ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The 2x2 factorial design is an effective method that allows for multiple comparisons, especially in the context of interactions between different interventions, without substantially increasing the required sample size. In view of the considerable preclinical evidence for Curcumin and Metformin in preventing the development and progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), this study describes the protocol of the clinical trial towards applying the drug combination in prevention of second primary tumors. METHODS: We have applied the trial design to a large phase IIB/III double-blind, multi-centric, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of Metformin and Curcumin in the prevention of second primary tumours (SPT) of the aerodigestive tract following treatment of HNSCC (n=1,500) [Clinical Registry of India, CTRI/2018/03/012274]. Patients recruited in this trial will receive Metformin (with placebo), Curcumin (with placebo), Metformin, and Curcumin or placebo alone for a period of 36 months. The primary endpoint of this trial is the development of SPT, while the secondary endpoints are toxicities associated with the agents, incidence of recurrence, and identifying potential biomarkers. In this article, we discuss the 2x2 factorial design and how it applies to the head and neck cancer chemoprevention trial. CONCLUSION: 2x2 factorial design is an effective trial design for chemoprevention clinical trials where the effectiveness of multiple interventions needs to be tested parallelly.
Subject(s)
Curcumin , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Metformin , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Humans , Metformin/therapeutic use , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/prevention & control , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Neoplasms, Second Primary/prevention & control , Male , Female , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/prevention & control , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Research Design , Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
We have conducted this study to understand the impact of poor differentiation (PD), as a sole poor prognostic factor, in early oral cancers. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of clinically node-negative early T stage OSCC patients operated between 2012 and 2014. Impact of PD on the survival and role of adjuvant therapy in these patients was noted. Out of 1172 patients screened, 280 patients were found to be eligible for the study. 11.4% patients had PDSCC. It was found to be associated with tongue cancers and peri-neural invasion. It had a significant impact on OS and DFS (48.7 months vs 81.4 months, p < 0.00 and 44.6 months vs 73.5 months, p < 0.00 respectively. Hazard ratio for DFS: 4.08. Although patients with PDSCC had better survival with radiotherapy, but this was not statistically significant. Poor differentiation as a stand-alone factor impacts survival in patients with early oral cancer. It may be seen more often in patients with tongue cancer and may have associated PNI. The role of adjuvant therapy in such patients is not clear.
