ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has recently been accepted to evaluate nodal status in endometrial cancer at early stage, which is key to tailoring adjuvant treatments. Our aim was to evaluate the national implementation of SLN biopsy in terms of accuracy to detect nodal disease in a clinical setting and oncologic outcomes according to the volume of nodal disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 29 Spanish centers participated in this retrospective, multicenter registry including patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma at preoperative early stage who had undergone SLN biopsy between 2015 and 2021. Each center collected data regarding demographic, clinical, histologic, therapeutic, and survival characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 892 patients were enrolled. After the surgery, 12.9% were suprastaged to FIGO 2009 stages III-IV and 108 patients (12.1%) had nodal involvement: 54.6% macrometastasis, 22.2% micrometastases, and 23.1% isolated tumor cells (ITC). Sensitivity of SLN biopsy was 93.7% and false negative rate was 6.2%. After a median follow up of 1.81 years, overall surivial and disease-free survival were significantly lower in patients who had macrometastases when compared with patients with negative nodes, micrometastases or ITC. CONCLUSIONS: In our nationwide cohort we obtained high sensitivity of SLN biopsy to detect nodal disease. The oncologic outcomes of patients with negative nodes and low-volume disease were similar after tailoring adjuvant treatments. In total, 22% of patients with macrometastasis and 50% of patients with micrometastasis were at low risk of nodal metastasis according to their preoperative risk factors, revealing the importance of SLN biopsy in the surgical management of patients with early stage EC.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Sentinel Lymph Node , Female , Humans , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm Micrometastasis/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Lymph Node ExcisionSubject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Sentinel Lymph Node , Humans , Female , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Lymph Node Excision , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
The main aim is to compare oncological outcomes and patterns of recurrence of patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer according to lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status. The secondary objective is to determine preoperative predictors of LVSI. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study. A total of 3546 women diagnosed with postoperative early-stage (FIGO I-II, 2009) endometrioid endometrial cancer were included. Co-primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and pattern of recurrence. Cox proportional hazard models were used for time-to-event analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistical regression models were employed. Positive LVSI was identified in 528 patients (14.6%) and was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 1.8), OS (HR 2.1) and distant recurrences (HR 2.37). Distant recurrences were more frequent in patients with positive LVSI (78.2% vs. 61.3%, p < 0.01). Deep myometrial invasion (OR 3.04), high-grade tumors (OR 2.54), cervical stroma invasion (OR 2.01), and tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm (OR 2.03) were independent predictors of LVSI. In conclusion, in these patients, LVSI is an independent risk factor for shorter DFS and OS, and distant recurrence, but not for local recurrence. Deep myometrial invasion, cervical stroma invasion, high-grade tumors, and a tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm are independent predictors of LVSI.
ABSTRACT
Background: Axillary surgical management in patients with node-positive breast cancer at the time of diagnosis converted to negative nodes through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear. Removal of more than two sentinel nodes (SLNs) in these patients may decrease the false negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs). We aim to analyse the detection rate (DR) and the FNR of SLNB assessment according to the number of SLNs removed. Methods: A retrospective study was performed from October 2012 to December 2018. Patients with invasive breast cancer who had a clinically node-positive disease at diagnosis and with a complete axillary response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. Patients included underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NAC. The SLN was considered positive if any residual disease was detected. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the clinicopathologic features and the results of SLNB and ALND. The DR of SLNB was defined as the number of patients with successful identification of SLN. Presence of residual disease in ALND and negative SLN was considered false negative. Results: A total of 368 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery after complete NAC were studied. Of them, 85 patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 50.8 years. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, with an average of 10 lymph nodes removed. The DR of SLNB was 92.9%, and the FNR was 19.1. The median number of SLNs removed was 3, and at least, three SLNs were obtained in 42 patients (53.2%). When at least three sentinel nodes were removed, the FNR decreased to 8.7%. Conclusions: In this cohort, the SLN assessment was associated with an adequate DR and a high FNR. Removing three or more SLNs decreased the FNR from 19.1% to 8.7%. Complementary approaches may be considered for axillary lymph node staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study was approved by our institution's ethics committee (Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCEI:20/0048).
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Axilla/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze histological factors possibly associated with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and to determine which of those can act as independent surrogate markers. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study performed between January 2001 and December 2014. LVSI was defined as the presence of tumor cells inside a space completely surrounded by endothelial cells. Risk factors evaluated included myometrial invasion, tumor grade, size, location, and cervical invasion. Univariate logistical regression models were applied to study any possible association of LVSI with these factors. Values were adjusted by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients with endometrial carcinoma treated in our Centre were included. LVSI was observed in 120 patients (36.7%). Lower uterine segment involvement (OR 5.21, 95% CI:2.6-10.4, p < 0.001) and size ≥2 cm (OR 2.62, 95% CI: 1.14-6.1, p < 0.001) were independent factors for LSVI in multivariate analysis. In univariate analysis, LVSI was a surrogate marker in type 1 tumors with deep myometrial invasion (IB, 51.9% vs. IA, 16.0%; p < 0.001), grade 3 (G3 55.8% vs. G1 16.2%; p < 0.001), size ≥2 cm (37.9% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.005), those with involving the lower segment of the uterus (58.9% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.001) and/or with cervical stromal invasion (65.4% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), and in type 2 tumors (61.5% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001). The use of uterine manipulator did not increase the rate of LVSI (35.5% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.612) as compared to no manipulator use. CONCLUSIONS: Size ≥2 cm and involvement of the lower uterine segment are independent factors for LSVI, in type 1 tumors, which can be used for surgical planning. LVSI is also more common in type 1 tumors with deep myometrial invasion, grade 3 and/or cervical stromal invasion, and also in type 2 tumors. The use of a uterine manipulator does not increase LVSI.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Carcinoma/mortality , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
At present, there is no effective screening of ovarian cancer. Primary prevention may be the only strategy to decrease the mortality from ovarian cancer, not only in women at high risk but also at low risk. Several recent studies have identified the distal fimbriae end of the fallopian tubes as primary precursor of High-grade serous carcinoma. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas and occult invasive serous carcinomas have been identified in 2-17% of the fallopian tubes of BRCA1/2 positive women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Removal of the fallopian tubes with ovarian preservation has been suggested as a reasonable strategy that could reduce the risk of developing ovarian carcinoma in both low and high-risk women. It has been proposed after childbearing in women at high risk to be followed by bilateral oophorectomy at a later date. Bilateral salpingectomy is also suggested for low risk women, at the time of other benign gynaecologic surgery as a primary preventive strategy. Some studies have shown a risk reduction of ovarian cancer in women with bilateral prophylactic salpingectomy. Current research regarding bilateral salpingoophorectomy as primary prevention approach of ovarian cancer is reviewed here. In addition, the potential use of bilateral salpingectomy as prevention approach of ovarian cancer is discussed.