ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study is designed in order to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) with the reference brand. METHODS: According to the inclusion criteria, 85 people in 13 Iranian centers were randomly selected to receive biosimilar Somatropin (Somatin®) (44 people) and reference Somatropin (Norditropin®) (41 people) at a dose of 35 µg/kg/d, seven days/week for 12 months. The primary outcomes included height velocity (HV) was measured during 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The two intervention groups' Height changes were similar. The mean HV was 10.96 cm/year in the biosimilar group and 10.05 cm/year in the reference groups after 12 months. Estimates of the lower bounds of 95% CI for mean height differences in the biosimilar intervention group compared to the reference intervention group did not exceed the 2 cm margin. Therefore, the non-inferiority of biosimilar intervention compared to the brand product is verified. Common ADRs in both groups were nausea in two patients (2.4%), diarrhea in two patients (2.4%), increased body temperature in one patient (1.2%), and headache in one patient (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The finding of this study indicated that Somatin® and Norditropin® have comparable efficacy and safety profiles. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.IRCT.irIRCT20171122037571N1.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Due to the high transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2, diagnostic tests have become tools for identifying patients. The key points were the virus genomes survey to design RT-LAMP primers; comparing the sensitivity and specificity of RT-LAMP and RT-qPCR; and determining the relationship among clinical symptoms, CT scan, RT-qPCR, and RT-LAMP results. METHODS: This cohort study included 444 symptomatic patients. The specificity and sensitivity of RT-LAMP were assayed. The five statistical models, simultaneously, by RapidMiner to find the best method for detecting the virus were done through the correlation between the clinical symptoms, RT-LAMP, RT-qPCR, and CT scan results. The chi-square test by SPSS 26.0 was used to calculate kappa agreement. RESULTS: The virus genome was detected in all the positive samples (198) by RT-qPCR and RT-LAMP. In addition, 246 samples were negative by RT-qPCR, while 88 were positive by RT-LAMP. Data mining analysis indicated that there were most associations between the RT-LAMP and CT scan data compared to RT-qPCR and CT scan data. CONCLUSIONS: RT-LAMP could detect SARS-CoV-2 with great simplicity, speed, and cheapness. Therefore, it is logical to screen, a large number of patients by RT-LAMP, and then RT-qPCR can be used on the limited samples.