An unexpected synergist role of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein on the central nervous system penetration of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib (N-{3-chloro-4-[(3-fluorobenzyl)oxy]phenyl}-6-[5-({[2-(methylsulfonyl)ethyl]amino}methyl)-2-furyl]-4-quinazolinamine; GW572016).

Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for use in combination with capecitabine to treat advanced or metastatic breast cancers overexpressing human epidermal receptor 2 (ErbB2). This work investigated the role of P-glycoprotein (Pgp; the protein from the Mdr1a/b gene) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp; the protein from the Bcrp1 gene) in modulating the central nervous system penetration of lapatinib at steady-state conditions in FVBn mice (wild-type), Mdr1a/b(-/-), Bcrp1(-/-), and Mdr1a/b(-/-)/Bcrp1(-/-) knockout mice. After an intravenous infusion of lapatinib for 24 h to a targeted steady-state plasma concentration of 700 ng/ml (0.3 mg/kg/h) or 7000 ng/ml (3 mg/kg/h), lapatinib brain-to-plasma ratios were approximately 3- to 4-fold higher in Mdr1a/b(-/-) knockout mice (ratio range from 0.09 to 0.16) compared with wild-type mice (ratio range from 0.03 to 0.04). There was no difference in the brain-to-plasma ratio in the Bcrp1(-/-) knockout mice (ratio range from 0.03 to 0.04) compared with wild-type mice. In contrast, Mdr1a/b(-/-)/Bcrp1(-/-) triple knockout mice had a 40-fold higher brain-to-plasma ratio (ratio range from 1.2 to 1.7), suggesting that Pgp and Bcrp work in concert to limit the brain-to-plasma ratio of lapatinib in mice. This finding has important potential consequences for the treatment of brain tumors in breast cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as the basic understanding of ATP binding cassette transporters expressed in the blood-brain barrier on the central nervous system disposition of drugs.

Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in subjects receiving peritoneal dialysis in end-stage renal failure.

AIMS: To establish whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) requires dosing modification from the CL(CR)-corrected lamivudine dose in end-stage renal failure subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label cohort study. A total of 12 subjects undergoing PD, six continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and six automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), for at least 3 months received lamivudine 10 mg (5 mg ml (-1) x 2 ml) daily for 8 consecutive days, followed by an intensive pharmacokinetic assessment. Urine and dialysate were collected from 0 to 24 h postdose on day 8 where possible. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental techniques. RESULTS: The plasma pharmacokinetic results demonstrated that peritoneal dialysis clearance (CL(D)) of lamivudine was similar between APD and CAPD patients with median (range) of 0.19 l h(-1) (0.14-0.25) and 0.1 l h(-1) (0.09-0.25), respectively. CL(D) was approximately 1/15th to 1/30th of plasma clearance, demonstrating that peritoneal dialysis does not contribute significantly to overall lamivudine clearance in this patient population. The AUC(0,24 h) of lamivudine given 10 mg daily to APD and CAPD patients was 3430 ng ml(-1) h and 3469 ng ml(-1) h, respectively, similar to historical data obtained in patients with normal renal function administered at the normal dose of 100 mg daily (3781 ng ml(-1) h). There were no clinically significant changes in any safety assessments that were attributable to lamivudine. CONCLUSIONS: ESRD patients who receive CAPD or APD require no supplemental dosing. These patients should follow the standard dosing reduction for patients infected with HIV or HBV with renal dysfunction.

The effects of ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of a novel CCR5 antagonist, aplaviroc, in healthy subjects.

AIMS: This study assessed the effects of the CYP3A inhibitors lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) on the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of aplaviroc (APL), a CYP3A4 substrate, in healthy subjects. METHODS: In Part 1, APL PK was determined in eight subjects who received a single oral 50-mg APL test dose with/without a single dose of 100 mg ritonavir (RTV). Part 2 was conducted as an open-label, single-sequence, three-period repeat dose study in a cohort of 24 subjects. Subjects received APL 400 mg every 12 h (b.i.d.) for 7 days (Period 1), LPV/r 400/100 mg b.i.d. for 14 days (Period 2) and APL 400 mg + LPV/r 400/100 mg b.i.d. for 7 days (Period 3). All doses were administered with a moderate fat meal. PK sampling occurred on day 7 of Periods 1 and 3 and day 14 of Period 2. RESULTS: In Part 1, a single RTV dose increased the APL AUC(0-infinity) by 2.1-fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 1.9, 2.4]. Repeat dose coadministration of APL with LPV/r increased APL exposures to a greater extent with the geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CI) being 7.7 (6.4, 9.3), 6.2 (4.8, 8.1) and 7.1 (5.6, 9.0) for the APL AUC, C(max), and C(min), respectively. No change in LPV AUC or C(max) and a small increase in RTV AUC and C(max) (28% and 32%) were observed. The combination of APL and LPV/r was well tolerated and adverse events were mild in severity with self-limiting gastrointestinal complaints most commonly reported. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of APL and LPV/r was well tolerated and resulted in significantly increased APL plasma concentrations.