Risk factors for infection at the saphenous vein harvest site after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection after saphenous vein harvest is common, with reported leg wound infection rates ranging from 2 to 24%. There have been few investigations into sex-related differences in complication rates. Moreover, varied effects of smoking have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors such as gender and smoking, associated with surgical site infection after vein graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. METHODS: We included 2,188 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with at least one vein graft at our centre from 2009 to 2018. All patients were followed up postoperatively. Risk factors for leg wound infection requiring antibiotic treatment and surgical revision were analysed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 374 patients (17.1%) received antibiotic treatment and 154 (7.0%) underwent surgical revision for leg wound infection at the harvest site. Female sex, high body mass index, diabetes mellitus, longer operation time, peripheral vascular disease and direct oral anticoagulants were independently associated with any leg wound infection at the harvest site. Among surgically revised patients, female sex and insulin or oral treatment for diabetes mellitus as well as longer operation time were independent risk factors. Smoking was not associated with leg wound infection. CONCLUSION: Female sex is associated with increased risk of leg wound infection. The underlying mechanism is unknown. In the current population, previous or current smoking was not associated with an increased risk of leg wound infection.

Older women's perceptions of HPV self-sampling and HPV-sampling performed by a midwife - a phenomenographic study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a global disease and it is well established that cervical cancer is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). In Sweden self-sampling for HPV is now used as a complement to sampling performed by a midwife. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how older women perceive the self-sampling compared to the sampling performed by a midwife. Therefore, the aim of the study was to describe how women, aged 64 years and older, perceived the process of self-sampling and sampling performed by a midwife for HPV-testing. METHODS: Eighteen women were included in a qualitative interview study, and a phenomenographic approach was used for the analysis of the interviews. RESULTS: Three descriptive categories emerged: Confidence in sampling, Facilitating participation and Being informed. Within the categories, eight conceptions emerged describing the variation relating to how the women perceived the process of self-sampling and sampling performed by a midwife. CONCLUSIONS: Women in this study describe confidence in self-sampling for HPV-testing and that the self-sampling was saving time and money, both for themselves and for society. Information in relation to an HPV-positive test result is of importance and it must be kept in mind that women affected by HPV may feel guilt and shame, which health care professionals should pay attention to. This knowledge can be used in education of health care staff. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://researchweb.org/is/fourol/project/228071 . Reg. no 228,071.

Patients' experiences regarding severe leg wound infection associated with coronary artery bypass grafting: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgery throughout the world. The most commonly used graft is the saphenous vein. Wound healing complications related to saphenous vein harvesting are common, with reported surgical site infection rates ranging from 2% to 20%. Surgical site infection can be long-lasting, and the wound healing can be difficult and also presumably troublesome for the patient. CABG patients' experiences of severe infection in the harvesting site have not been studied before. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe patients' experiences associated with acquiring a severe infection in the harvesting site after CABG. METHOD: A qualitative study with descriptive design was conducted at the department of vascular and cardiothoracic surgery in a Swedish university hospital from May to December 2018. Patients diagnosed with a severe surgical site infection in the harvesting site following CABG were included. Data from 16 face-to-face interviews were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULT: The main category, varying impact on body and mind, was the core of the patients' experiences of severe wound infection in the harvesting site after CABG. Two generic categories were identified: physical impact and thoughts about the complication. The patients described experiencing different degrees of pain, anxiety, and limitation in daily life. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that a severe infection in the harvesting site after CABG was experienced as an important issue with varying impact. Overall, the participants experienced pain, anxiety, and limitations in daily life. However, most of them were satisfied with the outcome after the wound had healed. Patients should be advised to seek care at an early stage if symptoms of infection occur. Improved individual pain management is needed for those with severe pain, and varied experiences imply a need for person-centred care.

How do orthopaedic surgeons inform their patients before knee arthroplasty surgery? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful and common procedure. However, 6-28% of patients are dissatisfied postoperatively. The provision of preoperative patient information, inquiring about patients' expectations, and taking a psychiatric history are essential parts of both preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate how orthopaedic knee surgeons in Sweden inform their patients before surgery. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to all knee surgeons performing TKA in Sweden. Responses were received from 60 of the 65 orthopaedic departments performing TKA in Sweden (92%), covering 219 of the approximately 311 knee surgeons at the 65 departments (70%). The answers were analysed with descriptive statistics. A content analysis of the surgeons' opinions was also performed using a thematic method. RESULTS: In terms of information provision, 58% of the surgeons always gave written information while 92% informed orally. Only 44% always asked about the patient's expectations, and only 42% always informed patients about the 20% dissatisfaction rate after TKA. Additionally, 24% never operated on mild indication of arthrosis, 20% always took a psychiatric history, and half never or seldom consulted a psychiatrist. However, all the knee surgeons believed in a psychiatric impact on TKA outcome. Qualitative analysis revealed five common causes of patient dissatisfaction, which in descending frequency were: patients' expectations, choice of patients to operate on, surgical factors, combinations of factors, and insufficient information provision to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Knee surgeons in Sweden have considerable awareness of the importance of preoperative patient information, the impact of patient expectations, and psychiatric illness. However, they need to improve their preoperative routines when it comes to providing written information, asking about the patient's expectations, and psychiatric assessment.

Symptoms and self-care strategies during and six months after radiotherapy for prostate cancer - Scoping the perspectives of patients, professionals and literature.

PURPOSE: Under-diagnosed and uncontrolled symptoms in patients with prostate cancer during radiotherapy can have a negative impact on the individual's quality of life. An opportunity for patients to report their symptoms systematically, communicate these symptoms to cancer nurses and to receive self-care advice via an application in an Information and Communication Technology-platform could overcome this risk. The content in the application must precisely capture symptoms that are significant to both patients and health care professionals. Therefore, the aim of the study was to map and describe symptoms and self-care strategies identified by patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy, by health care professionals caring for these patients, and in the literature. METHODS: The study combines data from interviews with patients (n = 8) and health care professionals (n = 10) and a scoping review of the literature (n = 26) focusing on the period during and up to 6 months after radiotherapy. RESULTS: There was a concordance between the patients, health care professionals, and the literature on symptoms during and after radiotherapy. Urinary symptoms, bowel problems, pain, sexual problems, fatigue, anxiety, depression, cognitive impairment and irregular symptoms were commonly described during the initial treatment period. Self-care strategies were rarely described in all three of the sources. CONCLUSIONS: The results show which symptoms to regularly assess using an Information and Communication Technology-platform for patients with newly-diagnosed prostate cancer during radiotherapy. The next step is to evaluate the efficacy of using the platform and the accuracy of the selected symptoms and self-care advice included in a smartphone application.

Patients' experiences of bladder emptying in connection with hip surgery: an issue but of varying impact.

AIM: To describe patients' experiences of bladder emptying and urinary catheterization in connection with hip surgery. BACKGROUND: The capacity of bladder emptying in connection with hip surgery is affected by pain, medication and confinement to bed. In connection with such surgery urinary catheterization is often performed, either intermittent or indwelling. Hip surgery patients' experiences of urinary catheterization and urination have not been studied before. DESIGN: A qualitative study with descriptive design was conducted among hip surgery patients. METHODS: Thirty face-to-face interviews were conducted from October 2009-March 2010 and analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The main category 'An issue but of varying impact' illustrated the patients' experiences of bladder emptying and urinary catheterization. Five generic categories were identified: ability to urinate, catheter is convenient, bothersome bladder emptying, intrusion on dignity and concern about complications. Irrespectively of whether the patients were able to urinate or were catheterized, the bladder emptying situation was not as usual. It was described as uncomplicated and experienced as being positive if the patients were able to urinate by themselves or when catheterization was experienced as convenient. Some patients did not want to be catheterized, approving it only reluctantly. Independently of the method for bladder emptying, the patients in our study would choose the same method next time. CONCLUSIONS: The patients undergoing hip surgery seem to experience bladder emptying as an issue but of varying impact. Both bladder emptying through micturition and bladder emptying through catheterization are described in positive and negative terms.

A randomised controlled trial on the effect of clamping the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with hip fracture.

AIM: To investigate the effect of clamping the urinary catheter before its removal in patients with hip fracture. BACKGROUND: Difficulties to return to normal bladder function after removal of the urinary catheter are frequent in patients with hip fracture. Clamping the urinary catheter before removal is proposed to shorten the amount of time required to return to normal bladder function. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial was conducted at the orthopaedic clinic at a Swedish university hospital. METHODS: Patients with hip fracture aged > or = 50 without a urinary catheter, without cognitive impairment or additional severe physical problems at the time of admission (n = 113) were included. They were randomly assigned either to have their urinary catheter clamped before removal or to have their catheter removed with free drainage. Blinding was not possible because of the nature of the study. The primary outcome was the amount of time required to return to normal bladder function. Secondary outcomes were need for re-catheterisation and length of hospital stay. All patients were analysed in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The median time required to return to normal bladder function was six (Q(1) 4-Q(3) 8) hours in the clamped catheter group and four (Q(1) 3-Q(3) 7.25) hours in the free drainage group. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the time required to regain normal bladder function (p = 0.156), the number of patients requiring re-catheterisation (p = 0.904) and the mean time in hospital (p = 0.777). CONCLUSION: This randomised trial did not show any advantage or disadvantage with clamping the urinary catheter before removal. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clamping is an additional task for the nursing staff in the removal of the indwelling urinary catheter. Therefore, when considering the present results, it seems that clamping the indwelling urinary catheters in patients with hip fracture is not indicated.