Noncontrast CT versus Perfusion-Based Core Estimation in Large Vessel Occlusion: The Blood Pressure after Endovascular Stroke Therapy Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 2018 AHA guidelines recommend perfusion imaging to select patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) for thrombectomy in the extended window. However, the relationship between noncontrast CT and CT perfusion imaging has not been sufficiently characterized >6 hours after last known normal (LKN). METHODS: From a multicenter prospective cohort of consecutive adults who underwent thrombectomy for anterior LVO 0-24 hours after LKN, we correlated baseline core volume (rCBF < 30%) and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scale (ASPECTS) score. We compared perfusion findings between patients with an unfavorable ASPECTS (<6) against those with a favorable ASPECTS (≥6), and assessed findings over time. RESULTS: Of 485 enrolled patients, 177 met inclusion criteria (median age: 69 years, interquartile range [IQR: 57-81], 49% female, median ASPECTS 8 [IQR: 6-9], median core 10 cc [IQR: 0-30]). ASPECTS and core volume moderately correlated (r = -.37). A 0 cc core was observed in 54 (31%) patients, 70% of whom had ASPECTS <10. Of the 28 patients with ASPECTS <6, 3 (11%) had a 0 cc core. After adjustment for age and stroke severity, there was a lower ASPECTS for every 1 hour delay from LKN (cOR: 0.95, 95% confidence of interval [CI]: 0.91-1.00, P = .04). There was no difference in core (P = .51) or penumbra volumes (P = .87) across patients over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter prospective cohort of patients who underwent thrombectomy, one-third of patients had normal CTP core volumes despite nearly three quarters of patients showing ischemic changes on CT. This finding emphasizes the need to carefully assess both noncontrast and perfusion imaging when considering thrombectomy eligibility.

The Effect of Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Cerebral Oxygenation and Metabolism After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Anemia adversely affects cerebral oxygenation and metabolism after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and is also associated with poor outcome. There is limited evidence to support the use of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion to optimize brain homeostasis after SAH. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of transfusion on cerebral oxygenation and metabolism in patients with SAH. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in a neurological intensive care unit of a university hospital. Nineteen transfusions were studied in 15 consecutive patients with SAH that underwent multimodality monitoring (intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygen, and cerebral microdialysis). Data were collected at baseline and for 12 h after transfusion. The relationship between hemoglobin (Hb) change and lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR) orbrain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) was tested using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: PRBC transfusion was administered on the median post-bleed day 8. The average Hb concentration at baseline was 8.1 g/dL and increased by 2.2 g/dL after transfusion. PbtO2 increased between hours 2 and 4 post-transfusion and this increase was maintained until hour 10. LPR did not change significantly during the 12-h monitoring period. After adjusting for SpO2, cerebral perfusion pressure, and LPR, the change in Hb concentration was independently and positively associated with a change in PbtO2 (adjusted b estimate = 1.39 [95% confidence interval 0.09-2.69]; P = 0.04). No relationship between the change in Hb concentration and LPR was found. CONCLUSIONS: PRBC transfusion resulted in PbtO2 improvement without a clear effect on cerebral metabolism prior to SAH.

A Consensus-Based Interpretation of the Benchmark Evidence from South American Trials: Treatment of Intracranial Pressure Trial.

Widely-varying published and presented analyses of the Benchmark Evidence From South American Trials: Treatment of Intracranial Pressure (BEST TRIP) randomized controlled trial of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring have suggested denying trial generalizability, questioning the need for ICP monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), re-assessing current clinical approaches to monitored ICP, and initiating a general ICP-monitoring moratorium. In response to this dissonance, 23 clinically-active, international opinion leaders in acute-care sTBI management met to draft a consensus statement to interpret this study. A Delphi method-based approach employed iterative pre-meeting polling to codify the group's general opinions, followed by an in-person meeting wherein individual statements were refined. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% by blinded voting for approval. Seven precisely-worded statements resulted, with agreement levels of 83% to 100%. These statements, which should be read in toto to properly reflect the group's consensus positions, conclude that the BEST TRIP trial: 1) studied protocols, not ICP-monitoring per se; 2) applies only to those protocols and specific study groups and should not be generalized to other treatment approaches or patient groups; 3) strongly calls for further research on ICP interpretation and use; 4) should be applied cautiously to regions with much different treatment milieu; 5) did not investigate the utility of treating monitored ICP in the specific patient group with established intracranial hypertension; 6) should not change the practice of those currently monitoring ICP; and 7) provided a protocol, used in non-monitored study patients, that should be considered when treating without ICP monitoring. Consideration of these statements can clarify study interpretation.