Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Contam Hydrol ; 241: 103838, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34089976

ABSTRACT

This study applies innovative methods to characterize and quantify the magnitude of groundwater flow in a fractured and variably cemented sandstone aquifer to inform an in-situ remediation strategy for trichloroethene (TCE) contamination. A modified active-distributed temperature sensing (A-DTS) approach in which fiber optic cables were permanently grouted in the borehole was used to quantify groundwater flow rates. Two additional tracer tests were conducted: 1) fluorescein tracer injection followed by rock coring and sampling for visual mapping and porewater analysis, and 2) deployment of passive flux meters in conventional monitoring wells to evaluate groundwater velocity and mass flux distributions. Forced gradient injection of fluorescein tracer suggests a dual porosity flow system wherein higher rates of groundwater flow occur within discrete features including highly permeable bedding planes and fractures, with slower flow occurring within the rock matrix. Tracer was observed and detected in the unfractured matrix porewater >1.5 m away from the injection well. Beyond this distance, >6 m radially away from the injection hole, tracer was primarily detected within and adjacent to high transmissivity fractures serving as preferential flow paths. The Darcy flux calculated using active distributed temperature sensing (A-DTS) shows depth-discrete values ranging from 7 to 60 cm/day, with average and median values of 23 and 17 cm/day, respectively. Passive Flux Meters (PFMs) deployed in three conventional monitoring wells with slotted screens and sand filter packs showed groundwater flux values ranging from 2 to 11 cm/day, with an overall average of 4 cm/day and are likely biased low due to spreading in the sand pack. The study results were used to inform an in-situ remediation system design including the proposed injection well spacing and the amendment delivery approach. In addition, the results were used to build confidence in the viability of delivering an oxidant to the rock matrix via advective processes. This is important because 1) the matrix is where the majority of the TCE mass occurs, and 2) it provides insights on processes that directly affect remedial performance expectations given advective delivery to preferential pathways and the matrix overcomes diffusion only conditions.


Subject(s)
Groundwater , Trichloroethylene , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Diffusion , Porosity , Trichloroethylene/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Wells
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Res ; 3(4): e1, 2013 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24422019

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pain is a common complication in head and neck cancer. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the evidence from randomised control trials investigating pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of pain management in head and neck cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were searched. Squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck excluding nasopharyngeal and salivary gland cancers were included. The limits were "human" and "randomised clinical trials". A quality assessment was carried out. RESULTS: 13 studies were included with a total of 644 participants. The primary outcome for most of these papers was pain control post-treatment. Levels of bias varied between the studies. Majority (12 out of the 13 studies) reported intervention to be superior to the control or standard therapy in pain management. Only 46% of the studies were carried out on an intention to treat basis. Two studies reported high dropout rates, with one at 66%. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from randomised clinical trials to suggest an optimal pharmacological intervention for head and neck cancer pain post-treatment. Further high quality randomised clinical trials should be conducted to develop an optimal management strategy for head and neck cancer pain.

3.
J Bacteriol ; 186(6): 1879-89, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14996819

ABSTRACT

The DcuS-DcuR system of Escherichia coli is a two-component sensor-regulator that controls gene expression in response to external C(4)-dicarboxylates and citrate. The DcuS protein is particularly interesting since it contains two PAS domains, namely a periplasmic C(4)-dicarboxylate-sensing PAS domain (PASp) and a cytosolic PAS domain (PASc) of uncertain function. For a study of the role of the PASc domain, three different fragments of DcuS were overproduced and examined: they were PASc-kinase, PASc, and kinase. The two kinase-domain-containing fragments were autophosphorylated by [gamma-(32)P]ATP. The rate was not affected by fumarate or succinate, supporting the role of the PASp domain in C(4)-dicarboxylate sensing. Both of the phosphorylated DcuS constructs were able to rapidly pass their phosphoryl groups to DcuR, and after phosphorylation, DcuR dephosphorylated rapidly. No prosthetic group or significant quantity of metal was found associated with either of the PASc-containing proteins. The DNA-binding specificity of DcuR was studied by use of the pure protein. It was found to be converted from a monomer to a dimer upon acetylphosphate treatment, and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis suggested that it can oligomerize. DcuR specifically bound to the promoters of the three known DcuSR-regulated genes (dctA, dcuB, and frdA), with apparent K(D)s of 6 to 32 micro M for untreated DcuR and < or =1 to 2 microM for the acetylphosphate-treated form. The binding sites were located by DNase I footprinting, allowing a putative DcuR-binding motif [tandemly repeated (T/A)(A/T)(T/C)(A/T)AA sequences] to be identified. The DcuR-binding sites of the dcuB, dctA, and frdA genes were located 27, 94, and 86 bp, respectively, upstream of the corresponding +1 sites, and a new promoter was identified for dcuB that responds to DcuR.


Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Dicarboxylic Acid Transporters/metabolism , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolism , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Base Sequence , Binding Sites , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Dimerization , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Operator Regions, Genetic , Phosphorylation , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Kinases/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL