Markers of platelet activation foR identification of late onset sEpsis in infaNTs: PARENT study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Newborns are at high risk of sepsis. At present there is no definitive "rule in" blood test for sepsis at the point of clinical concern. A positive blood culture remains the gold standard test for neonatal sepsis, however laboratory markers that correlate prospectively with culture positive sepsis could aid clinicians in making decisions regarding administration of empiric antibiotic therapies. METHODS: This multi-site, prospective observational study will take place in two neonatal intensive care units (National Maternity Hospital and Rotunda Hospital, Dublin). Neonates born at less than 34 weeks will be enroled and informed consent obtained prior to late onset sepsis work up. If at any point subsequently during their neonatal intensive care stay they develop signs and symptoms of possible sepsis requiring blood culture, an additional sodium citrate sample will be obtained. Infants will be categorised into three groups as follows: (i) culture positive sepsis, (ii) culture negative sepsis where an infant receives 5 days of antibiotics (iii) non sepsis. Our primary outcome is to establish if differential platelet/endothelial activation can prospectively identify neonatal culture positive late onset sepsis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05530330 IMPACT: Preterm infants are a high risk group for the development of sepsis which is a major cause of mortality in this population. Platelets have been associated with host response to invasive bacterial infections both in animal models and translational work. A positive blood culture is the gold standard test for neonatal sepsis but can be unreliable due to limited blood sampling in the very low birth weight population. This study hopes to establish if platelet/endothelial associated plasma proteins can prospectively identify late onset neonatal sepsis.

Parents' understanding and experiences of blood component transfusion in the neonatal intensive care unit: A qualitative study.

AIM: Blood component transfusion is a common intervention in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents consent on their babies' behalf. This study aimed to explore parents' understandings and experiences of consenting and the subsequent blood transfusion. METHODS: A "low inference" qualitative descriptive semi-structured interview approach was utilised. Grounded theory was employed. Parents described their memories of babies' transfusions, their responses to the consent process and assessed the written information they were given. RESULTS: A purposive sample of 17 parents whose babies required blood transfusion in the NICU participated. Parents talked about their initial fears of transfusion, later replaced by confidence in the process and results of transfusion and trust in the healthcare professional team. The main themes elicited by the interviews were parents' expectations and outcomes of transfusion, parents' prior and current opinions of transfusion, parents trust in healthcare professionals and how parents would like to receive information about transfusions in the NICU. CONCLUSION: Parents in our study trust information from the healthcare professionals caring for their baby and would like more specific information about how blood transfusion will impact their baby, in a variety of means. Parents felt that blood transfusions were beneficial for their babies.

Safety and feasibility of platelet transfusion through long catheters in the neonatal intensive care unit: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and feasibility of platelet transfusion through small-bore long lines used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), including double-lumen umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) and 24 G and 28 G peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). DESIGN: Prospective in vitro controlled study. SETTING: Blood transfusion service laboratory. METHODS: In vitro platelet transfusions were set up as per NICU practice. Transfusion line pressure was monitored. Post-transfusion swirling, presence of aggregates, pH analysis and automated cell count in vitro activation response by flow cytometry assessing CD62P expression were assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All transfusions completed successfully. The rate of infusion was reduced in 5 of 16 transfusions through 28 G lines due to 'pressure high' alarms. There was no difference in swirling values or transfusion aggregate formation, CD62P expression levels, platelet count, platelet distribution width, mean platelet volume, plateletcrit or platelet to large cell ratio across transfusions post-transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that in vitro platelet transfusion performed through 24 G and 28 G neonatal PICC lines and double-lumen UVCs is non-inferior to 24 G short cannulas, using outcome measures of platelet clumping, platelet activation and line occlusion. This suggests that where available these lines can be used if necessary for platelet transfusion.

Changes in inflammatory proteins following platelet transfusion in a neonatal population.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated increased morbidity and mortality with platelet transfusions in the neonatal period. Platelets are as important for host immunity and inflammation as for hemostasis. Increased inflammation may explain the dose-associated increase in mortality, bleeding, and lung disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess if there are any changes in inflammatory cytokines post-platelet transfusion in babies in NICU. METHODS: This prospective observational study recruited babies due to receive a non-emergency platelet transfusion. Dried whole blood samples were collected prior to and 2 h post-transfusion. Samples were processed using multiplex immunoassay to enable analysis of tiny blood volumes. Statistical analysis was performed using R. RESULTS: Seventeen babies underwent 26 platelet transfusions across two centers. Median birthweight was 1545 g (535-3960 g) and median birth gestation was 31 weeks and 1 day (23 + 1 to 40 + 5). Median pre-transfusion platelet count was 19.5 × 109/l. There was a significant increase in levels of CXCL5 (p < 0.001), CD40 (p = 0.001), and TGF-ß (p = 0.001) in neonatal blood samples post-platelet transfusion in the study group. CONCLUSION: The increase in the cytokines CXCL5, CD40 and TGF-ß after platelet transfusion in babies in NICU could potentiate existing inflammation, NEC, lung, or white matter injury. This could potentially explain long-term harm from platelet transfusion in babies. IMPACT: There is a change in levels of immunomodulatory proteins CXCL5, CD40, and TGF-ß after platelet transfusion in babies in NICU. Murine neonatal models have demonstrated an increase in cytokine levels after platelet transfusions. This is the first time that this has been demonstrated in human neonates. The increase in proinflammatory cytokines could potentially explain the long-term harm from platelet transfusion in babies, as they could potentiate existing inflammation, NEC, lung injury, or white matter injury.

Two-year outcomes following a randomised platelet transfusion trial in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: Assess mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of corrected age in children who participated in the PlaNeT-2/MATISSE (Platelets for Neonatal Transfusion - 2/Management of Thrombocytopenia in Special Subgroup) study, which reported that a higher platelet transfusion threshold was associated with significantly increased mortality or major bleeding compared to a lower one. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial, enrolling from June 2011 to August 2017. Follow-up was complete by January 2020. Caregivers were not blinded; however, outcome assessors were blinded to treatment group. SETTING: 43 level II/III/IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across UK, Netherlands and Ireland. PATIENTS: 660 infants born at less than 34 weeks' gestation with platelet counts less than 50×109/L. INTERVENTIONS: Infants were randomised to undergo a platelet transfusion at platelet count thresholds of 50×109/L (higher threshold group) or 25×109/L (lower threshold group). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Our prespecified long-term follow-up outcome was a composite of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (developmental delay, cerebral palsy, seizure disorder, profound hearing or vision loss) at 2 years of corrected age. RESULTS: Follow-up data were available for 601 of 653 (92%) eligible participants. Of the 296 infants assigned to the higher threshold group, 147 (50%) died or survived with neurodevelopmental impairment, as compared with 120 (39%) of 305 infants assigned to the lower threshold group (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.17, p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Infants randomised to a higher platelet transfusion threshold of 50×109/L compared with 25×109/L had a higher rate of death or significant neurodevelopmental impairment at a corrected age of 2 years. This further supports evidence of harm caused by high prophylactic platelet transfusion thresholds in preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN87736839.

Serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity in antenatal testing and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: The BEST collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity (SRUS) in pregnancy is not clear based on available literature. The aim of this study is to determine if SRUS is associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from eight institutions over an 11-year study period (2010-2020), when available (5/8 sites). The outcome of the pregnancies with SRUS-no, mild, moderate, or severe HDFN-was determined. RESULTS: SRUS was demonstrated in 589 pregnancies. After excluding those with incomplete data, a total of 284 pregnancies were included in the primary HDFN outcome analysis. SRUS was detected in 124 (44%) pregnancies in isolation, and none were affected by HDFN. Of 41 pregnancies with SRUS and ABO incompatibility, 37 (90%) were unaffected, and 4 (10%) were associated with mild HDFN. Of 98 pregnancies with SRUS and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), 80 (81%) were unaffected, and 19 (19%) were associated with mild to severe HDFN. There was 1 case of mild HDFN and 1 case of severe HDFN in the 21 pregnancies with SRUS, ABO incompatibility, and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), and 19 (90%) were unaffected by HDFN. Among all patients with repeat testing, newly identified alloantibodies or other antibodies were identified in 63 of 212 (30%) patients. Although most were not clinically significant, on occasion SRUS preceded clinically significant antibody(s) associated with HDFN (3%, 5/188). CONCLUSION: The antenatal serologic finding of SRUS in isolation is not associated with HDFN but may precede clinically significant antibodies.

Nasal high-flow therapy to Optimise Stability during Intubation: the NOSI pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: In adult patients with acute respiratory failure, nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy at the time of intubation can decrease the duration of hypoxia. The objective of this pilot study was to calculate duration of peripheral oxygen saturation below 75% during single and multiple intubation attempts in order to inform development of a larger definitive trial. DESIGN AND SETTING: This double-blinded randomised controlled pilot trial was conducted at a single, tertiary neonatal centre from October 2020 to October 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Infants undergoing oral intubation in neonatal intensive care were included. Infants with upper airway anomalies were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to have NHF 6 L/min, FiO2 1.0 or NHF 0 L/min (control) applied during intubation, stratified by gestational age (<34 weeks vs ≥34 weeks). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was duration of hypoxaemia of <75% up to the time of successful intubation, RESULTS: 43 infants were enrolled (26 <34 weeks and 17 ≥34 weeks) with 50 intubation episodes. In infants <34 weeks' gestation, median duration of SpO2 of <75% was 29 s (0-126 s) vs 43 s (0-132 s) (p=0.78, intervention vs control). Median duration of SpO2 of <75% in babies ≥34 weeks' gestation was 0 (0-32 s) vs 0 (0-20 s) (p=0.9, intervention vs control). CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that it is feasible to provide NHF during intubation attempts. No significant differences were noted in duration of oxygen saturation of <75% between groups; however, this trial was not powered to detect a difference. A larger, higher-powered blinded study is warranted.

Cost-effectiveness of alternative minimum recall intervals between whole blood donations.

BACKGROUND: The INTERVAL trial showed shorter inter-donation intervals could safely increase the frequency of whole-blood donation. We extended the INTERVAL trial to consider the relative cost-effectiveness of reduced inter-donation intervals. METHODS: Our within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) used data from 44,863 whole-blood donors randomly assigned to 12, 10 or 8 week (males), and 16, 14 or 12 week inter-donation intervals (females). The CEA analysed the number of whole-blood donations, deferrals including low- haemoglobin deferrals, and donors' health-related quality of life (QoL) to report costs and cost-effectiveness over two years. FINDINGS: The mean number of blood donation visits over two years was higher for the reduced interval strategies, for males (7.76, 6.60 and 5.68 average donations in the 8-, 10- and 12- week arms) and for females (5.10, 4.60 and 4.01 donations in the 12-, 14- and 16- week arms). For males, the average rate of deferral for low haemoglobin per session attended, was 5.71% (8- week arm), 3.73% (10- week), and 2.55% (12- week), and for females the rates were: 7.92% (12-week), 6.63% (14- week), and 5.05% (16- week). Donors' QoL was similar across strategies, although self-reported symptoms were increased with shorter donation intervals. The shorter interval strategies increased average cost, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £9.51 (95% CI 9.33 to 9.69) per additional whole-blood donation for the 8- versus 12- week interval for males, and £10.17 (95% CI 9.80 to 10.54) for the 12- versus 16- week interval arm for females. CONCLUSIONS: Over two years, reducing the minimum donation interval could provide additional units of whole-blood at a small additional cost, including for those donor subgroups whose blood type is in relatively high demand. However, the significance of self-reported symptoms needs to be investigated further before these policies are expanded.

Neonatal Platelet Transfusions: Starting Again.

Preterm neonates with severe thrombocytopenia are frequently prescribed prophylactic platelet transfusions despite no evidence of benefit. Neonatal platelet transfusion practice varies, both nationally and internationally. Volumes and rates of transfusion in neonatology are based on historic precedent and lack an evidence base. The etiology of harm from platelet transfusions is poorly understood. Neonates are expected to be the longest surviving recipients of blood produce transfusions, and so avoiding transfusion associated harm is critical in this cohort. This article reviews the evidence for and against platelet transfusion in the neonate and identifies areas of future potential neonatal platelet transfusion research.

Haematological issues in neonates with neonatal encephalopathy treated with hypothermia.

Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is associated with abnormality of neurological function and involves multiorgan dysfunction. There are long-term complications such as cerebral palsy and developmental delay. Cardiac, renal, neurological and other organ dysfunctions are well described. Haematological dysfunction is relatively common and includes anaemia, thrombocytopenia, monocyte and neutrophil activation, hypofibrinogenemia and coagulopathy. There is a lack of consensus definitions of hematological parameters and optimal levels for intervention due to the lack of interventional studies in term neonates and the lack of knowledge of the optimal values during therapeutic hypothermia. However, derangements in hematological values are also associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes. This article outlines the different hematological complications associated with NE and therapeutic hypothermia and suggests a framework for management.

Comparison of four methods to measure haemoglobin concentrations in whole blood donors (COMPARE): A diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare four haemoglobin measurement methods in whole blood donors. BACKGROUND: To safeguard donors, blood services measure haemoglobin concentration in advance of each donation. NHS Blood and Transplant's (NHSBT) customary method have been capillary gravimetry (copper sulphate), followed by venous spectrophotometry (HemoCue) for donors failing gravimetry. However, NHSBT's customary method results in 10% of donors being inappropriately bled (ie, with haemoglobin values below the regulatory threshold). METHODS: We compared the following four methods in 21 840 blood donors (aged ≥18 years) recruited from 10 NHSBT centres in England, with the Sysmex XN-2000 haematology analyser, the reference standard: (1) NHSBT's customary method; (2) "post donation" approach, that is, estimating current haemoglobin concentration from that measured by a haematology analyser at a donor's most recent prior donation; (3) "portable haemoglobinometry" (using capillary HemoCue); (4) non-invasive spectrometry (using MBR Haemospect or Orsense NMB200). We assessed sensitivity; specificity; proportion who would have been inappropriately bled, or rejected from donation ("deferred") incorrectly; and test preference. RESULTS: Compared with the reference standard, the methods ranged in test sensitivity from 17.0% (MBR Haemospect) to 79.0% (portable haemoglobinometry) in men, and from 19.0% (MBR Haemospect) to 82.8% (portable haemoglobinometry) in women. For specificity, the methods ranged from 87.2% (MBR Haemospect) to 99.9% (NHSBT's customary method) in men, and from 74.1% (Orsense NMB200) to 99.8% (NHSBT's customary method) in women. The proportion of donors who would have been inappropriately bled ranged from 2.2% in men for portable haemoglobinometry to 18.9% in women for MBR Haemospect. The proportion of donors who would have been deferred incorrectly with haemoglobin concentration above the minimum threshold ranged from 0.1% in men for NHSBT's customary method to 20.3% in women for OrSense. Most donors preferred non-invasive spectrometry. CONCLUSION: In the largest study reporting head-to-head comparisons of four methods to measure haemoglobin prior to blood donation, our results support replacement of NHSBT's customary method with portable haemoglobinometry.

Variability in the management and imaging use in paediatric minor head trauma in European emergency departments. A Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the variability in the management of paediatric MHT in European emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study of children ≤18 years old with minor head trauma (MHT) (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥14) who presented to 15 European EDs between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 31. Data on clinical characteristics, imaging tests, and disposition of included patients were collected at each hospital over a 3-year period. RESULTS: We included 11 212 patients. Skull radiography was performed in 3416 (30.5%) patients, range 0.4-92.3%. A computed tomography (CT) was obtained in 696 (6.2%) patients, range 1.6-42.8%. The rate of admission varied from 0 to 48.2%. CONCLUSION: We found great variability in terms of the type of imaging and rate of CT scan obtained. Our study suggests opportunity for improvement in the area of paediatric head injury and the need for targeted individualised ED interventions to improve management of MHT.

Somatic mosaicism and common genetic variation contribute to the risk of very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease.

Very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) is a heterogeneous phenotype associated with a spectrum of rare Mendelian disorders. Here, we perform whole-exome-sequencing and genome-wide genotyping in 145 patients (median age-at-diagnosis of 3.5 years), in whom no Mendelian disorders were clinically suspected. In five patients we detect a primary immunodeficiency or enteropathy, with clinical consequences (XIAP, CYBA, SH2D1A, PCSK1). We also present a case study of a VEO-IBD patient with a mosaic de novo, pathogenic allele in CYBB. The mutation is present in ~70% of phagocytes and sufficient to result in defective bacterial handling but not life-threatening infections. Finally, we show that VEO-IBD patients have, on average, higher IBD polygenic risk scores than population controls (99 patients and 18,780 controls; P < 4 × 10-10), and replicate this finding in an independent cohort of VEO-IBD cases and controls (117 patients and 2,603 controls; P < 5 × 10-10). This discovery indicates that a polygenic component operates in VEO-IBD pathogenesis.

Development of the MiNDToolkit for management of cognitive and behavioral impairment in motor neuron disease.

Aim: To develop structured guidance, recommendations and techniques for nonpharmacological management of cognitive and behavioral impairments in motor neuron disease, called the MiNDToolkit. Methods: A four-round-modified Delphi method was utilized (online and face-to-face meeting), supplemented by recent research, recommendations, expertise from allied health professionals, clinicians, researchers and clients. Results: Round 1 (N = 47) identified allied health professionals techniques. Round 2 (N = 23) and 3 (N = 19) used expert consensus, refining general focus, specific elements and techniques. Round 4 (N = 8) applied personal, lived and occupational experience, finalizing the general structure and content of specific techniques. Conclusion: The MiNDToolkit is composed of multiple tools to structure decision-making through flowcharts, decision trees and checklists, provide information about impairments, assessment recommendations and techniques or strategies for nonpharmacological management cognitive or behavioral impairments in motor neuron disease.

Platelet transfusion thresholds in neonatal medicine.

Thrombocytopenia is common in preterm neonates. Thresholds for prophylactic platelet transfusion vary widely due to lack of evidence. The results of the PlaNet-2/MATISSE Study identified harm in the form of mortality and major bleed in babies prophylactically transfused below a platelet count of 50 × 109/L compared to 25 × 109/L. Neonatal platelet transfusions are administered at volumes based on historical practice which greatly exceed those routinely used in adults. Rate of transfusion is also based around practice in trauma and does not take into account the physiology of the preterm infant. There are multiple ways in which platelets may be mediating harm and this review discusses these potential mechanisms including immunological, inflammatory and blood group incompatibility. Much of the difficulty in assessing harm relates to problems in classification of transfusion-associated adverse events in babies. Thrombocytopenia and timing, efficacy and adverse effects of platelet transfusion are poorly understood. Further research is essential.

Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors.

BACKGROUND: The INTERVAL trial showed that, over a 2-year period, inter-donation intervals for whole blood donation can be safely reduced to meet blood shortages. We extended the INTERVAL trial for a further 2 years to evaluate the longer-term risks and benefits of varying inter-donation intervals, and to compare routine versus more intensive reminders to help donors keep appointments. METHODS: The INTERVAL trial was a parallel group, pragmatic, randomised trial that recruited blood donors aged 18 years or older from 25 static donor centres of NHS Blood and Transplant across England, UK. Here we report on the prespecified analyses after 4 years of follow-up. Participants were whole blood donors who agreed to continue trial participation on their originally allocated inter-donation intervals (men: 12, 10, and 8 weeks; women: 16, 14, and 12 weeks). They were further block-randomised (1:1) to routine versus more intensive reminders using computer-generated random sequences. The prespecified primary outcome was units of blood collected per year analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes related to safety were quality of life, self-reported symptoms potentially related to donation, haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and deferrals because of low haemoglobin and other factors. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN24760606, and has completed. FINDINGS: Between Oct 19, 2014, and May 3, 2016, 20 757 of the 38 035 invited blood donors (10 843 [58%] men, 9914 [51%] women) participated in the extension study. 10 378 (50%) were randomly assigned to routine reminders and 10 379 (50%) were randomly assigned to more intensive reminders. Median follow-up was 1·1 years (IQR 0·7-1·3). Compared with routine reminders, more intensive reminders increased blood collection by a mean of 0·11 units per year (95% CI 0·04-0·17; p=0·0003) in men and 0·06 units per year (0·01-0·11; p=0·0094) in women. During the extension study, each week shorter inter-donation interval increased blood collection by a mean of 0·23 units per year (0·21-0·25) in men and 0·14 units per year (0·12-0·15) in women (both p<0·0001). More frequent donation resulted in more deferrals for low haemoglobin (odds ratio per week shorter inter-donation interval 1·19 [95% CI 1·15-1·22] in men and 1·10 [1·06-1·14] in women), and lower mean haemoglobin (difference per week shorter inter-donation interval -0·84 g/L [95% CI -0·99 to -0·70] in men and -0·45 g/L [-0·59 to -0·31] in women) and ferritin concentrations (percentage difference per week shorter inter-donation interval -6·5% [95% CI -7·6 to -5·5] in men and -5·3% [-6·5 to -4·2] in women; all p<0·0001). No differences were observed in quality of life, serious adverse events, or self-reported symptoms (p>0.0001 for tests of linear trend by inter-donation intervals) other than a higher reported frequency of doctor-diagnosed low iron concentrations and prescription of iron supplements in men (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: During a period of up to 4 years, shorter inter-donation intervals and more intensive reminders resulted in more blood being collected without a detectable effect on donors' mental and physical wellbeing. However, donors had decreased haemoglobin concentrations and more self-reported symptoms compared with the initial 2 years of the trial. Our findings suggest that blood collection services could safely use shorter donation intervals and more intensive reminders to meet shortages, for donors who maintain adequate haemoglobin concentrations and iron stores. FUNDING: NHS Blood and Transplant, UK National Institute for Health Research, UK Medical Research Council, and British Heart Foundation.

Effect of communicating phenotypic and genetic risk of coronary heart disease alongside web-based lifestyle advice: the INFORM Randomised Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether provision of web-based lifestyle advice and coronary heart disease risk information either based on phenotypic characteristics or phenotypic plus genetic characteristics affects changes in objectively measured health behaviours. METHODS: A parallel-group, open randomised trial including 956 male and female blood donors with no history of cardiovascular disease (mean [SD] age=56.7 [8.8] years) randomised to four study groups: control group (no information provided); web-based lifestyle advice only (lifestyle group); lifestyle advice plus information on estimated 10-year coronary heart disease risk based on phenotypic characteristics (phenotypic risk estimate) (phenotypic group) and lifestyle advice plus information on estimated 10-year coronary heart disease risk based on phenotypic (phenotypic risk estimate) and genetic characteristics (genetic risk estimate) (genetic group). The primary outcome was change in physical activity from baseline to 12 weeks assessed by wrist-worn accelerometer. RESULTS: 928 (97.1%) participants completed the trial. There was no evidence of intervention effects on physical activity (difference in adjusted mean change from baseline): lifestyle group vs control group 0.09 milligravity (mg) (95% CI -1.15 to 1.33); genetic group vs phenotypic group -0.33 mg (95% CI -1.55 to 0.90); phenotypic group and genetic group vs control group -0.52 mg (95% CI -1.59 to 0.55) and vs lifestyle group -0.61 mg (95% CI -1.67 to 0.46). There was no evidence of intervention effects on secondary biological, emotional and health-related behavioural outcomes except self-reported fruit and vegetable intake. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of risk information, whether based on phenotypic or genotypic characteristics, alongside web-based lifestyle advice did not importantly affect objectively measured levels of physical activity, other health-related behaviours, biological risk factors or emotional well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17721237; Pre-results.

APOE4 Genotype Exerts Greater Benefit in Lowering Plasma Cholesterol and Apolipoprotein B than Wild Type (E3/E3), after Replacement of Dietary Saturated Fats with Low Glycaemic Index Carbohydrates.

We examined the impact of APOE genotype on plasma lipids and glucose in a secondary analysis of data from a five-arm, randomised controlled, parallel dietary intervention trial ('RISCK' study), to investigate the impact of replacing saturated fatty acids (SFA) with either monounsaturated fat (MUFA) or carbohydrate of high or low glycaemic index (GI) on CVD risk factors and insulin sensitivity. We tested the impact of APOE genotype (carriage of E2 and E4 alleles versus E3/E3), determined retrospectively, on plasma lipids, lipoproteins and glucose homeostasis at baseline (n = 469), and on the change in these variables after 24 weeks of dietary intervention (n = 389). At baseline, carriers of E2 (n = 70), E4 (n = 125) and E3/E3 (n = 274) expressed marked differences in total plasma cholesterol (TC, p = 0.001), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, p < 0.0001), apolipoprotein B (apo B, p < 0.0001) and total to high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TC:HDL-C, p = 0.002), with plasma concentrations decreasing in the order E4 > E3/E3 > E2. Following intervention, there was evidence of a significant diet x genotype interaction with significantly greater decreases in TC (p = 0.02) and apo B (p = 0.006) among carriers of E4 when SFA was replaced with low GI carbohydrate on a lower fat diet (TC -0.28 mmol/L p = 0.03; apo B -0.1 g/L p = 0.02), and a relative increase in TC (in comparison to E3/E3) when SFA was replaced with MUFA and high GI carbohydrates (TC 0.3 mmol/L, p = 0.03). Among carriers of E2 (compared with E3/E3) there was an increase in triacylglycerol (TAG) when SFA was replaced with MUFA and low GI carbohydrates 0.46 mmol/L p = 0.001). There were no significant interactions between APOE genotype and diet for changes in indices of glucose homeostasis. In conclusion, variations in APOE genotype led to differential effects on the lipid response to the replacement of SFA with MUFA and low GI carbohydrates.

Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): a randomised trial of 45 000 donors.

BACKGROUND: Limits on the frequency of whole blood donation exist primarily to safeguard donor health. However, there is substantial variation across blood services in the maximum frequency of donations allowed. We compared standard practice in the UK with shorter inter-donation intervals used in other countries. METHODS: In this parallel group, pragmatic, randomised trial, we recruited whole blood donors aged 18 years or older from 25 centres across England, UK. By use of a computer-based algorithm, men were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 12-week (standard) versus 10-week versus 8-week inter-donation intervals, and women were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 16-week (standard) versus 14-week versus 12-week intervals. Participants were not masked to their allocated intervention group. The primary outcome was the number of donations over 2 years. Secondary outcomes related to safety were quality of life, symptoms potentially related to donation, physical activity, cognitive function, haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and deferrals because of low haemoglobin. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN24760606, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants. FINDINGS: 45 263 whole blood donors (22 466 men, 22 797 women) were recruited between June 11, 2012, and June 15, 2014. Data were analysed for 45 042 (99·5%) participants. Men were randomly assigned to the 12-week (n=7452) versus 10-week (n=7449) versus 8-week (n=7456) groups; and women to the 16-week (n=7550) versus 14-week (n=7567) versus 12-week (n=7568) groups. In men, compared with the 12-week group, the mean amount of blood collected per donor over 2 years increased by 1·69 units (95% CI 1·59-1·80; approximately 795 mL) in the 8-week group and by 0·79 units (0·69-0·88; approximately 370 mL) in the 10-week group (p<0·0001 for both). In women, compared with the 16-week group, it increased by 0·84 units (95% CI 0·76-0·91; approximately 395 mL) in the 12-week group and by 0·46 units (0·39-0·53; approximately 215 mL) in the 14-week group (p<0·0001 for both). No significant differences were observed in quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function across randomised groups. However, more frequent donation resulted in more donation-related symptoms (eg, tiredness, breathlessness, feeling faint, dizziness, and restless legs, especially among men [for all listed symptoms]), lower mean haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and more deferrals for low haemoglobin (p<0·0001 for each) than those observed in the standard frequency groups. INTERPRETATION: Over 2 years, more frequent donation than is standard practice in the UK collected substantially more blood without having a major effect on donors' quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function, but resulted in more donation-related symptoms, deferrals, and iron deficiency. FUNDING: NHS Blood and Transplant, National Institute for Health Research, UK Medical Research Council, and British Heart Foundation.