A framework to measure the wildness of managed large vertebrate populations.

As landscapes continue to fall under human influence through habitat loss and fragmentation, fencing is increasingly being used to mitigate anthropogenic threats and enhance the commercial value of wildlife. Subsequent intensification of management potentially erodes wildness by disembodying populations from landscape-level processes, thereby disconnecting species from natural selection. Tools are needed to measure the degree to which populations of large vertebrate species in formally protected and privately owned wildlife areas are self-sustaining and free to adapt. We devised a framework to measure such wildness based on 6 attributes relating to the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of vertebrates (space, disease and parasite resistance, exposure to predation, exposure to limitations and fluctuations of food and water supply, and reproduction). For each attribute, we set empirical, species-specific thresholds between 5 wildness states based on quantifiable management interventions. We analysed data from 205 private wildlife properties with management objectives spanning ecotourism to consumptive utilization to test the framework on 6 herbivore species representing a range of conservation statuses and commercial values. Wildness scores among species differed significantly, and the proportion of populations identified as wild ranged from 12% to 84%, which indicates the tool detected site-scale differences both among populations of different species and populations of the same species under different management regimes. By quantifying wildness, this framework provides practitioners with standardized measurement units that link biodiversity with the sustainable use of wildlife. Applications include informing species management plans at local scales; standardizing the inclusion of managed populations in red-list assessments; and providing a platform for certification and regulation of wildlife-based economies. Applying this framework may help embed wildness as a normative value in policy and mitigate the shifting baseline of what it means to truly conserve a species.

Un Marco de Trabajo para Medir el Estado Salvaje de Poblaciones de Vertebrados Mayores bajo Manejo Resumen Conforme los paisajes siguen cayendo bajo la influencia del humano por causa de la pérdida del hábitat y la fragmentación, cada vez se usa más el encercado para mitigar las amenazas antropogénicas o incrementar el valor comercial de la fauna. La intensificación subsecuente del manejo tiene el potencial para erosionar el estado salvaje al desincorporar a las poblaciones de los procesos a nivel de paisaje, desconectando así a las especies del proceso de selección natural. Por lo tanto, se necesitan herramientas para medir el grado al cual las poblaciones de especies de vertebrados mayores dentro de áreas de fauna protegidas y privadas son autosostenibles y libres de adaptarse. Diseñamos un marco de trabajo para medir dicho estado salvaje con base en seis atributos relacionados con las dinámicas evolutivas y ecológicas de los vertebrados (espacio, resistencia a las enfermedades y a los parásitos, exposición a la depredación, exposición a las limitaciones y fluctuaciones en las reservas de agua y alimentos, y reproducción). Para cada atributo, establecimos umbrales empíricos y específicos por especie entre cinco estados salvajes basados en las intervenciones de manejo cuantificables. Usamos datos de 205 propiedades privadas de fauna con objetivos de manejo que abarcan desde el ecoturismo hasta el uso para consumo para probar el marco de trabajo en seis especies de herbívoros con una gama de estados de conservación y valores comerciales. Los puntajes de estado salvaje entre las especies difirieron significativamente y la proporción de poblaciones identificadas como salvajes osciló del 12% al 84%, lo que indica que la herramienta detectó diferencias a escala de sitio entre las poblaciones de diferentes especies y las poblaciones de la misma especie bajo diferentes regímenes de manejo. Si cuantificamos el estado salvaje, este marco de trabajo les proporciona a los practicantes las unidades de medida estandarizadas que vinculan a la biodiversidad con el uso sostenible de la fauna. Las aplicaciones de este marco de trabajo incluyen informar a los planes de manejo de las especies a escalas locales; estandarizar la inclusión de las poblaciones manejadas en las evaluaciones de listas rojas; y proporcionar una plataforma para la certificación y regulación de las economías basadas en la fauna. La aplicación de este marco de trabajo puede ayudar a insertar a la fauna como un valor normativo dentro de la política y a mitigar la línea base cambiante de lo que significa conservar verdaderamente a una especie.

Habitat use and life history as predictors of bird responses to habitat change.

In theory the consideration of life-history characteristics should provide a way of making predictive generalizations about the responses of different species to environmental modification. Nevertheless, few studies have tested the validity of this assumption or attempted to apply it across large numbers of related species. We explored both quantitative and qualitative contrasts between species of waterbirds that have either expanded or contracted their ranges in southern Africa over the past 40 years to test the hypothesis that expansionists and contractionists, respectively, should share life-history characteristics and/or ecological attributes. Similarities and differences in life history and ecology were explored through multivariate statistics. Overall, life-history traits provided an inadequate explanation of whether species would be range expansionists or contractionists. By contrast, ecological attributes of species that related to habitat use correlated well with range changes. In particular, waterbird species that inhabit pans seemed to be preadapted to using human-made dams and impoundments. The ability of many species to use artificial wetlands has aided their westward range expansions into arid regions of southern Africa. By contrast, species that rely on vegetated wetlands and that require reeds for nesting were predisposed to range contraction because their habitats have been severely affected by agricultural development and urbanization. In direct contrast to range expansions, most range contractions were west to east, the eastward contraction reflected the high level of wetland loss and degradation in the eastern lowlands of South Africa. Based on analysis of ecological attributes of regional contractionists, several additional species were identified as of potential conservation concern, although such concern may not as yet have been expressed.