ABSTRACT
The aim of this review is to present and compare the various animal models of vascularized nerve grafts described in the literature as well as to summarize preclinical evidence for superior functional results compared to non-vascularized free nerve grafts. We also will present the state of the art on prefabricated vascularized nerve grafts. A systematic literature review on vascularized nerve graft models was conducted via the retrieval with the PubMed database on March 30, 2019. Data on the animal, nerve, and vascularization model, the recipient bed, the evaluation time points and methods, and the results of the study results were extracted and analyzed from selected articles. The rat sciatic nerve was the most popular model for vascularized nerve grafts, followed by the rabbit; however, rabbit models allow for longer nerve grafts, which are suitable for translational evaluation, and produced more cautious results on the superiority of vascularized nerve grafts. Compared to free nerve grafts, vascularized nerve grafts have better early but similar long-term results, especially in an avascular bed. There are few studies on avascular receiving beds and prefabricated nerve grafts. The clinical translation potential of available animal models is limited, and current experimental knowledge cannot fully support that the differences between vascularized nerve grafts and free nerve grafts yield a clinical advantage that justifies the complexity of the procedure.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of radiological depth of invasion (rDOI) and bone invasion in patients with oral cavity cancer, and the prognostic value of preoperative rDOI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with surgically resected oral cavity cancer and preoperative MRI acquired within four weeks before surgery. Two readers evaluated the MRI to assess the superficial and deep bone invasion, preoperative T stage, and measured the rDOI. The rDOI was compared to the histopathological DOI (pDOI), used as reference standard. Prognostic value of preoperative features for the disease-specific survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: The final population included 80 patients (50 males, mean age 67.7 ± 13.6 years). There was a strong statistically significant correlation between the rDOI (median 10 mm) and the pDOI (median 9 mm) (ρ: 0.978, p < 0.001). The agreement between MRI and histopathological T stage was excellent (k = 0.93, 95% CI 0.86, 0.99). The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative MRI were 93.3% and 98.8% for deep bone invasion, while they were 75.0% and 95.8% for superficial bone invasion, respectively. The rDOI > 10 mm was associated with poorer disease-specific survival (log-rank p = 0.016). The rDOI remained the only independent preoperative predictor associated with poorer disease-specific survival at multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 5.5; 95% CI 1.14, 26.58; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI is accurate for the assessment of DOI and bone invasion. The rDOI is an independent preoperative predictor of disease-specific survival in patients with oral cavity cancer.