Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lupus ; 24(1): 42-9, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25124676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Anti-C1q has been associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis in previous studies. We studied anti-C1q specificity for SLE (vs rheumatic disease controls) and the association with SLE manifestations in an international multicenter study. METHODS: Information and blood samples were obtained in a cross-sectional study from patients with SLE (n = 308) and other rheumatologic diseases (n = 389) from 25 clinical sites (84% female, 68% Caucasian, 17% African descent, 8% Asian, 7% other). IgG anti-C1q against the collagen-like region was measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Prevalence of anti-C1q was 28% (86/308) in patients with SLE and 13% (49/389) in controls (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.8-4, p < 0.001). Anti-C1q was associated with proteinuria (OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.7-5.1, p < 0.001), red cell casts (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2-5.4, p = 0.015), anti-dsDNA (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.9-6.1, p < 0.001) and anti-Smith (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.5-5.0, p = 0.01). Anti-C1q was independently associated with renal involvement after adjustment for demographics, ANA, anti-dsDNA and low complement (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3-4.2, p < 0.01). Simultaneously positive anti-C1q, anti-dsDNA and low complement was strongly associated with renal involvement (OR = 14.9, 95% CI: 5.8-38.4, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-C1q was more common in patients with SLE and those of Asian race/ethnicity. We confirmed a significant association of anti-C1q with renal involvement, independent of demographics and other serologies. Anti-C1q in combination with anti-dsDNA and low complement was the strongest serological association with renal involvement. These data support the usefulness of anti-C1q in SLE, especially in lupus nephritis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Complement C1q/immunology , DNA/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Complement System Proteins/deficiency , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/ethnology , Lupus Nephritis/ethnology , Lupus Nephritis/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Proteinuria/blood , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
2.
Lupus ; 20(7): 709-16, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21478286

ABSTRACT

The EXPLORER study was designed to assess the response to rituximab versus placebo in patients with moderate to severe extrarenal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) receiving background immunosuppression. The definition of response required reduced clinical activity without subsequent flares over 52 weeks, and the study did not meet its efficacy endpoint. The current exploratory analysis assessed flare rates in patients who achieved initial low disease activity response (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG] C or better in all organs) during the study. Exploratory reanalysis of data from the EXPLORER trial was conducted, considering alternative definitions for flare. No difference was found between rituximab and placebo in preventing or delaying moderate to severe flares. However, when severe (BILAG A) flares alone were examined, rituximab reduced the risk of a subsequent first A flare (hazard ratio = 0.61; p = 0.052) and lowered mean ± SD annualized A flare rates (0.86 ± 1.47 vs. 1.41 ± 2.14; p = 0.038). Eighty-four (49.7%) rituximab-treated patients achieved low disease activity without subsequent A flares versus 31 (35.2%) placebo-treated patients (p = 0.027). Prednisone rescue for A flares was similar in rituximab- (24%) and placebo-treated (14%) patients (p = 0.204). This post hoc analysis evaluates the hypothesis that assessment of BILAG A flares may distinguish potential treatment effects with greater sensitivity than assessment of BILAG B flares.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Rituximab , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Medscape Womens Health ; 1(11): 5, 1996 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9746657

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of autoimmune diseases in women may be the consequence of a bidirectional signaling network between hormones and the immune system that regulates female reproductive life. Two prototypical autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, arise from 2 different immune responses that generate mutually exclusive signals in response to different inflammatory triggers. Certain estrogens may ameliorate the rheumatoid-arthritis-like TH1 response while exacerbating the lupus-like TH2 response. Studies of sex hormone metabolism in lupus patients reveal increased 16-hydroxylation of estrone in some patients and decreased levels of androgens as a result of increased oxidation at C17. These occurrences result in low serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Both the increase of 16-hydroxylation of estrone and the depletion of DHEA have immune effects that would tend to exacerbate a lupus-like TH2 response. This theoretical framework provides a rationale for ongoing initial clinical trials of exogenous hormones in autoimmune diseases.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...