ABSTRACT
Patients presenting with severe COVID-19 are predisposed to acquire secondary fungal infections such as COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC), which are associated with poor clinical outcomes despite antifungal treatment. The extreme burden imposed on clinical facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic has provided a permissive environment for the emergence of clonal outbreaks of multiple Candida species, including C. auris and C. parapsilosis. Here we report the largest clonal CAC outbreak to date caused by fluconazole resistant (FLZR) and echinocandin tolerant (ECT) C. parapsilosis. Sixty C. parapsilosis strains were obtained from 57 patients at a tertiary care hospital in Brazil, 90% of them were FLZR and ECT. Although only 35.8% of FLZR isolates contained an ERG11 mutation, all of them contained the TAC1L518F mutation and significantly overexpressed CDR1. Introduction of TAC1L518F into a susceptible background increased the MIC of fluconazole and voriconazole 8-fold and resulted in significant basal overexpression of CDR1. Additionally, FLZR isolates exclusively harboured E1939G outside of Fks1 hotspot-2, which did not confer echinocandin resistance, but significantly increased ECT. Multilocus microsatellite typing showed that 51/60 (85%) of the FLZR isolates belonged to the same cluster, while the susceptible isolates each represented a distinct lineage. Finally, biofilm production in FLZR isolates was significantly lower than in susceptible counterparts Suggesting that it may not be an outbreak determinant. In summary, we show that TAC1L518F and FKS1E1393G confer FLZR and ECT, respectively, in CAC-associated C. parapsilosis. Our study underscores the importance of antifungal stewardship and effective infection control strategies to mitigate clonal C. parapsilosis outbreaks.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Candidemia , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Candida parapsilosis/genetics , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidemia/microbiology , Disease Outbreaks , Echinocandins/pharmacology , Echinocandins/therapeutic use , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pandemics , Voriconazole/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) promotes challenging immune and inflammatory phenomena. Though various therapeutic possibilities have been tested against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the most adequate treatment has not yet been established. Propolis is a natural product with considerable evidence of immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory activities, and experimental data point to potential against viral targets. We hypothesized that propolis can reduce the negative effects of COVID-19. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center trial, hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients were treated with a standardized green propolis extract (EPP-AF®ï¸) as an adjunct therapy. Patients were allocated to receive standard care plus an oral dose of 400 mg or 800 mg/day of green propolis for seven days, or standard care alone. Standard care included all necessary interventions, as determined by the attending physician. The primary end point was the time to clinical improvement, defined as the length of hospital stay or oxygen therapy dependency duration. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury and need for intensive care or vasoactive drugs. Patients were followed for 28 days after admission. RESULTS: We enrolled 124 patients; 40 were assigned to EPP-AF®ï¸ 400 mg/day, 42 to EPP-AF®ï¸ 800 mg/day, and 42 to the control group. The length of hospital stay post-intervention was shorter in both propolis groups than in the control group; lower dose, median 7 days versus 12 days (95% confidence interval [CI] -6.23 to -0.07; p = 0.049) and higher dose, median 6 days versus 12 days (95% CI -7.00 to -1.09; p = 0.009). Propolis did not significantly affect the need for oxygen supplementation. In the high dose propolis group, there was a lower rate of acute kidney injury than in the controls (4.8 vs 23.8%), (odds ratio [OR] 0.18; 95% CI 0.03-0.84; p = 0.048). No patient had propolis treatment discontinued due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of propolis to the standard care procedures resulted in clinical benefits for the hospitalized COVID-19 patients, especially evidenced by a reduction in the length of hospital stay. Consequently, we conclude that propolis can reduce the impact of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Hospitalization , Propolis/therapeutic use , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Adult , Aged , Brazil , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Propolis/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the occurrence of Trichosporon asahii fungemia among critically ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS: From 1 July to 30 September 2020, cases of T asahii fungemia (TAF) in a Brazilian COVID-19 referral centre were investigated. The epidemiology and clinical courses were detailed, along with a mycological investigation that included molecular species identification, haplotype diversity analysis and antifungal susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Five critically ill COVID-19 patients developed TAF in the period. All five patients had common risk conditions for TAF: central venous catheter at fungemia, previous exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, prior echinocandin therapy and previous prolonged corticosteroid therapy. The average time of intensive care unit hospitalisation previous to the TAF episode was 23 days. All but one patient had voriconazole therapy, and TAF 30-day mortality was 80%. The five T asahii strains from the COVID-19 patients belonged to 4 different haplotypes, mitigating the possibility of skin origin and cross-transmission linking the 5 reported episodes. The antifungal susceptibility testing revealed low minimal inhibitory concentrations for azole derivatives. CONCLUSIONS: Judicious prescription of antibiotics, corticosteroids and antifungals needs to be discussed in critically ill COVID-19 patients to prevent infections by hard-to-treat fungi like T asahii.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Basidiomycota/isolation & purification , COVID-19/complications , Superinfection/complications , Trichosporonosis/complications , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacology , Aged , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Basidiomycota/classification , Basidiomycota/drug effects , Basidiomycota/genetics , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Candidemia/complications , Female , Fungemia/complications , Haplotypes , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Phylogeny , Risk Factors , Superinfection/epidemiology , Trichosporonosis/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Skin ulcer development in cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania braziliensis infection is associated with a mononuclear cell infiltrate and high levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Herein, we show that despite the absence of Leishmania-driven TNF, a cutaneous leishmaniasis patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome developed a skin ulcer. The presence of mononuclear phagocytes and high levels of TNF, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), and metalloproteinase-9 in tissue are identified as potential contributors to immunopathology observed in L. braziliensis-infected patients.
Subject(s)
Coinfection/complications , HIV Infections/complications , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/complications , Phagocytes/physiology , Skin Ulcer/etiology , Adult , Chemokine CCL2/blood , Coinfection/parasitology , Coinfection/virology , Female , HIV Infections/parasitology , Humans , Leishmania braziliensis , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/pathology , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/virology , Matrix Metalloproteinase 9/blood , Skin Ulcer/parasitology , Skin Ulcer/virology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/bloodABSTRACT
Determination of the neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) level can be used to detect acute kidney injury (AKI) earlier than determination of the serum creatinine (SCr) level in settings such as cardiac surgery, contrast nephropathy, and intensive care units. We hypothesized that urine NGAL (UrNGAL) would be an early biomarker of drug nephrotoxicity. To test this, we studied hemodynamically stable patients treated with amphotericin B (AmB). We measured the SCr and UrNGAL levels at the baseline and daily after initiation of AmB up to day 14 or development of AKI by the use of the SCr criterion. AKI was defined according to a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criterion (an increase in the SCr level by ≥0.3 mg/dl within 48 h or an SCr level ≥1.5 times the baseline level within 7 days). We studied 24 patients with a mean age of 48.4 ± 16.4 years. Most patients were male, and the patients received AmB (12 received AmB deoxycholate and 12 received liposomal AmB) for the treatment of leishmaniasis (91.7%). Overall, 17/24 patients fulfilled a KDIGO criterion for AKI. Peak UrNGAL levels were higher in patients with AKI than in patients without AKI and in recipients of AmB deoxycholate than in recipients of liposomal AmB. The diagnostic performance of the UrNGAL level on day 5 for the detection of AKI was moderate, with the area under the curve (AUC) being 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.95). In the subgroup receiving AmB deoxycholate, however, the AUC rose to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.00). In a patient-level analysis, we found that AKI could be detected 3.2 days earlier by the use of the UrNGAL criterion than by the use of the SCr criterion (times to AKI by the UrNGAL and SCr criteria, 3.7 ± 2.5 versus 6.9 ± 3.3 days, respectively; P = 0.001). Future studies should evaluate if a treatment strategy oriented toward evaluation of UrNGAL levels will improve outcomes. These findings for AmB-induced AKI in leishmaniasis patients could serve as a basis for the investigation of urine biomarkers in the early detection of drug nephrotoxicity in other clinical settings.