Effectiveness of Postoperative Physiotherapy Compared to Postoperative Instructions by Treating Specialist Only in Patients With an Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Background: In current literature, the benefit of postoperative physiotherapy versus postoperative instructions by treating specialist only remains unclear. The aim of this review is to systematically assess existing literature regarding the functional outcome of postoperative physiotherapy compared to postoperative instructions by treating specialist only in the rehabilitation of patients with an ankle fracture. The secondary aim is to determine if there is a difference in ankle range of motion, strength, pain, complications, quality of life, and patient's satisfaction between these 2 rehabilitation methods. Methods: For this review, the PubMed/MEDLINE, PEDro, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched for studies that compared postoperative rehabilitation groups. Results: The electronic data search detected 20 579 articles. After exclusion, 5 studies with a total of 552 patients were included. Overall, no significant benefit in functional outcome of postoperative physiotherapy was seen compared to the instructions-only group. One study even found a significant benefit in favor of the instructions-only group. An exemption for beneficial effect of the use of physiotherapy could be made for younger patients, as 2 studies described younger age as a factor for better outcomes (functional outcome and ankle range of motion) in the postoperative physiotherapy group. Patients' satisfaction, described by one study, was found to be significantly higher in the physiotherapy group (P = .047). All other secondary aims showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Because of the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity among studies, a valid conclusion about the general effect of physiotherapy cannot be formed. However, we identified limited evidence suggesting a possible benefit of physiotherapy in younger patients with an ankle fracture in functional outcome and ankle range of motion.

Implementing 3D fluoroscopy in the management of tibial plateau fractures: Shorter hospitalization and decline in revision surgery, but increase in the duration of surgery and radiation exposure.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy (3DRX) is increasingly used in fracture management instead of conventional fluoroscopy (RX), but its effect on the treatment and outcome of tibial plateau fractures (TFs) is not well known. This study aims to evaluate whether the use of 3DRX in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures reduces the number of revision surgeries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes all patients who underwent surgical treatment for TF in a single center from 2014 to 2018. Patient-, fracture-, and treatment characteristics were compared between the 3DRX and RX subgroups. The primary endpoint was the number of patients requiring revision surgery. Secondary endpoints were surgery duration, hospital length of stay, radiation exposure, postoperative complications, and secondary total knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, of which 36 were treated with 3DRX. Three patients in the RX group required revision surgery, while no revision surgery was performed in the 3DRX group (p = 0.265). The use of 3DRX resulted in significantly more intraoperative adjustments (25% versus 6%; p = 0.024) and an increase in surgery duration (by average of 28 min, p = 0.001), without a significant increase in postoperative wound infections (12% versus 19%; p = 0.374) or fracture-related infections (2% versus 2.8%; p = 0.802). The 3DRX group had an average radiation exposure of 7,985 mGy versus 1,273 mGy in the RX group (p<0.001). The hospital length of stay was 1 day shorter in the 3DRX group (5 days versus 4 days; p = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing 3DRX in treating TFs improves the assessment of fracture alignment and implant position perioperatively, resulting in more intraoperative corrections and no revision surgeries within 6 weeks postoperatively. However, using 3DRX significantly increases perioperative radiation exposure and surgery duration without a significant rise in postoperative infections and a shorter hospital length of stay.

Influence of psychiatric co-morbidity on health-related quality of life among major trauma patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare 1-year post-discharge health-related quality of life (HRQL) between trauma patients with and without psychiatric co-comorbidity. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study identified all severely injured adult trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2018 and 2019. Bivariate analysis compared patients with and without psychiatric co-morbidity, which was defined as prior diagnosis by a healthcare provider or acute psychiatric consultation for new or chronic mental illness. HRQL metrics included the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D) questionnaire, visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and overall index score. A multiple linear regression model was utilized to identify predictors of EQ-5D index scores. RESULTS: Analysis of baseline characteristics revealed significantly greater rates of substance abuse, severe extremity injuries, inpatient morbidity, and hospital length-of-stay among patients with psychiatric illness. At 1-year follow-up, patients with psychiatric co-morbidity had lower median EQ-5D index scores compared to the control group (0.71, interquartile range [IQR] 0.32 vs. 0.79, IQR 0.22, p = 0.03). There were no differences between groups in individual EQ-5D dimensions, nor in EQ-VAS scores. Presence of psychiatric co-morbidity was not found to independently predict EQ-5D index scores in the linear regression model. Instead, Injury Severity Score (standardized regression coefficient [SRC] - 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.010 to - 0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score (SRC - 0.13, 95% CI - 0.08 to - 0.004) predicted poor HRQL 1-year after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric co-morbidity does not independently predict low HRQL 1 year after injury. Instead, lower HRQL scores among patients with psychiatric co-morbidity appear to be mediated by baseline health status and injury severity.

The lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer.

To predict prognosis of gastric cancer, an adequate assessment of the stage of gastric cancer is important. The UICC/AJCC TNM classification is the most commonly used classification system. For adequate N staging at least 15 lymph nodes should be retrieved. In some countries, this amount of lymph nodes is not met, which can lead to understaging. Therefore, the lymph node ratio (LNR) is proposed as an alternative N staging modality. The purpose of this study was to compare the different staging modalities. Patients and methods. We included all patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer, newly diagnosed between 2000 and 2009 and staged patient by UICC/AJCC TNM 5th/6th or 7th and by LNR. We conducted crude survival analysis, univariate and multivariate analyses according to the different staging systems. Results. The five-year overall survival rates ranged from 58% for N0 disease to 18% in case of more than 15 metastatic lymph nodes. The distribution of overall five-year survival according to LNR was 58% for LNR0 and 10% for LNR3. Univariate analysis showed that all the UICC/AJCC TNM classification systems as well as the LNR were strong prognostic factors for overall survival. The LNR correlated less with the number of nodes examined. Conclusion. LNR is a good prognostic tool for overall survival, it is an independent prognostic factor with a more homogenous spread of hazard ratios and five-year survival rates than UICC/AJCC systems. Furthermore, the LNR has a lower correlation with the number of nodes examined, making it less vulnerable for stage migration.