High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Treatment of Facial Skin Cancers: Local Control, Toxicity, and Quality of Life in 67 Patients.

While treatment of localized cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is based on surgery, brachytherapy, which delivers a high dose of radiation to tumor tissue while sparing healthy tissue, is an alternative. Since the withdrawal of iridium wires from the market, brachytherapy has mainly been performed with high-dose-rate iridium-192 (HDR). This study evaluated the efficacy of HDR brachytherapy in terms of local control, survival, toxicity, and quality of life in patients with facial periorificial cutaneous SCC or BCC treated in our center between 2015 and 2021. Sixty-seven patients were treated for SCC (n = 49) or BCC (n = 18), on the nose (n = 29), lip (n = 28), eyelid (n = 7), or ear (n = 3). The majority had Tis or T1 tumors (73.1%). After a median follow-up of 28 months, 8 patients had a local recurrence. The local control rate at 3 years was 87.05% (95% CI 74.6-93.7). All patients developed grade 1-2 acute radio-mucositis or radiodermatitis and one experienced reversible grade 3 acute radio-mucositis. Of the 27 patients who completed the quality-of-life questionnaire, 77.8% recommended the treatment. This study confirms that HDR brachytherapy for facial cutaneous carcinomas provides good local control, good tolerance, and satisfactory functional outcome.

Association of Radiochemotherapy to Immunotherapy in unresectable locally advanced Oesophageal carciNoma-randomized phase 2 trial ARION UCGI 33/PRODIGE 67: the study protocol.

BACKGROUND: In case of locally advanced and/or non-metastatic unresectable esophageal cancer, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) delivering 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with platinum-based regimen remains the standard of care resulting in a 2-year disease-free survival of 25% which deserves to be associated with new systemic strategies. In recent years, several immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1, anti-Program-Death 1/anti-Program-Death ligand 1) have been approved for the treatment of various solid malignancies including metastatic esophageal cancer. As such, we hypothesized that the addition of an anti-PD-L1 to CRT would provide clinical benefit for patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. To assess the efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with CRT and then as maintenance therapy we designed the randomized phase II ARION (Association of Radiochemotherapy with Immunotherapy in unresectable Oesophageal carciNoma- UCGI 33/PRODIGE 67). METHODS: ARION is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative phase II trial. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio in each arm with a stratification according to tumor stage, histology and centre. Experimental arm relies on CRT with 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with FOLFOX regimen administrated during and after radiotherapy every two weeks for a total of 6 cycles and durvalumab starting with CRT for a total of 12 infusions. Standard arm is CRT alone. Use of Intensity Modulated radiotherapy is mandatory. The primary endpoint is to increase progression-free survival at 12 months from 50 to 68% (HR = 0.55) (power 90%; one-sided alpha-risk, 10%). Progression will be defined with central external review of imaging. ANCILLARY STUDIES ARE PLANNED: PD-L1 Combined Positivity Score on carcinoma cells and stromal immune cells of diagnostic biopsy specimen will be correlated to disease free survival. The study of gut microbiota will aim to determine if baseline intestinal bacteria correlates with tumor response. Proteomic analysis on blood samples will compare long-term responder after CRT with durvalumab to non-responder to identify biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study will be of great importance to evaluate the impact of immunotherapy in combination with CRT and decipher immune response in this unmet need clinical situation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT: 03777813.Trial registration date: 5th December 2018.

Afatinib maintenance therapy following post-operative radiochemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Results from the phase III randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study BIB2992ORL (GORTEC 2010-02).

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of afatinib maintenance therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with macroscopically complete resection and adjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT). METHODS: This French multicentric randomised phase III double-blind placebo-controlled study included adult patients with ECOG-PS≤2, normal haematological, hepatic and renal functions, and non-metastatic, histologically confirmed HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx, with macroscopically complete resection and adjuvant RCT (≥2 cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 J1, J22, J43 and 66Gy (2Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week, conventional or intensity modulated radiotherapy ≥60Gy). Randomised patients were planned to receive either afatinib (afa arm) or placebo (control arm (C)) as maintenance therapy for one year. Primary endpoint was disease free survival (DFS). A 15% improvement in DFS was expected at 2 years with afatinib (from 55 to 70%). RESULTS: Among the 167 patients with resected HNSCC included in 19 cancer centres and hospitals from Dec 2011, 134 patients were randomised to receive one-year maintenance afatinib or placebo (afa:67; C:67). Benefit/risk ratio was below assumptions and independent advisory committee recommended to stop the study in Feb 2017, the sponsor decided premature study discontinuation, with a 2-year follow-up for the last randomised patient. 2y-DFS was 61% (95% CI 0.48-0.72) in the afatinib group and 64% (95% CI 0.51-0.74) in the placebo group (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.70-1.80). CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy with afatinib compared with placebo following post-operative RCT in patients with HNSCC did not significantly improve 2y-DFS and should not be recommended in this setting outside clinical trials. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier NCT01427478.

Human papilloma virus integration sites and genomic signatures in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

A prevalence of around 26% of human papillomavirus (HPV) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been previously reported. HPV induced oncogenesis mainly involving E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins. In some cases, HPV viral DNA has been detected to integrate with the host genome and possibly contributes to carcinogenesis by affecting the gene expression. We retrospectively assessed HPV integration sites and signatures in 80 HPV positive patients with HNSCC, by using a double capture-HPV method followed by next-generation Sequencing. We detected HPV16 in 90% of the analyzed cohort and confirmed five previously described mechanistic signatures of HPV integration [episomal (EPI), integrated in a truncated form revealing two HPV-chromosomal junctions colinear (2J-COL) or nonlinear (2J-NL), multiple hybrid junctions clustering in a single chromosomal region (MJ-CL) or scattered over different chromosomal regions (MJ-SC) of the human genome]. Our results suggested that HPV remained episomal in 38.8% of the cases or was integrated/mixed in the remaining 61.2% of patients with HNSCC. We showed a lack of association of HPV genomic signatures to tumour and patient characteristics, as well as patient survival. Similar to other HPV associated cancers, low HPV copy number was associated with worse prognosis. We identified 267 HPV-human junctions scattered on most chromosomes. Remarkably, we observed four recurrent integration regions: PDL1/PDL2/PLGRKT (8.2%), MYC/PVT1 (6.1%), MACROD2 (4.1%) and KLF5/KLF12 regions (4.1%). We detected the overexpression of PDL1 and MYC upon integration by gene expression analysis. In conclusion, we identified recurrent targeting of several cancer genes such as PDL1 and MYC upon HPV integration, suggesting a role of altered gene expression by HPV integration during HNSCC carcinogenesis.

Adjuvant brachytherapy for oral squamous cell carcinomas: a single-center experience comparing low-dose and pulsed-dose-rate techniques.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the outcomes of adjuvant interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to the tumor bed for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and to compare the oncological outcomes and toxicity profile of low-dose-rate (LDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) BT. DESIGN: This retrospective single-center study included all patients who underwent postoperative LDR- or PDR-BT to the tumor bed as the sole adjuvant treatment for an oral tongue or floor of the mouth SCC between January 2000 and December 2020. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were eligible for this study. The cohort was divided into an LDR group (n = 38) and a PDR group (n = 41). The median time interval between surgery and brachytherapy was 55 days. Median delivered total dose was 55 Gy and median hospital stay was 5 days. Five patients (8.3%) experienced grade 3-4 early toxicity, 2 in the LDR group and 3 in the PDR group. Late toxicities were present in 28 patients (44.4%) and were dominated by grade 1-2 residual pain and dysesthesia, without a statistical difference between the groups. After a median follow-up of 65.1 months, 5­year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort were 76.3% (95% CI = 63.4-85.1), 61.6% (95% CI = 49.0-72.0), and 71.4% (95% CI = 58.6-80.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant BT after excision of oral cavity SCC provides satisfactory oncological outcomes along with good tolerance. In our study, PDR-BT showed similar oncological and functional results to LDR-BT in this indication.

Metachronous second primary neoplasia in oropharyngeal cancer patients: Impact of tumor HPV status. A GETTEC multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) display a significant risk to develop a metachronous second primary neoplasia (MSPN). HPV and non-HPV-related OPSCC are 2 distinct entities with biological, clinical and prognostic differences. The aims of our study were to analyze the impact of tumor HPV status and other relevant clinical factors, such as tobacco and/or alcohol (T/A) consumption, on the risk and distribution of MSPN in OPSCC patients and to assess the impact of MSPN on patient survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All OPSCC patients treated from 2009 to 2014 were included in this multicentric retrospective study. P16 immunohistochemical expression was used as a surrogate maker of tumor HPV status. The impact of tumor p16 status on the risk of MSPN was assessed in uni- and multivariate analyses. Overall survival (OS) was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among the 1291 patients included in this study, 138 (10.7%) displayed a MSPN which was preferentially located in the head and neck area (H&N), lung and esophagus. Multivariate analyses showed that p16- tumor status (p = 0.003), T/A consumption (p = 0.005) and soft palate tumor site (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with a higher risk of MSPN. We found no impact of p16 tumor status on the median time between index OPSCC diagnosis and MSPN development, but a higher proportion of MSPN arising outside the H&N, lung and esophagus was found in p16 + than in p16- patients. MSPN development had an unfavorable impact (p = 0.04) on OS only in the p16 + patient group. CONCLUSION: P16 tumor status and T/A consumption were the main predictive factors of MSPN in OPSCC patients. This study provides crucial results with a view to tailoring global management and follow-up of OPSCC patients.

Intracranial Treatment in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastasis Is Associated with Improved Survival in the Era of Immunotherapy and Anti-BRAF Therapy.

Metastatic melanoma patients are at high risk of brain metastases (BM). Although intracranial control is a prognostic factor for survival, impact of local (intracranial) treatment (LT), surgery and/or radiotherapy (stereotactic or whole brain) in the era of novel therapies remains unknown. We evaluated BM incidence in melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or anti-BRAF therapy and identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Clinical data and treatment patterns were retrospectively collected from all patients treated for newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic melanoma between May 2014 and December 2017 with available BRAF mutation status and receiving systemic therapy. Prognostic factors for OS were analyzed with univariable and multivariable survival analyses. BMs occurred in 106 of 250 eligible patients (42.4%), 64 of whom received LT. Median OS in patients with BM was 7.8 months (95% CI [5.4-10.4]). In multivariable analyses, LT was significantly correlated with improved OS (HR 0.21, p < 0.01). Median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI [8.3-22.3]) versus 3.6 months (95% CI [1.4-4.8]) in patients with or without LT. LT correlates with improved OS in melanoma patients with BM in the era of ICI and anti-BRAF therapy. The use of LT should be addressed at diagnosis of BM while introducing systemic treatment.

Distinct Outcomes of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients after Distant Failure According to p16 Status: Implication in Therapeutic Options.

INTRODUCTION: Recent modifications in the epidemiology of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have led to the increase of Human papillomavirus (HPV) related metastatic head and neck cancer patients with high life expectancy even at advanced stage, low comorbidity and still restricted systemic therapy opportunities. In the recent era of ablative therapies' development, oligometastatic HPV OSCC patients are indubitably good candidates for intensified treatment. However, data related to outcomes after optimised management of metastatic sites are dramatically missing. MATERIALS AND PATIENTS: In our cohort of 186 unselected consecutive OSCC patients treated with curative intent at our institution between 2009 and 2013, we analysed the incidence, treatment and outcomes of distant metastatic (DM) failure according to p16 status. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.2 years (95% CI: 3.8-4.4) from primary diagnosis of OSCC, 21/95 p16- patients (22.1%) vs. 8/91 (8.8%) p16+ patients presented DM failure with a median interval of 11 (range 0-46) and 28 months (range 0-71), respectively (p = 0.10). Overall survival (OS) after DM failure was significantly higher in p16+ patients with a two-year OS rate of 75% and 15% for p16+ and p16-, respectively (p = 0.002). In eight HPV-related metastatic patients, three underwent ablative lung metastasis treatment and are still complete responders four to five years later. CONCLUSION: This study highlights distinct outcomes of metastatic HPV-related OSCC patients emphasised by three long-term complete responders after lung ablative treatment. In patients with high life expectancy and limited tumour burden, the question of ablative treatment such as metastasectomy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) should be addressed.

Upfront surgery or definitive radiotherapy for p16+ oropharyngeal cancer. A GETTEC multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the initial therapeutic strategy on oncologic outcomes in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC. METHODS: All p16-positive OPSCCs treated from 2009 to 2014 in 7 centers were retrospectively included and classified according to the therapeutic strategy: surgical strategy (surgery ± adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy) vs. non-surgical strategy (definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy). Univariate, multivariate propensity score matching analyses were performed to compare overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: 382 patients were included (surgical group: 144; non-surgical group: 238). Five-year OS, DSS and RFS were 89.2, 96.8 and 83.9% in the surgical group and 84.2, 87.1 and 70.4% in the non-surgical group, respectively. These differences were statistically significant for DSS and RFS after multivariate analysis, but only for RFS after propensity score matching analysis. CONCLUSION: In p16+ OPSCC patients, upfront surgery results in higher RFS than definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy but does not impact OS.

Synchronous primary neoplasia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer: Impact of tumor HPV status. A GETTEC multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) display a significant risk of synchronous primary neoplasia (SPN) which could impact their management. The aims of this study were to evaluate the risk and distribution of SPN in OPSCC patients according to their HPV (p16) status, the predictive factors of SPN and the impact of SPN on therapeutic strategy and oncologic outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All OPSCC patients treated from 2009 to 2014 were included in this multicentric retrospective study. Univariate analyses were conducted using Chi-2 and Fisher exact tests. For multivariate analyses, all variables associated with a p ≤ 0.10 in univariate analysis were included in logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among the 1291 patients included in this study, 75 (5.8%) displayed a SPN which was preferentially located in the upper aerodigestive tract, lung and esophagus. Comorbidity level (p = 0.03), alcohol (p = 0.005) and tobacco (p = 0.01) consumptions, and p16 tumor status (p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of SPN. In multivariate analysis, p16+ status was significantly associated with a lower risk of SPN (OR = 0.251, IC95% [0.133;0.474]). Patients with a SPN were more frequently referred for non-curative treatment (p = 0.02). In patients treated with curative intent, there was no impact of SPN on the therapeutic strategy (surgical vs. non-surgical treatment). We observed no overall survival differences between patients with or without SPN. CONCLUSION: P16 tumor status is the main predictive factor of SPN in OPSCC patients. This study provides crucial results which should help adapt the initial work-up and the global management of OPSCC patients.

Upfront surgery or definitive radiotherapy for patients with p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. A GETTEC multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) is still debated. Since the role of HPV was demonstrated, few studies have focused on HPV-negative OPSCC. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of therapeutic strategy (surgical vs. non-surgical) on oncologic outcomes in patients with HPV-negative OPSCC. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All p16-negative OPSCCs treated from 2009 to 2014 in 7 tertiary-care centers were included in this retrospective study and were classified according to the therapeutic strategy: surgical strategy (surgery ± adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy) vs. non-surgical strategy (definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy). Patients not eligible for surgery (unresectable tumor, poor general-health status) were excluded. Univariate, multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were performed to compare overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-four (474) patients were included in the study (surgical group: 196; non-surgical group: 278). Five-year OS, DSS and RFS were 76.5, 81.3 and 61.3%, respectively, in the surgical group and 49.9, 61.8 and 43.4%, respectively, in the non-surgical group. The favorable impact of primary surgical treatment on oncologic outcomes was statistically significant after multivariate analysis. This effect was more marked for locally-advanced than for early-stage tumors. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the prognostic impact of primary surgical treatment for RFS. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic strategy is an independent prognostic factor in patients with p16-negative OPSCC and primary surgical treatment is associated with improved OS, DSS and RFS. These results suggest that surgical strategy is a reliable option for advanced stage OPSCC.

Oropharyngeal cancer: First relapse description and prognostic factor of salvage treatment according to p16 status, a GETTEC multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: Although Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) prognosis is significantly better than that of other head and neck cancers, up to 25% of cases will recur within 5 years. Data on the pattern of disease recurrence and efficiency of salvage treatment are still sparse. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Observational study of all recurrent OPCs diagnosed, following a curative intent treatment, in seven French centers from 2009 to 2014. p16 Immunohistochemistry was used to determine HPV status. Clinical characteristics, distribution of recurrence site, and treatment modalities were compared by HPV tumor status. Overall survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression modeling. RESULTS: 350 recurrent OPC patients (246 p16-negative and 104 p16-positive patients). The site of recurrence was more frequently locoregional for p16-negative patients (65.4% versus 52.9% in p16-positive patients) and metastatic for p16-positive patients (47.1% versus 34.6% in p16-patients, p = 0.03). Time from diagnosis to recurrence did not differ between p16-positive and p16-negative patients (12 and 9.6 months, respectively, p-value = 0.2), as the main site of distant metastasis (all p-values ≥0.10). Overall and relapse-free survival following the first recurrence did not differ according to p16 status (p-values from log-rank 0.30 and 0.40, respectively). In multivariate analysis, prognosis factors for overall survival in p16-negative patients were distant metastasis (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.30-3.43) and concurrent local and regional recurrences (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.24-3.88). CONCLUSION: With the exception of the initial site of recurrence, the pattern of disease relapse and the efficiency of salvage treatment are not different between p16-positive and negative OPCs.

PD-1 inhibitors might limit the development of brain metastases in patients with advanced melanoma.

Brain metastases are a common and severe complication potentially leading to death in patients with metastatic melanoma. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy have significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma. Few studies focus on patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, and these patients are often excluded and have a poor prognosis. It has been suggested that immunotherapy could reduce the incidence of brain metastases. We tested this hypothesis in a retrospective bicentric study. We performed a retrospective, bicentric descriptive analysis on a cohort of 293 patients treated for metastatic melanoma between May 2014 and October 2017 (Toulouse, N = 202; Limoges, N = 91). Patients with brain metastasis at diagnosis were excluded from the analysis. Patients were separated into two groups according to the first line of treatment: immunotherapy [immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)] vs other and anti-PD-1 vs other. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of brain metastases, and secondary endpoints were OS and PFS. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence of brain metastases was 13.78% in the ICI group [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.14-19.36] and 27.26% in the other group (95% CI 19.38-35.71), P = 0.004. The cumulative incidence was 9.49% in the anti-PD-1 group (95% CI 5.43-14.90) vs 30.11% in the other group (95% CI 22.59-37.97), P < 0.0001. In multivariable analysis (model with 277 patients), anti-PD-1 reduced the risk of brain metastases by almost 70% (hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.56, P < 0.0001). The use of ICI (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) in advanced melanomas without initial brain metastasis shows a protective effect and prevents their occurrence.

Phase I Trial of Debio 1143, an Antagonist of Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins, Combined with Cisplatin Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

PURPOSE: Debio 1143 is an oral antagonist of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, which enhances tumor response with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Addition of Debio 1143 to cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN) was evaluated in a phase I/II study to determine the MTD and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Here, phase I results are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with LA-SCCHN (stages III/IVA/IVB) received Debio 1143 (100, 200, 300 mg/day), for 14 days every 3 weeks, with cisplatin (100 mg/m², every 3 weeks), for three cycles, and concomitant conventional fractionation radiotherapy (70 Gy/7 weeks). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated over 9 weeks using continual reassessment. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated/evaluable for DLT. Median age was 64.5 years, and all patients were current/former smokers. Primary tumors were hypopharynx, oropharynx (all human papillomavirus/p16 negative), larynx, and oral cavity. Two of six patients at 200 mg/day had DLT (grade 3 tubular necrosis, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase increase, grade 4 febrile neutropenia, and grade 3 lipase increase), which was considered the MTD and RP2D. Common grade 3-4 adverse events were dysphagia (36%) and mucositis (29%). Laboratory abnormalities were frequent and generally mild, including anemia, white blood cell decrease, and increased creatinine. Addition of Debio 1143 did not compromise chemotherapy administration. Overall locoregional control rate at 18 months was 85%. Overall response rate was 85%, including 69% complete responses. Progression-free survival rate at 24 months was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D of Debio 1143 is 200 mg/day for 14 days, every 3 weeks, when combined with concomitant high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy in LA-SCCHN. Debio 1143 addition to chemoradiotherapy was safe and manageable. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging and supports further development.

Cytochrome P450 1B1 polymorphism drives cancer cell stemness and patient outcome in head-and-neck carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is mostly expressed in tumours and displays unusual properties. Its two polymorphic forms were differently associated with anticancer drug sensitivity. We decipher here the role of this polymorphism in anticancer drug efficacy in vitro, in vivo and in the clinical setting. METHODS: From head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines not expressing CYP1B1, we generated isogenic derivatives expressing the two forms. Proliferation, invasiveness, stem cell characteristics, sensitivity to anticancer agents and transcriptome were analysed. Tumour growth and chemosensitivity were studied in vivo. A prospective clinical trial on 121 patients with advanced head-and-neck cancers was conducted, and a validation-retrospective study was conducted. RESULTS: Cell lines expressing the variant form displayed high rates of in vitro proliferation and invasiveness, stemness features and resistance to DNA-damaging agents. In vivo, tumours expressing the variant CYP1B1 had higher growth rates and were markedly drug-resistant. In the clinical study, overall survival was significantly associated with the genotypes, wild-type patients presenting a longer median survival (13.5 months) than the variant patients (6.3 months) (p = 0.0166). CONCLUSIONS: This frequent CYP1B1 polymorphism is crucial for cancer cell proliferation, migration, resistance to chemotherapy and stemness properties, and strongly influences head-and-neck cancer patients' survival.

Survival estimation of melanoma patients with brain metastasis using the Melanoma-molGPA score: external validation from a French cohort.

While immunotherapies and targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors have improved the prognosis, BM is still associated with poor outcome and a short survival. Metastatic melanoma patients are a heterogeneous subgroup with variable prognosis. As several prospective clinical trials have addressed the question of optimal therapy for these patients, an accurate validated selection tool is needed. Melanoma molecular graded prognostic assessment (Melanoma-molGPA) is a new prognostic score for BM melanoma patients. We decided to perform an external validation of this score. All consecutive patients treated between May 2014 and December 2017 for a newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic melanoma with available status for BRAF mutation were identified. Melanoma mol-GPA was applied in each patient with BM and correlated to overall survival. One hundred patients were included. Median follow-up was 27.8 months. Distribution for the Melanoma-molGPA groups GPA 0-1, GPA 1.5-2, GPA 2.5-3 and GPA 3.5-4 were as follows: 23, 51, 24 and 2.0%, respectively. Subgroups GPA 2.5-3 and 3.5-4 were combined. Median overall survival for groups GPA 0-1, 1.5-2 and 2.5-4.0 was 4.2, 6.9 and 18.4 months, respectively, P = 0.0032. Our study is the most recent, and with the largest cohort, to validate the Melanoma-molGPA score as an accurate and reproducible score for estimating overall survival. As several prospective clinical trials are addressing the issue of optimal therapy including the impact of local treatment for these patients, the Melanoma-molGPA is a useful tool in BM melanoma patients.

The GIRAFE phase II trial on MVCT-based "volumes of the day" and "dose of the day" addresses when and how to implement adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

During exclusive curative radiotherapy for head and neck tumors, the patient's organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes frequently change size and shape, leading to a risk of higher toxicity and lower control than expected on planned dosimetry. Adaptive radiotherapy is often necessary but 1) tools are needed to define the optimal time for replanning, and 2) the subsequent workflow is time-consuming. We designed a prospective study to evaluate 1) the validity of automatically deformed contours on the daily MVCT, in order to safely use the "dose-of the day" tool to check daily if replanning is necessary; 2) the automatically deformed contours on the replanning CT and the time gained in the replanning workflow. Forty-eight patients with T3-T4 and/or involved node >2 cm head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, planned for curative radiotherapy without surgery, will be enrolled. They will undergo treatment with helical IMRT including daily repositioning MVCTs. The contours proposed will be compared weekly on intermediate planning CTs (iCTs) on weeks 3, 4, 5 and 6. On these iCTs both manual recontouring and automated deformable registration of the initial contours will be compared with the contours automatically defined on the MVCT. The primary objective is to evaluate the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the volumes of each parotid gland. The secondary objectives will evaluate, for target volumes and all OARs: the DSC, the mean distance to agreement, and the average surface-to-surface distance. Time between the automatic and the manual recontouring workflows will be compared.

Definitive radiochemotherapy or initial surgery for oropharyngeal cancer : To what extent can p16 expression be used in the decision process?

BACKGROUND: The decision between definitive radio(chemo)therapy (RCT) or a surgical strategy, i. e. surgery ± adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy for optimal treatment of oropharyngeal cancer is highly debated. Human papillomavirus(HPV)-related tumours are a distinct entity associated with p16 overexpression. While this represents a major prognostic factor, its predictive significance remains unknown. RESULTS: Among 183 consecutive unselected patients treated between 2009 and 2013 with a state-of-the-art surgical procedure ± adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy or definitive RCT including intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 3­year disease-free survival (DFS) was 74 vs. 57%, respectively (p = 0.007). When focusing on p16+ patients (49%), there was no significant difference in tumour control rate between surgery ± radio(chemo)therapy and the definitive RCT group (3-year DFS 83 vs. 82%, respectively; p = 0.48). However, delayed severe dysphagia was significantly lower in favour of definitive RCT: 35 vs. 4%, respectively; p = 0.0002. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight distinct outcomes after definitive RCT or initial surgical treatment according to p16 status, which should thus be considered during the decision process.

Alpha-6 integrin promotes radioresistance of glioblastoma by modulating DNA damage response and the transcription factor Zeb1.

Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of glioblastoma (GBM) standard treatment. However, radioresistance of cancer cells leads to an inevitable recurrence. In the present study, we showed that blocking α6-integrin in cells derived from GBM biopsy specimens cultured as neurospheres, sensitized cells to radiation. In cells downregulated for α6-integrin expression, we observed a decrease in cell survival after irradiation and an increase in radio-induced cell death. We also demonstrated that inhibition of α6-integrin expression affects DNA damage checkpoint and repair. Indeed, we observed a persistence of γ-H2AX staining after IR and the abrogation of the DNA damage-induced G2/M checkpoint, likely through the downregulation of the checkpoint kinase CHK1 and its downstream target Cdc25c. We also showed that α6-integrin contributes to GBM radioresistance by controlling the expression of the transcriptional network ZEB1/OLIG2/SOX2. Finally, the clinical data from TCGA and Rembrandt databases demonstrate that GBM patients with high levels of the five genes signature, including α6-integrin and its targets, CHK1, ZEB1, OLIG2 and SOX2, have a significantly shorter overall survival. Our study suggest that α6-integrin is an attractive therapeutic target to overcome radioresistance of GBM cancer cells.

Continuous Infusion of Cilengitide Plus Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Stage III Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Phase I Study.

INTRODUCTION: Because of our previous preclinical results, we conducted a phase I study associating the specific αvß3/αvß5 integrin inhibitor cilengitide, given as a continuous infusion, with exclusive chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standard 3+3 dose escalation design was used. Cilengitide was given as a continuous infusion (dose levels of 12, 18, 27, and 40 mg/h), starting 2 weeks before and continuing for the whole course of chemoradiotherapy (66 Gy combined with platinum/vinorelbine), and then at a dose of 2000 mg twice weekly in association with chemotherapy. 2-Deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography scans were performed before and after the first 2 weeks of cilengitide administration and then every 3 months. RESULTS: Of the 14 patients included, 11 were evaluable for evaluation of the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). One DLT, a tracheobronchial fistula, was reported with the 40 mg/h dose. No relevant adverse events related to cilengitide were observed overall. At the PET evaluation 2 months after chemoradiotherapy, 4 of 9 patients had a complete response and 4 had a partial response. The median progression-free and overall survival was 14.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4 to not reached) and 29.4 months (95% CI, 11.73 to not reached), respectively. CONCLUSION: Cilengitide, given continuously with chemoradiotherapy, showed acceptable toxicity and gave encouraging clinical results.