Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 20(2): 223.e1-223.e6, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37968162

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Kidney ureter bladder radiography (KUB) is widely used for the evaluation of constipation in children with bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD); however, there is varying evidence to support its routine diagnostic use. One drawback to KUB is radiation exposure. The dangers of radiation in children are well-documented, and per As Low As Reasonably Achievable, non-beneficial radiation should be avoided. This risk is especially high in children who undergo repeated imaging in the follow up of constipation treatment. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the utility of KUB in diagnosing children with BBD by comparing it to four diagnostic tests and/or validated instruments: the Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS), Rome IV criteria, rectal diameter on ultrasound (RD), and the Bristol Stool Form Score (BSFS). STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively enrolled a cohort of patients presenting to an academic pediatric urology practice with symptoms of BBD. Severity of stool burden on KUB (mild, moderate, or severe), RD on ultrasound (≥3.4 cm), DVSS, Rome IV, and BSFS were obtained for each patient. All imaging was interpreted by a pediatric radiologist and pediatric urologist. Primary outcomes were the association between the four diagnostic tests and KUB stool burden. Bivariate analysis of all individual variables versus KUB was performed, as well as multivariate regressions to determine if multiple measures were predictive of KUB stool burden when combined. RESULTS: Between October 2020 and May 2022, 50 patients were enrolled. All children were under the age of 18, with a median age of 8 years (IQR 3-13). 38 % were male. Median BMI-for-age-percentile was 80.8 (IQR 50.3-98.3). When comparing individual variables to KUB in bivariate analyses, it was found that RD on ultrasound is predictive of significant stool burden on KUB (p = 0.03). No other individual variables were predictive. In the multivariate analyses, no combination of tests was found to be predictive of KUB. DISCUSSION: We compared the effectiveness of four commonly used diagnostic tests in children with BBD to validate the use of KUB. In conclusion, our results support the use of RD on ultrasound as a non-radiating alternative to KUB to assess stool burden. Data also suggest that KUB for fecal load does not correlate with urinary (DVSS) or bowel (Rome IV, BSFS) symptoms in BBD, and that symptoms scores should still be used independently for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, KUB has a limited role in the diagnosis of BBD.

2.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 2272, 2023 04 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37080956

ABSTRACT

For accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD), a consensus of radiologic, pathological, and clinical findings is vital. Management of ILD also requires thorough follow-up with computed tomography (CT) studies and lung function tests to assess disease progression, severity, and response to treatment. However, accurate classification of ILD subtypes can be challenging, especially for those not accustomed to reading chest CTs regularly. Dynamic models to predict patient survival rates based on longitudinal data are challenging to create due to disease complexity, variation, and irregular visit intervals. Here, we utilize RadImageNet pretrained models to diagnose five types of ILD with multimodal data and a transformer model to determine a patient's 3-year survival rate. When clinical history and associated CT scans are available, the proposed deep learning system can help clinicians diagnose and classify ILD patients and, importantly, dynamically predict disease progression and prognosis.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging , Disease Progression , Thorax , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Retrospective Studies , Lung/diagnostic imaging
3.
Clin Imaging ; 97: 14-21, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36868033

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Interpretation of high-resolution CT images plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of interstitial lung diseases. However, interreader variation may exist due to varying levels of training and expertise. This study aims to evaluate interreader variation and the role of thoracic radiology training in classifying interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: This is a retrospective study where seven physicians (radiologists, thoracic radiologists, and a pulmonologist) classified the subtypes of ILD of 128 patients from a tertiary referral center, all selected from the Interstitial Lung Disease Registry which consists of patients from November 2014 to January 2021. Each patient was diagnosed with a subtype of interstitial lung disease by a consensus diagnosis from pathology, radiology, and pulmonology. Each reader was provided with only clinical history, only CT images, or both. Reader sensitivity and specificity and interreader agreements using Cohen's κ were calculated. RESULTS: Interreader agreement based only on clinical history, only on radiologic information, or combination of both was most consistent amongst readers with thoracic radiology training, ranging from fair (Cohen's κ: 0.2-0.46), moderate to almost perfect (Cohen's κ: 0.55-0.92), and moderate to almost perfect (Cohen's κ: 0.53-0.91) respectively. Radiologists with any thoracic training showed both increased sensitivity and specificity for NSIP as compared to other radiologists and the pulmonologist when using only clinical history, only CT information, or combination of both (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Readers with thoracic radiology training showed the least interreader variation and were more sensitive and specific at classifying certain subtypes of ILD. SUMMARY SENTENCE: Thoracic radiology training may improve sensitivity and specificity in classifying ILD based on HRCT images and clinical history.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Radiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/pathology , Radiography, Thoracic , Radiology/education , Lung/pathology
4.
Radiographics ; 38(4): 1239-1263, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29995618

ABSTRACT

Superficial palpable masses of the head and neck are common in the pediatric population, with the vast majority of the lesions ultimately proven to be benign. Duplex ultrasonography (US) has emerged as the first-line imaging modality for the evaluation of superficial pediatric masses. Without utilizing radiation, iodinated contrast material, or sedation and/or anesthesia, US provides a means for quick and cost-effective acquisition of information, including the location, size, shape, internal content, and vascularity of the mass. In this review, the US findings are described for a variety of common and uncommon pediatric head and neck masses diagnosed in our practice. Specifically, the entities covered include neonatal scalp hematoma, craniosynostosis, dermoid and epidermoid cysts, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, lymph nodes and their complications, fibromatosis colli, thyroglossal duct cyst, branchial cleft cyst, cervical thymus, congenital goiter, thyroid papillary carcinoma, parathyroid adenoma, hemangioma, lymphangioma, jugular vein phlebectasia, Lemierre syndrome, acute parotitis and parotid abscess, leukemia and/or lymphoma, neurogenic tumor, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Ultimately, in situations in which the head or neck mass is too large, deep, or hyperechoic to be fully assessed within the US field of view, or if malignancy or a high-flow vascular lesion is suspected, then further evaluation with cross-sectional imaging is warranted. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2018.


Subject(s)
Craniofacial Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Skin Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Stomatognathic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans
5.
J Pediatr Surg ; 43(8): 1554-6, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18675653

ABSTRACT

Appendiceal intussusception is a rare entity that primarily affects children. The optimal surgical management is not known. We describe a child with appendiceal intussusception treated by simple appendectomy who suffered recurrent intussusception of the cecum at the base of the appendiceal stump. He was cured by resection of a rim of cecum around the appendiceal staple line. Partial cecectomy with appendectomy may be the most effective operation for appendiceal intussusception.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Cecal Diseases/surgery , Cecum/surgery , Intussusception/surgery , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Appendix/surgery , Cecal Diseases/diagnosis , Cecostomy/methods , Cecum/diagnostic imaging , Child , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intussusception/diagnosis , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Recurrence , Reoperation , Risk Assessment , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...