Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
1.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 243: 108386, 2024 Jun 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901374

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine risk factors predictive of external ventricular drain (EVD)-related hemorrhage and the association of such hemorrhages with mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and total cost. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, data was collected retrospectively for adult patients requiring EVD placement from 2015 to 2018 at the authors' institution. Collected data included demographic patient information, peri-procedural factors, and relevant post-procedural measures. Computerized tomography (CT) images and associated radiologic reports were independently reviewed, identifying hemorrhages accompanying EVD placement. RESULTS: From this 487-patient sample, 85 (17.5 %) patients had hemorrhages, including asymptomatic hemorrhages identified on imaging alone. A univariable analysis of patient parameters in the overall cohort was performed to identify possible predictors of hemorrhage. Age (p = 0.002), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (p < 0.001), platelet count (p = 0.002), presence of uremia (p = 0.035), and the number of times the EVD was replaced (p < 0.001) were associated with hemorrhage in univariable models. The experience of the resident surgeon based on post-graduate year (PGY level) and the number of attempts/passes needed for EVD placement were not associated with hemorrhage risk. Significant predictor of hemorrhage confirmed in a multivariable analysis only included the number of times the EVD was replaced (OR = 2.78, adjusted p < 0.001). Outcomes between EVD-related hemorrhage versus no hemorrhage groups, including mortality, discharge disposition, LOS, and cost, were compared. EVD-related hemorrhage was found to be associated with increased mortality (OR = 3.58, adjusted p < 0.001) and decreased likelihood of discharge home (OR = 0.13, adjusted p = 0.030) in the associated multivariable regressions. CONCLUSION: The number of times an EVD was replaced was associated with EVD-related hemorrhage outcome. EVD-related hemorrhage is associated with increased mortality and a decreased likelihood of being discharged home.

2.
Neurosurgery ; 2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38940573

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery for the very elderly is a progressively important paradigm as life expectancy continues to rise. Patients with glioblastoma multiforme often undergo surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy (CT) to prolong overall survival (OS). However, the efficacy of these treatment modalities in patients aged 80 years and older has yet to be fully assessed in the literature. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to retrospectively identify patients aged 65 years and older with glioblastoma multiforme (1989-2016). All available patient demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. To study OS, bivariable survival models were created using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used for final adjusted analyses. RESULTS: A total of 578 very elderly patients (aged 80 years and older) and 2836 elderly patients (aged 65-79 years) were identified. Compared with elderly patients, very elderly patients were more likely to have Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 1.899 [95% CI: 1.417-2.544], P < .001) while less likely to have private insurance status (OR 0.544 [95% CI: 0.401-0.739], P < .001). In addition, very elderly patients were more likely to travel the least distance for treatment and have multiple tumors (P < .001). When controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, very elderly patients were less likely to receive gross total resection (GTR) (OR 0.822 [95% CI: 0.681-0.991], P < .041), RT (OR 0.385 [95% CI: 0.319-0.466], P < .001), or postoperative CT (OR 0.298 [95% CI: 0.219-0.359], P < .001) relative to elderly counterparts. Within very elderly patients, GTR, RT, and CT all independently and significantly predicted improved OS (P < .001 for all). These predictive models were deployed in an online calculator (https://spine.shinyapps.io/GBM_elderly). CONCLUSION: Very elderly patients are less likely to receive GTR, RT, or CT when compared with elderly counterparts despite use of these therapies conferring improved OS. Selected very elderly patients may benefit from more aggressive attempts at surgical and adjuvant treatment.

3.
J Neurosurg Spine ; : 1-8, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848586

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Spinal chordoma treatment guidelines recommend resection. However, in patients in whom gross-total resection (GTR) is achieved, the benefits of radiation therapy (RT) are unclear. Therefore, the authors performed a systematic review to determine if RT is associated with postoperative progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after achieving GTR of spinal chordoma. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for studies including individualized data of patients undergoing GTR with or without RT for spinal chordoma. Patients < 18 years of age or those who underwent stereotactic body RT were excluded. Qualitative assessment was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale guidelines. Log-rank tests for time-to-event data and a Cox proportional-hazards model were generated for a multivariable statistical model. RESULTS: Complete data of 132 patients were retrieved, with 37 (28%) patients receiving adjuvant RT and 95 (72%) not receiving adjuvant RT. The mean follow-up was not statistically significantly different between those undergoing RT and not undergoing RT (54.02 months and 65.43 months, respectively). Patients were more likely not to undergo RT if their disease was located in the sacrum versus the mobile spine (p < 0.001). When controlling for age ≥ 65 years, male sex, disease location, and treatment year ≥ 2010, patients undergoing RT had similar PFS and OS when compared with those not undergoing RT on multivariable survival analysis (HR 0.935 [95% CI 0.703-2.340], p = 0.844 and HR 2.078 [95% CI 0.848-5.090], p = 0.110, respectively). However, age ≥ 65 years was associated with poorer OS in adjusted analyses (HR 2.761 [95% CI 1.185-6.432], p = 0.018) relative to patients < 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: After achieving GTR of spinal chordoma, the utility of RT on PFS and OS remains unclear. Age ≥ 65 years appears to be associated with OS in spinal chordoma patients. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the utility of RT in this patient population.

5.
World Neurosurg ; 181: e133-e153, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37739175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown growing promise in the treatment of brain metastases, especially combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The combination of ICIs with SRS has been studied for efficacy as well as increasing radiation necrosis risks. In this review, we compare clinical outcomes of radiation necrosis, intracranial control, and overall survival between patients with brain metastases treated with either SRS alone or SRS-ICI combination therapy. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane was performed in May 2023 for articles comparing the safety and efficacy of SRS/ICI versus SRS-alone for treating brain metastases. RESULTS: The search criteria identified 1961 articles, of which 48 met inclusion criteria. Combination therapy with SRS and ICI does not lead to significant increases in incidence of radiation necrosis either radiographically or symptomatically. Overall, no difference was found in intracranial control between SRS-alone and SRS-ICI combination therapy. Combination therapy is associated with increased median overall survival. Notably, some comparative studies observed decreased neurologic deaths, challenging presumptions that improved survival is due to greater systemic control. The literature supports SRS-ICI administration within 4 weeks of another for survival but remains inconclusive, requiring further study for other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Combination SRS-ICI therapy is associated with significant overall survival benefit for patients with brain metastases without significantly increasing radiation necrosis risks compared to SRS alone. Although intracranial control rates appear to be similar between the 2 groups, timing of treatment delivery may improve control rates and demands further study attention.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Necrosis , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Neurosurg ; 140(2): 393-403, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877968

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Grade 3 meningioma represents a rare meningioma subtype, for which limited natural history data are available. The objective of this study was to identify demographics and pathologic characteristics, clinical and functional status outcomes, and prognostic factors in an international cohort of grade 3 meningioma patients. METHODS: Clinical and histopathological data were collected for patients treated at 7 sites across North America and Europe between 1991 and 2022. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (54% female, median age 65 [IQR 52, 72] years) were included. Sixty-seven (65%) patients had de novo grade 3 lesions, whereas 29 (28%) had malignant transformations of lower-grade meningiomas. All patients underwent initial resection of their tumor. Patients were followed for a median of 46 (IQR 24, 108) months, during which time there were 65 (73%) recurrences and 50 (49%) deaths. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 66% (95% CI 56%-77%) and 37% (95% CI 28%-48%), respectively. Age ≥ 65 years and male sex were independent predictors of worse OS and PFS in multivariate regression analysis, while postoperative radiotherapy was independently associated with improved OS. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) remained stable relative to baseline over 5 years postdiagnosis among participants who were alive at the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This large multicenter study provides insight into the longitudinal outcomes of grade 3 meningioma, with respect to recurrence, survival, and functional status. This study affirms the survival benefit conferred by radiotherapy in this population and suggests good functional status outcomes for patients surviving to 5 years postoperatively.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Meningioma/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Progression-Free Survival , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Prognosis , Disease-Free Survival
7.
J Neurosurg ; 140(2): 350-356, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877982

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating improved outcomes for patients with CNS neoplasms treated at academic centers (ACs) versus nonacademic centers (non-ACs), which represents a potential healthcare disparity within neurosurgery. In this paper, the authors sought to investigate the relationship between facility type and surgical outcomes in meningioma patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients diagnosed with intracranial meningioma between 2004 and 2019. Patients were stratified by facility type, and the Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher exact test were used for bivariate comparisons of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess whether demographic variables were associated with treatment at ACs. Furthermore, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether facility type was associated with overall survival (OS) outcomes. RESULTS: Data on 139,304 patients (74% male, 84% White) were retrieved. Patients were stratified by facility type, with 50,349 patients (36%) treated at ACs and 88,955 patients (64%) treated at non-ACs. Patients treated at ACs were more likely to have private insurance (41% vs 34%, p < 0.001) and less likely to have Medicare (46% vs 57%, p < 0.001). Patients treated at ACs were more likely to have larger tumors (36.91 mm vs 33.57 mm, p < 0.001) and more likely to undergo surgery (47% vs 34%, p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients treated at ACs had decreased comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index rating 0: 74% vs 69%) and similar income levels (income ≥ $46,000: 44% vs 43%). With respect to survival outcomes, patients treated at ACs demonstrated a higher median OS at 10 years than patients treated at non-ACs (65.2% vs 54.1%). The association of improved OS in patients treated at ACs continued to be true when adjusting for all other clinical and demographic variables (HR 0.900, 95% CI 0.882-0.918; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that facility type is associated with disparate survival outcomes in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas. Namely, patients treated at non-ACs appear to have a survival disadvantage even when controlling for additional comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Adult , Humans , Male , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Female , Meningioma/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Medicare , Proportional Hazards Models , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery
8.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-7, 2023 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37922549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Joint Cerebrovascular (CV) Section serves as a centralized entity for the dissemination of information related to CV neurosurgery. The quality of scientific conferences, such as the CV Section's Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Annual Meeting, can be gauged by the number of poster and oral presentations that are published in peer-reviewed journals. However, publication rates from the CV Section's meetings are unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the rate at which abstracts presented at the AANS/CNS CV Section Annual Meeting from 2014 to 2018 were subsequently published in peer-reviewed journals. METHODS: The abstract titles for all accepted poster and oral podium presentation abstracts from the 2014-2018 Annual Joint AANS/CNS CV Section Meetings were searched using PubMed. A match was defined as sufficient similarity between the abstract and its corresponding journal publication with regard to title, authors, methods, and results. Five-year impact factors (IFs) from Journal Citation Reports (JCR), the country of the corresponding author, and the number of citations in the Scopus database were obtained using the articles' digital object identifier when available, or the exact article title, journal, and year of publication. RESULTS: Of the 607 total poster and oral presentations from the 2014-2018 Annual Meetings of the AANS/CNS Joint CV Section, 46.29% (n = 281) have been published. Published articles received 3233 total citations for an average number of citations per article (± SD) of 10.89 ± 16.37. The average 5-year JCR IF of published studies was 4.64 ± 3.13. Additionally, 98.22% of published abstracts were in publication within 4 years from the time the abstract was presented. The most common peer-reviewed neurosurgical journals featuring these publications were the Journal of Neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery, the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Neurosurgery, and the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of all poster and oral presentations at the annual meetings of the AANS/CNS Joint CV Section from 2014 to 2018 have been published in PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed journals. The average number of citations per publication (10.89 ± 16.37) reflects the high quality of abstracts accepted for presentation. It is important to continuously assess the quality of research presented at national conferences to ensure that standards are being maintained for the advancement of clinical practice in a given area of medicine. Conference abstract publication rates in peer-reviewed journals represent a way in which research quality can be gauged, and the authors encourage others to conduct similar investigations in their subspecialty area of interest and/or practice.

10.
J Clin Neurosci ; 117: 151-155, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37816269

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medical Students applying to neurosurgery residency programs incur substantial costs associated with interviews, away rotations, and application fees. However, few studies have compared expenses prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study evaluates the financial impact of COVID-19 on the neurosurgery residency application and identifies strategies that may alleviate the financial burden of prospective neurosurgery residents. METHODS: The TEXAS STAR database was surveyed for applicants of neurosurgical residency programs during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) and post-pandemic (2022). 66 applicants for the 2021 application cycle and 50 applicants for the 2022 application cycle completed the survey. We compared application fees, away rotations cost, interview cost, and total expenses as reported by the neurosurgery applicants of the 2021 and 2022 application cycle. A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for data normality, and a Mann-Whitney U-Test was used to compare costs during the 2021 and 2022 neurosurgery application cycle. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in total expenses in 2021 vs 2022 ($3,934 vs $9,860). Interview and away rotation expenses decreased in 2021 vs 2022 (interview expenses $786 vs $4511, away rotation $1,083 vs $3,000, p < 0.001). Application fee expenses were not different between 2021 and 2022. The greatest reduction in application cost ($11,908) was seen in the South for 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced total fees associated with the neurosurgical residency application. Virtual platforms in place of in-person interviews could lessen the financial burden on applicants and alleviate socioeconomic barriers in the neurosurgical application process after COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Students, Medical , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Costs and Cost Analysis , COVID-19/epidemiology
11.
Eur Spine J ; 32(11): 3868-3874, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37768336

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Predicting urinary retention is difficult. The aim of this study is to prospectively validate a previously developed model using machine learning techniques. METHODS: Patients were recruited from pre-operative clinic. Prediction of urinary retention was completed pre-operatively by 4 individuals and compared to ground truth POUR outcomes. Inter-rater reliability was calculated with intercorrelation coefficient (2,1). RESULTS: 171 patients were included with age 63 ± 14 years, 58.5% (100/171) male, BMI 30.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2.6 ± 0.5, 1.7 ± 1.0 levels, 56% (96/171) fusions. The observed rate of POUR was 25.7%. The model's performance was found to be 0.663 (0.567-0.759). With a regression model probability cutoff of 0.24 and a neural network cutoff of 0.23, the following predictive power was achieved: specificity 90.6%, sensitivity 22.7%, negative predictive value 77.2%, positive predictive value 45.5%, and accuracy 73.1%. Intercorrelation coefficient for the regression aspect of the model was found to be 0.889 and intercorrelation coefficient for the neural network aspect of the model was found to be 0.874. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study confirms performance of the prediction model for POUR developed with retrospective data, showing great correlation. This supports the use of machine learning techniques in the prediction of postoperative complications such as urinary retention.


Subject(s)
Urinary Retention , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Urinary Retention/diagnosis , Urinary Retention/etiology , Reproducibility of Results , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Machine Learning
12.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 39(4): 490-497, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37486864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion including anterior-to-psoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion has conventionally relied on pedicle screw placement (PSP) for construct stabilization. Single-position surgery with lumbar interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position with concomitant PSP has been associated with increased operative efficiency. What remains unclear is the accuracy of PSP with robotic guidance when compared with the more familiar prone patient positioning. The present study aimed to compare robot-assisted screw placement accuracy between patients with instrumentation placed in the prone and lateral positions. METHODS: The authors identified all consecutive patients treated with interbody fusion and PSP in the prone or lateral position by a single surgeon between January 2019 and October 2022. All pedicle screws placed were analyzed using CT scans to determine appropriate positioning according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification grading system (grade C or worse was considered as a radiographically significant breach). Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of a radiographically significant breach. RESULTS: Eighty-nine consecutive patients (690 screws) were included, of whom 46 (477 screws) were treated in the prone position and 43 (213 screws) in the lateral decubitus position. There were fewer breaches in the prone (n = 13, 2.7%) than the lateral decubitus (n = 15, 7.0%) group (p = 0.012). Nine (1.9%) radiographically significant breaches occurred in the prone group compared with 10 (4.7%) in the lateral decubitus group (p = 0.019), for a prone versus lateral decubitus PSP accuracy rate of 98.1% versus 95.3%. There were no significant differences in BMI between prone versus lateral decubitus cohorts (30.1 vs 29.6) or patients with screw breach versus those without (31.2 vs 29.5). In multivariate models, the prone position was the only significant protective factor for screw accuracy; no other significant risk factors for screw breach were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that pedicle screws placed with robotic assistance have higher placement accuracy in the prone position. Further studies will be needed to validate the accuracy of PSP in the lateral position as single-position surgery becomes more commonplace in the treatment of spinal disorders.


Subject(s)
Pedicle Screws , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Spinal Fusion , Surgeons , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
13.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 39(3): 411-418, 2023 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37327146

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chordomas are most frequently found in the sacrum, vertebral column, and skull base. Achieving gross-total resection (GTR) has been shown to optimize overall survival (OS); however, the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with GTR is currently not well understood. Given that RT may negatively impact patient quality of life, the aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of RT for improving OS in patients who have undergone GTR of spinal chordoma through analysis of the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: The SEER database (1975-2018) was queried for all adult patients (≥ 21 years) who underwent GTR for spinal chordoma. Bivariate analysis was conducted using chi-square testing for categorical variables, and the log-rank test was performed to find the associations of clinical variables with OS. Cox proportional hazards models were generated for multivariate analyses of the associations among clinical variables and OS. RESULTS: A total of 263 spinal chordomas that underwent GTR were identified. The mean age of all included patients was 58.72 years, and 63.9% of patients were male. In addition, 0.4% had dedifferentiated histology. The mean follow-up was 75.54 months. Of all patients, 152 (57.8%) received no RT and 111 (42.2%) received RT. Patients with sacral tumor location (80.9% vs 51.4%, p < 0.001) were more likely not to undergo RT when compared to patients with vertebral column location. In multivariate analysis, only age ≥ 65 years was associated with poorer OS (HR 3.16, CI 1.54-5.61, p < 0.001). RT did not have a statistically significant association with OS. CONCLUSIONS: RT after GTR of chordoma did not improve OS among SEER chordoma patients to a value that achieved statistical significance. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the true efficacy of RT after GTR of spinal chordoma.


Subject(s)
Chordoma , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Chordoma/radiotherapy , Chordoma/surgery , Chordoma/pathology , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Sacrum/surgery , Sacrum/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
14.
Egypt J Neurosurg ; 38(1)2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37124311

ABSTRACT

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors in adult patients. Although the majority of meningiomas are diagnosed as benign, approximately 20% of cases are high-grade tumors that require significant clinical treatment. The gold standard for grading central nervous system tumors comes from the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the central nervous system. Treatment options also depend on the location, imaging, and histopathological features of the tumor. This review will cover diagnostic strategies for meningiomas, including 2021 updates to the World Health Organization's grading of meningiomas. Meningioma treatment plans are variable and highly dependent on tumor grading. This review will also update the reader on developments in the treatment of meningiomas, including surgery, radiation therapy and monoclonal antibody treatment.

15.
Curr Oncol ; 30(5): 4990-5002, 2023 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232835

ABSTRACT

Focused ultrasound is a novel technique for the treatment of aggressive brain tumors that uses both mechanical and thermal mechanisms. This non-invasive technique can allow for both the thermal ablation of inoperable tumors and the delivery of chemotherapy and immunotherapy while minimizing the risk of infection and shortening the time to recovery. With recent advances, focused ultrasound has been increasingly effective for larger tumors without the need for a craniotomy and can be used with minimal surrounding soft tissue damage. Treatment efficacy is dependent on multiple variables, including blood-brain barrier permeability, patient anatomical features, and tumor-specific features. Currently, many clinical trials are currently underway for the treatment of non-neoplastic cranial pathologies and other non-cranial malignancies. In this article, we review the current state of surgical management of brain tumors using focused ultrasound.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Humans , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/surgery
16.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 39(2): 216-227, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37119104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a comprehensive, multifaceted approach aimed at improving postoperative outcomes. It incorporates a range of strategies to promote early and more effective recovery, including reducing pain, complications, and length of stay, without increasing readmission rate. To date, ERAS for spine surgery patients has been primarily limited to lumbar surgery and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). ERAS has not been previously studied for posterior cervical surgery, which may present a greater opportunity for improvement in patient outcomes with ERAS than ACDF. This single-institution, multi-surgeon study assessed the impact of an ERAS protocol in patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression surgery. METHODS: This study included a retrospective consecutive patient cohort with controls that were propensity matched for age, body mass index, sex, home opioid use, surgical levels, Nurick grade, and smoking status. In addition, consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression surgery for degenerative disease from December 2014 to December 2021 were included. ERAS was implemented in December 2018. Demographic, perioperative, clinical, and radiographic information was gathered. Regression models were created to evaluate length of stay, physiological function, pain levels, and opioid use. The primary focus was length of stay, with secondary outcomes including timing of ambulation, bowel movement, and voiding; daily pain scores; opioid consumption; discharge status; 30-day readmission rates; and reoperation rates. RESULTS: There were 366 patients included in the study, all of whom were included in multivariate models, and 254 (127 in each cohort) were included on the basis of matching. After propensity matching, patient characteristics, operative procedures, and operative duration were similar between groups. The ERAS cohort had a significantly improved length of stay (3.2 vs 4.7 days, p < 0.0001) and home discharge rate (80% vs 50%, p < 0.001) without an increase in readmission rate. The ERAS cohort had an earlier day of the first ambulation (p = 0.003), bowel movement (p = 0.014), and voiding (p = 0.001). ERAS demonstrated a significantly lower composite complication rate (1.1 vs 1.8, p < 0.0001). ERAS resulted in better maximum pain scores (p = 0.043) and trended toward improved mean pain scores (p = 0.072), although total opioid use was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a novel ERAS protocol significantly improved length of stay, return of physiological function, home discharge, complications, and maximum pain score after posterior cervical surgery.


Subject(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Analgesics, Opioid , Pain , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
17.
World Neurosurg ; 175: e1186-e1190, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37121507

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Within the trauma spine surgery literature, the effect of patient frailty on postoperative outcomes for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) remains clear. In this study, the authors quantified the influence of the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) score on hospital length of stay, diagnosis of a postoperative infection, 30-day readmission, and 90-day return to operating room (OR). METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with traumatic spine injury undergoing PSF by a single surgeon at our institution from 2016 to 2021. Data were extracted using manual chart review and the mFI-5 score was calculated using data on comorbidities. Bivariate (Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test) and multivariate regressions (linear and logistic) revealed whether there was an independent relationship between patient frailty and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The patient cohort included 263 patients (52.00 ± 19.04), 67 (25.5) were classified as frail, defined as having an mFI-5 score ≥2. Patients who were classified as frail were significantly more likely to have diabetes (odds ratio = 21.53; P < 0.001) and active cancer (odds ratio = 10.03; P = 0.004). Patients with mFI-5 scores ≥2 were also significantly older (P < 0.001) and had higher body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.007). Patients with mFI-5 scores >2 were more likely to return to the OR (odds ratio = 2.43; P = 0.037) on bivariate analysis. When controlling for demographics and clinical characteristics, mFI-5 score independently predicted return to OR (odds ratio = 1.294; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Patient frailty independently predicted a return to OR in patients undergoing PSF for traumatic spine injury. Future studies can investigate methods for patient risk optimization to reduce morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Operating Rooms , Risk Factors , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36846724

ABSTRACT

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are an anomaly of the vascular system where feeding arteries are directly connected to the venous drainage network. While AVMs can arise anywhere in the body and have been described in most tissues, brain AVMs are of significant concern because of the risk of hemorrhage which carries significant morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of AVM's and the mechanisms underlying their formation are not well understood. For this reason, patients who undergo treatment for symptomatic AVM's remain at increased risk of subsequent bleeds and adverse outcomes. The cerebrovascular network is delicate and novel animal models continue to provide insight into its dynamics in the context of AVM's. As the molecular players in the formation of familial and sporadic AVM's are better understood, novel therapeutic approaches have been developed to mitigate their associated risks. Here we discuss the current literature surrounding AVM's including the development of models and therapeutic targets which are currently being investigated.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...