Correction to: Phase Ib Trial of the PI3K Inhibitor Copanlisib Combined with the Allosteric MEK Inhibitor Refametinib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

The article Phase Ib Trial of the PI3K Inhibitor Copanlisib Combined with the Allosteric MEK Inhibitor Refametinib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

Phase Ib Trial of the PI3K Inhibitor Copanlisib Combined with the Allosteric MEK Inhibitor Refametinib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Dual inhibition of PI3K and MAPK signaling is conceptually a promising anticancer therapy. OBJECTIVE: This phase 1b trial investigated the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose, pharmacokinetics, tumor response, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) pharmacodynamics, and biomarker explorations for the combination of pan-PI3K inhibitor copanlisib and allosteric MEK inhibitor refametinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an adaptive trial with eight dose cohorts combining dose escalation and varying schedules in repeated 28-day cycles. Patients received copanlisib (0.2-0.8 mg/kg intravenously) intermittently (days 1, 8, 15) or weekly (days 1, 8, 15, 22) each cycle, and refametinib (30-50 mg twice daily orally) continuously or 4 days on/3 days off. Patients with KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, or PI3KCA mutations were eligible for the expansion cohort. RESULTS: In the dose-escalation (n = 49) and expansion (n = 15) cohorts, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea (59.4%), nausea, acneiform rash, and fatigue (51.6% each). Dose-limiting toxicities included oral mucositis (n = 4), increased alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (n = 3), rash acneiform, hypertension (n = 2 each), and diarrhea (n = 1). MTD was copanlisib 0.4 mg/kg weekly and refametinib 30 mg twice daily. No pharmacokinetic interactions were identified. Decreased tumor FDG uptake and MEK-ERK signaling inhibition were demonstrated during treatment. Best response was stable disease (n = 21); median treatment duration was 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Despite sound rationale and demonstrable pharmacodynamic tumor activity in relevant tumor populations, a dose and schedule could not be identified for this drug combination that was both tolerable and offered clear efficacy in the population assessed. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01392521.

A phase I study of BI 811283, an Aurora B kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of the Aurora B kinase inhibitor BI 811283 in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: BI 811283 was administered via 24-h infusion on Days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (schedule A) or Day 1 of a 3-week cycle (schedule B) in a modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Pharmacodynamic assessments included immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated histone H3 (pHH3) on skin biopsies to determine Aurora B kinase inhibition and plasma concentrations of caspase-cleaved CK-18 (apoptosis marker). RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were treated. The MTDs of BI 811283 were 125 mg (schedule A) and 230 mg (schedule B). Dose-limiting toxicities were primarily hematological (febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia); the most common drug-related adverse effects included neutropenia, fatigue, leukopenia, nausea, alopecia, diarrhea, and decreased appetite. A trend toward a decrease in pHH3 was observed, with increasing BI 811283 doses, indicating target engagement; there was no consistent trend regarding caspase-cleaved CK-18 levels. No objective response was observed although 19 patients in each schedule achieved clinical benefit (stable disease). CONCLUSIONS: BI 811283 demonstrated a generally manageable safety profile and disease stabilization in some patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT No: 2007-000191-17, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00701324.

Vascular effects, efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer: a prospective phase I subanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Nintedanib is a potent, oral angiokinase inhibitor that targets VEGF, PDGF and FGF signalling, as well as RET and Flt3. The maximum tolerated dose of nintedanib was evaluated in a phase I study of treatment-refractory patients with advanced solid tumours. In this preplanned subanalysis, the effect of nintedanib on the tumour vasculature, along with efficacy and safety, was assessed in 30 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients with advanced CRC who had failed conventional treatment, or for whom no therapy of proven efficacy existed, were treated with nintedanib ranging from 50-450 mg once-daily (n = 14) or 150-250 mg twice-daily (n = 16) for 28 days. After a 1-week rest, further courses were permitted in the absence of progression or undue toxicity. The primary objective was the effect on the tumour vasculature using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and expressed as the initial area under the DCE-MRI contrast agent concentration-time curve after 60 seconds (iAUC60) or the volume transfer constant between blood plasma and extravascular extracellular space (Ktrans). RESULTS: Patients received a median of 4.0 courses (range: 1-13). Among 21 evaluable patients, 14 (67%) had a ≥40% reduction from baseline in Ktrans and 13 (62%) had a ≥40% decrease from baseline in iAUC60, representing clinically relevant effects on tumour blood flow and permeability, respectively. A ≥40% reduction from baseline in Ktrans was positively associated with non-progressive tumour status (Fisher's exact: p = 0.0032). One patient achieved a partial response at 250 mg twice-daily and 24 (80%) achieved stable disease lasting ≥8 weeks. Time to tumour progression (TTP) at 4 months was 26% and median TTP was 72.5 days (95% confidence interval: 65-114). Common drug-related adverse events (AEs) included nausea (67%), vomiting (53%) and diarrhoea (40%); three patients experienced drug-related AEs ≥ grade 3. Four patients treated with nintedanib once-daily had an alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase increase ≥ grade 3. No increases > grade 2 were seen in the twice-daily group. CONCLUSIONS: Nintedanib modulates tumour blood flow and permeability in patients with advanced, refractory CRC, while achieving antitumour activity and maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

FOLFIRI and sunitinib as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases--a CESAR phase II study including pharmacokinetic, biomarker, and imaging data.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was the evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters, biomarkers, clinical outcome, and imaging parameters in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with FOLFIRI plus sunitinib. METHODS: mCRC patients with liver metastases were treated with FOLFIRI and sunitinib as 1st line therapy. At protocol-defined time points, multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)measurements, computed tomography (CT) scans, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biomarker analyses were performed during the first and second treatment cycle. Thereafter, patients were treated until tumor progression, investigator’s decision due to toxicity, or patient withdrawal. RESULTS: 28 patients were screened, 26 were included, and 23 received at least one study medication. Full safety analysis was performed in 23 patients. Full PK and biomarker analyses were performed in 21 patients. Strong responses in tumor size reduction forced a change from the original imaging timing scheme. This unforeseen change in the timing scheme resulted in subgroups too small for meaningful statistical analysis of most imaging parameters. Thus, only a descriptive analysis of the MRI data was possible. In 21/22 patients, MRI showeda decrease of the liver metastases. Best response was partial remission (PR) in 8/17 patients. Plasma concentrations of sVEGFR-2 and sVEGFR-3 decreased in all patients. The majority of the patients developed some kind of toxicity not always deducible to FOLFIRI or sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the observed side effect profile, FOLFIRI plus sunitinib 37.5 mg per day cannot be recommended for previously untreated mCRC.

First-in-human phase I study of PRS-050 (Angiocal), an Anticalin targeting and antagonizing VEGF-A, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: To report the nonrandomized first-in-human phase I trial of PRS-050, a novel, rationally engineered Anticalin based on human tear lipocalin that targets and antagonizes vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received PRS-050 at 0.1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg by IV in successive dosing cohorts according to the 3+3 escalation scheme. The primary end point was safety. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled; 25 were evaluable. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity, comprising grade (G) 3 hypertension and G3 pyrexia, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) included chills (52%; G3, 4%), fatigue (52%; G3, 4%), hypertension (44%; G3, 16%), and nausea (40%, all G1/2). No anti-PRS-050 antibodies following multiple administration of the drug were detected. PRS-050 showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics (PK), with a terminal half-life of approximately 6 days. Free VEGF-A was detectable at baseline in 9/25 patients, becoming rapidly undetectable after PRS-050 infusion for up to 3 weeks. VEGF-A/PRS-050 complex was detectable for up to 3 weeks at all dose levels, including in patients without detectable baseline-free VEGF-A. We also detected a significant reduction in circulating matrix metalloproteinase 2, suggesting this end point could be a pharmacodynamic (PD) marker of the drug's activity. CONCLUSIONS: PRS-050, a novel Anticalin with high affinity for VEGF-A, was well-tolerated when administered at the highest dose tested, 10 mg/kg. Based on target engagement and PK/PD data, the recommended phase II dose is 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks administered as a 120-minute infusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01141257 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01141257.

Determination of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (sVEGFR-3) in plasma as pharmacodynamic biomarker.

Soluble VEGFR-3 (sVEGFR-3) is a potential biomarker for the anti-angiogenic activity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The aim of this investigation was the validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure sVEGFR-3 in human plasma and the investigation of its applicability in clinical trials as first step of the biomarker validation process. General validation criteria were assessed based on current guidelines and recommendations for immunoassays. The ELISA was applied in two clinical trials including healthy volunteers and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving 50 or 37.5mg sunitinib per day, respectively. SVEGFR-3 was measured at predefined time points. Undiluted, inactivated fetal calf serum was identified as surrogate matrix to substitute for human plasma. Dilutional linearity and parallelism could be successfully confirmed. The analyte was measured in the study matrix with intra- and inter-run precision and accuracy ≤20%. Stability was proven over a period of at least 15 months as well as upon three freeze-thaw cycles. SVEGFR-3 concentrations decreased in response to sunitinib to 57% (IQR 50-88%) and 58% (IQR 47-80%) of the respective baseline concentrations in healthy volunteers and mCRC patients, respectively, with subsequent increase after stop of treatment. The ELISA for the quantification of sVEGFR-3 in human plasma was successfully validated. The applicability of the assay was demonstrated in two clinical trials.

A phase I dose-escalation study of regorafenib (BAY 73-4506), an inhibitor of oncogenic, angiogenic, and stromal kinases, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Regorafenib is a novel oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic (VEGFR1-3, TIE2), stromal (PDGFR-ß, FGFR), and oncogenic kinases (KIT, RET, and RAF). This first-in-man, phase I dose-escalation study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy profiles of regorafenib in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment were recruited. Regorafenib was administered orally for 21 days on/seven days off in repeating cycles, until discontinuation due to toxicity or tumor progression. Adverse events (AE) were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Pharmacokinetic profiles were measured after a single dose and on day 21. Pharmacodynamic and efficacy evaluations included tumor perfusion assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, plasma cytokines, and tumor response using RECIST (v1.0). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled into eight cohorts at dose levels from 10 to 220 mg daily. The recommended dose for future studies was determined to be 160 mg daily, with a treatment schedule of 21 days on/seven days off in repeating 28-day cycles. The most common drug-related grade 3 or 4 AEs were dermatologic AEs (hand-foot skin reaction, rash), hypertension, and diarrhea. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a similar exposure at steady state for the parent compound and two pharmacologically active metabolites. Tumor perfusion and plasma cytokine analysis showed biologic activity of regorafenib. Three of 47 evaluable patients achieved a partial response (renal cell carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and osteosarcoma). CONCLUSION: Regorafenib showed an acceptable safety profile and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors.

Phase I study of telatinib (BAY 57-9352): analysis of safety, pharmacokinetics, tumor efficacy, and biomarkers in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Telatinib (BAY 57-9352) is an orally available, small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 and 3 (VEGFR-2/-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor ß tyrosine kinases. METHODS: In this multicenter phase I dose-escalation study including a phase II like expansion part, 39 patients with refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) were enrolled into 14 days on / 7 days off in repeating cycles of 28 days (n = 11) or continuous dosing groups (n = 28) to receive ≥ 600 mg telatinib twice-daily (bid). RESULTS: Hypertension (28%) and diarrhoea (15%) were the most frequent study drug-related adverse events of CTC grade 3. In this population, no clear relationship between telatinib dose and individual Cmax and AUC was apparent in the 600 mg bid to 1500 mg bid dose range. No partial remission according to RECIST was reached, but 41% of the patients reached some tumour shrinkage during treatment. Tumour blood flow measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and sVEGFR-2 plasma levels decreased with increasing telatinib AUC(0-12). CONCLUSION: Telatinib treatment was well tolerated. The observed single agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated CRC patients was limited. Pharmacodynamic results are suggestive for the biological activity of telatinib justifying a further evaluation of telatinib bid in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens in CRC patients.

A phase IA, open-label, dose-escalating study of PTK787/ZK 222584 administered orally on a continuous dosing schedule in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK) offers a novel approach to inhibit tumour angiogenesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study characterized the safety, tolerability, biological activity and pharmacokinetic profile of PTK/ZK, while determining the optimum dose. Seventy-one patients with advanced cancer were enrolled to receive once daily dosing. Pharmacokinetic, dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and safety assessments were performed, along with measurement of soluble markers. Patients were treated until they had unacceptable toxicity and/or disease progression. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were assessable for maximum tolerated dose (MTD) determination, but no MTD was established; only two patients experienced dose limiting toxicities. PTK/ZK was well tolerated with only nine patients experiencing serious adverse events suspected to be PTK/ZK related, but no objective tumour response was observed; 34% had stable disease and 48% had progressive disease. In addition, PTK/ZK was rapidly absorbed with a maximum concentration occurring 2 hours post-dosing. Vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblastic growth factor were good predictors of best tumour response, as was the MRI bidirectional transfer constant on day 2 of treatment. CONCLUSION: An MTD was not reached in this study but, based on these data and findings from other studies, 1200 mg was found to be the optimum dose of PTK/ZK for patients with advanced cancer.

Clinical trials with anti-angiogenic agents in hematological malignancies.

New blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) is not only essential for the growth of solid tumors but there is also emerging evidence that progression of hematological malignancies like multiple myeloma, acute leukemias, and myeloproliferative neoplasms, also depends on new blood vessel formation. Anti-angiogenic strategies have become an important therapeutic modality for solid tumors. Several anti-angiogenic agents targeting angiogenesis-related pathways like monoclonal antibodies, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and proteasome inhibitors have been entered clinical trials or have been already approved for the treatment of hematological malignancies as well and in some instances these pathways have emerged as promising therapeutic targets. This review summarizes recent advances in the basic understanding of the role of angiogenesis in hematological malignancies and clinical trials with novel therapeutic approaches targeting angiogenesis.

c-kit (CD117) expression in human tumors and its prognostic value: an immunohistochemical analysis.

c-kit functions as a tyrosine kinase receptor and represents a target for small molecule kinase inhibitors. The expression pattern for c-kit was studied in different human tumor types to their correlation with prognosis. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from 282 patients were analyzed immunohistochemically for c-kit expression. Survival and follow-up data were available from 192/282 (68%) patients. c-kit immunopositivity was found in 62/282 (22%) cases. c-kit expression was found in 14/83 (17%) colorectal cancers, in 13/62 (21%) breast cancers, in 7/20 sarcomas (35%), in 5/14 (36%) renal cell carcinomas, in 2/12 ovarian cancers (17%) and in 2/12 (17%) hepatocellular carcinomas. We found no significant correlation between c-kit expression and prognosis although a trend to a worse prognosis in patients with c-kit positive tumors could be observed. Expression of c-kit was found in tumor samples with varying intensities and infrequently.

First-time-in-man and pharmacokinetic study of weekly oral perifosine in patients with solid tumours.

AIM: To identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of oral perifosine. METHODS: Patients with solid tumours received perifosine at dosages ranging from 100-800mg/week. Eligibility criteria included life expectancy>12weeks, WHO performance status2, normal blood, liver and renal functions and no recent anticancer treatment. Drug concentrations were analysed by HPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Thirty six patients were recruited (75% males, mean age 54.7years, performance status 1 in 72.2%). Adverse events included nausea (69.4%), diarrhoea (55.6%), vomiting (52.8%) and abdominal pain (13.9%). Antiemetic regimens including glucocorticoids, dopamine antagonists and 5-HT3-antagonists were used as treatment and/or prophylaxis in 50% of the patients. Though MTD was formally not reached with 800mg/week, the treatment discontinuation due to diarrhoea and vomiting likely related to perifosine in two cases led to the decision to stop further dose escalation. Pharmacokinetics after a single dose were median t(max)=8.0-24.2h, median t(1/2)=81.0-115.9h and mean(geo) CL/f=0.28-0.43mL/min/kg. Urinary excretion was below 1%. Perifosine slightly accumulated and steady state was nearly reached after 2-3weeks. CONCLUSION: Oral perifosine was tolerable up to 600mg/week in cancer patients when administered with meal and prophylactic antiemetics. Based on its half-life of about 4days, a weekly regimen may be appropriate.

Uptake of permethrin from impregnated clothing.

In order to examine exposure and health risks which can arise from permethrin-impregnated clothing, a controlled trial was conducted. In a study group consisting of 187 volunteers in total, a subgroup of 86 persons was equipped with permethrin-impregnated battle dress uniforms (BDU) for 28 days. One hundred and one persons served as a control group, wearing non-impregnated BDUs throughout the entire study period of 56 days. Internal exposure of all participants was assessed by determination of urinary permethrin metabolites (cis-DCCA, trans-DCCA and 3-PBA) on day 0, 14 and 28 of the wearing period and 28 days after termination of wearing. Exposure levels in the control group ranged within background exposure of the general German population at all four dates of sampling (medians Sigma DCCA+3-PBA were 0.09, 0.13, 0.23 and 0.10mug/l, respectively). For the group equipped with impregnated BDUs this applied to day 0 (0.31mug/l) only, while the following measurements revealed considerably higher metabolite concentrations (31.39, 22.01 and 1.44mug/l, respectively), especially while wearing impregnated clothing. Due to these results a substantial uptake of permethrin from impregnated BDUs has to be assumed. However, since calculations reveal a maximum permethrin uptake clearly below the acceptable daily intake (ADI), health impairments are rather unlikely.

Phase I study of the angiogenesis inhibitor BIBF 1120 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: BIBF 1120 is an oral, potent angiokinase inhibitor targeting receptors of the vascular endothelial growth factors, platelet-derived growth factors, and fibroblast growth factors. This phase I, accelerated titration study assessed the maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects of BIBF 1120. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with advanced cancers received BIBF 1120 in successive cohorts. Twenty-five received 50 to 450 mg once daily and 36 received 150 to 300 mg twice daily in 4-week treatment courses interspersed by 1 week of washout. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessed antiangiogenic effect in 42 patients. RESULTS: Most frequent BIBF 1120-related adverse events were mostly mild to moderate (Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1-2) nausea (68.9%), vomiting (45.9%), and diarrhea (44.3%). The majority of dose-limiting adverse events of Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or 4 were reversible liver enzyme elevations. The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg of BIBF 1120 for once and twice daily dosing. BIBF 1120 was absorbed moderately fast (t(max) = 1-3 hours at steady state), with no deviation from dose linearity and no decrease of exposure over time. The gMean terminal half-life was from 13 to 19 hours. One complete and two partial responses occurred in patients with renal cell cancer (n = 2) and colorectal cancer (n = 1). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed a significant reduction in tumor blood flow in 55% of evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: BIBF 1120 dosed continuously displayed a favorable safety and pharmacokinetics profile, and first efficacy signals were observed. Twice daily dosing permitted increased drug exposure without additional toxicity. Two hundred milligrams BIBF 1120 twice daily is the recommended dose for phase II monotherapy studies.

DCE-MRI assessment of the effect of vandetanib on tumor vasculature in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and liver metastases: a randomized phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling pathways. In patients with advanced colorectal cancer and liver metastases, the effect of vandetanib on tumor vasculature was assessed using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). METHODS: Eligible patients received vandetanib 100 or 300 mg/day. DCE-MRI (iAUC(60 )and K(trans)) was used to quantify the primary endpoints of tumor perfusion and vascular permeability. An exploratory assessment of tumor oxygenation was performed using MRI/T2*. All MRI parameters were measured at baseline (twice) and on days 2, 8, 29 and 57. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received vandetanib (n = 10, 100 mg; n = 12, 300 mg). Baseline measurements of iAUC(60 )and K(trans )were reproducible, with low intrapatient coefficients of variation (11% and 24%, respectively). Estimates of mean % changes from baseline were -3.4% (100 mg) and -4.6% (300 mg) for iAUC(60), and -4.6% (100 mg) and -2.7% (300 mg) for K(trans); these changes were not significantly different between doses. The exploratory T2* measurement showed a significant increase at 300 mg versus 100 mg (P = 0.006). Both doses of vandetanib were generally well tolerated; common toxicities were fatigue, rash and diarrhea (majority CTC grade 1 or 2). The pharmacokinetic profile of vandetanib was similar to that observed previously. There were no RECIST-defined objective responses; five patients experienced stable disease >/=8 weeks. CONCLUSION: In this study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, vandetanib did not modulate gadolinium uptake in tumor vasculature and tissue measured by the DCE-MRI parameters iAUC(60 )and K(trans). TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00496509 (ClinicalTrials.gov); D4200C00050 (AstraZeneca).

Phase II STUdy with 3rd- or 4th-line bendamustine (flat dose) therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bendamustine is a drug with a favorable side effect spectrum and it offers a chance to overcome tumor resistance in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bendamustine was given as flat dose with 200 mg at days 1 + 2 in MBC patients pretreated with 2-3 different chemotherapies. Therapy was repeated at day 28 or fully recovered neutrophils. After 2 treatment cycles, a tumor response evaluation was performed. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC) catalogue. RESULTS: 22 patients were evaluated for toxicity. 4 patients dropped out before the first tumor response evaluation; thus, 18 patients were evaluable for anticancer efficacy evaluation. 3/18 patients reached a partial remission (PR), 4 stable disease and 11 showed progression after 2 treatment cycles. The time to progression (TTP) was 5 months in patients with PR and 4 months in patients with no change (NC). In patients with progressive disease (PD), TTP was < 2 months. The main toxicities were nausea, weight loss and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Bendamustine can be given with a fixed flat dose, which simplifies the drug preparation. 2/5th of all treated patients responded to this therapy whereas bendamustine showed no anticancer effect in 3/5th of all patients. Bendamustine is definitely a drug with anticancer potential.

Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of BI 2536, a novel Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: BI 2536 is a novel, potent, and highly specific inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), which has an essential role in the regulation of mitotic progression. The aim of this trial was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 2536 and to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in patients who had advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I trial followed an open label, toxicity-guided, dose-titration design. Single doses of BI 2536 (25 to 250 mg) were administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion; patients who experienced clinical benefit were eligible for additional treatment courses. Safety and pharmacokinetics were investigated. Tumor response was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group guidelines. RESULTS: The MTD was defined at 200 mg in a total of 40 patients entered; reversible neutropenia constituted the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the most frequent adverse event at the MTD (grade 3 to 4; 56%). Nausea (52%), fatigue (52%), and anorexia (44%) also were common and were mostly of mild to moderate intensity (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events