ABSTRACT
Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type-1 (RTPS1) is characterized by germline pathogenic variants in SMARCB1 and development of INI1-deficient rhabdoid tumors in early childhood. Due to its poor prognosis, the risk of subsequent tumor development and the impact of surveillance at later ages are poorly understood. We retrospectively reviewed individuals referred to the Cancer Genetics Program at The Hospital for Sick Children for SMARCB1 genetic testing and/or surveillance for RTPS1. In addition, to explore characteristics of late-onset tumors in RTPS1, a literature review was conducted. Of eighty-three individuals (55 probands and 28 family members), 12 probands and 4 family members were genetically confirmed with RTPS1. Four pediatric probands with RTPS1 underwent surveillance. An additional three individuals, including one patient with 22q11.2 distal deletion without history of tumor, one patient with negative genetic testing results but clinically diagnosed with RTPS1, and one sibling identified through cascade testing, underwent surveillance. Three patients with RTPS1 developed tumors between the ages of 9 and 17, including malignant rhabdoid tumors (N = 3), schwannomas (N = 4), and epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (N = 1). Three of these lesions were asymptomatically detected by surveillance. A literature review revealed 17 individuals with RTPS1 who developed INI1-deficient tumors after age five. Individuals with RTPS1 remain at elevated risk for developing INI1-deficient tumors after the peak age of rhabdoid tumor in early childhood. Extension of surveillance beyond 5 years of age could lead to improved survival and reduced morbidity for these patients, and prospective evaluation of revised approaches will be important.
ABSTRACT
Genetic predisposition to neuroblastoma (NB) is relatively rare. Only 1% to 2% of patients have a family history of NB, 3% to 4% of cases present with bilateral or multifocal primary tumors, and occasional patients have syndromes that are associated with increased NB risk. Previously, a germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in PHOX2B was associated with Hirschsprung disease and congenital central hypoventilation syndrome. Recently, certain GPVs were shown to be responsible for congenital central hypoventilation syndrome and NB predisposition. Also, several groups determined that activating GPVs in ALK accounted for a substantial number of familial NB. Finally, there are additional genes and cancer predisposition syndromes in which NB occurs with greater frequency or that have been associated with NB based on genome-wide association studies. We review the evidence for all these genes and whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant surveillance. We review recommended surveillance for hereditary patients with NB, including minor updates to surveillance recommendations that were published previously in 2017.
Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Neuroblastoma , Humans , Neuroblastoma/genetics , Neuroblastoma/epidemiology , Neuroblastoma/pathology , Child , Genome-Wide Association Study , Transcription Factors , Homeodomain ProteinsSubject(s)
DEAD-box RNA Helicases , Germ-Line Mutation , Introns , Ribonuclease III , Humans , Ribonuclease III/genetics , DEAD-box RNA Helicases/genetics , Male , Female , RNA SplicingABSTRACT
Tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) comprise the second most common group of neoplasms in childhood. The incidence of germline predisposition among children with brain tumors continues to grow as our knowledge on disease etiology increases. Some children with brain tumors may present with nonmalignant phenotypic features of specific syndromes (e.g., nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, neurofibromatosis type 1 and type 2, DICER1 syndrome, and constitutional mismatch-repair deficiency), while others may present with a strong family history of cancer (e.g., Li-Fraumeni syndrome) or with a rare tumor commonly found in the context of germline predisposition (e.g., rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome). Approximately 50% of patients with a brain tumor may be the first in a family identified to have a predisposition. The past decade has witnessed a rapid expansion in our molecular understanding of CNS tumors. A significant proportion of CNS tumors are now well characterized and known to harbor specific genetic changes that can be found in the germline. Additional novel predisposition syndromes are also being described. Identification of these germline syndromes in individual patients has not only enabled cascade testing of family members and early tumor surveillance but also increasingly affected cancer management in those patients. Therefore, the AACR Cancer Predisposition Working Group chose to highlight these advances in CNS tumor predisposition and summarize and/or generate surveillance recommendations for established and more recently emerging pediatric brain tumor predisposition syndromes.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Germ-Line Mutation , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Humans , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Child , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/diagnosis , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/epidemiology , Genetic Testing , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
Within the last few decades, we have witnessed tremendous advancements in the study of pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG), leading to a much-improved understanding of their molecular underpinnings. Consequently, we have achieved successful milestones in developing and implementing targeted therapeutic agents for treating these tumors. However, the community continues to face many unknowns when it comes to the most effective clinical implementation of these novel targeted inhibitors or combinations thereof. Questions encompassing optimal dosing strategies, treatment duration, methods for assessing clinical efficacy, and the identification of predictive biomarkers remain unresolved. Here, we offer the consensus of the international pLGG coalition (iPLGGc) clinical trial working group on these important topics and comment on clinical trial design and endpoint rationale. Throughout, we seek to standardize the global approach to early clinical trials (phase I and II) for pLGG, leading to more consistently interpretable results as well as enhancing the pace of novel therapy development and encouraging an increased focus on functional endpoints as well and quality of life for children faced with this disease.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Brain Neoplasms , Glioma , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Young Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Consensus , Glioma/drug therapy , Glioma/pathology , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
Here, we investigated the detailed molecular oncogenic mechanisms of a novel receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusion, KLC1-ROS1, with an adapter molecule, KLC1, and an RTK, ROS1, discovered in pediatric glioma, and we explored a novel therapeutic target for glioma that possesses oncogenic RTK fusion. When wild-type ROS1 and KLC1-ROS1 fusions were stably expressed in the human glioma cell lines A172 and U343MG, immunoblotting revealed that KLC1-ROS1 fusion specifically activated the JAK2-STAT3 pathway, a major RTK downstream signaling pathway, when compared with wild-type ROS1. Immunoprecipitation of the fractionated cell lysates revealed a more abundant association of the KLC1-ROS1 fusion with JAK2 than that observed for wild-type ROS1 in the cytosolic fraction. A mutagenesis study of the KLC1-ROS1 fusion protein demonstrated the fundamental roles of both the KLC1 and ROS1 domains in the constitutive activation of KLC1-ROS1 fusion. Additionally, in vitro assays demonstrated that KLC1-ROS1 fusion upregulated cell proliferation, invasion, and chemoresistance when compared to wild-type ROS1. Combination treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide and an inhibitor of ROS1, JAK2, or a downstream target of STAT3, demonstrated antitumor effects against KLC1-ROS1 fusion-expressing glioma cells. Our results demonstrate that KLC1-ROS1 fusion exerts oncogenic activity through serum-independent constitutive activation, resulting in specific activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Our data suggested that molecules other than RTKs may serve as novel therapeutic targets for RTK fusion in gliomas.