App-based Therapy of Erectile Dysfunction Using a Digital Health Application (EDDIG Study): A Randomized, Single-blind, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While international guidelines advocate for a multifaceted approach to treating erectile dysfunction (ED) involving physical activities, psychological support, and education, structured programs are infrequent. To address this gap, an app-based therapy was developed, offering a systematic approach. This randomized, single-blind controlled trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of an app-based therapeutic in improving ED. METHODS: A total of 241 patients (49.74, standard deviation 12.73 yr) with ED (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]-5 <22) were randomized to the 12-wk app-based therapy (treatment group [TG], n = 122) or a waiting list for the app with continuation of their current management protocol (control group [CG], n = 119). Patients on long-term medication for ED were included, but subsequent exclusion occurred for those starting new medication. Coprimary endpoints were improvements from baseline to 12 wk in erectile function (IIEF-5), disease-related quality of life (QOL-Med-15), and patient activation (Patient Activation Measure [PAM-13]). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Erectile function (IIEF-5) improved by 4.5 points in the TG versus 0.2 points in the CG (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-5.0) group. Quality of life (QOL-Med) improved by 20.5 points in the TG versus -0.0 points in the CG (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 19.2-26.0) group. Patient activation (PAM-13) improved by 11.2 points in the TG versus 0.6 points in the CG (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 9.1-13.6) group. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor intake had no influence on all observed treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: App-based therapy of patients with ED provided a significant, clinically meaningful improvement. Quality of life and patient activation were also enhanced significantly. This program has the potential to change clinical practice in the treatment of ED. PATIENT SUMMARY: A therapy app improved sexual function and overall well-being for men experiencing erectile dysfunction, leading to better quality of life.

Transplant nephrectomy: indication, surgical approach and complications-experiences from a single transplantation center.

PURPOSE: Management of a failed kidney allograft, and the question whether it should be removed is a challenging task for clinicians. The reported risks for transplant nephrectomy (TN) vary, and there is no clear recommendation on indications or surgical approach that should be used. This study gives an overview of indications, compares surgical techniques, and identifies risk factors for higher morbidity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on all transplant nephrectomies performed between 2005 and 2020 at Charité Hospital Berlin, Department of Urology. Patient demographics, laboratory parameters, graft survival data, indication for TN, and surgical complications were extracted from medical reports. RESULTS: A total of 195 TN were performed, with graft intolerance syndrome being the most common indication in 52 patients (26.7%), acute rejection in 36 (18.5%), acute infection in 30 (15.4%), and other reasons to stop immunosuppression in 26 patients (13.3%). Rare indications were vascular complications in 16 (8.2%) and malignancies in the allograft in six (3.1%) cases. Extracapsular surgical approach was significantly more often used in cases of vascular complications and earlier allograft removal, but there was no difference in complication rates between extra- and intracapsular approach. Acute infection was identified as an independent risk factor for a complication grade IIIb or higher according to Clavien-Dindo classification, with a HR of 12.3 (CI 2.2-67.7; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Transplant nephrectomy should only be performed when there is a good indication, and non-elective surgery should be avoided, when possible, as it increases morbidity.

Reduction of false positives using zone-specific prostate-specific antigen density for prostate MRI-based biopsy decision strategies.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and test zone-specific prostate-specific antigen density (sPSAD) combined with PI-RADS to guide prostate biopsy decision strategies (BDS). METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients, who underwent prostate MRI and biopsy (01/2012-10/2018). The whole gland and transition zone (TZ) were segmented at MRI using a retrained deep learning system (DLS; nnU-Net) to calculate PSAD and sPSAD, respectively. Additionally, sPSAD and PI-RADS were combined in a BDS, and diagnostic performances to detect Grade Group ≥ 2 (GG ≥ 2) prostate cancer were compared. Patient-based cancer detection using sPSAD was assessed by bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions and reported as area under the curve (AUC). Clinical utility of the BDS was tested in the hold-out test set using decision curve analysis. Statistics included nonparametric DeLong test for AUCs and Fisher-Yates test for remaining performance metrics. RESULTS: A total of 1604 patients aged 67 (interquartile range, 61-73) with 48% GG ≥ 2 prevalence (774/1604) were evaluated. By employing DLS-based prostate and TZ volumes (DICE coefficients of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.97) and 0.84 (0.70-0.99)), GG ≥ 2 detection using PSAD was inferior to sPSAD (AUC, 0.71 (0.68-0.74)/0.73 (0.70-0.76); p < 0.001). Combining PI-RADS with sPSAD, GG ≥ 2 detection specificity doubled from 18% (10-20%) to 43% (30-44%; p < 0.001) with similar sensitivity (93% (89-96%)/97% (94-99%); p = 0.052), when biopsies were taken in PI-RADS 4-5 and 3 only if sPSAD was ≥ 0.42 ng/mL/cc as compared to all PI-RADS 3-5 cases. Additionally, using the sPSAD-based BDS, false positives were reduced by 25% (123 (104-142)/165 (146-185); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using sPSAD to guide biopsy decisions in PI-RADS 3 lesions can reduce false positives at MRI while maintaining high sensitivity for GG ≥ 2 cancers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Transition zone-specific prostate-specific antigen density can improve the accuracy of prostate cancer detection compared to MRI assessments alone, by lowering false-positive cases without significantly missing men with ISUP GG ≥ 2 cancers. KEY POINTS: • Prostate biopsy decision strategies using PI-RADS at MRI are limited by a substantial proportion of false positives, not yielding grade group ≥ 2 prostate cancer. • PI-RADS combined with transition zone (TZ)-specific prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) decreased the number of unproductive biopsies by 25% compared to PI-RADS only. • TZ-specific PSAD also improved the specificity of MRI-directed biopsies by 9% compared to the whole gland PSAD, while showing identical sensitivity.