Open Fractures in National Football League Athletes: Analyzing Performance and Return to Sport.

INTRODUCTION: Open fractures are potentially devastating injuries for the professional athlete. We sought to compare return to sports (RTS) and performance in National Football League (NFL) athletes sustaining open versus closed fractures. METHODS: NFL athletes with surgically treated open and closed fractures of the forearm, tibial shaft, and ankle from 2009-2018 were identified through publicly available reports and records. Data including demographics, RTS, career duration, and the approximate value performance metric before and after injury were collected. Statistical analyses were performed comparing open to closed injuries. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U or two sample t- tests while categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Ninety-five athletes met inclusion criteria (10 open and 85 closed fractures). Overall, 90% (n = 9) returned to sport after an open injury and 83.5% (n = 71) returned after closed injury with a median time missed of 48.9 (range 35.1 - 117.4) weeks and 43.0 (range 2.4 - 108.0) weeks, respectively. Athletes undergoing forearm surgery were able to return sooner, at around 20.8 weeks, and ankle fractures conferred the lowest return rate at 80% (n = 48). There were no significant differences in career duration and post-injury performance between open or closed fracture cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Although open fractures are relatively uncommon injuries seen in NFL athletes, our study suggests RTS for these players is high. Athletes undergoing surgical treatment for open fractures had similar RTS rates, performance metrics, and career durations compared to those with comparable closed fractures. This information can provide guidance for providers counseling elite athletes on postoperative expectations.

Pyogenic spinal infections warrant a total spine MRI.

Study design: retrospective case series. Objective: the presenting clinical symptoms of spinal infections are often nonspecific and a delay in diagnosis can lead to adverse patient outcomes. The morbidity and mortality of patients with multifocal spinal infections is significantly higher compared to unifocal infections. The purpose of the current study was to analyse the risk factors for multifocal spinal infections. Methods: we conducted a retrospective review of all pyogenic non-tuberculous spinal infections treated surgically at a single tertiary care medical center from 2006-2020. The medical records, imaging studies, and laboratory data of 43 patients during this time period were reviewed and analysed after receiving Institutional Review Board approval. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a multifocal spinal infection. Results: 15 patients (35 %) had multifocal infections. In univariate analysis, there was a significant association with chronic kidney disease ( p = 0.040 ), gender ( p = 0.003 ), a white blood cell count ( p = 0.011 ), and cervical ( p < 0.001 ) or thoracic ( p < 0 .001) involvement. In multivariate analysis, both cervical and thoracic involvement remained statistically significant ( p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 , respectively). Conclusions: patients with infections in the thoracic or cervical region are more likely to have a multifocal infection. Multifocal pyogenic spinal infections remain a common entity and a total spine MRI should be performed to aid in prompt diagnosis.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis Are at Least Equivalent to Corticosteroid or Saline Solution Injections: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for adhesive capsulitis (AC) as compared with other injectables. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed and Embase online databases was performed to identify articles evaluating injection therapy for the treatment of AC. The inclusion criteria included prospective studies comparing PRP against alternative injectables with a minimum of 15 patients in each treatment arm and a minimum 12-week follow-up period. Pain scores, range of motion, and function scores were the primary outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Five articles comparing PRP with corticosteroid or saline solution injections met the inclusion criteria. A total of 157 patients were treated with PRP, with a follow-up duration ranging from 3 to 6 months. All 5 studies showed statistically significant improvements in pain scores, motion, and function scores in patients receiving PRP, corticosteroid, and saline solution injections. However, PRP was consistently superior on intergroup analyses in all but 1 study. In 4 studies, pain and function scores favored PRP over control at final follow-up (range in mean difference, -2.2 to 0.69 for visual analog scale pain score [n = 5] and -50.5 to -4.0 for Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score [n = 3]), whereas 3 studies found greater improvement in shoulder motion after PRP (range in mean difference, 0.7° to 34.3° for forward flexion and -2.3° to 20.4° for external rotation [n = 4]). One study found no significant difference between PRP and corticosteroid injections but noted that the results were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: According to a limited number of prospective studies, PRP injections for AC are at least equivalent to corticosteroid or saline solution injections and often lead to improved pain, motion, and functional outcomes at 3- to 6-month follow-up. Given the small number of studies, with design heterogeneity, there is insufficient evidence to routinely recommend PRP for AC. However, the results are promising and do support considering PRP as an adjunct treatment option for AC, especially for patients refractory and/or averse to corticosteroids or alternative treatment modalities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Whole-Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review of Suggested Indications.

¼: The spinal column has a propensity for lesions to manifest in a multifocal manner, and identification of the lesions can be difficult. ¼: When used to image the spine, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) most accurately identifies the presence and location of lesions, guiding the treatment plan and preventing potentially devastating complications that are known to be associated with unidentified lesions. ¼: Certain conditions clearly warrant evaluation with whole-spine MRI, whereas the use of whole-spine MRI with other conditions is more controversial. ¼: We suggest whole-spine MRI when evaluating and treating any spinal infection, lumbar stenosis with upper motor neuron signs, ankylosing disorders of the spine with concern for fracture, congenital scoliosis undergoing surgical correction, and metastatic spinal tumors. ¼: Use of whole-spine MRI in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and acute spinal trauma remains controversial.

Early Response to Warfarin Initiation and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis with warfarin is common after total joint arthroplasty. Early response to warfarin initiation has been theorized to engender a transient increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that a rapid rise in the international normalized ratio is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism after total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of Medicare patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty who were given nomogram-dosed warfarin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the postoperative rate of change in the international normalized ratio and the occurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The study included 948 patients (715 total knee arthroplasty, 233 total hip arthroplasty), of whom 4.4% experienced symptomatic venous thromboembolism within 30 days postoperatively. The change in the international normalized ratio from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 2 was significantly greater in the symptomatic venous thromboembolism group compared with the group that did not have venous thromboembolism (increase of 0.70 versus 0.46; P = 0.008). Regression analysis showed that a higher rate of change in the international normalized ratio was associated with increased risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (odds ratio, 2.59 per unit of change in the international normalized ratio; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-4.38; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: A rapid rise in the international normalized ratio after warfarin initiation in total joint arthroplasty patients is associated with increased risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. This novel finding identifies a population at risk for this complication. Further study of the early effects of warfarin therapy is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.