Facial erythema in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with Dupilumab - a descriptive study of morphology and Aetiology.

BACKGROUND: The development of dermatitis on face and neck, which was not described in phase 3 clinical trials, has been reported in the literature in patients treated with dupilumab. Little is known regarding the causes or defining features of the facial dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: We conducted surveys of consecutive patients with AD on dupilumab to describe its clinical features, morphology and aetiology. METHODS: A multi-centre prospective cohort study was conducted from 1 January 2020, to 31 December 31 2020. A total of 162 patients under dupilumab treatment were asked to complete a questionnaire and patients were evaluated by dermatologists. RESULTS: Of all 162 patients, 137 (84.6%) patients reported pre-existing facial dermatitis prior to dupilumab therapy. One hundred and twenty-one (88.3%) patients with pre-existing facial dermatitis reported improvement of their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy, nine (6.6%) patients reported no change after the treatment and seven (4.3%) patients of them got worse after the treatment (exacerbation group). Of 25 patients who reported no pre-existing active facial dermatitis, six (24%) patients reported new-onset facial erythema after the starting dupilumab therapy (new-onset group). A large proportion of the patients in both the exacerbation (86%) and new-onset groups (67%) had a history of facial TCS use. Both groups showed similar clinical manifestations and distribution with few differences. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients treated with dupilumab in academic institutions from Korea and the United States experienced improvement in their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy. A small proportion of patients had new onset and exacerbation. Although the mechanisms of this adverse event remain unclear, steroid withdrawal should be considered as a diagnosis of the erythema in some patients.

Two-year experience of using the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine as intralesional immunotherapy for warts.

BACKGROUND: The currently available treatments for warts, including cryosurgery, laser surgery, electrosurgery, and topical keratolytic applications, are often very painful and can induce disfiguring scars. Recently, intralesional immunotherapy with skin test antigens and vaccines has been shown to be effective in the management of warts. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of a new intralesional immunotherapy for warts, using the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed, and we enrolled 136 patients with various types of warts into the study, which was for a duration of 2 years. Patients were treated for a total of six times at 2-week intervals. The treatment response was classified as one of three levels, based on reduction in the size and number of warts, and patients with complete response (CR) were checked for recurrence. Clinical evaluations were carried out using photographs and medical records. RESULTS: Over half (51.5%) of patients experienced > 50% reduction in the size and number of warts, and 46.7% who had distant warts (in different locations) showed good response. Common warts showed significantly higher treatment response than other types of warts (P < 0.05). However, other clinical variables did not have any effect on efficacy. Almost all the patients reported mild pain during the injection, but other side effects were rarely observed. Only 5.6% of patients who experienced CR had recurrence of warts after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that intralesional immunotherapy with MMR vaccine is a tolerable and effective method for patients who are sensitive to pain, concerned about side effects, or have common warts. Treatment response is improved by increasing the number of injections.

An empirical model for gas phase acidity and basicity estimation.

Gas phase acidity and basicity estimation models have been developed for acidic and basic functional groups of amino acid side-chains and also for a number of small organic molecules. The acidic functional groups include aliphatic and aromatic alcohol, and aliphatic and aromatic carboxylic acid, and the basic functional groups include aliphatic, aromatic and hetero-aromatic amines, and also pyridino-, pyrazolo- and imidazolo-groupings. The models are described in terms of a linear combination of descriptors that highly influence reactivity at the reaction centres of the functional groups. In order to describe the chemical environments of the deprotonating and protonating sites, atomic descriptors such as the effective atomic electronegativity and effective atomic polarizability of the atoms in the reaction field and the electrostatic potentials at the reaction sites have been introduced. The coefficient of determination (r(2)) of each model is above 0.8, apart from the imidazole model. The models are readily applicable, ranging from simple organic molecules to proteins.