Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 26(3): 255-260, 2021 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33554674

OBJECTIVE: Developing countries have seen an increase in the use of hormonal contraception due to its high efficacy in preventing pregnancy. Our study assessed risk compensation among single women of reproductive age using hormonal contraception. METHODS: The study used data from a nationally representative, cross-sectional sample of the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Study participants (N = 2151) were single, sexually active women aged 15-49 years, of whom 595 were using hormonal contraception. RESULTS: Hormonal contraception was used by 26% of participants, 81% of whom reported they had not used a condom every time they had sexual intercourse (p < .001). Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were reported in 4% of hormonal contraceptive users, compared with 2% of non-hormonal contraceptive users (p = .036). The odds of condom use at each occurrence of sexual intercourse were lower for: hormonal contraceptive users (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48, 0.80); women aged 15-19 years (adjusted OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.36, 1.08) and 20-24 years (adjusted OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33, 0.95); women with no education (adjusted OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16, 0.69) and primary education (adjusted OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.42, 0.94); women in the low wealth quintile (adjusted OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.36, 0.61); and women who had one or more children (adjusted OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.45, 0.77). CONCLUSION: Lack of knowledge about hormonal contraception predisposes women to sexual risk behaviour. As hormonal contraception is very effective in preventing unwanted pregnancy, and condoms are effective in reducing the risk of STI transmission, the use of both (dual protection) should be encouraged.


Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Hormonal Contraception/adverse effects , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Single Person/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Contraception , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Sexual Behavior/ethnology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Young Adult , Zambia/epidemiology
2.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 26: 100554, 2020 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032165

BACKGROUND: Antenatal care utilization is fundamental in preventing adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. This paper assessed abuse and disrespectful care on women during access to antenatal care services and its implications in Ndola and Kitwe districts of Zambia. METHODS: The assessment used a cross-sectional study design with a sample size of 505 women of child bearing age (15-49). Eighteen (18) high volume health facilities were identified as benchmarks for catchment areas (study sites) and using cluster sampling, households within catchment areas of health facilities were sampled. Chi-square and poison regression analysis was performed to ascertain associations between abuse and disrespect and antenatal care utilization. RESULTS: One third (33%) of the participants attended less than half of the recommended antenatal visits. Results reveal a statistical significant association between; physical abuse (p value = 0.039); not being allowed to assume position of choice during examination (p value = 0.021); not having privacy during examination (p value = 0.006) and antenatal care service utilization. The difference in the logs of expected count on the number of antenatal care visits is expected to be; 0.066 (CI: -0.115,-0.018) unit lower for women who experienced lack of privacy during examinations; 0.067 (CI: -0.131,-0.004) unit lower for women who were discriminated based on specific attributes and 0.067 (CI: -0.120,-0.014) unit lower for women who were left unattended. CONCLUSION: Abuse and disrespect during antenatal care service impedes demand for health care and service utilization thereby barricading the element of the package of services aimed at improving maternal and newborn health.


Agonistic Behavior , Attitude of Health Personnel , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Physical Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Professional Misconduct/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Peripartum Period/psychology , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult , Zambia
3.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e030044, 2019 08 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31401608

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the paper was to investigate the spatial distribution and correlates of tobacco smoking in various regions of Zambia. METHODS: This paper adopts a cross-sectional study design. The study used data from the 2013/2014 Zambia Demographic Health Survey which is a nationwide health survey conducted in all the 10 provinces. A random sample of men and women from 15 920 households was successfully selected and interviewed. All women aged 15-49 and men aged 15-59 who were either permanent residents of the households or visitors present in the households on the night before the survey were eligible to be interviewed. RESULTS: The results show that 8.2% and 11% of Zambians in urban and rural areas smoke, respectively. In urban areas, the risk of being a cigarette smoker was 2.31 (CI: 1.69 to 3.16) and 2.03 (CI: 1.36 to 3.02) times higher for the divorced and separated. However, the risk of being a cigarette smoker was lower for those with some formal education. In rural areas, the risk of being a cigarette smoker was lower for the married (relative risk ratios (RRR): 0.69, CI: 0.55 to 0.86) and those with a formal education. Nevertheless, in rural areas, the risk of being a pipe and other smoker was higher for those who were self-employed (RRR: 8.46, CI: 2.95 to 24.20) and with an occupation (RRR: 2.37, CI: 1.39 to 4.02) but was lower among women. CONCLUSION: Tobacco smoking varies between and within regions as well as provinces. Therefore, interventions to curb smoking should target specific demographic, socioeconomic and cultural factors and how they are spatially distributed.


Tobacco Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Employment , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population , Young Adult , Zambia/epidemiology
...