular updates on the most effective PH management strategies (5). (4) Conclusion: lessons found in this review could be essential for the future, providing recommendations for an increasingly flexible, fast and efficient PH response to a healthcare emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Public Health , Pandemics , Delivery of Health Care , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Stroke causes a significant reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and studies addressing its predictors often rely on models with few variables. This study aimed to assess the degree to which health status, health habits, and features of the environment predict HRQoL in stroke survivors with stable clinical condition. WHO Quality of Life questionnaire for old-Age subjects (WHOQOL-AGE) was used to assess HRQoL. We ran a multivariable linear regression to predict WHOQOL-AGE variation, entering measures of health state, bad habits, healthy behaviors, physical environment features, and social support. Patients were stroke survivors with a stable clinical condition, distance from acute event of more than 6 months, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 10 or less. A total of 122 participants (47 females, 97 with ischemic stroke) were enrolled, the mean age was 64.1, mean NIHSS 2.9, and mean distance from the acute event was 5.1 years. State anxiety (ß = -0.202), trait anxiety (ß = -0.232), depression (ß = -0.255), social support (ß = 0.247), and functional independence (ß = -0.210) predicted WHOQOL-AGE variation (Adj. R2 = 0.549). Our results show that psychological symptoms, reduced social network, and functional dependence together have a negative impact on HRQoL. These elements, which are partly stroke-specific, should be taken into account in the recovery process to enhance patients' health outcomes.
Subject(s)
Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Stroke/psychologyABSTRACT
This preliminary analysis of a single-blind phase-III RCT aims to compare the feasibility and short-term efficacy of mindfulness as an add-on to treatment as usual (TaU) in the management of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH). Patients were randomized to either TaU (structured withdrawal of overused drugs, patient education and pharmacological prophylaxis) or TaU + MIND, wherein patients additionally received six 90 min weekly group sessions of mindfulness-based therapy. Repeated measures analyses were used to test whether patients in the two arms showed different course with regard to headache frequency and medication intake over a three-month period. Drop-out rates were not different between the two groups: 6/89 (6.7%) and 9/88 (10.2%) among those in TaU and TaU + MIND, respectively. A significant effect of time for all variables was shown, together with a significant effect of time by group, favoring TaU + MIND condition for headache frequency (p = 0.025) and NSAID intake (p = 0.007), controlling for age and CM duration. In total, 45/83 (54.2%) and 69/79 (75.9%) of the patients allocated to TaU and TaU + MIND, respectively, achieved 50% or more headache-day reduction (chi-squared 8.38, p = 0.004). Our preliminary analysis indicates that adding six mindfulness-based sessions to TaU was feasible and showed short-term efficacy in the treatment of patients with CM and MOH.
Subject(s)
Headache Disorders, Secondary , Migraine Disorders , Mindfulness , Humans , Feasibility Studies , Single-Blind Method , Analgesics , Headache Disorders, Secondary/chemically induced , Headache Disorders, Secondary/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Headache/chemically inducedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine (CM) is one of the most disabling neurological diseases, often associated to medication overuse headache (MOH). These patients make high use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, and experience high work-related indirect costs. The aim of this study was to address and compare the main driver of cost associated to CM-MOH and EM, and to evaluate the effect of improvement in migraine profile on disease cost. METHODS: We selected patients with baseline CM-MOH who reverted to an episodic pattern by 3 months after structured withdrawal. Paired sample t-test was used to explore the variation in headache frequency and its costs. Regression models were run to address the impact of single cost categories on total migraine cost. RESULTS: A total of 261 patients were included. Significant reductions in headache frequency and its costs were observed, with the exception of medical prophylaxis cost. The cost of migraine from chronic to episodic pattern is reduced by 533 per month and 80% of this reduction is accountable to reduced indirect costs, i.e., loss of productive time. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study open to future considerations on future approaches to the treatment of CM-MOH in which new migraine-specific treatments, i.e., monoclonal antibodies, should be combined with other pharmacological and non-pharmacological ones.