Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 8 de 8
1.
PM R ; 15(3): 325-330, 2023 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35191195

BACKGROUND: Health disparities related to concussions have been reported in the literature for certain minority populations. Given the significant impact of concussions on long- and short-term function, the mitigation of barriers to accessing care is an important public health objective. OBJECTIVE: To determine if racial and ethnic disparities exist in patients who seek care for concussions compared to a control group with orthopedic ankle injuries (sprains and fractures) to minimize confounding factors that predispose to injury. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Single institution between February 2016 and December 2020. PATIENTS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records was completed for patients with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes for concussion, ankle sprain, and ankle fracture. A total of 10,312 patients were identified: 1568 (15.2%) with concussion, 4871 (47.3%) with ankle sprain, and 3863 (37.5%) with ankle fracture. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified by demographic factors, including sex, ethnicity, race, and insurance type. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnosis of concussion. RESULTS: The concussion group was the youngest (28.3 years ± 18.0) and had the fewest females (53.1%) compared to the ankle sprain (35.1 years ± 19.7; 58.7%) and fracture groups (44.1 years ± 21.3; 57.3%). The concussion group had a smaller proportion of Hispanic patients than the ankle sprain group (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.92, p = .010) and fracture group (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.75, p = <.001). In addition, the concussion group was less likely to be Asian (OR 0.70, CI 0.52-0.95, p = .023) than the sprain group and less likely to be Black/African American than both sprain (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.93, p = .017) and fracture groups (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89, p = .010). There were no differences across racial groups between ankle sprains and fractures. Patients with Medicaid/Medicare and self-pay had a higher likelihood of being in the concussion group than those with private insurance. CONCLUSION: Differences in concussion diagnosis may exist between certain demographic groups compared to those with ankle injuries. Efforts to mitigate disparities in concussion care are worthwhile with a focus on patient and caregiver education.


Ankle Fractures , Ankle Injuries , Brain Concussion , Sprains and Strains , Female , Humans , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Ankle Fractures/diagnosis , Medicare , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/epidemiology , Sprains and Strains/diagnosis , Sprains and Strains/epidemiology , Ankle Injuries/diagnosis , Ankle Injuries/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Healthcare Disparities
2.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med ; 15(6): 570-580, 2022 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36342649

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize current guidance and best practices surrounding non-orthopedic medical concerns in baseball. RECENT FINDINGS: Discussion of COVID19-related practice changes pertaining to the prevention and screening of communicable respiratory illness, concussion protocol updates, the enhanced role of a multi-disciplinary team of mental health professionals. Prevention, appropriate screening, and early identification remain cornerstones of effective primary care both within the general population as well as for the baseball athlete.

3.
Am J Sports Med ; 50(10): 2797-2804, 2022 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862642

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how different pitch count limits and rest day requirements affect cumulative pitch counts during a baseball season. PURPOSE: To determine (1) the variability of pitch count rules in high school baseball and (2) the theoretical effect of different pitch count limits and rest day combinations on game, weekly, and seasonal pitch totals in high school baseball pitchers. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Pitch count rules for the 2019-2020 academic year for 48 sanctioned states were recorded from each state's athletic association website. Maximum pitch count limits were recorded along with the number of pitches allowed before requiring 0 to 5 rest days before the next pitching outing. Rules were also analyzed for several distinctions, including the athlete's level of competition, age, and grade. To determine the effect of pitch count rules and rest days, a theoretical 3-month season was calculated in the following scenarios: (1) variable maximum pitch count limits with a universal 3-day rest requirement, (2) universal 110 pitch count limit with variable rest day requirements (3, 4, or 5 days), and (3) actual pitch count limits and required rest days for every state assuming pitchers throw as many pitches as allowed. Analysis of variance and Student t tests were used to compare between-group and intragroup seasonal pitch totals based on variations in required rest days. RESULTS: The most common maximum pitch count limit for a varsity high school athlete was 110 pitches (range, 100-125 pitches) with 4 rest days (range, 0-5 days). We found that 23 states (48%) did not make distinctions for pitch count rules based on the athlete's level of competition, age, or grade. We noted a 25% increase in total seasonal pitch counts between the smallest and largest pitch count limit when assuming constant 3-day rest. We found a 53% difference in total seasonal pitch count when rest days varied between 3 and 5 days with a constant 110-pitch limit. Allowing 140 pitches in a 4-day span without a specific rest day requirement resulted in the highest seasonal pitch count (Nevada). There was a 49% difference in maximum seasonal pitch counts between the most and least restrictive states (P < .001). Submaximum pitch limits resulted in higher seasonal pitch counts than maximum pitch limits in 56% of states. CONCLUSION: Pitch count rules vary widely by state. Required rest days influenced total seasonal pitch counts more than maximum or submaximum pitch count limits.


Baseball , Elbow Joint , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Rest , Schools , Seasons
4.
Am J Sports Med ; 50(9): 2534-2541, 2022 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35763569

BACKGROUND: Location, frequency, and severity of in-game injuries by defensive position played have never been determined in professional baseball players. HYPOTHESIS: Catchers would have a higher frequency of hip and knee injuries; infielders and outfielders would have a higher frequency of general lower extremity injuries; and pitchers would have a higher frequency and severity of shoulder and elbow/forearm injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: The Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System database was queried for all injuries in Major League Baseball and Minor League Baseball during the 2011-2019 seasons. Injuries were stratified by the following variables: athlete's level of play at the time of injury, anatomic region injured, whether the injury occurred during a game, and position played at the time of injury (infielder, outfielder, catcher, or pitcher). Number of days missed from competition immediately after an injury was used as a surrogate for injury severity: mild (0 days missed), moderate (1-5 days), and severe (>5 days). Observed versus expected injury ratios were calculated for each anatomic region based on position played, and ratios were adjusted by the number of players per position type during a standard inning of play. RESULTS: A total of 112,405 work-related injuries were reported, with the majority of injuries (86,520; 77%) occurring in Minor League Baseball athletes. Injuries to the leg, hand, shoulder, torso, and foot were the most common for athletes in both leagues, while hip/groin injuries were the least common. Catchers sustained the most in-game defensive head/neck injuries, while infielders and outfielders had the highest number of knee injuries. Starting and relief pitchers had the greatest total proportion of in-game defensive injuries across every other body region. Infielders and outfielders sustained injuries less frequently than expected across all body regions, while pitchers experienced more injuries than expected for all body parts. Catchers experienced more injuries than expected to the head/neck, hand, hip/groin, knee, and foot, and were more likely than other position players to sustain a knee injury that was categorized as severe based on time missed. CONCLUSION: The location, severity, and frequency of injuries vary by defensive position among professional baseball players.


Athletic Injuries , Baseball , Hip Injuries , Knee Injuries , Athletes , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Baseball/injuries , Humans
5.
J Orthop ; 30: 108-114, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35264824

Background: Core injuries in professional baseball pitchers have been linked to both diminished performance and time missed during the season injury was sustained. It is currently unclear how a history of a core injury may affect the future pitching performance and mechanics of professional baseball pitchers. Purpose: To compare kinetic and kinematic variables between professional baseball pitchers with prior core/groin injuries and those without prior injury. Study design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Professional baseball pitchers with a history of core injury pitched 8-12 fastball pitches while evaluated with 3D-motion capture (480 Hz). Inclusion criteria necessitated that the core injury occurred within one to four-years prior to biomechanical evaluation and that the core injury required time off from professional play for a minimum of 2 weeks and maximum of 3 months. These pitchers were 4:1 propensity-scored matched by age, height, weight, and handedness to pitchers with no prior injury history (control). Twenty kinematic and eleven normalized and non-normalized kinetic parameters were compared between groups using appropriate parametric testing. Sub-analysis of pitchers with distinct core muscle and spinal injuries were also analyzed. Results: The No Prior Injury (NPI) subgroup (n = 76) had significantly less elbow flexion at ball release (31 ± 5° vs. 35 ± 6° respectfully, p = 0.044) compared to the Core Musculature/Soft Tissue subgroup (CM/ST, n = 10), with no significant difference in kinematics for other injury groups (p > 0.05). The General Core/Groin injury group (GCG, n = 19) had significantly greater normalized elbow anterior force (43.9 ± 4.7 vs. 40.0 ± 5.2 %BodyWeight[BW], p = 0.006) and elbow flexion torque (4.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5 %BWxBodyHeight[BH], p = 0.001) than the NPI pitchers. CM/ST had significantly greater normalized elbow anterior force (p = 0.031), elbow flexion torque (p = 0.002), and shoulder adduction torque (p = 0.007) than NPI pitchers. Conclusion: Professional baseball pitchers with prior core/groin injuries demonstrated increased elbow anterior force and elbow flexion torque compared to pitchers with no prior core injuries. One possible explanation for this finding includes inadequate recruitment and utilization of the lower extremities as a component of the kinetic chain leading to compensation at the level of the throwing arm. Whether these kinetic differences arise as a consequence of injury or present a risk for such warrants additional investigation.

6.
Sports Health ; 14(4): 532-537, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292110

CONTEXT: Transmission of communicable diseases observed in sporting organizations is often preventable. Early detection, isolation, and treatment can significantly diminish time lost. Until recently, there has been a paucity of standardized guidelines outlining feasible, preventable measures to protect both athletes and staff from contagious illnesses. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative was to highlight optimal prevention practices for transmission mitigation, with a particular focus on hygiene activity and travel considerations in professional sporting organizations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Current recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and peer-reviewed journals. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5. RESULTS: Communicable illness prevention strategies begin at the level of sufficient personal hygiene practices. Common area surface cleaning recommendations, including shared equipment sanitization between usage as well as designated equipment use to specific athletes, should be considered to minimize cross-contamination, in particular, for liked-position players. Intelligent design for shared areas can include redistributing the layout of communal spaces, most feasibly, spreading locker designation a minimum distance of 6 ft from one another. Travel considerations can include placing most susceptible passengers closest to window seating, boarding last and exiting first. Team physicians should have knowledge of essential personnel medical histories in an effort to risk stratify staff members and players in the setting of communicable disease. CONCLUSION: Providing a framework for illness management and prevention is important when considering the effects on player health, missed time, performance, and overall cost. Containment of commonly observed communicable illnesses can be optimized with sufficient personal hygiene practices, common area surface cleaning recommendations, intelligent design for shared areas, travel and hotel considerations, as well as appropriate screening tools and isolation techniques. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY (SORT): B.


Sports , Travel , Athletes , Humans , Mass Screening
7.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 31(5): 1026-1034, 2022 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34896252

BACKGROUND: Temporal variations during the pitch have demonstrated significant impacts on the kinetic chain, and as such, have implications in injury risk. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of varying chronological orders of maximum joint and segment velocities on ball velocity and upper extremity kinetics. METHODS: Professional baseball pitchers (n = 287) were assessed with 3D-motion capture (480 Hz) while pitching. Pitches were categorized into one of the following groups dependent on the first maximum joint or segment velocity achieved out of chronological order in an inferior to superior direction: knee extension (DscK), pelvis rotation (DscP), trunk rotation (DscT), shoulder rotation (DscS), forearm pronation (DscF), and Proper (for pitchers with the correct temporal sequence), and Total Population, for all pitchers. Ten normalized throwing arm kinetic variables were compared among groups. Regression analysis was conducted on the timing of maximum velocities with ball velocity. RESULTS: The majority of pitches were in the DscK group (64.5%). The DscK group had a significantly slower maximum lead knee extension velocity compared with the Proper group (253°/s vs. 316°/s, P = .017). The Proper group had a significantly faster ball velocity compared with the Total Population (39.0 ± 1.9 m/s vs. 38.3 ± 2.1 m/s, P = .013). The DscP group had a significantly slower maximum pelvis rotation velocity compared with the Proper group (596°/s vs. 698°/s, P < .001). The Proper group had no significant difference in kinetics relative to the population. For every 1 standard deviation delay in attaining maximum lead knee extension velocity, ball velocity increased by 0.38 m/s (B = 3.5, ß = 0.18, P < .001). For every 1 standard deviation delay in timing to achieve maximum pelvis rotation velocity, maximum pelvis rotation velocity and ball velocity increased by 22.5°/s (B = 1107.0, ß = 0.23, P < .001) and 0.48 m/s (B = 23.4, ß = 0.23, P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pitchers with a discordant sequence of knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity timing had significantly slower corresponding segment/joint velocities. Conversely, pitchers with a proper sequence had the fastest ball velocity with minimal differences in throwing arm kinetics. To maximize ball velocity, professional pitchers should consider achieving maximal velocities in an inferior to superior chronological sequence, with a particular focus on the knee and pelvis.


Baseball , Elbow Injuries , Arm , Baseball/injuries , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Kinetics
8.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 8(12): 2325967120969245, 2020 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33354584

BACKGROUND: Although the monitoring of a pitcher's throwing arm workload has become a hot topic in both research and the pitching world, the impact of mound height and distance still remains unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the kinetics and kinematics between pitches from a mound and flat ground at 2 different distances. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 21 healthy high school varsity baseball pitchers (age, 16.2 ± 1.3 years; weight, 73.6 ± 11.0 kg; height, 181.3 ± 6.4 cm) participated in this study. Players were fitted with a motusBASEBALL sensor and sleeve. Each pitcher was instructed to pitch 5 fastballs under 4 conditions: mound at 60.5 ft (regulation distance), flat ground at 60.5 ft, mound at 50.5 ft, and flat ground at 50.5 ft. Linear mixed-effects models were used to account for both intra- and interplayer variability. A multivariable model was used to evaluate the association of mound pitching, flat-ground pitching, and their distances (50.5 ft and 60.5 ft), and their interaction to arm speed, arm slot, arm rotation, elbow varus torque, and ball velocity. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant effects of mound, flat-ground, or distance variation on arm speed or shoulder rotation. Arm slot was significantly higher (+3.0°; P = .02) on pitches from the mound at 60.5 ft compared with 50.5 ft. Elbow varus torque was lower (-1.5 N·m; P = .02) on mound pitches at 60.5 ft compared with 50.5 ft. Pitches thrown from the mound displayed significantly faster ball velocity compared with flat-ground pitches at both distances (P < .01 for both), with pitches at 60.5 ft having higher velocity (+0.7 m/s; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Contrary to long-standing notions, the study results suggest that pitching from the mound does not significantly increase stress on the elbow compared with flat-ground pitching. Lower elbow varus torque and faster ball velocity at the regulation distance compared with the reduced distance indicate that elbow stress and ball velocity may not correlate perfectly, and radar guns may not be an appropriate surrogate measure of elbow varus torque. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A better understanding of the kinetic and kinematic implications of various throwing programs will allow for the designing of programs that are driven by objective data with aims directed toward injury prevention and rehabilitation in baseball pitchers.

...