ABSTRACT
The monoclonal antibody nirsevimab was at least 70% effective in preventing hospitalisations in infants with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) positive for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Spain (Oct 2023-Jan 2024), where a universal immunisation programme began late September (coverage range: 79-99%). High protection was confirmed by two methodological designs (screening and test-negative) in a multicentre active surveillance in nine hospitals in three regions. No protection against RSV-negative LRTI-hospitalisations was shown. These interim results could guide public-health decision-making.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Infant , Humans , Spain/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , HospitalsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: RSV is the leading cause of hospital admissions in infants and the principal cause of bronchiolitis in young children. There is a lack of granular data on RSV-associated hospitalization per season using laboratory confirmed results. Our current study addresses this issue and intends to fill this gap. METHODS: The study was conducted from 2014 through 2018, in 4 to 10 hospitals in the Valencia Region, Spain. Infants included in this study were admitted in hospital through the Emergency Department with a respiratory complaint and tested by RT-PCR for RSV in a central laboratory. RESULTS: Incidence rates of RSV-associated hospitalization varied by season and hospital. Overall, the highest incidence rates were observed in 2017/2018. RSV-associated hospitalization was highest in infants below 3 months of age and in those born before or at the beginning of the RSV season. Almost 54% of total infants hospitalized with laboratory confirmed RSV were found to be born outside the season, from April to October. The RSV positivity rate by ICD-10 discharged codes varied by season and age with results from 48% to 57% among LRI (J09-J22). CONCLUSION: The study was instrumental in bringing forth the time unpredictability of RSV epidemics, the critical impact of age, and the comparable distribution of RSV-associated hospitalization in infants born on either side of the RSV season. These data could help in better characterization of the population that drives the healthcare burden and is crucial for the development of future immunization strategies, especially with upcoming vaccines in against RSV.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Child , Child, Preschool , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Seasons , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
On 9 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Influenza Programme (GIP) asked participant sites on the Global Influenza Hospital Surveillance Network (GIHSN) to contribute to data collection concerning severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We re-analysed 5833 viral RNA archived samples collected prospectively from hospital admissions for influenza-like illness (ILI) in the Valencia Region of Spain by the Valencia Hospital Surveillance Network for the Study of Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses (VAHNSI) network (four hospitals, catchment area population 1 118 732) during the pre-pandemic 2018/2019 (n = 4010) and pandemic 2019/2020 (n = 1823) influenza seasons for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. We did not find evidence for community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospital admissions for ILI in our region before early March 2020.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Seasons , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
IntroductionInfluenza immunisation is recommended for elderly people each season. The influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) varies annually due to influenza viruses evolving and the vaccine composition.AimTo estimate, in inpatients ≥ 60 years old, the 2017/18 trivalent IVE, overall, by vaccine type and by strain. The impact of vaccination in any of the two previous seasons (2016/17 and 2015/16) on current (2017/18) IVE was also explored.MethodsThis was a multicentre prospective observational study within the Valencia Hospital Surveillance Network for the Study of Influenza and Respiratory Viruses Disease (VAHNSI, Spain). The test-negative design was applied taking laboratory-confirmed influenza as outcome and vaccination status as main exposure. Information about potential confounders was obtained from clinical registries and/or by interviewing patients; vaccine information was only ascertained by registries.ResultsOverall, 2017/18 IVE was 9.9% (95% CI: -15.5 to 29.6%), and specifically, 48.3% (95% CI: 13.5% to 69.1%), -29.9% (95% CI: -79.1% to 5.8%) and 25.7% (95% CI: -8.8% to 49.3%) against A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and B/Yamagata lineage, respectively. For the adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines, overall IVE was 10.0% (95% CI: -24.4% to 34.9%) and 7.8% (95% CI: -23.1% to 31.0%) respectively. Prior vaccination significantly protected against influenza B/Yamagata lineage (IVE: 50.2%; 95% CI: 2.3% to 74.6%) in patients not vaccinated in the current season. For those repeatedly vaccinated against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, IVE was 46.4% (95% CI: 6.8% to 69.2%).ConclusionOur data revealed low vaccine effectiveness against influenza in hospitalised patients ≥60 years old in 2017/18. Prior vaccination protected against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and B/Yamagata-lineage.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza B virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/immunology , Aged , Female , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza B virus/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Seasons , Sentinel Surveillance , Spain/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Vaccination/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Multidrug-resistant Candida auris has emerged as a cause of insidious hospital outbreaks and complicated infections. We present the analysis of an ongoing C. auris outbreak including the largest published series of C. auris bloodstream infection. All C. auris-positive patients from April-2016 to January-2017 were included. Environmental, clinical and microbiological data were recorded. Definitive isolate identification was performed by ITS-rDNA sequencing, and typing by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting. One hundred and forty patients were colonised by C. auris during the studied period (68% from surgical intensive care). Although control measures were implemented, we were not able to control the outbreak. Forty-one invasive bloodstream infections (87.8% from surgical intensive care) were included. Clinical management included prompt intravascular catheter removal and antifungal therapy with echinocandins. All isolates were fluconazole- and voriconazole-resistant, but echinocandin- and amphotericin B-susceptible. Thirty-day mortality rate was 41.4%, and severe septic metastasis as spondylodiscitis and endocarditis were observed in 5 patients (12%). C. auris was also recovered from inanimate patient surroundings and medical equipment. Despite antifungal treatment, high mortality and late complication rates were recorded. Molecular typing suggested a clonal outbreak different from those previously published.
Subject(s)
Candida/isolation & purification , Candida/physiology , Candidemia/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Adult , Aged , Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/drug effects , Candida/genetics , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/microbiology , DNA, Ribosomal Spacer/genetics , Disease Management , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal , Female , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Genotype , Humans , Infection Control , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Molecular Typing , Mycological Typing Techniques , Tertiary HealthcareABSTRACT
IntroductionSeasonal influenza vaccination is widely recommended for people with risk factors, especially for people who are elderly. However, influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) varies year after year because of the variable antigenic composition of the circulating viruses and the vaccine composition. Methods: We summarise the results of IVE and the impact of previous vaccination among subjects 60 years of age and over in a multicentre prospective study in the Valencia Hospital Surveillance Network for the Study of Influenza and Respiratory Viruses Disease (VAHNSI) in Spain. We applied the test-negative design taking laboratory-confirmed influenza as outcome and vaccination status as exposure. Information about potential confounders was obtained from clinical registries or directly from patients. Results: Adjusted IVE was 19% (95% confidence interval (CI): -15 to 43). For patients vaccinated in the current season but not in the two previous seasons, effectiveness was 49% (95% CI: -20 to 78) and for patients vaccinated in the current and any of two previous seasons, effectiveness was 29% (95% CI: -3 to 52). For those patients not vaccinated in the current season but vaccinated in any of the two previous seasons, effectiveness was 53% (95% CI: 8 to 76). Conclusions: Our data show a low vaccine effectiveness for the 2016/17 influenza season.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/pharmacology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Laboratories , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Prospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Seasons , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Introducción. Determinar la prevalencia de eventos adversos relacionados con la medicación (EAM) en los hospitales de la Comunidad Valenciana en el periodo de estudio 2005-2013. Conocer los factores de riesgo asociados, su análisis e impacto. Material y métodos. El trabajo está basado en los datos y metodología del Estudio de Prevalencia de Eventos Adversos en los hospitales de la Comunidad Valenciana (EPIDEA), desde 2005 hasta 2013. Se analizaron los EAM producidos en cada año. Resultados. Se identificaron 344 EAM que ocurrieron a 337 pacientes, entre 35.103 pacientes estudiados, lo cual constituye una prevalencia de EAM de 0,96% (IC95% 0,89-1,07). Los factores de riesgo intrínseco para EAM más prevalentes fueron hipertensión, diabetes y neoplasia. Los factores de riesgo extrínseco más prevalentes fueron catéter venoso periférico, sonda urinaria cerrada y catéter venoso central. Los grupos terapéuticos más implicados fueron antibióticos sistémicos, fármacos cardiovasculares, y antineoplásicos. El 61,17% de los EAM fue clasificado como moderado, un 27,18% como leve y un 11,65 % como grave. El 33,99% de los EAM prolongaron la estancia del paciente y un 39,90% fueron causa de reingreso del paciente. Globalmente, el 58,5% de los EAM fueron evitables. Según gravedad, fueron evitables el 46.3% de los EAM leves, el 60.3% de los EAM moderados, y el 75% de los EAM graves (p=0.013). Conclusiones. La prevalencia de pacientes con EAM en la Comunidad Valenciana durante el periodo 2005-2013 fue de 0,96%. Más de la mitad de EAM fueron evitables, observándose una relación directa significativa entre la evitabilidad de los EAM con la gravedad de los mismos (AU)
Introduction. To determine the prevalence of Adverse Events related to Medication (AEM) in hospitals of the Valencian Community in the 2005-2013 study period, and to describe the associated risk factors and their impact. Material and methods. This study is based on data and methodology of the Study of Prevalence of Adverse Events in hospitals (EPIDEA), since its inception in 2005 until 2013. AEM produced in each year were analyzed. Results. We identified 344 AEM that occurred in 337 patients, among 35,103 patients studied, giving a prevalence of patients with AEM of 0.96% (IC95% 0.89-1.07). The most prevalent intrinsic risk factors for AEM were hypertension, diabetes and cancer. The most prevalent extrinsic risk factors were peripheral venous catheter, urinary catheter and central venous catheter. Therapeutic groups most frequently involved were systemic antibiotics, cardiovascular drugs and antineoplastics. The 61.17% of AEM was classified as moderate, followed by 27.18% as mild and 11.65% as severe. The 33.99% of EAM caused increase of the patients stay and 39.90% of EAM caused the re-entry of patient. The 58.5% of AEM were avoidable. Mild AEM were avoidable in 46.3%, moderate AEM were avoidable in 60.3% and severe AEM were in 75% (p = 0.013). Conclusions. The prevalence of patients with AEM in hospitals of the Community of Valencia for the period 2005- 2013 was 0.96%. More than half of AEM were preventable, and preventability increases significantly with the severity of the event (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Medication Errors/adverse effects , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Spain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods , Mass Screening/methodsABSTRACT
Background. Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast that can cause invasive infections and is associated with high mortality. It is typically resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole and, some cases, also to echinocandins and amphotericin B. This species, phylogenetically related to Candida haemulonii, is frequently misidentified by commercial identification techniques in clinical laboratories; therefore, the real prevalence of C. auris infections may be underestimated. Aims. To describe the clinical and microbiological features of the first four cases of C. auris fungemia episodes observed in the European continent. Methods. The four patients were hospitalized in the adult surgical intensive care unit. A total of 8 isolates (two per patient) from blood and catheter tip were analyzed. Results. All isolates were misidentified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae by AuxaColor 2, and as Candida sake by API ID20C. VITEK MS technology misidentified one isolate as Candida lusitaniae, another as C. haemulonii and could not identify the other six. C. auris identification was confirmed by ITS rDNA sequencing. All isolates were fluconazole (MIC >256mg/l) and voriconazole (MIC 2mg/l) resistant and susceptible to posaconazole, itraconazole, echinocandins and amphotericin B. Conclusions. C. auris should be regarded as an emerging pathogen, which requires molecular methods for definitive identification. Our isolates were highly resistant to fluconazole and resistant to voriconazole, but susceptible to the other antifungals tested, which emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying this species to avoid therapeutic failures (AU)
Antecedentes. Candida auris es una levadura multirresistente de reciente aparición que puede causar infecciones invasivas asociadas con una elevada mortalidad. Habitualmente, C. auris es resistente al fluconazol y el voriconazol, y en algunos casos, también a las equinocandinas y la anfotericina B. Esta especie, relacionada filogenéticamente con Candida haemulonii, no se identifica por las técnicas comerciales habitualmente disponibles en los laboratorios clínicos, por lo que la prevalencia real de las infecciones causadas por C. auris puede estar subestimada. Objetivos. Describir las características clínicas y microbiológicas de los cuatro primeros casos de fungemia por C. auris observados en el continente europeo. Métodos. Los cuatro pacientes eran adultos y estaban en la unidad de cuidados intensivos quirúrgicos. Se analizaron un total de 8 aislamientos (dos por paciente), obtenidos a partir de un hemocultivo y de punta de catéter. Resultados. Todos los aislamientos se identificaron erróneamente como Saccharomyces cerevisiae por AuxaColor 2 y como Candida sake por API ID20C. El sistema VITEK MS identificó erróneamente un aislamiento como Candida lusitaniae, otro como C. haemulonii y no pudo identificar los seis aislamientos restantes. La identificación de C. auris se confirmó mediante secuenciación de la región ITS del ADNr. Todos los aislamientos fueron resistentes al fluconazol (CMI>256mg/l) y el voriconazol (CMI 2mg/l) y sensibles al posaconazol, el itraconazol, las equinocandinas y la anfotericina B. Conclusiones. C. auris es un agente patógeno de reciente aparición que actualmente solo puede ser identificado mediante secuenciación molecular. Nuestros aislamientos fueron muy resistentes al fluconazol y resistentes al voriconazol, pero sensibles a los otros antifúngicos ensayados, lo cual destaca la importancia de identificar correctamente esta especie en la práctica asistencial para evitar fracasos terapéuticos (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Fungemia/epidemiology , Fungemia/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Candida/isolation & purification , Candida/pathogenicity , Phylogeny , Europe/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Voriconazole/therapeutic use , Amphotericin B/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast that can cause invasive infections and is associated with high mortality. It is typically resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole and, some cases, also to echinocandins and amphotericin B. This species, phylogenetically related to Candida haemulonii, is frequently misidentified by commercial identification techniques in clinical laboratories; therefore, the real prevalence of C. auris infections may be underestimated. AIMS: To describe the clinical and microbiological features of the first four cases of C. auris fungemia episodes observed in the European continent. METHODS: The four patients were hospitalized in the adult surgical intensive care unit. A total of 8 isolates (two per patient) from blood and catheter tip were analyzed. RESULTS: All isolates were misidentified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae by AuxaColor 2, and as Candida sake by API ID20C. VITEK MS technology misidentified one isolate as Candida lusitaniae, another as C. haemulonii and could not identify the other six. C. auris identification was confirmed by ITS rDNA sequencing. All isolates were fluconazole (MIC >256mg/l) and voriconazole (MIC 2mg/l) resistant and susceptible to posaconazole, itraconazole, echinocandins and amphotericin B. CONCLUSIONS: C. auris should be regarded as an emerging pathogen, which requires molecular methods for definitive identification. Our isolates were highly resistant to fluconazole and resistant to voriconazole, but susceptible to the other antifungals tested, which emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying this species to avoid therapeutic failures.