ABSTRACT
Background and aim Cancer poses a significant burden in India, with a considerable number of people living with the disease and a substantial increase in new cases every year. Hence, considering the unique challenges faced by developing nations regarding the disease burden, this study has been designed. The aim of this work was to carry out a descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study on various types of cancer conducted in a tertiary care centre in India. Methods One thousand cancer patients who attended the outpatient department (OPD) from tertiary care cancer hospitals from July 2019 to December 2023 in Eastern India were enrolled. Patients included were of either gender, with their demographic details and the disease duration, who visited the OPD of hospitals meeting the eligibility criteria. Exclusion criteria were terminally ill cancer patients and patients who did not visit the outpatient department of the studied site. Descriptive analysis and chi-square test were carried out using the SPSS statistical software, version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) for data analysis. Ethics committee approval was taken. Results Gastrointestinal tract cancer (31.3%, n=313) and breast cancer (19.8%, n=198) were found to be the most common types of cancer among all. Out of the total patients studied, 41.1% were males and 58.9% were females. Among regions, North Chotanagpur had the highest (40.5%) prevalence, followed by South Chotanagpur (26.0%). The majority of individuals belonged to 41 to 60 years (49.0%, n=490), followed by 21-40 years (28.9%, n=289). Gastrointestinal cancer was more prevalent among males (35.5%, n=146), while breast cancer was predominant among females (31.4%, n=185). Conclusion Cancer is more prevalent among rural females (58.9%), providing valuable insights into the prevalence of various cancers and highlighting differences between regions, age groups, and genders.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The most difficult hernia surgery is the repair of the ventral hernia, which is caused by aberrant organ or tissue protrusions through the abdominal wall. Factors like obesity, smoking, and chronic medical conditions contribute to their formation. Surgical strategies have evolved from anatomical repair to mesh hernioplasty, with mesh placement playing a significant role in outcomes. The ideal anatomical location for mesh placement remains debated due to varying results. So, the objective of the study is to compare early postoperative complications, surgical site infection, and incidence of recurrence between sublay and onlay mesh placement repair of incisional hernias of <10 cm in diameter, at a tertiary hospital in Ranchi. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study was conducted over a period of January 2022 to January 2024 at the Rajendra Institute of Medical Science, Ranchi, India. During the study period, 96 patients were operated on, and their demographic details, along with their position of mesh placement and postoperative complications (seroma formation, wound infection, postoperative hospital stays, and recurrence), were retrieved from the hospital data. Comparisons between onlay and sublay groups in terms of post-operative complications were made. RESULTS: Within the study period, a total of 96 patients were operated on for incisional hernia. In this study, 36 (37.5%) were male and 60 (62.5%) were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.6:1. Out of the total number of patients, 56 (58.4%) had a past history of emergency surgery. It was observed that there was a higher incidence of seroma formation in the onlay group compared to the sublay with a statistical significance p-value of 0.027. The incidence of wound infection was found to be statistically significant (p-value = 0.035) between the onlay and sublay groups. In a period of six-month follow-up, three patients of the total study population had an incidence of recurrent incisional hernia, of which two from the onlay group and one from the sublay group were present, and there was no statistical significance (p-value > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our retrospective analysis, we can say that there is a lower incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence in sublay repair, along with a shorter postoperative hospital stay, making it a preferred method of repair over onlay.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Peritonitis refers to the inflammation of the peritoneum and peritoneal cavity. Causes of peritonitis can be bacterial (gastrointestinal or non-gastrointestinal), chemical, traumatic, or ischemic. Peritonitis can be localized or diffuse, acute or chronic. Peritonitis can be primary, secondary, or tertiary, according to the pathogenesis. Peritonitis developed secondary to hollow viscus perforation is a life-threatening condition and a common cause of emergency surgery in India. The Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) is a simple scoring system that can accurately predict the outcome of peritonitis. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MPI in predicting mortality risk or prognosis in patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation. Materials and methods This observational cross-sectional study at the Department of General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, involved 111 patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation from December 2021 to March 2022. Detailed history, clinical examination, relevant blood tests, and radiological investigations established a diagnosis of perforation peritonitis, followed by a score assessment. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Patients >50 years had higher mortality (i.e., 18/43) than patients <50 years (i.e., 13/68). Overall mortality was 31, which included one in low risk, 12 in intermediate risk, and 18 in the high-risk group. Mortality was lowest in the low-risk group (i.e., 1/30), highest in the high-risk group (i.e., 18/40), and 12/41 in the intermediate-risk group; the p-value was <0.05, which was highly significant. Mortality was higher in patients presenting after 24 hours, having organ failure, and non-colonic sepsis. Conclusion The MPI scoring system is simple, easy to calculate, cost-effective, precise, and effective in assessing mortality and morbidity risk in patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation. It can also guide further management strategies.
