Care pathways, prescribing practices and treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression: retrospective, population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of effective therapies, many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) develop treatment-resistant depression (TRD). AIMS: To evaluate and compare prescribing patterns, contact with specialist services and treatment outcomes in patients with MDD and TRD. METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of linked primary and secondary care National Health Service data in the north-west London Discover-NOW data-set. Eligible patients were adults who had diagnostic codes for depression and had been prescribed at least one antidepressant between 2015 and 2020. RESULTS: A total of 110 406 patients were included, comprising 101 333 (92%) with MDD and 9073 (8%) with TRD. Patients with TRD had significantly higher risks of suicidal behaviour and comorbidities such as anxiety, asthma, and alcohol or substance misuse (all P < 0.0001). Citalopram, sertraline, fluoxetine and mirtazapine accounted for 83% of MDD and 71% of TRD prescriptions. Use of antidepressant switching (1% MDD, 7% TRD) and combination therapy (1%, 5%) was rare, whereas augmentation occurred more frequently in the TRD group (4%, 35%). Remission was recorded in 42 348 (42%) patients with MDD and 1188 (13%) with TRD (P < 0.0001), whereas relapse was seen in 20 970 (21%) and 4923 (54%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Mean times from diagnosis to first contact with mental health services were 38.9 (s.d. 33.6) months for MDD and 41.5 (s.d. 32.0) months for TRD (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a considerable difference between treatment guidelines for depression and TRD and the reality of clinical practice. Long-term treatment with single antidepressants, poor remission, and high relapse rates among patients in primary care highlight the need to optimise treatment pathways and access to newer therapies.

Current treatments used in clinical practice for major depressive disorder and treatment resistant depression in England: A retrospective database study.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic recurrent or episodic psychiatric illness that can be successfully treated with oral antidepressants, yet one-in-three patients do not respond to currently-available treatments. According to the FDA and EMA, patients are considered to have treatment-resistant depression (TRD) when their MDD fails to respond adequately to ≥2 successive antidepressants in a single episode. AIMS: To describe current clinical management of patients with MDD and TRD in England, including treatment strategies and referral to secondary mental healthcare. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients identified in primary care with diagnosed MDD, including a TRD subgroup (≥2 treatment failures as determined by treatment dynamics) was conducted using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD primary care database linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Mental Health Services Data Set data (Protocol 19_019R). RESULTS: 41,375 patients with MDD (mean age 44yrs, 62% female, median follow-up 29mths); and 1,051 (3%) patients with TRD were identified. Mean time-to-TRD was 18 months. Most patients (>99%) received first-line antidepressant monotherapy. Following TRD criteria being met, antidepressant monotherapy use remained most frequent from TRD first-line (70%) to fifth-line (48%). Dual/triple antidepressant use remained constant (range:24%-26%), while augmented antidepressant use increased from TRD first-line (7%) to third-line (17%). Minimal non-pharmacological therapies were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite current clinical guidelines recommending a stepwise approach, many patients frequently cycle through numerous antidepressants with similar mechanisms of action and efficacy. These findings indicate a high unmet need for new treatments that improve outcomes in these patient populations.

A retrospective chart review study to quantify the monthly medical resource use and costs of treating patients with treatment resistant depression in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a globally prevalent chronic psychiatric illness with a significant disease impact. As many as 30% of patients with MDD do not adequately respond to two therapies and are considered to be treatment resistant. This study aimed to quantify healthcare costs associated with treatment resistant depression (TRD) in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with TRD was conducted in primary and secondary care settings over a 2 year period. Data abstracted from medical records of patients included demographics, clinical characteristics and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU; number of consultations, use of Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Teams [CRHTTs], non-drug and drug interventions, and hospitalizations). HCRU per patient per month (28 days) was calculated for three health states: major depressive episode (MDE), remission and recovery. Unit costs were from the British National Formulary (BNF) and the Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). RESULTS: A total of 295 patients with TRD were recruited between January 2016 and May 2018. The mean age of the total sample was 43.3 years; 60.3% were female. Costs per patient, per 28 days, were highest in the MDE state, with the average cost (£992) mainly driven by consultations, non-drug treatment, hospitalizations and CRHTT, with a considerable fall in costs as patients moved into remission and subsequent recovery. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that antidepressant treatments for TRD that are more effective in reducing the time spent in an MDE health state, and helping patients achieve remission and recovery, are essential for reducing the overall HCRU and costs in patients with TRD. Cost of TRD in the UK Strengths and limitations of this study This observational study of TRD is the first to assess the HCRU impact associated with different predefined health states. Using retrospective data from both primary and secondary care physicians from regions across the UK ensures a representative real-world patient population. One limitation is that the selection of patients is based on criteria that define TRD that rely on physician judgement. Although the study captures direct HCRU costs, the indirect costs of lost productivity and care are not included in the overall burden. This study has defined the current clinical management of patients with TRD in the UK and provides an estimate of the associated HCRU and associated costs.