ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (GACI) enables a simpler and more effective delivery of chondrocytes with reproducible three-dimensional structural restoration of the articular cartilage surface. There is limited documentation of medium-term outcomes. This study assessed safety and effectiveness of GACI for treatment of cartilage defects of the knee. METHODS: This multicentric retrospective study was conducted across eight hospitals in India. Patients who had undergone GACI (CARTIGROW®) between 2008 and 2014 for the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects of the knee (mean defect size 4.5 ± 5.8 cm2) in limbs with normal alignment were analyzed. Primary outcomes were changes in Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score, and Knee Outcome Sports Activity Scale (SAS). RESULTS: A total of 107 patients (110 knee joints) with mean age 31.0 ± 10.5 years were included. The mean follow-up was 9.8 ± 1.5 years (range 7.85-13.43). Majority had osteochondritis dissecans (n = 51; 46.4%). The mean Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score (81.23 ± 13.21 vs. 51.32 ± 17.89; p < 0.0001) and SAS score (80.93 ± 8.26 vs. 28.11 ± 12.28; p < 0.0001) improved significantly at follow-up as compared to pre-operative. Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score in 39 patients at minimum 2 years follow-up was 84.5 ± 4.3. Among 30 patients who were playing sports before treatment, 17 patients (56.7%) could return to the same or higher level of sports post-transplantation. No major intra-operative or post-operative complications were noted. Four patients warranted revision surgery. CONCLUSION: GACI is an effective treatment option for large focal articular cartilage defects of the knee with a low complication rate and revision rate and significant improvement in functional scores.
Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular , Chondrocytes , Knee Joint , Transplantation, Autologous , Humans , Chondrocytes/transplantation , Adult , Male , Cartilage, Articular/surgery , Female , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Young Adult , Gels , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Lysholm Knee Score , Knee Injuries/surgeryABSTRACT
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a common clinical entity among people involved in contact sports activities. With the number of primary ACL reconstructions increasing, there has been a proportional increase in the revision of failed ACL reconstruction surgeries. As our understanding of knee kinematics improves over time, there has been evidence that alignment of the lower limb weight-bearing axis also plays an important part in ACL functioning. Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is one such procedure that has been used extensively worldwide to correct the varus lower limb alignment. This procedure is usually reserved for young active patients with varus lower limb weight-bearing alignment. The technical dilemma for the surgeon arises when there is a need to revise a failed ACL reconstruction while at the same time correcting the axis malalignment. The general dictum says that alignment correction is done first followed by ligament reconstruction in a dual-stage procedure. However, single-stage surgery is possible in certain indications. In this case report, we present the case of a 31-year-old male involved in recreational sports who sustained a repeat ACL tear five years post the index surgery. He also had a significant varus alignment of the lower limb weight-bearing axis which was considered to be one of the causes of index surgery failure. In this report, we would like to highlight the problems we encountered in a single-stage procedure and certain surgical facets of a single-stage alignment surgery with arthroscopic revision ACL reconstruction.
ABSTRACT
Amniotic band syndrome (ABS) constriction rings in the lower limb are common. Despite this, there is insufficient literature on anatomical abnormalities in the knee joints of children with ABS. There is an increasing incidence of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries recently. ACL reconstruction in this population has an extra dilemma of sparing the physis to prevent growth disturbances. Treating both these conditions simultaneously is a challenge that is rarely encountered. In our literature review, we found no case such as this. As such a case is being described for the first time, we also found certain meniscal anatomical variations on diagnostic arthroscopy. A 12-year-old adolescent Indian girl presented with an ACL tear in her left leg after a school sports injury. She had a known case of ABS constriction bands in both her lower limbs. Her distal femoral and proximal femoral physis was fused on radiographs, so we went ahead with a transphyseal ACL soft-tissue graft reconstruction. On the diagnostic round, we found an anatomical variation of the menisci, which was previously not described since arthroscopy of the knee in an adolescent kid with ABS has not been published in the literature as of yet. These kinds of clinical presentations can become common in the future as more and more kids with ABS take part in recreational sports. In such a scenario, having knowledge about common anatomical variations in the knee of such syndromic patients is essential. While performing ACL reconstructions in this population, we have to be aware of the risk of growth deformities along with vascular and neurological complications, which are added risks with constriction bands around the lower limb.