A comprehensive, predictive mortality score for patients with bloodstream infections (PROBAC): a prospective, multicentre cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Bloodstream infections (BSI) are an important cause of mortality, although they show heterogeneity depending on patients and aetiological factors. Comprehensive and specific mortality scores for BSI are scarce. The objective of this study was to develop a mortality predictive score in BSI based on a multicentre prospective cohort. METHODS: A prospective cohort including consecutive adults with bacteraemia recruited between October 2016 and March 2017 in 26 Spanish hospitals was randomly divided into a derivation cohort (DC) and a validation cohort (VC). The outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. Predictors were assessed the day of blood culture growth. A logistic regression model and score were developed in the DC for mortality predictors; the model was applied to the VC. RESULTS: Overall, 4102 patients formed the DC and 2009 the VC. Mortality was 11.8% in the DC and 12.34% in the CV; the patients and aetiological features were similar for both cohorts. The mortality predictors selected in the final multivariate model in the DC were age, cancer, liver cirrhosis, fatal McCabe underlying condition, polymicrobial bacteraemia, high-risk aetiologies, high-risk source of infection, recent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, stupor or coma, mean blood pressure <70 mmHg and PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 or equivalent. Mortality in the DC was <2% for ≤2 points, 6%-14% for 3-7 points, 26%-45% for 8-12 points and ≥60% for ≥13 points. The predictive score had areas under the receiving operating curves of 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.83) in the DC and 0.80 (0.78-0.83) in the VC. CONCLUSIONS: A 30 day mortality predictive score in BSI with good discrimination ability was developed and internally validated.

Association of microbiological factors with mortality in Escherichia coli bacteraemia presenting with sepsis/septic shock: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the association of Escherichia coli microbiological factors with 30-day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) presenting with a dysregulated response to infection (i.e. sepsis or septic shock). METHODS: Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 224 E coli isolates of patients with sepsis/septic shock, from 22 Spanish hospitals. Phylogroup, sequence type, virulence, antibiotic resistance, and pathogenicity islands were assessed. A multivariable model for 30-day mortality including clinical and epidemiological variables was built, to which microbiological variables were hierarchically added. The predictive capacity of the models was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Mortality at day 30 was 31% (69 patients). The clinical model for mortality included (adjusted OR; 95% CI) age (1.04; 1.02-1.07), Charlson index ≥3 (1.78; 0.95-3.32), urinary BSI source (0.30; 0.16-0.57), and active empirical treatment (0.36; 0.11-1.14) with an AUROC of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.80). Addition of microbiological factors selected clone ST95 (3.64; 0.94-14.04), eilA gene (2.62; 1.14-6.02), and astA gene (2.39; 0.87-6.59) as associated with mortality, with an AUROC of 0.76 (0.69-0.82). DISCUSSION: Despite having a modest overall contribution, some microbiological factors were associated with increased odds of death and deserve to be studied as potential therapeutic or preventive targets.

Whole-genome characterisation of Escherichia coli isolates from patients with bacteraemia presenting with sepsis or septic shock in Spain: a multicentre cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli is the most frequent cause of bloodstream infections (BSIs). About one-third of patients with BSIs due to E coli develop sepsis or shock. The objective of this study is to characterise the microbiological features of E coli blood isolates causing sepsis or septic shock to provide exploratory information for future diagnostic, preventive, or therapeutic interventions. METHODS: E coli blood isolates from a multicentre cross-sectional study of patients older than 14 years presenting with sepsis or septic shock (according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria) from hospitals in Spain between Oct 4, 2016, and Oct 15, 2017, were studied by whole-genome sequencing. Phylogroups, sequence types (STs), serotype, FimH types, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, pathogenicity islands, and virulence factors were identified. Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution. The main outcome of this study was the characterisation of the E coli blood isolates in terms of population structure by phylogroups, groups (group 1: phylogroups B2, F, and G; group 2: A, B1, and C; group 3: D), and STs and distribution by geographical location and bloodstream infection source. Other outcomes were virulence score and prevalence of virulence-associated genes, pathogenicity islands, AMR, and AMR-associated genes. Frequencies were compared using χ² or Fisher's exact tests, and continuous variables using the Mann-Whitney test, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. FINDINGS: We analysed 224 isolates: 140 isolates (63%) were included in phylogenetic group 1, 52 (23%) in group 2, and 32 (14%) in group 3. 85 STs were identified, with four comprising 44% (n=98) of the isolates: ST131 (38 [17%]), ST73 (25 [11%]), ST69 (23 [10%]), and ST95 (12 [5%]). No significant differences in phylogroup or ST distribution were found according to geographical areas or source of bloodstream infection, except for ST95, which was more frequent in urinary tract infections than in other sources (11 [9%] of 116 vs 1 [1%] of 108, p=0·0045). Median virulence score was higher in group 1 (median 25·0 [IQR 20·5-29·0) than in group 2 (median 14·5 [9·0-20·0]; p<0·0001) and group 3 (median 21 [16·5-23·0]; p<0·0001); prevalence of several pathogenicity islands was higher in group 1. No significant differences were found between phylogenetic groups in proportions of resistance to antibiotics. ST73 had higher median virulence score (32 [IQR 29-35]) than the other predominant clones (median range 21-28). Some virulence genes and pathogenicity islands were significantly associated with each ST. ST131 isolates had higher prevalence of AMR and a higher proportion of AMR genes, notably blaCTX-M-15 and blaOXA-1. INTERPRETATION: In this exploratory study, the population structure of E coli causing sepsis or shock was similar to previous studies that included all bacteraemic isolates. Virulence genes, pathogenicity islands, and AMR genes were not randomly distributed among phylogroups or STs. These results provide a comprehensive characterisation of invasive E coli isolates causing severe response syndrome. Future studies are required to determine the contribution of these microbiological factors to severe clinical presentation and worse outcomes in patients with E coli bloodstream infection. FUNDING: Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

Effectiveness of fosfomycin trometamol as oral step-down therapy for bacteraemic urinary tract infections due to MDR Escherichia coli: a post hoc analysis of the FOREST randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is a potentially attractive option as step-down therapy for bacteraemic urinary tract infections (BUTI), but available data are scarce. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness and safety of fosfomycin trometamol and other oral drugs as step-down therapy in patients with BUTI due to MDR Escherichia coli (MDR-Ec). METHODS: Participants in the FOREST trial (comparing IV fosfomycin with ceftriaxone or meropenem for BUTI caused by MDR-Ec in 22 Spanish hospitals from June 2014 to December 2018) who were stepped-down to oral fosfomycin (3 g q48h) or other drugs were included. The primary endpoint was clinical and microbiological cure (CMC) 5-7 days after finalization of treatment. A multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression to estimate the association of oral step-down with fosfomycin with CMC adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Overall, 61 patients switched to oral fosfomycin trometamol and 47 to other drugs (cefuroxime axetil, 28; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 7 each; ciprofloxacin, 5) were included. CMC was reached by 48/61 patients (78.7%) treated with fosfomycin trometamol and 38/47 (80.9%) with other drugs (difference, -2.2; 95% CI: -17.5 to 13.1; P = 0.38). Subgroup analyses provided similar results. Relapses occurred in 9/61 (15.0%) and 2/47 (4.3%) of patients, respectively (P = 0.03). The adjusted OR for CMC was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.42-3.29, P = 0.75). No relevant differences in adverse events were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Fosfomycin trometamol might be a reasonable option as step-down therapy in patients with BUTI due to MDR-Ec but the higher rate of relapses would need further assessment.

Conventional Hospitalization versus Sequential Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Observational Cohort.

It is not known whether sequential outpatient parenteral antimicrobial (OPAT) is as safe and effective as conventional hospitalization in patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB). A post-hoc analysis of the comparative effectiveness of conventional hospitalization versus sequential OPAT was performed in two prospective Spanish cohorts of patients with S. aureus bacteremia. The PROBAC cohort is a national, multicenter, prospective observational cohort of patients diagnosed in 22 Spanish hospitals between October 2016 and March 2017. The DOMUS OPAT cohort is a prospective observational cohort including patients from two university hospitals in Seville, Spain from 2012 to 2021. Multivariate regression was performed, including a propensity score (PS) for receiving OPAT, stratified analysis according to PS quartiles, and matched pair analyses based on PS. Four hundred and thirteen patients were included in the analysis: 150 in sequential OPAT and 263 in the full hospitalization therapy group. In multivariate analysis, including PS and center effect as covariates, 60-day treatment failure was lower in the OPAT group than in the full hospitalization group (p < 0.001; OR 0.275, 95%CI 0.129−0.584). In the PS-based matched analyses, sequential treatment under OPAT was not associated with higher 60-day treatment failure (p = 0.253; adjusted OR 0.660; % CI 0.324−1.345). OPAT is a safe and effective alternative to conventional in-patient therapy for completion of treatment in well-selected patients with SAB, mainly those associated with a low-risk source and without end-stage kidney disease.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Community-Onset Bloodstream Infections: Characterization, Diagnostic Predictors, and Predictive Score Development-Results from the PRO-BAC Cohort.

Community-onset bloodstream infections (CO-BSI) caused by gram-negative bacilli are common and associated with significant mortality; those caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with worse prognosis and higher rates of inadequateempirical antibiotic treatment. The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics of patients with CO-BSI caused by P. aeruginosa, to identify predictors, and to develop a predictive score for P. aeruginosa CO-BSI. Materials/methods: PROBAC is a prospective cohort including patients >14 years with BSI from 26 Spanish hospitals between October 2016 and May 2017. Patients with monomicrobial P. aeruginosa CO-BSI and monomicrobial Enterobacterales CO-BSI were included. Variables of interest were collected. Independent predictors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CO-BSI were identified by logistic regression and a prediction score was developed. Results: A total of 78patients with P. aeruginosa CO-BSI and 2572 with Enterobacterales CO-BSI were included. Patients with P. aeruginosa had a median age of 70 years (IQR 60−79), 68.8% were male, median Charlson score was 5 (IQR 3−7), and 30-daymortality was 18.5%. Multivariate analysis identified the following predictors of CO-BSI-PA [adjusted OR (95% CI)]: male gender [1.89 (1.14−3.12)], haematological malignancy [2.45 (1.20−4.99)], obstructive uropathy [2.86 (1.13−3.02)], source of infection other than urinary tract, biliary tract or intra-abdominal [6.69 (4.10−10.92)] and healthcare-associated BSI [1.85 (1.13−3.02)]. Anindex predictive of CO-BSI-PA was developed; scores ≥ 3.5 showed a negative predictive value of 89% and an area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) of 0.66. Conclusions: We did not find a good predictive score of P. aeruginosa CO-BSI due to its relatively low incidence in the overall population. Our model includes variables that are easy to collect in real clinical practice and could be useful to detect patients with very low risk of P. aeruginosa CO-BSI.

Effectiveness of Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Bacteremic Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The consumption of broad-spectrum drugs has increased as a consequence of the spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli. Finding alternatives for these infections is critical, for which some neglected drugs may be an option. Objective: To determine whether fosfomycin is noninferior to ceftriaxone or meropenem in the targeted treatment of bacteremic urinary tract infections (bUTIs) due to MDR E coli. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized, pragmatic, open clinical trial was conducted at 22 Spanish hospitals from June 2014 to December 2018. Eligible participants were adult patients with bacteremic urinary tract infections due to MDR E coli; 161 of 1578 screened patients were randomized and followed up for 60 days. Data were analyzed in May 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1 to 1 to receive intravenous fosfomycin disodium at 4 g every 6 hours (70 participants) or a comparator (ceftriaxone or meropenem if resistant; 73 participants) with the option to switch to oral fosfomycin trometamol for the fosfomycin group or an active oral drug or parenteral ertapenem for the comparator group after 4 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinical and microbiological cure (CMC) 5 to 7 days after finalization of treatment; a noninferiority margin of 7% was considered. Results: Among 143 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (median [IQR] age, 72 [62-81] years; 73 [51.0%] women), 48 of 70 patients (68.6%) treated with fosfomycin and 57 of 73 patients (78.1%) treated with comparators reached CMC (risk difference, -9.4 percentage points; 1-sided 95% CI, -21.5 to ∞ percentage points; P = .10). While clinical or microbiological failure occurred among 10 patients (14.3%) treated with fosfomycin and 14 patients (19.7%) treated with comparators (risk difference, -5.4 percentage points; 1-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 4.9; percentage points; P = .19), an increased rate of adverse event-related discontinuations occurred with fosfomycin vs comparators (6 discontinuations [8.5%] vs 0 discontinuations; P = .006). In an exploratory analysis among a subset of 38 patients who underwent rectal colonization studies, patients treated with fosfomycin acquired a new ceftriaxone-resistant or meropenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria at a decreased rate compared with patients treated with comparators (0 of 21 patients vs 4 of 17 patients [23.5%]; 1-sided P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that fosfomycin did not demonstrate noninferiority to comparators as targeted treatment of bUTI from MDR E coli; this was due to an increased rate of adverse event-related discontinuations. This finding suggests that fosfomycin may be considered for selected patients with these infections. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02142751.

Revisiting the epidemiology of bloodstream infections and healthcare-associated episodes: results from a multicentre prospective cohort in Spain (PRO-BAC Study).

The epidemiology of bloodstream infections (BSIs) is dynamic as it depends on microbiological, host and healthcare system factors. The aim of this study was to update the information regarding the epidemiology of BSIs in Spain considering the type of acquisition. An observational, prospective cohort study in 26 Spanish hospitals from October 2016 through March 2017 including all episodes of BSI in adults was performed. Bivariate analyses stratified by type of acquisition were performed. Multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression. Overall, 6345 BSI episodes were included; 2510 (39.8%) were community-acquired (CA), 1661 (26.3%) were healthcare-associated (HCA) and 2056 (32.6%) hospital-acquired (HA). The 30-day mortality rates were 11.6%, 19.5% and 22.0%, respectively. The median age of patients was 71 years (interquartile range 60-81 years) and 3656 (58.3%; 95% confidence interval 57.1-59.6%) occurred in males. The proportions according to patient sex varied according to age strata. Escherichia coli (43.8%), Klebsiella spp. (8.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (8.9%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (7.4%) were the most frequent pathogens. Multivariate analyses confirmed important differences between CA and HCA episodes, but also between HCA and HA episodes, in demographics, underlying conditions and aetiology. In conclusion, we have updated the epidemiological information regarding patients' profiles, underlying conditions, frequency of acquisition types and aetiological agents of BSI in Spain. HCA is confirmed as a distinct type of acquisition.

Initiatives and resources to promote antimicrobial stewardship.

The development of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) requires institutional support. However, obtaining sufficient institutional support is often a complex task that requires convincing the hospital's managers of the benefits of these programs. Additionally, in the design and implementation of an ASP, antimicrobial stewardship (AS) leaders need tools for diverse purposes, such as measuring antimicrobial consumption, education and training and designing protocols. In this review we provide useful information for AS promoters to facilitate the task of designing and implementing an ASP. First, we summarize information about various institutions that promote AS and include evidence that supports the need for and benefits of these programs. Then, several campaigns promoting AS are described. Finally, online resources for professionals dealing with AS are briefly summarized.

Initiatives and resources to promote antimicrobial stewardship / Iniciativas y recursos para promover la optimización del uso de antibióticos

The development of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) requires institutional support. However, obtaining sufficient institutional support is often a complex task that requires convincing the hospital's managers of the benefits of these programs. Additionally, in the design and implementation of an ASP, antimicrobial stewardship (AS) leaders need tools for diverse purposes, such as measuring antimicrobial consumption, education and training and designing protocols. In this review we provide useful information for AS promoters to facilitate the task of designing and implementing an ASP. First, we summarize information about various institutions that promote AS and include evidence that supports the need for and benefits of these programs. Then, several campaigns promoting AS are described. Finally, online resources for professionals dealing with AS are briefly summarized

La puesta en marcha de un programa de optimización del uso de antibióticos requiere apoyo institucional. La obtención de este apoyo institucional frecuentemente es una tarea compleja que hace preciso persuadir a los equipos directivos del hospital de los beneficios de estos programas. Además del apoyo institucional, los profesionales sanitarios implicados en el diseño e implementación de este tipo de programas necesitan herramientas para medir el consumo de uso antibiótico, para el desarrollo de actividades formativas y para la elaboración de protocolos, entre otros. En esta revisión se pretende recopilar información potencialmente útil para los profesionales encargados del diseño e implementación de este tipo de programas. Inicialmente se revisan las principales instituciones e iniciativas de apoyo a las actividades de mejora del uso de antibióticos y finalmente se resumen brevemente algunos recursos disponibles en la red para profesionales implicados en este tipo de actividades

Respuesta: Bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina de origen respiratorio / Reply: Meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia of respiratory origin

No disponible

Factores de riesgo de neumonía nosocomial por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina / Risk factors of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Fundamento y objetivo: Es necesario predecir una neumonía nosocomial (NN) por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (SARM) para facilitar la inclusión de un antibiótico específico en la terapia empírica. En este estudio se desarrolla un modelo para predecir la probabilidad de NN por SARM cuando se desconoce el estado de portador y el diagnóstico microbiológico. Pacientes y método: Se diseñó un estudio de casos y controles, realizándose una regresión logística multivariable para identificar los factores de riesgo de NN por SARM. Se incluyeron factores demográficos, relacionados con la hospitalización, la inmunodepresión, neutropenia, la medicación y la gravedad.Resultados: Se estudiaron 363 pacientes (121 casos y 242 controles). Permanecieron en el modelo final la edad>14 años (odds ratio [OR] 7,4, intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%] 1,5-37,4, p<0,015), la aparición de la NN>6 días después del ingreso (OR 4,1, IC 95% 2,4-7,1, p<0,001), el desarrollo de la NN fuera del verano (OR 2,5, IC 95% 1,2-5,2, p = 0,015), las enfermedades respiratorias (OR 4,9, IC 95% 1,5-15,8, p = 0,007) y la afectación multilobar (OR 4, IC 95% 2,3-7,2, p<0,001). Con estas variables se calculó la probabilidad de desarrollar neumonía por SARM para cada una de las posibles combinaciones, clasificándose en criterios mayores y menores.Conclusiones: Se debe incluir cobertura de SARM en el tratamiento empírico de la NN cuando: a) un paciente adulto (>14 años) tiene, al menos, 2 criterios mayores o un criterio mayor y 2 menores, y b) un paciente<14 años tiene los 2 criterios mayores y los 2 menores (AU)

Background and objective: To include a specific antibiotic in the empiric therapy, it is necessary to predict when a nosocomial pneumonia (NP) is caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We have developed a model for the prediction of the probability of a NP being caused by MRSA, when the carrier status and the microbiological diagnosis are unknown. Patients and methods: A retrospective case-control study (1999-2005) was designed. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors for suffering a NP due to MRSA. Demographic factors, related to hospitalization, immunosuppression or neutropenia, to medication and severity were included. Results:Three hundred and sixty three patients (121 cases and 242 controls) were studied. The final model of multivariate logistic regression included an age>14 years (OR 7.4, CI 95% 1.5-37.4, P<.015), NP appearance>6 days after admittance (OR 4.1, CI 95% 2.4-7,1, P<.001), NP development excluding summers (OR 2.5, CI 95% 1.2-5.2, P<.015), respiratory diseases (OR 4.9, CI 95% 1.5-15.8, P<.007) and multilobar involvement (OR 4, CI 95% 2.3-7.2, P<.001).The probability of developing a pneumonia due to MRSA was studied for each of the possible combinations and subsequently classified in minor and major criteria. Conclusions: MRSA coverage should be included in the empirical treatment of NP when: a) an adult patient (>14 years old) presents, at least, 2 major criteria or 1 major criterion together with 2 minor criteria, and b) a patient <14 years-old has 2 major criteria as well as 2 minor criteria Ç(AU)

[Risk factors of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus]. / Factores de riesgo de neumonía nosocomial por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To include a specific antibiotic in the empiric therapy, it is necessary to predict when a nosocomial pneumonia (NP) is caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We have developed a model for the prediction of the probability of a NP being caused by MRSA, when the carrier status and the microbiological diagnosis are unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study (1999-2005) was designed. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors for suffering a NP due to MRSA. Demographic factors, related to hospitalization, immunosuppression or neutropenia, to medication and severity were included. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty three patients (121 cases and 242 controls) were studied. The final model of multivariate logistic regression included an age>14 years (OR 7.4, CI 95% 1.5-37.4, P<.015), NP appearance>6 days after admittance (OR 4.1, CI 95% 2.4-7,1, P<.001), NP development excluding summers (OR 2.5, CI 95% 1.2-5.2, P<.015), respiratory diseases (OR 4.9, CI 95% 1.5-15.8, P<.007) and multilobar involvement (OR 4, CI 95% 2.3-7.2, P<.001).The probability of developing a pneumonia due to MRSA was studied for each of the possible combinations and subsequently classified in minor and major criteria. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA coverage should be included in the empirical treatment of NP when: a) an adult patient (>14 years old) presents, at least, 2 major criteria or 1 major criterion together with 2 minor criteria, and b) a patient <14 years-old has 2 major criteria as well as 2 minor criteria.

[Variability in coronary risk assessment in HIV-infected patients]. / Variabilidad en la valoración del riesgo coronario en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antiretroviral treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients seems to increase the coronary risk (CR) in these patients. Adequate assessment of CR has significant implications for the management of these patients. Our objective was to compare 2 systems for assessing 10-year CR in HIV-infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: CR was calculated in a prospective cohort of 205 HIV-infected patients using Framingham tables and REGICOR adapted tables. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in these patients was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age (standard deviation) was 41.4 (8.2) years. Most patients were taking antiretrovirals and had a good immunological status. Current smoking was reported by 77.1% of patients, while a history of dyslipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes was found in 29.3%, 7.3%, and 4.9% of patients, respectively. Lipodystrophy was seen in 41% of patients, abdominal obesity in 21.5%, and a sedentary lifestyle in 50.7% Mean values obtained were 6.55 (6.36) in the Framingham scale and 2.85 (2.31) in the REGICOR scale. A 10-year CR greater than 10% was found in 26 patients (12.9%) with the Framingham tables and in 4 patients (2.0%) with the REGICOR tables. The difference between both methods was significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Application of the Framingham tables to our cohort may overestimate the CR. Studies aimed at identifying the most adequate method for measuring CR in HIV-infected patients are required. Until such data are available, estimation of CR in these patients should be taken with caution.

Variabilidad en la valoración del riesgo coronario en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Variability in coronary risk assessment in HIV-infected patients

Fundamento y objetivo: El tratamiento antirretroviral de los pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) parece aumentar su riesgo coronario (RC). La correcta valoración de éste tiene importantes implicaciones en el tratamiento de estos pacientes. Nuestro objetivo ha sido comparar 2 sistemas de evaluación del RC a 10 años en pacientes infectados por el VIH. Pacientes y método: Se calculó el RC en una cohorte prospectiva de 205 pacientes infectados por el VIH utilizando las tablas de Framingham y las tablas adaptadas REGICOR. Se evaluó la prevalencia de factores de riesgo cardiovascular de estos pacientes. Resultados: La edad media (desviación estándar) fue de 41,4 (8,2) años. La mayoría de los pacientes tomaba antirretrovirales y tenía buena situación inmunológica. Presentaba tabaquismo activo el 77,1%, antecedentes de dislipemia el 29,3%, de hipertensión el 7,3%, de diabetes el 4,9%, lipodistrofia el 41%, obesidad abdominal el 21,5% y sedentarismo el 50,7%. La valoración media en la escala Framingham fue de 6,55 (6,36) y en la escala REGICOR de 2,85 (2,31). El RC a 10 años fue mayor del 10% en 26 pacientes (12,9%) con las tablas de Framingham y en 4 (2,0%) con las tablas REGICOR. La diferencia entre ambos métodos resultó significativa (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: Aplicar las tablas Framingham en nuestra cohorte podría suponer una sobrestimación del RC. Son necesarios estudios que tengan como objetivo identificar el método más adecuado para medir el RC en pacientes infectados por el VIH. Mientras no dispongamos de estos datos, debemos tomar con precaución la estimación del RC en estos pacientes

Background and objective: Antiretroviral treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients seems to increase the coronary risk (CR) in these patients. Adequate assessment of CR has significant implications for the management of these patients. Our objective was to compare 2 systems for assessing 10-year CR in HIV-infected patients. Patients and method: CR was calculated in a prospective cohort of 205 HIV-infected patients using Framingham tables and REGICOR adapted tables. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in these patients was evaluated. Results: Mean age (standard deviation) was 41.4 (8.2) years. Most patients were taking antiretrovirals and had a good immunological status. Current smoking was reported by 77.1% of patients, while a history of dyslipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes was found in 29.3%, 7.3%, and 4.9% of patients, respectively. Lipodystrophy was seen in 41% of patients, abdominal obesity in 21.5%, and a sedentary lifestyle in 50.7% Mean values obtained were 6.55 (6.36) in the Framingham scale and 2.85 (2.31) in the REGICOR scale. A 10-year CR greater than 10% was found in 26 patients (12.9%) with the Framingham tables and in 4 patients (2.0%) with the REGICOR tables. The difference between both methods was significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Application of the Framingham tables to our cohort may overestimate the CR. Studies aimed at identifying the most adequate method for measuring CR in HIV-infected patients are required. Until such data are available, estimation of CR in these patients should be taken with caution