ABSTRACT
Introduction: Sensory disturbance due to injury of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) is a donor-site morbidity of the radial forearm (RF) flap. The relationship between the SBRN preservation method and the post-operative sensation at the flap donor-site was retrospectively investigated. Methods: We included 39 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with a free RF flap at Hyogo Cancer Center between April 2014 and March 2018. The patients were classified into the following three groups according to the SBRN preservation method: group 1, zero preservation, excision of the entire SBRN; group 2, main trunk preservation, excision of all branches except the main trunk of the SBRN; and group 3, complete preservation, preservation of the entire SBRN. Objective sensations and subjective symptoms at the flap donor-site were analyzed. Results: The mean objective sensory scores were 3.18, 2.97, and 1.78 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 were significant (p = 0.0035 and p = 0.037, respectively). The mean subjective symptom scores were 2.40, 1.33, and 1.40 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 2, and between groups 1 and 3 were significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.019, respectively). Conclusions: Zero preservation method had a higher risk of subjective symptoms and objective hypoesthesia development at the flap donor-site than the complete preservation method. Despite inevitable objective hypoesthesia, the main trunk preservation prevented the development of subjective symptoms. Complete preservation is optimal for RF flap harvest; however, in case of perforator crossing, main trunk preservation is another option.
ABSTRACT
Total laryngectomy involves removal of the vocal cords resulting in the loss of vocal function. After laryngectomy, the patient's vocal function can be restored in several ways, including the insertion of a tracheoesophageal (TE) shunt. A TE shunt is considered an effective means of restoring speech due to its high efficacy, low requirement for training, and no need for any equipment while speaking. However, complications such as saliva inflow into the trachea, caused by the widening of the shunt opening, have also been reported. Moreover, the optimal treatment for an enlarged fistula has not yet been established. A fistula may also form at sites of hypopharyngeal reconstruction with free jejunal transplantation. Following its formation, the influx of saliva, infections, and pressure exerted by the act of swallowing make a fistula resistant to closure, and most patients require closure surgery using myocutaneous flaps. We encountered a case where an intractable TE fistula formed due to a TE shunt after the patient underwent total pharyngolaryngeal resection for hypopharyngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal reconstruction with a free jejunum flap. Since the optimal method for the TE fistula closure remains uncertain, we attempted to close the fistula according to the fistula closure of the free jejunal transplantation. Failure to close a TE fistula using a myocutaneous flap necessitates a re-closure procedure. However, because the surgical field around the trachea can be limited in such patients, creating an additional myocutaneous flap may not be feasible. In addition to the myocutaneous flap, ventilation control using a conventional intubation tube may further narrow the surgical field during the re-closure surgery. Based on our experience and existing literature, in this article, we summarize several ways of managing TE fistula when the surgical field around the trachea is limited.