Large-Vessel Vasculitis Presenting with Syncope and Complete Heart Block.

We present the case of a 55-year-old male with a pseudoaneurysm in the right coronary sinus of Valsalva. He was found to have a complete heart block in the context of large-vessel vasculitis involving the aortic root and basal interventricular septum. This case demonstrates the importance of generating a thorough differential diagnosis of complete heart block and using multimodality imaging to pursue the investigations for aortitis when a septal recess near the aortic root is detected. Considering to proceed to a surgical intervention earlier in the progression of the disease should also be part of the management.

Atrioventricular conduction disorders in aortic valve infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve infective endocarditis may be complicated by high-degree atrioventricular block in up to 10-20% of cases. AIM: To assess high-degree atrioventricular block occurrence, contributing factors, prognosis and evolution in patients referred for aortic infective endocarditis. METHODS: Two hundred and five patients referred for aortic valve infective endocarditis between January 2018 and March 2021 were included in this study. A comprehensive assessment of clinical, electrocardiographic, biological, microbiological and imaging data was conducted, with a follow-up carried out over 1 year. RESULTS: High-degree atrioventricular block occurred in 22 (11%) patients. In univariate analysis, high-degree atrioventricular block was associated with first-degree heart block at admission (odds ratio 3.1; P=0.015), periannular complication on echocardiography (odds ratio 6.9; P<0.001) and severe biological inflammatory syndrome, notably C-reactive protein (127 vs 90mg/L; P=0.011). In-hospital mortality (12.7%) was higher in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio 4.0; P=0.011) in univariate analysis. Of the 16 patients implanted with a permanent pacemaker for high-degree atrioventricular block and interrogated, only four (25%) were dependent on the pacing function at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: High-degree atrioventricular block is associated with high inflammation markers and periannular complications, especially if first-degree heart block is identified at admission. High-degree atrioventricular block is a marker of infectious severity, and tends to raise the in-hospital mortality rate. Systematic assessment of patients admitted for infective endocarditis suspicion, considering these contributing factors, could indicate intensive care unit monitoring or even temporary pacemaker implantation in those at highest risk.

Pericardial Diseases in Pregnancy.

Pericardial effusion is the most common manifestation of pericardial diseases during pregnancy. This effusion is benign, mild, or moderate, well tolerated, with spontaneous resolution after delivery; no specific treatment is required. Acute pericarditis is the second most common condition, usually requiring medical therapy during pregnancy. Cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis are rare in pregnancy. Pre-pregnancy counselling is essential in women of childbearing age with recurrent pericarditis to plan pregnancy in a phase of disease quiescence and to review therapy. High-dose aspirin or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen and indomethacin, can be used up to the 20th week of gestation. Low-dose prednisone (2.5-10 mg/d) can be administered throughout pregnancy. All of these medications, apart from high-dose aspirin, may be used during lactation. Colchicine is compatible with pregnancy and breastfeeding, and it can be continued throughout pregnancy to prevent recurrences. Appropriate follow-up with a multidisciplinary team with experience in the field is recommended throughout pregnancy to ensure good maternal and fetal outcomes.

New Developments in the Management of Recurrent Pericarditis.

Recurrent pericarditis is a common and troublesome complication that affects 15%-30% of patients with a previous episode of pericarditis. However, the pathogenesis of these recurrences is not well understood, and most cases remain idiopathic. Recent advances in medical therapy, including the use of colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents like anakinra and rilonacept, have suggested an autoinflammatory rather than an autoimmune mechanism for recurrences with an inflammatory phenotype. As a result, a more personalized approach to treatment is now recommended. Patients with an inflammatory phenotype (fever and elevated C-reactive protein level) should receive colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents as first-line therapy, whereas those without systemic inflammation should receive low to moderate doses of corticosteroids (eg, prednisone 0.2-0.5 mg/kg/d as an initial dose) and consider azathioprine and intravenous human immunoglobulins in the case of corticosteroid failure. Tapering of corticosteroids should be slow after achieving clinical remission. In this article, we review the new developments in the management of recurrent pericarditis.

Pericarditis Secondary to an Acupuncture Needle Extracted Via a Transjugular Approach.

Acupuncture is generally considered safe; however, cardiac complications can occur. We describe a case of refractory pericarditis requiring transvenous extraction of an acupuncture needle from within the right ventricular cavity. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Treatment Considerations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is rapidly evolving, with important cardiovascular considerations. The presence of underlying cardiovascular risk factors and established cardiovascular disease (CVD) may affect the severity and clinical management of patients with COVID-19. We conducted a review of the literature to summarize the cardiovascular pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentations, and treatment considerations of COVID-19 patients with underlying CVD. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been identified as a functional receptor for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and it is associated with the cardiovascular system. Hypertension, diabetes, and CVD are the most common comorbidities in COVID-19 patients, and these factors have been associated with the progression and severity of COVID-19. However, elderly populations, who develop more-severe COVID-19 complications, are naturally exposed to these comorbidities, underscoring the possible confounding of age. Observational data support international cardiovascular societies' recommendations to not discontinue ACE inhibitor/angiotensin-receptor blocker therapy in patients with guideline indications for fear of the increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severe disease, or death. In addition to the cardiotoxicity of experimental antivirals and potential interactions of experimental therapies with cardiovascular drugs, several strategies for cardiovascular protection have been recommended in COVID-19 patients with underlying CVD. Troponin elevation is associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality and adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Cardiovascular care teams should have a high index of suspicion for fulminant myocarditis-like presentations being SARS-CoV-2 positive, and remain vigilant for cardiovascular complications in COVID-19 patients.

La pandémie de la maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) causée par le coronavirus du syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère 2 (SRAS-CoV-2) évolue rapidement, et des considérations cardiovasculaires importantes y sont rattachées. La présence de facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire sous-jacents ou d'une maladie cardiovasculaire (MCV) établie peut influer la gravité de la COVID-19 et la prise en charge des patients qui en sont atteints. Nous avons effectué une revue de la littérature afin de résumé la physiopathologie cardiovasculaire, les facteurs de risque, les manifestations cliniques et les traitements à considérer pour les patients atteints de la COVID-19 et présentant une MCV sous-jacente. L'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine 2 (ECA2), qui intervient dans le système cardiovasculaire, a été identifiée comme étant un récepteur fonctionnel du SRAS-CoV-2. L'hypertension, le diabète et la MCV sont les affections concomitantes les plus fréquentes chez les patients atteints de la COVID-19, et ces facteurs ont été associés à l'évolution et à la gravité de la COVID-19. Les personnes âgées, chez qui les complications de la COVID-19 sont plus graves, sont cependant naturellement plus exposées à ces affections, ce qui fait ressortir l'âge comme étant un facteur de confusion possible. Les données d'observation soutiennent les recommandations des organismes internationaux s'intéressant à la santé cardiovasculaire, qui sont de ne pas cesser le traitement d'inhibiteur d'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine ou d'antagoniste des récepteurs de l'angiotensine lorsque ces traitements sont indiqués selon les lignes directrices, par crainte d'accroître le risque de maladie grave ou de décès pour les patients atteints par le SRAS-CoV-2. Compte tenu des effets cardiotoxiques des antiviraux expérimentaux et des interactions possibles entre les traitements expérimentaux et les médicaments utilisés pour traiter les MCV, plusieurs stratégies de protection cardiovasculaire ont été recommandées pour le traitement des patients atteints de la COVID-19 présentant une MCV sous-jacente. L'élévation de la troponine est associée à un risque accru de mortalité hospitalière et à des résultats défavorables pour les patients atteints de la COVID-19. Les équipes de soins cardiovasculaires doivent toujours garder à l'esprit qu'un patient présentant des symptômes évocateurs d'une myocardite fulminante pourrait être infecté par le SRAS-CoV-2 et surveiller les complications cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints de la COVID-19.

Muscle Mass and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Activity in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are hydrophilic drugs with plasma levels inversely proportional to lean body mass. Sarcopenic patients with low muscle mass may be at risk for supra-therapeutic DOAC levels and bleeding complications. We therefore sought to examine the influence of lean body mass on DOAC levels in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients 65 years of age or more receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban for AF. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was measured using a bioimpedance device and a dual X-ray absorptiometry scanner. DOAC levels were measured using a standardized anti-Xa assay 4 hours after (peak) and 1 hour before (trough) ingestion. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 62 patients (47% female, 77.0 ± 6.1 years). The prescribed DOACs were apixaban 2.5 mg (21%), apixaban 5 mg (53%), and rivaroxaban 20 mg (26%). Overall, 16% had supra-therapeutic DOAC levels at trough and 25% at peak. In the multivariable logistic regression model, lower ALM was independently associated with supra-therapeutic DOAC levels at trough (odds ratio per ↓ 1-kg 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.49) and peak (odds ratio per ↓ 1-kg 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.37). Addition of ALM to a model consisting of age, total body weight, and renal function resulted in improved discrimination for supra-therapeutic DOAC levels. CONCLUSION: Our proof-of-concept study has identified an association between ALM and DOAC levels in older adults with AF. Further research is needed to determine the impact of ALM on bleeding complications and the potential role of ALM-guided dosing for sarcopenic patients.

Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Pregnancy: When Should Early Delivery Be Considered?

BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic and physiological changes of pregnancy may predispose women to cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, new-onset AF in pregnancy remains rare, and treatment is challenging. Current recommendations are to treat pregnant women with AF as non-pregnant adults, by using pharmacological or synchronized electrical cardioversion, without mention of gestational age or possibility of delivery. CASE: A 23-year-old nulliparous woman developed new-onset symptomatic AF at 362 weeks gestation, but presented to our hospital was delivered at 364 weeks gestation. Beta-blockers were administered for heart rate control. After 48 hours, the decision was made to proceed with delivery rather than cardioversion. The patient's arrhythmia resolved spontaneously postpartum without further treatment. CONCLUSION: In pregnant patients near or at term, delivery should be considered in the management of new-onset AF after consultation with cardiology, anaesthesiology, and maternal-fetal medicine.

Investigation into the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on cardiac pacemakers.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the therapeutic applications of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of age-related neurodegenerative disease have been promising. However, exclusion criteria for these studies invariably disqualify patients implanted with internal cardiac pacemakers, citing safety concerns. Because the majority of cardiac pacemaker implantees are over 65, this criterion may limit candidacy for tDCS based research and/or treatment of age-related neurodegenerative disease. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We will test the hypothesis that tDCS impacts pacemaker function. Strong electrical potentials, such as those generated by external defibrillators (∼500 V, ∼10 A), are known to occasionally damage pacemaker circuitry and software, but it seems unlikely tDCS would damage a pacemaker because it involves about 1/200th the energy (∼12 V, ∼2 mA) of an external defibrillator. METHODS: We delivered tDCS to seven participants (ages 70-92) with bipolar non-dependent pacemakers and subsequently collected data from the internal memory of the pacemakers to assess the tDCS signal detection, as well as alterations in mode switches, impedance levels, and pacing. Subsequently, similar assessments were carried out in participants who were pacemaker-dependent (ages 89-91). RESULTS: After a review of the recordings, it was found that tDCS had no impact on the non-dependant, as well as the dependent, pacemakers. There were zero mode switches nor any impact on impedance levels. CONCLUSION: Results in this small series of cases found no evidence that tDCS interferes with the function of the pacemakers and suggests tDCS can be delivered to patients equipped with a cardiac pacemaker. Further studies are needed to generalize these results to other pacemakers.

Anakinra for corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant pericarditis: The IRAP (International Registry of Anakinra for Pericarditis) study.

AIMS: Novel therapies are needed for recurrent pericarditis, particularly when corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant. Based on limited data, interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra may be beneficial. The aim of this multicentre registry was to evaluate the broader effectiveness and safety of anakinra in a 'real world' population. METHODS AND RESULTS: This registry enrolled consecutive patients with recurrent pericarditis who were corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant and treated with anakinra. The primary outcome was the pericarditis recurrence rate after treatment. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalisations, corticosteroid use and adverse events. Among 224 patients (46 ± 14 years old, 63% women, 75% idiopathic), the median duration of disease was 17 months (interquartile range 9-33). Most patients had elevated C-reactive protein (91%) and pericardial effusion (88%). After a median treatment of 6 months (3-12), pericarditis recurrences were reduced six-fold (2.33-0.39 per patient per year), emergency department admissions were reduced 11-fold (1.08-0.10 per patient per year), hospitalisations were reduced seven-fold (0.99-0.13 per patient per year). Corticosteroid use was decreased by anakinra (respectively from 80% to 27%; P < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred; adverse events consisted mostly of transient skin reactions (38%) at the injection site. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 3%. A full-dose treatment duration of over 3 months followed by a tapering period of over 3 months were the therapeutic schemes associated with a lower risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent pericarditis, anakinra appears efficacious and safe in reducing recurrences, emergency department admissions and hospitalisations.

Performing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Contemporary Review.

There are expanding indications for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The presence of a CIED had been regarded as a contraindication to CMR due to concerns of arrhythmias, significant changes to lead parameters, and detrimental changes to device programming. The risk of these potential adverse events is theoretically higher in patients undergoing CMR as compared with other anatomic sites. Recent studies have observed low rates of adverse events in patients undergoing CMR (< 1% to 2%), prompting a shift in the recommendations on CMR in patients with CIEDs. The 2017 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement now states that CMR can be performed in patients with both conditional and nonconditional CIEDs at a magnetic strength of 1.5 T, provided there are no fractured, abandoned, or epicardial leads and modifications to MRI parameters are made. The purpose of this review is to (a) outline the potential concerns of performing CMR in patients with CIEDs, (b) define categories of CIEDs as they pertain to MRI safety, (c) summarize the emerging data on adverse events, and (d) provide a practical approach, integrating the key modifications required to perform CMR in patients with CIEDs.

A Practical Approach to Pericardiocentesis With Periprocedural Use of Ultrasound Training Initiative.

Tamponade is a life-threatening condition characterized by fluid accumulation in the pericardium, which compresses the cardiac chambers, impairs diastolic filling, and can lead to clinical shock. The diagnosis is a clinical one that is supported by echocardiographic findings. Pericardiocentesis is the definitive treatment for tamponade; however, it remains a challenge for trainees because of the infrequent exposure compared with other invasive procedures. Moreover, this technique, unlike others, can lead to serious complications including cardiac perforation and arrhythmia. There has been increased attention to periprocedural use of ultrasound in various techniques, particularly pericardiocentesis, given its ability to assess the pericardial effusion as well as the safety and feasibility of the procedure from various trajectories to minimize major and minor complications. As such, periprocedural use of ultrasound for pericardiocentesis has emerged as the preferred initial technique for pericardiocentesis. We outline a simple stepwise approach to prepare and perform pericardiocentesis, facilitated by periprocedural ultrasound, including practical tips from our centre's experiences. These include the proper assessment of the target area defined as the most pericardial fluid with the least interfering structures and troubleshooting the introduction of the needle into the pericardium. Absolute contraindications are few and often require surgery, but knowledge of them is mandatory when assessing patients for pericardiocentesis.

The Use of Ultrasound to Improve Axillary Vein Access and Minimize Complications during Pacemaker Implantation.

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in the United States recommends the use of ultrasound (US) for central venous access to improve patient outcomes. However, in a recent publication, US is still underutilized for axillary vein access during pacemaker implantation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe a technique for US-guided axillary vein access during pacemaker implantation and to report complication rates and success rate. METHODS: Retrospective data collection included success rate and complications on all pacemaker implants by one operator since implementing the systematic use of US at our institution, from November 2012 to January 2015. For the last 59 cases, data were collected prospectively to include time of venous access and number of attempts. RESULTS: A total of 403 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Two leads were implanted in 255 cases and one lead was implanted in 148 cases. The rate of successful US-guided access was 99.25%. There were no access-related complications. The average number of venipuncture attempts was 1.18 per patient. The average time to obtain venous access was 2.24 minutes including the time to apply the sterile US sleeve. CONCLUSION: The described technique has the potential to improve the success rate of axillary vein access and minimize complications during pacemaker implantation.

Implications of Frailty in Elderly Patients With Electrophysiological Conditions.

A growing number of complex older adults are referred for electrophysiological conditions and age alone is insufficient to guide management decisions such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation or atrial fibrillation anticoagulation. The concept of frailty has emerged as a geriatric vital sign to gain insight into physiological reserve and prognostic risk beyond chronological age and comorbidities. To date, a number of published studies have evaluated frailty in patients with electrophysiological conditions. These studies collectively demonstrate that frail patients have an increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation, lower use of oral anticoagulation, higher risk of bleeding complications from oral anticoagulation, and higher risk of stroke and mortality. A paucity of studies have explored frailty in the setting of device implantation, with a signal suggesting that frail heart failure patients may have a lower likelihood of being considered for ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, and a higher risk of fatal and nonfatal events after ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Whether frailty modulates the risks and benefits of these devices is a critical knowledge gap for which further study is clearly warranted.