ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis is the main acute lower respiratory tract infection in infants. Data regarding SARS-CoV-2-related bronchiolitis are limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe the main clinical characteristics of infants with SARS-CoV-2-related bronchiolitis in comparison with infants with bronchiolitis associated with other viruses. SETTING, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS: A multicentre retrospective study was conducted in 22 paediatric emergency departments (PED) in Europe and Israel. Infants diagnosed with bronchiolitis, who had a test for SARS-CoV-2 and were kept in clinical observation in the PED or admitted to hospital from 1 May 2021 to 28 February 2022 were considered eligible for participation. Demographic and clinical data, diagnostic tests, treatments and outcomes were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the need for respiratory support in infants testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared with infants testing negative. RESULTS: 2004 infants with bronchiolitis were enrolled. Of these, 95 (4.7%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Median age, gender, weight, history of prematurity and presence of comorbidities did not differ between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative infants. Human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus were the viruses most frequently detected in the group of infants negative for SARS-CoV-2.Infants testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 received oxygen supplementation less frequently compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative patients, 37 (39%) vs 1076 (56.4%), p=0.001, OR 0.49 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.75). They received less ventilatory support: 12 (12.6%) high flow nasal cannulae vs 468 (24.5%), p=0.01; 1 (1.0%) continuous positive airway pressure vs 125 (6.6%), p=0.03, OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 rarely causes bronchiolitis in infants. SARS-CoV-2-related bronchiolitis mostly has a mild clinical course.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis , COVID-19 , Infant , Child , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Bronchiolitis/diagnosis , Bronchiolitis/epidemiology , Bronchiolitis/therapy , HospitalizationSubject(s)
Diagnosis, Differential , Ulcer/diagnosis , Vulvar Diseases , Child , Dysuria , Female , HumansSubject(s)
Adjuvants, Anesthesia/administration & dosage , Anesthesia/methods , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Infant, Premature , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Administration, Intranasal , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIM: Pain is a neglected problem in children with cognitive impairments, and few studies compare the clinical use of specific pain scales. We compared the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist Postoperative Version (NCCPC-PV), the Echelle Douleur Enfant San Salvador (DESS) and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS). The first two were developed for children with cognitive impairment, and the third is a more general pain scale. METHODS: Two external observers and the child's caregiver assessed 40 children with cognitive impairment for pain levels. We assessed inter-rater agreement, correlation, dependence on knowledge of the child's behaviour, simplicity and adequacy in pain rating according to the caregiver for all three scales. RESULTS: The correlation between the NCCPC-PV and the DESS was strong (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.76) and better than between each scale and the CHEOPS. Although the DESS showed better inter-rater agreement, it was more dependent on familiarity with the child and was judged more difficult to use by all observers. The NCCPC-PV was the easiest use and the most appropriate for rating the child's pain. CONCLUSION: The NCCPC-PV was the easiest to use for pain assessment in cognitively impaired children and should be adopted in clinical settings.
