Ceftazidime Plasma Concentrations and Neurotoxicity: The Importance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Different Modalities of Renal Replacement Therapy. A Grand Round.

ABSTRACT: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CTZ-AVM) is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor with broad-spectrum activity against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Ceftazidime-induced neurotoxicity is a well-described adverse effect, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency. However, appropriate dosing of ceftazidime-avibactam in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is sparsely investigated, and therapeutic drug monitoring to guide dosing remains lacking. Furthermore, when dose adjustment for impaired renal function is based on CTZ-AVM product information, inferior cure rates have been obtained compared with those with the standard therapy for intra-abdominal infections. Maintaining an effective dose while avoiding toxicity in these patients is challenging. Here, the authors describe the case of a critically ill patient, undergoing 2 modalities of RRT, who developed ceftazidime-induced neurotoxicity as confirmed using ceftazidime therapeutic drug monitoring. This case illustrates a therapeutic drug monitoring-based approach for guiding ceftazidime-avibactam dosing in this context and in diagnosing the cause of neurological symptoms and signs.

It cuts both ways: A single-center retrospective review describing a three-way interaction between flucloxacillin, voriconazole and tacrolimus.

AIM: Tacrolimus is a CYP3A4 substrate with a narrow therapeutic index that requires dose adjustment when used with voriconazole, a recognized CYP3A4 inhibitor. Interactions involving flucloxacillin and tacrolimus or voriconazole individually have been shown to result in decreased concentrations of the latter two drugs. Tacrolimus concentrations have been reported to be unaffected by flucloxacillin when voriconazole is administered; however, this has not been extensively investigated. METHODS: Retrospective review of voriconazole and tacrolimus concentrations and subsequent dose adjustment following flucloxacillin administration. RESULTS: Eight transplant recipients (five lung, two re-do lung, one heart) received concurrent flucloxacillin, voriconazole and tacrolimus. Voriconazole trough concentrations were measured before flucloxacillin initiation in three of eight patients and all trough concentrations were therapeutic. Following flucloxacillin initiation, all eight patients exhibited subtherapeutic concentrations of voriconazole (median concentration 0.15 mg/L [interquartile range (IQR) 0.10-0.28]). In five patients, voriconazole concentrations remained subtherapeutic despite dose increases, and treatment for two patients was changed to alternative antifungal agents. All eight patients required tacrolimus dose increases to maintain therapeutic concentrations after flucloxacillin initiation. Median total daily dose prior to flucloxacillin treatment was 3.5 mg [IQR 2.0-4.3] and this increased to 13.5 mg [IQR 9.5-20] (P=0.0026) during flucloxacillin treatment. When flucloxacillin was ceased, the median tacrolimus total daily dose reduced to 2.2 mg [IQR 1.9-4.7]. Supra-therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations were observed in seven patients after flucloxacillin discontinuation (median concentration 19.7 µg/L [IQR 17.9-28.0]). CONCLUSION: A significant three-way interaction was shown between flucloxacillin, voriconazole and tacrolimus, resulting in subtherapeutic voriconazole concentrations, and requiring substantial tacrolimus dose increases. Administration of flucloxacillin to patients receiving voriconazole should be avoided. Tacrolimus concentrations should be closely monitored, and dosing adjusted during and after flucloxacillin administration.

LInezolid Monitoring to MInimise Toxicity (LIMMIT1): A multicentre retrospective review of patients receiving linezolid therapy and the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial with limited use due to toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate linezolid toxicity in a large multicentre cohort. Secondary objectives were to identify factors contributing to toxicity, including the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). METHODS: Patients administered linezolid between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected on patient characteristics, linezolid therapy and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed on all patients, and statistical comparisons were undertaken between those who did and did not experience linezolid toxicity. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify any covariates that correlated with toxicity. RESULTS: Linezolid was administered to 1050 patients; of these, 381 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 47 were excluded as therapy ceased for non-toxicity reasons. There were 105 of 622 (16.9%) patients assessed to have linezolid toxicity. Patients who experienced toxicity displayed a higher baseline creatinine (96.5 µmol/L vs. 79 µmol/L; P = 0.025), lower baseline platelet count (225 × 109/L vs. 278.5 × 109/L; P = 0.002) and received a longer course (median 21 vs. 14 days; P < 0.001) than those who did not. Linezolid TDM was performed in 144 patients (23%). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that TDM-guided appropriate dose adjustment significantly reduced the odds of linezolid toxicity (aOR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.21-0.96; P = 0.038) and a treatment duration > 28 days was no longer significantly associated with toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that linezolid treatment-limiting toxicity remains a problem and suggests that TDM-guided dose optimisation may reduce the risk of toxicity and facilitate prolonged courses beyond 28 days.

Hematological toxicities associated with linezolid therapy in adults: key findings and clinical considerations.

INTRODUCTION: Linezolid can cause serious adverse effects including thrombocytopenia and anemia. Here, we focus specifically on linezolid-related hematological toxicity in adult patients requiring prolonged drug treatment. AREAS COVERED: We review the available evidence on the likelihood of hematological toxicity in adult patients treated with linezolid, with a focus on the main risk factors and strategies to prevent this adverse event. A MEDLINE PubMed search for articles published from January 2000 to May 2022 was completed matching the terms linezolid, hematology, hematological toxicity, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved articles. EXPERT OPINION: Thrombocytopenia is the major concern with administration of linezolid for Gram-positive infections, whereas anemia is more common in patients with tuberculosis. The important clinical risk factors for the development of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia are aging, renal dysfunction, low baseline platelet count, duration of treatment, and linezolid plasma trough concentrations >8 mg/L. Patients receiving linezolid for extended periods of time or patient populations with increased risk of altered drug pharmacokinetics would benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring or from the availability of toxico-dynamic predictive models to optimize linezolid dosing.

Effect of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange on Itraconazole Pharmacokinetics: A Case Study.

ABSTRACT: The authors present the case of a 34-year-old male patient who underwent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for amyopathic dermatomyositis. Immunosuppression resulted in Aspergillus lentulus pulmonary infection , requiring treatment with super bioavailable-itraconazole. Therapeutic itraconazole concentrations were attained after 2 weeks of treatment after dose adjustments. Interestingly, a substantial reduction in plasma itraconazole concentration was observed during TPE, which was attributed to an insufficient delay between the dosing of itraconazole and TPE initiation. Furthermore, there was an increase in plasma concentration post-TPE, which presumably reflects the redistribution of itraconazole from peripheral compartments back into plasma. This was confirmed by sampling of the TPE plasmapheresate, which revealed that changes in plasma concentration overestimated itraconazole clearance. These findings highlight that the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole are altered during TPE, which should be considered when timing drug administration and obtaining plasma concentrations.

Multispecies Outbreak of Nocardia Infections in Heart Transplant Recipients and Association with Climate Conditions, Australia.

A multispecies outbreak of Nocardia occurred among heart transplant recipients (HTR), but not lung transplant recipients (LTR), in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, during 2018-2019. We performed a retrospective review of 23 HTR and LTR who had Nocardia spp. infections during June 2015-March 2021, compared risk factors for Nocardia infection, and evaluated climate conditions before, during, and after the period of the 2018-2019 outbreak. Compared with LTR, HTR had a shorter median time from transplant to Nocardia diagnosis, higher prevalence of diabetes, greater use of induction immunosuppression with basiliximab, and increased rates of cellular rejection before Nocardia diagnosis. During the outbreak, Sydney experienced the lowest monthly precipitation and driest surface levels compared with time periods directly before and after the outbreak. Increased immunosuppression of HTR compared with LTR, coupled with extreme weather conditions during 2018-2019, may explain this outbreak of Nocardia infections in HTR.

Disseminated Aspergillus lentulus Infection in a Heart Transplant Recipient: A Case Report.

We present the first published case of successfully treated disseminated Aspergillus lentulus infection in a solid organ transplant recipient with invasive pulmonary disease, endophthalmitis, and a cerebral abscess. This case highlights important challenges associated with treating A. lentulus, particularly regarding antifungal resistance and toxicities associated with long-term antifungal therapy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Echinocandin Antifungal Agents: Is There a Role in Clinical Practice? A Position Statement of the Anti-Infective Drugs Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

PURPOSE: Reduced exposure to echinocandins has been reported in specific patient populations, such as critically ill patients; however, fixed dosing strategies are still used. The present review examines the accumulated evidence supporting echinocandin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and summarizes available assays and sampling strategies. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed in December 2020, with search terms such as echinocandins, anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, or rezafungin with pharmacology, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), drug-drug interactions, TDM, resistance, drug susceptibility testing, toxicity, adverse drug reactions, bioanalysis, chromatography, and mass spectrometry. Data on PD/PD (PK/PD) outcome markers, drug resistance, PK variability, drug-drug interactions, assays, and TDM sampling strategies were summarized. RESULTS: Echinocandins demonstrate drug exposure-efficacy relationships, and maximum concentration/minimal inhibitory concentration ratio (Cmax/MIC) and area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) are proposed PK/PD markers for clinical response. The relationship between drug exposure and toxicity remains poorly clarified. TDM could be valuable in patients at risk of low drug exposure, such as those with critical illness and/or obesity. TDM of echinocandins may also be useful in patients with moderate liver impairment, drug-drug interactions, hypoalbuminemia, and those undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, as these conditions are associated with altered exposure to caspofungin and/or micafungin. Assays are available to measure anidulafungin, micafungin, and caspofungin concentrations. A limited-sampling strategy for anidulafungin has been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Echinocandin TDM should be considered in patients at known risk of suboptimal drug exposure. However, for implementing TDM, clinical validation of PK/PD targets is needed.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics in the Elderly: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic dosing adaptation in elderly patients is frequently complicated by age-related changes affecting the processes of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and/or elimination. These events eventually result in treatment failure and/or development of drug-related toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can prevent suboptimal antibiotic exposure in adult patients regardless of age. However, little data are available concerning the specific role of TDM in the elderly patients. METHODS: This review is based on a PubMed search of the literature published in the English language. The search involved TDM studies of antibiotics in the elderly patients performed between 1990 and 2021. Additional studies were identified from the reference lists of the retrieved articles. Studies dealing with population pharmacokinetic modeling were not considered. RESULTS: Only a few studies, mainly retrospective and with observational design, have specifically dealt with appropriate antibiotic dosing in the elderly patients based on TDM. Nevertheless, some clinical situations in which the selection of optimal antibiotic dosing in the elderly patients was successfully guided by TDM were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients are at an increased risk of bacterial infections and inadequate drug dosing compared with younger patients. Therefore, the availability of TDM services can improve the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in this population.

Emerging therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-infective agents in Australian hospitals: Availability, performance and barriers to implementation.

AIMS: The purpose of the study was to assess the status of emerging therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-infective agents in Australian hospitals. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of all Australian hospitals operating in the public and private health sector was conducted between August and September 2019. The survey consisted of questions regarding institutional TDM practice for anti-infective agents and clinical vignettes specific to ß-lactam antibiotics. RESULTS: Responses were received from 82 unique institutions, representing all Australian states and territories. All 29 (100%) of principal referral (major) hospitals in Australia participated. Five surveys were partially complete. Only 25% (20/80) of hospitals had TDM testing available on-site for any of the eight emerging TDM candidates considered: ß-lactam antibiotics, anti-tuberculous agents, flucytosine, fluoroquinolones, ganciclovir, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs, linezolid and teicoplanin. A considerable time lag was noted between TDM sampling and reporting of results. With respect to ß-lactam antibiotic TDM, variable indications, pharmacodynamic targets and sampling times were identified. The three greatest barriers to local TDM performance were found to be (1) lack of timely assays/results, (2) lack of institutional-wide expertise and/or training and (3) lack of guidelines to inform ordering of TDM and interpretation of results. The majority of respondents favoured establishing national TDM guidelines and increasing access to dose prediction software, at rates of 89% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Translating emerging TDM evidence into daily clinical practice is slow. Concerted efforts are required to address the barriers identified and facilitate the implementation of standardised practice.

Optimal Practice for Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Position Statement From the Anti-infectives Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

ABSTRACT: Individualization of vancomycin dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data is known to improve patient outcomes compared with fixed or empirical dosing strategies. There is increasing evidence to support area-under-the-curve (AUC24)-guided TDM to inform vancomycin dosing decisions for patients receiving therapy for more than 48 hours. It is acknowledged that there may be institutional barriers to the implementation of AUC24-guided dosing, and additional effort is required to enable the transition from trough-based to AUC24-based strategies. Adequate documentation of sampling, correct storage and transport, accurate laboratory analysis, and pertinent data reporting are required to ensure appropriate interpretation of TDM data to guide vancomycin dosing recommendations. Ultimately, TDM data in the clinical context of the patient and their response to treatment should guide vancomycin therapy. Endorsed by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, the IATDMCT Anti-Infectives Committee, provides recommendations with respect to best clinical practice for vancomycin TDM.

Consensus guidelines for optimising antifungal drug delivery and monitoring to avoid toxicity and improve outcomes in patients with haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2021.

Antifungal agents can have complex dosing and the potential for drug interaction, both of which can lead to subtherapeutic antifungal drug concentrations and poorer clinical outcomes for patients with haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Antifungal agents can also be associated with significant toxicities when drug concentrations are too high. Suboptimal dosing can be minimised by clinical assessment, laboratory monitoring, avoidance of interacting drugs, and dose modification. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays an increasingly important role in antifungal therapy, particularly for antifungal agents that have an established exposure-response relationship with either a narrow therapeutic window, large dose-exposure variability, cytochrome P450 gene polymorphism affecting drug metabolism, the presence of antifungal drug interactions or unexpected toxicity, and/or concerns for non-compliance or inadequate absorption of oral antifungals. These guidelines provide recommendations on antifungal drug monitoring and TDM-guided dosing adjustment for selected antifungal agents, and include suggested resources for identifying and analysing antifungal drug interactions. Recommended competencies for optimal interpretation of antifungal TDM and dose recommendations are also provided.

Assessment of cefepime toxicodynamics: comprehensive examination of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for cefepime-induced neurotoxicity and evaluation of current dosing guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is an increasingly reported adverse event; however, the toxicity threshold remains unclear. This study was conducted to provide a comprehensive examination of the most appropriate threshold for CIN, and evaluate the ability of current dosing regimens to attain therapeutic targets. METHODS: Data of the incidence of CIN and cefepime plasma concentrations were collected retrospectively from patients administered cefepime. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was used to determine daily cefepime trough concentration (Cmin), maximum serum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve. The ability of each pharmacokinetic parameter to predict CIN was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, from which optimal toxicity thresholds were determined. Pharmacokinetic simulation was used to evaluate the ability of cefepime dosing guidelines to meet established efficacy targets, whilst maintaining exposure below the determined CIN threshold. RESULTS: In total, 102 cefepime courses were evaluated, with CIN reported in 10. ROC analyses showed that all cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters were strongly predictive of CIN. Cmin of 49 mg/L was identified as the optimal toxicity target, based on its predictive ability (0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.758-0.999, P<0.001) and ease of clinical use. Assessment of cefepime dosing regimens predicted that only 29% of simulated patients achieve therapeutic targets, with patients with impaired renal function more likely to exhibit subtherapeutic concentrations (89%), and patients with normal renal function likely to have potentially toxic exposure (64%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study provide evidence that cefepime exposure is highly predictive of CIN, with Cmin of 49 mg/L being the most appropriate toxicity threshold. Further research is required to optimize cefepime dosing in the context of this therapeutic target.

Are vancomycin dosing guidelines followed? A mixed methods study of vancomycin prescribing practices.

AIMS: Despite the availability of international consensus guidelines, vancomycin dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remain suboptimal. This study aimed to assess concordance of vancomycin dosing and TDM with institutional guidelines and to identify factors taken into consideration by clinicians when prescribing vancomycin. METHODS: A retrospective audit of 163 patients receiving vancomycin therapy (≥48 hours) was undertaken. Data collected included patient characteristics, dosing history and plasma vancomycin and creatinine concentrations. Concordance of dosing and TDM with institutional guidelines was evaluated. Semi-structured interviews, including simulated prescribing scenarios, were undertaken with prescribers (n = 17) and transcripts analysed. RESULTS: Plasma vancomycin concentrations (n = 1043) were collected during 179 courses of therapy. Only 24% of courses commenced with a loading dose with 72% lower than recommended. The initial maintenance dose was concordant in 42% of courses with 34% lower than recommended. Only 14% of TDM samples were trough vancomycin concentrations. Dose was not adjusted for 60% (21/35) of subtherapeutic and 43% (18/42) of supratherapeutic trough vancomycin concentrations, respectively. Interview participants reported that patient characteristics (including renal function), vancomycin concentrations, guidelines and expert advice influenced vancomycin prescribing decisions. Despite referring to guidelines when completing simulated prescribing scenarios, only 37% of prescribing decisions aligned with guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION: Poor compliance with institutional vancomycin guidelines was observed, despite prescriber awareness of available guidelines. Multifaceted strategies to support prescriber decision-making are required to improve vancomycin dosing and monitoring.