Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(28): 894-898, 2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35834422

ABSTRACT

During 2020, an estimated 150,000 persons aged 0-14 years acquired HIV globally (1). Case identification is the first step to ensure children living with HIV are linked to life-saving treatment, achieve viral suppression, and live long, healthy lives. Successful interventions to optimize pediatric HIV testing during the COVID-19 pandemic are needed to sustain progress toward achieving Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 95-95-95 targets.* Changes in HIV testing and diagnoses among persons aged 1-14 years (children) were assessed in 22 U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-supported countries during October 1, 2019-September 30, 2020. This period corresponds to the two fiscal quarters before the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., Q1 and Q2) and the two quarters after the pandemic began (i.e., Q3 and Q4). Testing was disaggregated by age group, testing strategy, and fiscal year quarter. During October 2019-September 2020, PEPFAR supported 4,312,343 HIV tests and identified 74,658 children living with HIV (CLHIV). The number of HIV tests performed was similar during Q1 and Q2, decreased 40.1% from Q2 to Q3, and increased 19.7% from Q3 to Q4. The number of HIV cases identified among children aged 1-14 years (cases identified) increased 7.4% from Q1 to Q2, decreased 29.4% from Q2 to Q3, and increased 3.3% from Q3 to Q4. Although testing in outpatient departments decreased 21% from Q1 to Q4, testing from other strategies increased during the same period, including mobile testing by 38%, facility-based index testing (offering an HIV test to partners and biological children of persons living with HIV) by 8%, and testing children with signs or symptoms of malnutrition within health facilities by 7%. In addition, most tests (61.3%) and cases identified (60.9%) were among children aged 5-14 years (school-aged children), highlighting the need to continue offering HIV testing to older children. These findings provide important information on the most effective strategies for identifying CLHIV during the COVID-19 pandemic. HIV testing programs should continue to use programmatic, surveillance, and financial data at both national and subnational levels to determine the optimal mix of testing strategies to minimize disruptions in pediatric case identification during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , COVID-19 , HIV Infections , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Testing , Humans , Pandemics
2.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 91(1): 39-46, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35536113

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is proven to be a highly effective HIV prevention method for key populations. However, its scale-up in resource-limited settings remains suboptimal. This paper seeks to describe PrEP initiation and continuation among key populations in Cameroon. METHODOLOGY: From June 2019 through October 2020, we collected routine program data on PrEP uptake and continuation among female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Continuum of prevention, care and treatment of HIV/AIDS with Most-at-risk Populations (CHAMP) program in Cameroon. PrEP was offered to clients who tested negative for HIV and were assessed to potentially benefit from PrEP. Using survival analysis, we identified factors associated with PrEP discontinuation over time with significance set at 5%. RESULTS: Overall, 27,750 clients were sensitized for PrEP of whom 3,138 persons were eligible to start PrEP and 1,409 (45%; FSW: 691 and MSM: 718) initiated PrEP. The PrEP continuation rate was 37% at 3 months, 28% at 6 months and 19% at 12 months. PrEP discontinuation was significantly higher among FSW than MSM [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.9)] in Yaounde [aHR 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.9)] and Bafoussam/Bertoua [aHR 3.1 (2.2-4.5)] relative to Douala. Discontinuation was lower among those with moderate [aHR 0.3 (0.3-0.4)] or good adherence [aHR 0.4 (0.3-0.6)] compared with poor adherence (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Differentiated approaches to deliver PrEP, create demand, and provide more intensive support for adherence and continuation may support scale-up of PrEP in Cameroon for equitable and prolonged impact on HIV prevention.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sex Workers , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Cameroon , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods
3.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 84 Suppl 1: S34-S40, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most HIV-exposed infants access early infant diagnosis (EID) through the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) service points. However, there are limited data on HIV positivity in non-PMTCT health care settings (pediatric wards, emergency departments, outpatient departments, tuberculosis clinics, etc.). The introduction of point-of-care testing provided an opportunity to describe HIV positivity at alternative health service points and associated risk factors. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional subanalysis with data from 58 health facilities in Cameroon. The risk of a child being HIV positive at a health service point was considered as a dependent variable, and exploratory variables were assessed using multivariate models with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 2254 HIV-exposed infants identified by clinical or biological screening were tested by polymerase chain reaction using point-of-care EID. Approximately 74.3% of the infants were tested at a PMTCT entry point, whereas 25.7% were tested at non-PMTCT service points. The positivity yield was 5.7% (95 of the 1674) at the PMTCT service point and 17.6% (102 of the 580) at non-PMTCT service points. Non-PMTCT service points [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36 to 2.80] and vaginal delivery (aOR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.25 to 5.25) were independently associated with HIV positivity. In a separate analysis (infants aged 0-6 months), mixed feeding mode (aOR: 3.68; 95% CI: 2.00 to 6.77) was also associated with HIV positivity. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of children newly identified as HIV-positive were tested at non-PMTCT service points. The highest EID positivity yields were found in non-PMTCT service points. Strengthening HIV testing in non-PMTCT service points may help to identify additional infected children and improve timely initiation of treatment and care.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Testing , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/statistics & numerical data , Point-of-Care Testing , Cameroon/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Diagnosis , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Testing/methods , Humans , Infant , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Male , Maternal Health Services , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...