Nationwide survey of the secondary findings in cancer genomic profiling: survey including liquid biopsy.

We surveyed the status of the secondary finding (SF) disclosure in comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) in 2020. The situation has changed: increase in the number of hospitals that provide CGP, an update to the Comprehensive Tumor Genomic Profiling: Materials for Review of Secondary Findings (CTGPMRSF), and the addition of a liquid biopsy test, FoundationOne® Liquid CDx (F1L). Moreover, the actual situation was unclear because the 2020 survey did not include all designated and cooperative hospitals. Herein, we conducted a questionnaire survey of all designated-core, designated, and cooperative hospitals to identify the current status and challenges concerning SF in the CGP in 2022. A total of 82.1% of the hospitals responded and 77.7% of the response was from cooperative hospitals. Approximately 80% of the hospitals used CTGPMRSF. SF disclosure, confirmatory test implementation, and SF confirmation rates were 12.4%, 31.6%, and 46.6% for FoundationOne® CDx (F1CDx), respectively, and 6.8%, 31.8%, and 70.7% for F1L, respectively. The implementation rate of the confirmatory test was substantially higher in hospitals with genetic experts and in hospitals that could conduct confirmatory tests on the same day. Our survey provides insight into how SF is handled in Japan. The percentage of cases leading to confirmatory tests has gradually increased, although challenges such as insurance coverage limitations and varied understanding of SF among patients and healthcare providers persist. With the increasing use of whole-genome analysis, our findings will provide valuable insights into establishing an effective SF disclosure system.

Association of Genetic Alterations with Prognosis in Extramammary Paget's Disease: Insights into the Involvement of somatic CDKN2A variants in Poor Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported the mutational landscape in extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD); however, the prognostic implications of genetic alterations remain unexplored. While CDKN2A loss is known to be associated with tumor progression or poor prognosis in some types of cancer, its significance in EMPD has not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between common genetic alterations and prognosis in EMPD. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing EMPD cases registered until January 2024 in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database, which is a nationwide database recording clinical data and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test results in Japan. RESULTS: A total of 167 cases were recorded in the database, with CDKN2A loss being the most frequent genetic variant. Survival analysis was conducted on 127 cases. Survival from chemotherapy initiation was analyzed with adjusting for length bias inherent in the database using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, an established adjustment method. Cases with BRCA2-mutant tumors (n=18) had a worse prognosis than those with BRCA2-wild-type tumors (n=109; HR=2.97, 95% CI 1.46-6.01, p=0.003). Additionally, CDKN2A-mutant group (n=72) had a significantly worse prognosis than those with CDKN2A-wild-type group (n=55; HR=1.81, 95% CI 1.06-3.07, p=0.029). Most CDKN2A variants were pathogenic, primarily characterized by loss, while most BRCA2 variants were variants of uncertain significance. In the analysis of survival from CGP enrollment based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), cases with ECOG-PS 1 at the time of CGP enrollment had significantly poorer prognosis than those with ECOG-PS 0 (p=0.034; median survival time, 531 vs. 259 days). CONCLUSIONS: Somatic CDKN2A variant, mainly exhibiting loss, may be associated with poor prognosis in EMPD. Cases with BRCA2-mutant cancer might also have a worse prognosis in EMPD. In addition, CGP testing before PS deteriorates is preferable, considering the observed median survival of individuals undergoing CGP tests in an ECOG-PS-1 condition was less than 9 months.

Extramammary Paget's Disease (EMPD) is a relatively rare skin cancer that typically appears in genital area. As a result, little is known about the association between genetic changes and prognosis for people diagnosed with this condition. This study was conducted in Japan using a national database. This database included people who had undergone comprehensive genomic profiling tests to examine genetic changes in their cancer. We aimed to explore the relationship between specific genetic changes and the prognosis of EMPD cases. To do this, we analyzed 167 cases from the database, focusing on 127 people for whom survival data was available. Our main goal was to see how genetic alterations might impact patient survival. In our cohort, a gene called 'CDKN2A' was most frequently altered (56%), and we found that changes to CDKN2A (such as loss) was linked to poorer prognosis. Similarly, cases with changes to a gene called 'BRCA2' were also associated with a poorer prognosis. We further noted that earlier testing for genetic changes could lead to better treatment planning and outcomes. In conclusion, identifying CDKN2A genetic changes in EMPD may be related to poor prognosis. These novel findings may help doctors create more personalized treatment plans for people with EMPD. Understanding these genetic factors also opens new research opportunities in EMPD.

Molecular analysis of non-small cell lung cancer using a dual-targeted DNA and RNA comprehensive genomic profiling panel.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive cancer genomic profiling tests have recently been used clinically to guide optimal treatment. Currently approved tests use DNA from tissue or plasma samples to analyze a few hundred genes. RNA panels complement DNA panels to detect fusion and exon skipping. METHODS: Between April 2017 and March 2022, we analyzed non-small cell lung cancer samples using Todai OncoPanel, a matched tumor/normal pair panel targeting both DNA and RNA. Publicly available genomic data was downloaded from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database on 2022/11/3. RESULTS: Sixty non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples were analyzed. With the DNA panel, 32 samples (53%) had TP53 loss-of-function mutations. Among adenocarcinoma, 17 (33%) had EGFR activating mutations, and 6 (12%) had ERBB2 activating mutations. One BRCA1 and one BRCA2 pathogenic germline variant were also detected. With the RNA panel, 11 fusion genes were detected, all in adenocarcinoma. Specifically, EML4-ALK and KIF5B-RET were detected from one sample each, and 9 others were all novel fusions with unknown pathogenicity. In addition, 4 of 60 (7%) NSCLC samples harbored MET exon 14 skipping. Analysis of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database found 37 MET exon 14 splice site mutations in 1514 NSCLC samples (2%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of NSCLC with Todai OncoPanel detected many druggable targets. Its RNA panel may detect MET exon 14 skipping with high sensitivity.

Integrated genomic/epigenomic analysis stratifies subtypes of clear cell ovarian carcinoma, highlighting their cellular origin.

The cellular origin of clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC), a major histological subtype of ovarian carcinoma remains elusive. Here, we explored the candidate cellular origin and identify molecular subtypes using integrated genomic/epigenomic analysis. We performed whole exome-sequencing, microarray, and DNA methylation array in 78 CCOC samples according to the original diagnosis. The findings revealed that ARID1A and/or PIK3CA mutations were mutually exclusive with DNA repair related genes, including TP53, BRCA1, and ATM. Clustering of CCOC and other ovarian carcinomas (n = 270) with normal tissues from the fallopian tube, ovarian surface epithelium, endometrial epithelium, and pelvic peritoneum mesothelium (PPM) in a methylation array showed that major CCOC subtypes (with ARID1A and/or PIK3CA mutations) were associated with the PPM-lile cluster (n = 64). This cluster was sub-divided into three clusters: (1) mismatch repair (MMR) deficient with tumor mutational burden-high (n = 2), (2) alteration of ARID1A (n = 51), and (3) ARID1A wild-type (n = 11). The remaining samples (n = 14) were subdivided into (4) ovarian surface epithelium-like (n = 11) and (5) fallopian tube-like (considered as high-grade serous histotype; n = 3). Among these, subtypes (1-3) and others (4 and 5) were found to be associated with immunoreactive signatures and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, respectively. These results contribute to the stratification of CCOC into biological subtypes.

Molecular classification of ovarian high-grade serous/endometrioid carcinomas through multi-omics analysis: JGOG3025-TR2 study.

BACKGROUND: Considerable interobserver variability exists in diagnosis of ovarian high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (HGEC) and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) due to histopathological similarities. While homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) correlates with drug sensitivity in HGSC, the molecular features of HGEC are unclear. METHODS: Fresh-frozen samples from 15 ovarian HGECs and 274 ovarian HGSCs in the JGOG-TR2 cohort were submitted to targeted DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, DNA methylation array, and SNP array. We additionally analyzed 555 ovarian HGSCs from TCGA-OV and 287 endometrial high-grade carcinomas from TCGA-UCEC. RESULTS: Unsupervised clustering using copy number signatures identified four distinct tumor groups (C1, C2, C3 and C4). C1 (n = 41) showed CCNE1 amplification and poor survival. C2 (n = 160) and C3 (n = 59) showed high BRCA1/2 alteration frequency with low and moderate ploidy, respectively. C4 (n = 22) was characterized by favorable outcome, higher HGEC proportion, no BRCA1/2 alteration or CCNE1 amplification, and low levels of HRD score, ploidy, intra-tumoral heterogeneity, cell proliferation rate, and WT1 gene expression. Notably, C4 exhibited a normal endometrium-like DNA methylation profile, thus, defined as "HGEC-type" tumors, which were also identified in TCGA-OV and TCGA-UCEC. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian "HGEC-type" tumors present a non-HRD status, favorable prognosis, and endometrial differentiation, possibly constituting a subset of clinically diagnosed HGSCs.

Comprehensive genomic profiling from C-CAT database unveiled over 80% presence of oncogenic drivers in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma including BRAF, RAS family, NF1, and FGFR1.

OBJECTIVE: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is considered a very aggressive carcinoma and has been difficult to treat with therapeutic strategies. This study examines the landscape of genomic alteration in ATC, including the BRAF V600E mutation, and its clinical implications. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MESUREMENT: A retrospective observational study was conducted using collected at the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) in Japan, utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling data from 102 ATC cases. Additionally, AACR-GENIE data from 267 cases were analysed for validation. Statistical methods, including the conditional Kendall tau statistic and χ2 tests, were employed for survival analysis and gene mutation comparisons. RESULTS: Among 102 ATCs, BRAF, RAS, and other driver mutations were found in 83 cases (81.2%). The prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations was as high as 60%. Co-mutation analysis identified different genomic profiles in the BRAF, RAS, and wild-type groups. Despite the diverse molecular backgrounds, no significant differences in clinical variables and overall survival were observed. The analysis considering left-side amputation suggested that RAS mutations had a poorer prognosis. In the BRAF/RAS wild-type group, FGFR1 and NF1 were identified as driver mutations, with an accumulation of copy number variations and less TERT promoter mutations. This molecular subgrouping was also supported by the AACR-GENIE data. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive genomic analysis of ATC in Japan revealed distinct molecular subgroups, highlighting the importance of BRAF V600E mutations, particularly V600E, as potential therapeutic targets and suggest the relevance of tailor-made therapeutic strategies based on genomic profiling.

Clinical genomic profiling of malignant giant cell tumor of bone: A retrospective analysis using a real­world database.

Malignant giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is identified by the presence of multinucleated giant cells, with an aggressive behavior and a high risk of metastasis, which has not been genetically characterized in detail. H3 histone family member 3A (H3F3A) gene mutations are highly recurrent and specific in GCTB. The present study analyzed the clinical information and genomic sequencing data of eight cases of malignant GCTB (out of 384 bone sarcoma samples) using an anonymized genomic database. There were 5 males and 3 females among the cases, with a median age of 33 years at the time of the initial diagnosis. H3F3A G34W and G34L mutations were detected in 3 patients and 1 patient, respectively. In 75% of cases without H3F3A mutation, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway gene alterations were found (KRAS single nucleotide variant, KRAS amplification, nuclear respiratory factor 1-BRAF fusion). Moreover, the collagen type I alpha 2 chain-ALK fusion was detected in remaining one case. The most frequent gene alterations were related to cell cycle regulators, including TP53, RB1, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B and cyclin E1 (75%, 6 of 8 cases). On the whole, the present study discovered recurrent MAPK signaling gene alterations or other gene alterations in cases of malignant GCTB. Of note, two fusion genes should be carefully validated following the pathology re-review by sarcoma pathologists. These two fusion genes may be detected in resembling tumors, which contain giant cells, apart from malignant GCTB. The real-world data used herein provide a unique perspective on genomic alterations in clinicopathologically diagnosed malignant GCTB.

Inhibition of protein arginine methyltransferase 6 activates interferon signaling and induces the apoptosis of endometrial cancer cells via histone modification.

Histone modification, a major epigenetic mechanism regulating gene expression through chromatin remodeling, introduces dynamic changes in chromatin architecture. Protein arginine methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6) is overexpressed in various types of cancer, including prostate, lung and endometrial cancer (EC). Epigenome regulates the expression of endogenous retrovirus (ERV), which activates interferon signaling related to cancer. The antitumor effects of PRMT6 inhibition and the role of PRMT6 in EC were investigated, using epigenome multi­omics analysis, including an assay for chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP­seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA­seq). The expression of PRMT6 in EC was analyzed using reverse transcription­quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT­qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The prognostic impact of PRMT6 expression was evaluated using IHC. The effects of PRMT6­knockdown (KD) were investigated using cell viability and apoptosis assays, as well as its effects on the epigenome, using ChIP­seq of H3K27ac antibodies and RNA­seq. Finally, the downstream targets identified by multi­omics analysis were evaluated. PRMT6 was overexpressed in EC and associated with a poor prognosis. PRMT6­KD induced histone hypomethylation, while suppressing cell growth and apoptosis. ChIP­seq revealed that PRMT6 regulated genomic regions related to interferons and apoptosis through histone modifications. The RNA­seq data demonstrated altered interferon­related pathways and increased expression of tumor suppressor genes, including NK6 homeobox 1 and phosphoinositide­3­kinase regulatory subunit 1, following PRMT6­KD. RT­qPCR revealed that eight ERV genes which activated interferon signaling were upregulated by PRMT6­KD. The data of the present study suggested that PRMT6 inhibition induced apoptosis through interferon signaling activated by ERV. PRMT6 regulated tumor suppressor genes and may be a novel therapeutic target, to the best of our knowledge, in EC.

Analysis of quality metrics in comprehensive cancer genomic profiling using a dual DNA-RNA panel.

Background: The nucleic acid quality from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor vary among samples, resulting in substantial variability in the quality of comprehensive cancer genomic profiling tests. The objective of the study is to investigate how nucleic acid quality affects sequencing quality. We also examined the variations in nucleic acid quality among different hospitals or cancer types. Methods: Three nucleic acid quality metrics (ddCq, Q-value, and DV200) and five sequencing quality metrics (on-target rate, mean depth, coverage uniformity, target exon coverage, and coverage of the housekeeping gene) were examined using 585 samples from the Todai OncoPanel, a dual DNA-RNA panel. Results: In the DNA panel, ddCq served as an indicator of sequencing depth and Q-value reflected the uniformity of sequencing across different regions. It was essential to have favorable values not only for ddCq but also for Q-value to obtain ideal sequencing results. For the RNA panel, DV200 proved to be a valuable metric for assessing the coverage of the housekeeping genes. Significant inter-hospital differences were observed for DNA quality (ddCq and Q-value), but not for RNA quality (DV200). Differences were also observed among cancer types, with Q-value being the lowest in lung and the highest in cervix, while DV200 was the highest in lung and the lowest in bowel. Conclusions: We demonstrated distinct characteristics and high predictive performances of ddCq, Q-value, and DV200. Variations were observed in the nucleic acid quality across hospitals and cancer types. Further study is warranted on preanalytical factors in comprehensive cancer genomic profiling tests.

Patient survey on cancer genomic medicine in Japan under the national health insurance system.

In Japan, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been reimbursed under the national health care system for solid cancer patients who have finished standard treatment. More than 50,000 patients have taken the test since June 2019. We performed a nation-wide questionnaire survey between March 2021 and July 2022. Questionnaires were sent to 80 designated Cancer Genomic Medicine Hospitals. Of the 933 responses received, 370 (39.7%) were web based and 563 (60.3%) were paper based. Most patients (784, 84%) first learned about CGP tests from healthcare professionals, and 775 (83.1%) gave informed consent to their treating physician. At the time of informed consent, they were most worried about test results not leading to novel treatment (536, 57.4%). On a scale of 0-10, 702 respondents (75.2%) felt that the explanations of the test result were easy to understand (7 or higher). Ninety-one patients (9.8%) started their recommended treatment. Many patients could not receive recommended treatment because no approved drugs or clinical trials were available (102/177, 57.6%). Ninety-eight patients (10.5%) did not wish their findings to be disclosed. Overall satisfaction with the CGP test process was high, with 602 respondents (64.5%) giving a score of 7-10. The major reason for choosing 0-6 was that the CGP test result did not lead to new treatment (217/277, 78.3%). In conclusion, satisfaction with the CGP test process was high. Patients and family members need better access to information. More patients need to be treated with genomically matched therapy.

Identification of target cells of human papillomavirus 18 using squamocolumnar junction organoids.

Human papillomavirus 18 (HPV18) is a highly malignant HPV genotype among high-risk HPVs, characterized by the difficulty of detecting it in precancerous lesions and its high prevalence in adenocarcinomas. The cellular targets and molecular mechanisms underlying its infection remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify the cells targeted by HPV18 and elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying HPV18 replication. Initially, we established a lentiviral vector (HPV18LCR-GFP vector) containing the HPV18 long control region promoter located upstream of EGFP. Subsequently, HPV18LCR-GFP vectors were transduced into patient-derived squamocolumnar junction organoids, and the presence of GFP-positive cells was evaluated. Single-cell RNA sequencing of GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells was conducted. Differentially expressed gene analysis revealed that 169 and 484 genes were significantly upregulated in GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells, respectively. Pathway analysis showed that pathways associated with cell cycle and viral carcinogenesis were upregulated in GFP-positive cells, whereas keratinization and mitophagy/autophagy-related pathways were upregulated in GFP-negative cells. siRNA-mediated luciferase reporter assay and HPV18 genome replication assay validated that, among the upregulated genes, ADNP, FHL2, and NPM3 were significantly associated with the activation of the HPV18 early promoter and maintenance of the HPV18 genome. Among them, NPM3 showed substantially higher expression in HPV-related cervical adenocarcinomas than in squamous cell carcinomas, and NPM3 knockdown of HPV18-infected cells downregulated stem cell-related genes. Our new experimental model allows us to identify novel genes involved in HPV18 early promoter activities. These molecules might serve as therapeutic targets in HPV18-infected cervical lesions.

Case report and literature review: exploration of molecular therapeutic targets in recurrent malignant meningioma through comprehensive genetic analysis with Todai OncoPanel.

Background: Despite accumulating research on the molecular characteristics of meningiomas, no definitive molecularly targeted therapy for these tumors has been established to date. Molecular mechanisms underlying meningioma progression also remain unclear. Comprehensive genetic testing approaches can reveal actionable gene aberrations in meningiomas. However, there is still limited information on whether profiling the molecular status of subsequent recurrent meningiomas could influence the choice of molecular-targeted therapies. Case presentation: We report a case of meningioma with malignant progression and multiple recurrences. We performed matched tumor pair analysis using the Todai OncoPanel to investigate the possibility of additional standard treatments. The loss of several chromosomal regions, including NF2 and CDKN2A, which is associated with aggressive meningiomas, was considered a significant driver event for malignant progression. Using additional matched tumor pair analysis, mutations in TRAF7, ARID1A, and ERBB3 were identified as subclonal driver events at the time of recurrence. No genetic aberrations were found for which evidence-based targeted therapy was applicable. We also reviewed previous reports of molecular therapies in meningioma to discuss issues with the current molecular testing approach. Conclusion: Gene panel testing platforms such as the Todai OncoPanel represent a powerful approach to elucidate actionable genetic alterations in various types of tumors, although their use is still limited to the diagnosis and prediction of prognosis in meningiomas. To enable targeted molecular therapy informed by gene-panel testing, further studies including matched tumor pair analyses are required to understand the molecular characteristics of meningiomas and develop treatments based on genetic abnormalities.

Characterization of a fluorescence imaging probe that exploits metabolic dependency of ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

The purpose of this study is to clarify the metabolic dependence of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) by comparing normal tissues and to examine the applicability of fluorescence imaging probe to exploit these metabolic differences. Enhanced glutathione synthesis was supported by the increased uptake of related metabolites and elevated expression levels of genes. Accumulation of intracellular iron and lipid peroxide, induction of cell death by inhibition of the glutathione synthesis pathway indicated that ferroptosis was induced. The activation of γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green (gGlu-HMRG), a fluorescent imaging probe that recognizes γ-glutamyl transferase, which is essential for the synthesis of glutathione, was investigated in fresh-frozen surgical specimens. gGlu-HMRG detected extremely strong fluorescent signals in the tumor lesions of CCC patients, compared to normal ovaries or endometrium. These results revealed that CCC occurs in the stressful and unique environment of free radical-rich endometrioma, and that glutathione metabolism is enhanced as an adaptation to oxidative stress. Furthermore, a modality that exploits these metabolic differences would be useful for distinguishing between CCC and normal tissues.

An Attempt to Develop a New Treatment Strategy for Rare Refractory Gynecological Malignancies: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been a frontline therapeutic strategy for advanced ovarian cancer. Although patients with ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) respond well to the combination therapy, those with relatively rare histologic subtypes, such as mucinous or clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (OCCC), show resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Even with the recently developed maintenance therapies using molecular targeted inhibitors for ovarian cancers, such as bevacizumab or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, the prognosis of non-HGSC ovarian cancers is unsatisfactory. To overcome the limitations in the treatment of rare ovarian cancers, the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) has launched a comprehensive project utilizing publicly available genomic databases, including a national clinico-genomic database maintained by the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT). JGOG, a leading group in Japan that conducts clinical trials for the treatment of gynecological malignancies, also established a nationwide network through the long-standing efforts of all participants. Currently, JGOG is engaged in a phase II international clinical trial (CYH33-G201: jRCT2031210216), targeting OCCC with PIK3CA hotspot mutations. The CYH33-G201 trial is sponsor-initiated, and JGOG, in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, is actively recruiting participants. To expand the functions of the nationwide network that JGOG had already established, we held explanatory meetings for this clinical trial in nine different areas throughout Japan to promote the penetration of the CYH33-G201 trial. Through C-CAT database analysis, we estimated that approximately 40% of the patients with OCCC harbored at least 1 of the 17 PIK3CA hotspot mutations designated in the CYH33-G201 trial. JGOG will continue the challenge of establishing novel treatment strategies for rare refractory cancers that will benefit patients suffering from gynecological malignancies, especially those who do not receive satisfactory standard treatment and care.

TERT promoter mutation positive oral cavity carcinomas, a clinically and genetically distinct subgroup of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUNDS: The importance of TERT promoter (pTERT) mutation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with clinical features and genetic alterations are not well recognized. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed genetic data from multiple databases, including 260 cases from the C-CAT database, 407 cases from the MSK-MetTropism database, and 40 OCSCC datasets from in-house clinical samples. RESULTS: From C-CAT database, TP53 (66%), CDKN2A (51%), and pTERT (29%) were the most frequent mutations observed. pTERT mutations were more prevalent in OCSCC (63%), younger individuals, and women (46%), with lower rates of alcohol abuse and smoking and co-mutated with TP53, HRAS, and CASP8. MSK-MetTroposim data validated with the enrichment of pTERT mutations in OCSCC, among women and Asian individuals. In-house datasets OCSCC with pTERT mutation (50%) characterized by fewer recurrent neck metastases. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that OCSCC with pTERT mutation represents a distinct subgroup with unique clinical and genetic characteristics.

First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors for Identification of Targeted Therapy Opportunities.

IMPORTANCE: Precision oncology using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) by next-generation sequencing is aimed at companion diagnosis and genomic profiling. The clinical utility of CGP before the standard of care (SOC) is still not resolved, and more evidence is needed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical utility of next-generation CGP (FoundationOne CDx [F1CDx]) in patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent solid tumors. DESIGN, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study enrolled patients with previously untreated advanced solid tumors between May 18, 2021, and February 16, 2022, with follow-up through August 16, 2022. The study was conducted at 6 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent cancers in the gastrointestinal or biliary tract; pancreas, lung, breast, uterus, or ovary; and malignant melanoma. EXPOSURE: Comprehensive genomic profiling testing before SOC for advanced solid tumors. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of patients with actionable or druggable genomic alterations and molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients met the inclusion criteria and 180 patients (92 men [51.1%]) with a median age of 64 years (range, 23-88 years) subsequently underwent CGP (lung [n = 28], colon/small intestine [n = 27], pancreas [n = 27], breast [n = 25], biliary tract [n = 20], gastric [n = 19], uterus [n = 12], esophagus [n = 10], ovary [n = 6], and skin melanoma [n = 6]). Data from 172 patients were available for end point analyses. Actionable alterations were found in 172 patients (100.0%; 95% CI, 97.9%-100.0%) and druggable alternations were identified in 109 patients (63.4%; 95% CI, 55.7%-70.6%). The molecular tumor board identified MBRT for 105 patients (61.0%; 95% CI, 53.3%-68.4%). Genomic alterations included in the companion diagnostics list of the CGP test were found in 49 patients (28.5%; 95% CI, 21.9%-35.9%) in a tumor-agnostic setting. After a median follow-up of 7.9 months (range, 0.5-13.2 months), 34 patients (19.8%; 95% CI, 14.1%-26.5%) received MBRT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggest that CGP testing before SOC for patients with advanced solid tumors may be clinically beneficial to guide the subsequent anticancer therapies, including molecularly matched treatments.

CDK12 alterations and ARID1A mutations are predictors of poor prognosis and therapeutic targets in high-grade salivary gland carcinoma: analysis of the National Genomic Profiling Database.

BACKGROUND: Due to the diversity of histopathologic types in salivary gland carcinoma, genomic analysis of large cohorts with next-generation sequencing by histologic type has not been adequately performed. METHODS: We analysed data from 93 patients with salivary duct carcinoma and 243 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling testing in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database, a Japanese national genome profiling database. We visualised gene mutation profiles using the OncoPrinter platform. Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In salivary duct carcinoma, a population with CDK12 and ERBB2 co-amplification was detected in 20 of 37 (54.1%) patients with ERBB2 amplification. We identified five loss-of-function variants in genes related to homologous recombination deficiency, such as BRCA2 and CDK12. Cox survival analysis showed that CDK12 and ERBB2 co-amplification is associated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.597; P = 0.045). In salivary duct carcinoma, NOTCH1 mutations were the most common, followed by mutations in chromatin modification genes such as KMT2D, BCOR, KDM6A, ARID1A, EP300 and CREBBP. In the multivariate Cox analysis, activating NOTCH1 mutations (hazard ratio, 3.569; P = 0.009) and ARID1A mutations (hazard ratio, 4.029; P = 0.034) were significantly associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: CDK12 and ERBB2 co-amplification is associated with a poor prognosis in salivary duct carcinoma. Chromatin remodelling genes are deeply involved in tumour progression in adenoid cystic carcinoma. One such gene, ARID1A, was an independent prognostic factor. In salivary duct carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma, there might be minor populations with mutations that could be targeted for treatment with the synthetic lethality approach.

BRAF mutations and concurrent alterations in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

BRAF alterations, including V600E and non-V600E mutations and fusions, in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have been identified in a limited case series. Here, we aimed to evaluate the frequency of BRAF mutations and concurrent alterations in STS to understand their therapeutic action. In this retrospective analysis, we included data from 1964 patients with advanced STS who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling tests at hospitals in Japan between June 2019 and March 2023. The prevalence of BRAF and recurrent concurrent gene alterations were also investigated. BRAF mutations were detected in 24 (1.2%) of 1964 STS patients, with a median age of 47 (range 1-69) years. BRAF V600E was detected in 11 (0.6%) of the 1964 patients with STS, BRAF non-V600E mutations in 9 (4.6%), and BRAF fusions were detected in 4 (0.2%). BRAF V600E was identified in 4 (0.2%) cases of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. The most common concurrent alteration was CDKN2A (11 cases, 45.8%), and the frequency was equivalent to that of the BRAF V600E (5/11 cases, 45.5%) and non-V600E (5/9 cases, 55.6%) groups. Recurrent concurrent alterations, such as TERT promoter mutations (7 cases, 29.2%), were detected at the same frequency in the V600E and non-V600E groups. In contrast, TP53 alterations (4/9 cases, 44.4%) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-activating genes, including NF1, GNAQ, and GNA11 (3/9 cases, 33.3%), were identified as relatively higher in the non-V600E group than in the V600E group (each 1/11 case, 9.1%). We identified BRAF alterations at a rate of 1.2% in all patients with advanced STS. Among them, BRAF V600E and BRAF fusions account for 45.8% and 16.7%, respectively. Collectively, our findings support the clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategies for patients with BRAF-altered advanced STS.